
Federal Report Denounces Gender Treatments for Adolescents
Federal health officials published a report on Thursday declaring that the use of hormonal and surgical treatments in young people with gender dysphoria lacked scientific evidence and expressing concern about long-term harms, a stark reversal from previous agency recommendations and the advice of top U.S. medical groups.
The report instead prioritized the role of psychotherapy, a divisive intervention to treat gender dysphoria that many advocates and physicians have equated with so-called conversion therapy.
Other parts of the review seemed to call into question the very notion that some people have a gender identity that does not align with their sex at birth.
In January, President Trump signed an executive order titled 'Protecting Children From Chemical and Surgical Mutilation' giving the Department of Health and Human Services 90 days to produce a report on the best practices for treating young people who say their gender does not align with their birth sex.
But the order made it clear that the administration had already reached its own conclusion about gender transition treatments for minors, characterizing the 'blatant harm done to children' as a 'stain on our nation's history.'
The 400-page report took a more sober tone but reached a similar conclusion. In a remarkable departure from the standard for medical evidence reviews, the authors were not identified pending a post-publication review process that would begin in 'the coming days.'
H.H.S. officials declined to answer questions about what the review process would entail. The department noted that the contributors included doctors, medical ethicists and a methodologist, all from 'a wide range of political viewpoints' who were chosen 'for their commitment to scientific principles.'
The report specified that the new assessment was not intended to set a standard for medical care or to make policy recommendations.
It relied predominantly on an analysis of reviews of the scientific studies of puberty blockers, hormone therapies and surgeries that have been published in the last few decades, when these treatments were first made available to adolescents.
The assessment concluded that while the benefits of medical interventions were uncertain, the harms, which can include loss of fertility, were less so.
The 'clinical practice in this field of medicine is exceptional and concerning,' the report said, and it criticized American medical groups for fostering intolerant work 'environments in which clinicians feel compelled to self-censor.'
The question of whether and when treatments like puberty blockers, hormone therapies or surgery are appropriate for young people has been the subject of fierce debate.
Several European countries have limited the treatments in recent years, after scientific reviews finding poor quality of evidence to support their benefits and uncertainty about long-term risks.
In the United States, 24 states have passed laws barring physicians from offering such treatments to adolescents.
The American Academy of Pediatrics is conducting its own review of the evidence. The academy and most major medical groups in the United States continue to endorse these treatments as effective in relieving the psychological distress many transgender youths experience.
'This report misrepresents the current medical consensus and fails to reflect the realities of pediatric care,' said Dr. Susan Kressly, president of the academy. 'The report prioritizes opinions over dispassionate reviews of evidence.'
Transgender rights advocates criticized the new assessment as seeking to paint over an ideological view with scientific gloss.
During Mr. Trump's first 100 days in office, his administration has sought to limit recognition of transgender identities in public life. The administration has threatened to end funding for hospitals that provide gender-transition treatments to people under 19 and to bar openly transgender people from serving in the military.
The administration has moved to house transgender women in federal prisons with men and to no longer reflect the gender identities of transgender people on passports.
'Is the administration's hostility to this medical care based on actual scientific research, or is it ideologically driven by this administration's open disapproval of transgender people and belief that transgender identity is false?' said Shannon Minter, legal director at the National Center for Lesbian Rights.
The center represents transgender individuals in several lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the administration's policies.
Casey Pick, director of law and policy at the Trevor Project, a nonprofit organization focused on suicide prevention among L.G.B.T.Q. young people, said, 'To the extent that this is a document that is challenging even the ability of a young person to identify as transgender, that is an ideological statement — that is not a medical statement.'
The report is a victory for those who have described this field of medicine as part of a broader project that denies the realities of biological sex.
Roger Severino, vice president for domestic policy at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think thank, applauded the H.H.S. report and blamed 'profit-seeking doctors and ideological groups' for persuading families that 'a child's sex is whatever they say it is.'
About 3 percent of high school students identify as transgender, according to government data, a number that has risen substantially over the last decade. A much smaller percentage of those adolescents seek medical interventions.
The issue of medical transition for minors has nonetheless become a political flashpoint. Mr. Trump made it a focus of his campaign, and some Democrats believe the strategy helped him win.
The new H.H.S. report goes further than similar reports in European countries that have introduced new restrictions on gender treatments for adolescents.
An independent review of clinical services for young people in England, led by Dr. Hilary Cass, former president of the Royal College of Pediatricians, reached similar conclusions about the quality of evidence to support the use of puberty blocking and hormonal treatments in minors. (Surgeries are not available for minors in Britain.)
But that review, conducted over a four-year period, interviewed young patients, transgender adults, parents and clinicians to gain a broad picture of the medical field.
Dr. Cass concluded that the evidence on both the benefits and the risks of the treatments was 'remarkably weak' but said that some young people were still likely to benefit from early intervention.
'There are young people who absolutely benefit from a medical pathway, and we need to make sure that those young people have access — under a research protocol, because we need to improve the research — but not assume that that's the right pathway for everyone,' Dr. Cass said in an interview last year.
That review concluded by recommending that England's National Health Service restrict the use of puberty blocking drugs to research trials only, and clinicians were advised to prescribe hormones to teenagers with 'extreme caution.'
Other clinicians who have voiced concerns about the field of youth gender medicine were ambivalent about how the new report might be used.
'I am glad that authorities in the United States are finally taking into account what's been going on in Europe in recent years,' said Erica Anderson, a child psychologist and former president of the U.S. Professional Association of Transgender Health.
She has been vocal about her concerns that youth gender clinics have moved away from careful mental health assessments as the population of children seeking gender treatments has grown.
But Dr. Anderson, who still supports early intervention for some young people, noted that it was impossible to ignore the inflammatory executive order that led to the report.
'It's kind of like calling out to someone a rank insult and then deciding you want to have a conversation with them,' she said. 'Well, that doesn't really work very well with actual human beings with feelings and histories.'
Mr. Minter, of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said that by emphasizing psychotherapy over medical interventions, the H.H.S. report effectively endorsed conversion therapy, intended to change a minor's gender identity or sexual orientation.
Leading medical groups have supported bans on the practice, citing evidence that it causes depression, anxiety and self-hatred.
But the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a First Amendment challenge to a Colorado ban on conversion therapy next term, brought by a licensed professional counselor whose Christian faith includes the belief that 'people flourish when they live consistently with God's design, including their biological sex,' according to court documents.
Other therapists, including Dr. Anderson, have argued that so-called 'exploratory' therapy with supportive clinicians can be helpful for helping to disentangle mental health issues from gender identity for adolescents.
Kellan Baker, who studies transgender health policy at Whitman Walker, a nonprofit community health center in Washington, said the report was a departure from how health policy had typically been shaped in the United States.
'It is important that medicine be practiced by those with expertise in it, by trained clinicians operating according to standards of care that are set out by their respective medical fields — not by the federal government,' Dr. Baker said.
He said he worried that the report might be cited by the government as justification for refusing to cover medical care for transgender young people.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, a division of H.H.S., sent a letter to state Medicaid agencies last month urging them not use Medicaid funds for gender-transition care for minors.
Pam Bondi, the attorney general, has directed the Justice Department to investigate doctors who provide such care.
'This document is not a standard of care, but it's going to be cited by the government as justification for refusing to cover medical care for transgender young people,' Dr. Baker said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
15 minutes ago
- Politico
GOP lawmakers stick with Trump in messy Musk breakup
Amid the messy ongoing divorce between the president and the world's richest man, this much is already clear: Donald Trump has sole custody of the House GOP. Republican lawmakers are making clear that, if forced to choose, it's Trump — not Elon Musk — they're sticking by as leaders race to contain the fallout for their 'one big, beautiful bill.' Even Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who helms a House panel inspired by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency initiative, blasted Musk's public attacks on Trump as 'unwarranted' and criticized his 'lashing out on the internet.' 'America voted for Donald Trump on Nov. 4, 2024 — every single vote mattered just as much as the other,' Greene said in a brief interview. 'And whether it was $1 that was donated or hundreds of millions of dollars, the way I see it, everybody's the same.' Like many Americans, GOP members watched Thursday's online exchange with a sense of car-crash-like fascination. Many shared that they hoped Musk and Trump could somehow patch things up. But many — including some of the former DOGE chief's biggest backers on Capitol Hill — were wholly unsurprised to see the billionaire suddenly cut down to size after months of chatter about who was really calling the shots at the White House. 'It's President Trump, not President Musk,' said one lawmaker granted anonymity to speak frankly about prevailing opinions inside the House GOP. Speaker Mike Johnson made no secret of where he stands on the public breakup. He told reporters Friday that he hoped the two men 'reconcile' and that it would be 'good for the party and the country if all this worked out.' But in the nearly same breath, Johnson quickly reaffirmed his allegiance to the president and issued a warning to Musk. 'Do not doubt, do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. 'He is the leader of the party. He is the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era. And he's doing an excellent job for the people.' Other House Republicans concurred with the speaker's assessment Friday, even as they faced the looming threat of Musk targeting them in the upcoming midterms or at least pulling back on his political giving after pouring more than $250 million into the 2024 election on behalf of Trump and the GOP ticket. 'I think it's unfortunate,' said Rep. Tim Moore (R-N.C.) of the breakup. 'But Donald Trump was elected by a majority of the American people.' Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio, who was one of only two Republicans to oppose Trump's megabill in the House last month, also made clear he stood with the president over Musk. 'He does not have a flight mode — he's fight, fight, fight … and he's been pretty measured,' Davidson said of Trump. 'I think Elon Musk looked a little out of control. And hopefully he gets back and grounded.' GOP leaders who have spent weeks cajoling their members to vote for the sprawling domestic-policy bill hardly hid their feelings as Musk continued to bash the legislation online, even calling on Americans to call their representatives in an effort to tank it. 'Frankly, it's united Republicans even more to go and defend the great things that are in this bill — and once it's passed and signed into law by August, September, you're going to see this economy turning around like nothing we've ever seen,' Majority Leader Steve Scalise said in a brief interview Friday. 'I'll be waiting for all those people who said the opposite to admit that they were wrong,' Scalise added. 'But I'm not expecting that to happen.' A few Republicans are still trying to walk a fine line by embracing both Trump and Musk — especially some fiscal hawks who believe Musk is right about the megabill adding trillions to the national debt. 'I think Elon has some valid points about the bill, concerns that myself and a handful of others were working to address up until the passage of it,' Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) said in an interview. 'I think that'll make the bill stronger. I think it'll help our standing with the American people.' Both Trump and Musk 'have paid a tremendous price personally for this country,' Cloud added. 'And them working together is certainly far better for the country.' Notably, House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, a key Musk ally on the Hill, declined to engage Thursday when asked about the burgeoning feud. Instead, the Ohio Republican responded by praising the megabill Musk had moved to tank. Democrats, for their part, watched the unfolding and public breakup with surprise and a heavy dose of schadenfreude. 'There are no good guys in a fight like this,' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.). 'You just eat some popcorn and watch the show.'


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Freedom Caucus warns it will ‘not accept' Senate changes on green energy tax credits
The conservative House Freedom Caucus said on Friday that it would 'not accept' changes that 'water down' its cuts to green energy tax credits as the Senate weighs whether to alter the legislation. The House version of the 'big, beautiful bill' would make drastic changes to tax cuts for low-carbon energy sources passed in the Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Climate-friendly energy projects, including wind and solar, would only be able to qualify for the credits under the House bill if they begin construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment. This brief window would likely make many projects ineligible for the credits, and is expected to significantly hamstring the development of new renewable power. In a post on social media on Friday, the Freedom Caucus warned the Senate against loosening that restriction or others included in the bill. 'We want to be crystal clear: if the Senate attempts to water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation, we will not accept it,' said the post, which was attributed to the Freedom Caucus's board. 'The House Freedom Caucus Board will stand united holding the line. The American people didn't send us here to cave to the swamp — they sent us here to change it,' they added. The Senate has been widely expected to consider changes that could slow the rapid elimination of the tax credit passed under the House version of Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Jerry Moran (Kan.) and John Curtis (Utah) released a letter warning against a 'full scale' repeal of the tax credits. Senate Republicans can only afford three defections and pass their bill. On Friday, a group of 13 House GOP moderates released a letter calling on Senate leadership 'to substantively and strategically improve clean energy tax credit provisions' in the legislation. 'We believe the Senate now has a critical opportunity to restore common sense and deliver a truly pro-energy growth final bill that protects taxpayers while also unleashing the potential of U.S. energy producers, manufacturers, and workers,' said the letter, which was led by Reps. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.). Altogether, the letters illustrate what could be a tough task ahead of the Republican leadership as they look to find a measure that will keep at least 50 senators on board and appease the House. Emily Brooks contributed.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shift4 appoints new CEO
This story was originally published on Payments Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Payments Dive newsletter. Shift4 named founder Jared Isaacman as executive chairman after President Donald Trump abruptly dropped the executive's nomination to run NASA over the weekend, the digital processor said in a regulatory filing Thursday. "Mr. Isaacman will remain an executive officer and Class I member of the Board," the filing said. The change is effective on Thursday, according to the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Allentown, Pennsylvania-based payments processing company had selected Shift4 President Taylor Lauber to succeed Isaacman if Trump's December nomination was confirmed by the Senate, but the chamber never voted on it. Isaacman, who has been the company's CEO and chairman since it was founded in 1999, will retain his super voting shares in Shift4, according to the filing. Lauber said during an April earnings call that Isaacman would convert his class B and class C shares into class A shares, which are worth a single vote per share. That agreement was "subject to several conditions, including the ratification and confirmation by the U.S. Senate of Mr. Isaacman's appointment as administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration," the SEC filing said. "As a result of this condition not being met, Mr. Isaacman is no longer required to reduce his voting shares." Isaacman had a 76% voting power ownership stake in Shift4, according toan April 30 proxy filing. Trump cited Isaacman's "prior associations" when he withdrew the NASA nomination. The president pulled the nomination over the Shift4 founder's past contributions to Democrats, according to a report from the New York Times. However, Isaacman suggested on a Wednesday episode o fthe All-In podcast that his ties to billionaire SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk cost him the nomination, Bloomberg reported. Musk may also have helped him win the nomination from Trump, given Isaacman's participation in past SpaceX missions. Recommended Reading Shift4 CEO likely to keep post