More than 50,000 people killed in Gaza since war began, Hamas-run health ministry says
More than 50,000 people have now been killed in Gaza since the Israel-Hamas war began, the territory's health ministry says.
The Hamas-run authority does not distinguish between civilians and combatants in its count, but has previously said more than half of those killed in the conflict were women and children.
The announcement on Sunday came alongside news an Israeli airstrike in southern Gaza had killed top Hamas political leader Salah al Bardaweel.
He was a member of the party's political bureau and Palestinian parliament - and often gave media interviews.
In a statement, Hamas said he was "a beacon of political, media, and national activism", and a "symbol of honesty, steadfastness, and sacrifice".
However, the Israeli Defence Force called him a "senior terrorist", adding: "This elimination further degrades Hamas' military and government capabilities."
The strike, which took place on Khan Younis, also killed his wife - and several other Palestinians.
At least 30 Palestinians were killed in Israeli strikes on Rafah and Khan Younis on Sunday, Gaza health authorities said.
The European Hospital and Kuwaiti Hospital said women and children were among those killed in the Khan Younis attack.
Gaza's health ministry said 50,021 Palestinians have been killed in the war and more than 113,000 have been wounded.
That includes 673 people killed since Israel's bombardment on Tuesday shattered the ceasefire.
Explosions through the night
Explosions took place throughout the north, central, and southern Gaza Strip in the early hours of Sunday - with Israeli planes hitting several targets.
On Sunday, the Israeli military ordered people to evacuate from part of Gaza's southernmost city of Rafah.
Ayda Abu Shaer, displaced from Rafah, was caught up in the shelling, and told the Associated Press: "We died tonight. Tanks are shelling us, our tents and houses, and they are shooting at us. We never slept. In the morning, they told us to leave. They threw leaflets."
"All the way, they were shooting at us and dropping shells and rockets. We threw ourselves into the streets and fell, asking for mercy. Enough is enough. We are exhausted. Our sons and daughters are dead, and the children have been orphaned.
"We don't know what to do."
'No ambulances and no Red Cross'
Hadeel Ghanim, also forced to leave Rafah, said: "There is no ambulances and no Red Cross. People have been walking for hours, with them elderly people and children unable to move.
"We do not know where to go. We left without tents, without mattresses, without anything. We do not know where to go or what to do. For God's sake, save us."
0:40
The war began when Hamas militants carried out a cross-border raid into southern Israel on 7 October 2023, killing 1,200 people and capturing around 250 hostages. Israel responded by launching an air and ground offensive in Gaza.
On Tuesday, Israel's military abandoned the ceasefire agreement that began on 19 January by resuming significant airstrikes on Gaza.
Israel claims Hamas broke the ceasefire - something the group denies, in turn accusing Israel of violating the agreement that was initiated by Qatar, Egypt and the US.
Speaking to Israel's ambassador to the UK Tzipi Hotovely, Sky's Sophy Ridge on Thursday challenged the idea that Hamas broke the ceasefire, given the militant group released all the hostages that were agreed upon during the first phase.
Mr Hotovely said: "Hamas is not releasing hostages anymore. Israel has no other choice rather than putting pressure on a terror organisation."
Hamas has spent weeks calling for serious talks on the ceasefire agreement's second phase, which calls for the release of remaining hostages in exchange for Palestinian political prisoners, a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, and a permanent ceasefire.
But Hamas has said it is still willing to negotiate and was studying "bridging" proposals from US President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff.
Yet Mr Witkoff told Fox News on Sunday Hamas was responsible for renewed fighting after rejecting efforts to move forward with an "acceptable deal".
"This is on Hamas. The United States stands with the state of Israel," Mr Witkoff told Fox News. "Hamas had every opportunity to demilitarise, to accept the bridging proposal."
Talks were supposed to begin last month. It is unclear whether if, or when, they will now take place.
'Israel has no other choice'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly asserted the primary aim of the war is to destroy Hamas in its entirety.
Mr Netanyahu has also said Israel's latest military assault hopes to force Hamas to give up the remaining hostages.
It comes as the Israeli protesters took to the streets for a sixth day, angry at Mr Netanyahu's approach to getting the remaining hostages home, his attempt to remove the head of the Shin Bet domestic security service and now his cabinet's motion of no confidence in the attorney general.
Mr Netanyahu's bid to sack Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar was a first in Israel's history, but was blocked by the country's top court pending an appeal.
The attorney general has frequently clashed with the government over the legality of some of its policies and the agency had also been investigating corruption allegations linking Qatar with Netanyahu's office.
Mr Netanyahu's cabinet approved a no-confidence motion against the attorney general on Sunday, in its latest move on officials deemed hostile to the government
Protesters have argued that the right-wing government is undermining key state institutions. Families and supporters of the remaining 59 hostages still held in Gaza have vented their anger at what many see as the government's abandonment of their loved ones.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
11 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Trump says Israel and Iran will come to deal ‘soon'
Mr Trump in an early morning social meeting posting said the United States 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran' as Israel and Iran traded missile attacks for the third straight day. 'The U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight. If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before. However, we can easily get a deal done between Iran and… — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 15, 2025 Iran, however, has said that it would hold the US, which has provided Israel with much of its deep arsenal of weaponry, for its backing of Israel. Israel targeted Iran's Defence Ministry headquarters in Tehran and sites it alleged were associated with Iran's nuclear program, while Iranian missiles evaded Israeli air defences and slammed into buildings deep inside the country. Mr Trump said: 'If we are attacked in any way, shape or form by Iran, the full strength and might of the US armed forces will come down on you at levels never seen before.' Hours later, the US president took to social media again to predict that 'Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal'. The US president made the claim that he has built a track record for de-escalating conflicts, and that he would get Israel and Iran to cease hostilities 'just like I got India and Pakistan to' after the two countries' recent cross-border confrontation. Mr Trump also pointed to efforts by his administration during his first term to mediate disputes between Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia. 'Likewise, we will have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran!' Mr Trump said. 'Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that's OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!' The growing conflict between Israel and Iran is testing Mr Trump, who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine and build a foreign policy that more broadly favours steering clear of foreign conflicts. Mr Trump has struggled to find an endgame to the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. And after criticising President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Mr Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. His administration's push on Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the US and other world powers reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement in 2015 that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Mr Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday about the growing Israel-Iran conflict, and he is set to travel to Canada for Group of Seven leaders summit where the Mideast crisis will loom large over his talks with the leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan and the European Union.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump in Iran crisis: MAGA descends into mutiny as Israel threatens to take out Ayatollah in regime change plot
Donald Trump is teetering on the brink of an all-out Iran crisis amid MAGA fury over his 'complicity' in Israel's strikes. In a sensational development Sunday, two US officials revealed that the president vetoed an Israeli plan this week to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The plot signals the intent and velocity with which Israel is moving to dismantle Iran's leadership amid fears it is deliberately fomenting regime change. The president is now facing calls from Iran hawks in the GOP to join Israel 's bombing campaign. Any military action in the region threatens to put Trump at odds with major allies in the MAGA movement, not least Tucker Carlson who has accused the commander-in-chief of being 'complicit' in Israel's strikes. It comes as Trump this morning refused to rule out involvement in the conflict, while at the same time denying any American participation to this point. Speaking with ABC News Sunday morning, Trump addressed reports that Israel was encouraging Administration to join the conflict with Iran to eliminate its nuclear program. "We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved," the president said. 'The U.S. had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight,' the president wrote on Truth Social in the early hours of Sunday morning. Trump vetoed an Israeli plan in recent days to kill Iran's Khamenei, two U.S. officials told Reuters on Sunday. "Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do we're not even talking about going after the political leadership," said one of the sources, a senior U.S. administration official. Israel launched "Operation Rising Lion" with a surprise attack on Friday morning that wiped out the top echelon of Iran's military command and damaged its nuclear sites, and says the campaign will continue to escalate in coming days. Iran has vowed to "open the gates of hell" in retaliation. Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on each other overnight into Sunday, killing scores and raising fears of a wider conflict. Israeli rescue teams combed through rubble of residential buildings destroyed by Iranian missiles, using sniffer dogs and heavy excavators to look for survivors after at least 10 people, including children, were killed, raising the two-day toll to 13. Sirens rang out across Israel after 4 p.m. on Sunday in the first such daylight alert, and fresh explosions could be heard in Tel Aviv. In Iran, images from the capital showed the night sky lit up by a huge blaze at a fuel depot after Israel began strikes against Iran's oil and gas sector - raising the stakes for the global economy and the functioning of the Iranian state. Iran has not given a full death toll but said 78 people were killed on Friday and scores more have died since, including in a single attack that killed 60 on Saturday, half of them children, in a 14-storey apartment block flattened in Tehran. Municipal workers clear the wreckage and debris in the northern Israeli town of Tamra, following an overnight missile attack from Iran on June 15, 2025, where four people were reported killed. Israel unleashed a punishing barrage of strikes targeting the capital Tehran on June 15, after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to make Iran pay "a very heavy price" for killing civilians, on the third day of fierce fighting To win re-election last November, Trump had to build a coalition of powerful allies across media, politics, and business. Now, some of his most vocal public backers are distancing themselves from some of the president's biggest moves, including right-wing media mogul Tucker Carlson. A Former Fox News primetime dynamo, Carlson was one of the very vocal allies Trump brought into the GOP fold last year, but their post-election honeymoon may be over. In a Friday newsletter post for his own media outlet - The Tucker Carlson Network - Carlson and his team wrote 'This Could Be the Final Newsletter Before All-Out War.' 'On Thursday, Iran 's president threatened to 'destroy' any country that eliminates his government's nuclear facilities,' TCN wrote. 'Now, the world will learn what that looks like,' they concluded. Trump's winning November coalition also heavily featured populist conservatives, may of whom consider Steve Bannon - a former Breitbart editor and a chief White House strategist from Trump's first term - to be their ringleader. Bannon, who also has built his own media empire around his War Room podcast, noted during a Friday episode of the show that he believed the Israeli government was attempting trying to pull America into a war with Iran, saying they 'want us to go on offense' against Tehran. Both inside and outside of government, the current GOP coalition has wide-ranging set of views on the level of American interventionism that is required on the global stage, particularly in the Middle East. The intra-MAGA split on foreign policy appears to be far-reaching, even extending as far at the leadership at the Pentagon itself. Semafor reports that the nation's top military officials have competing visions about how involved America should be with Israel. 'US military leaders, including the chief of US Central Command, Gen. Michael Kurilla, have requested more resources to support and defend Israel,' Semafor notes. 'But their requests have drawn resistance from undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby, who has long opposed moving US military assets from Asia to the Middle East, people sympathetic to each side of the argument,' Semafor reported. Colby was one of the Trump administration's more controversial selections that has gone through the Senate conformation this year. Vice President JD Vance personally advocated for Colby's confirmation before his former U.S. Senate colleagues back in March. Elbridge Colby, President Donald Trump's nominee to be under secretary of defense for policy, prepares for his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on March 04, 2025 in Washington, DC. Colby served in Trump's first administration 'In so many ways, Bridge predicted what we would be talking about four years down the road, five years down the road, 10 years down the road. He saw around corners that very few other people were seeing around,' Vance told an audience of the Senate Armed Services Committee in March. 'If you look at his long career in defense policy, he has said things that, you know, frankly, alienated Democrats and Republicans. He's also said things that I think both Democrats and Republicans would agree with,' Vance also stated. 'There is a real risk of major war, and we cannot afford to lose one. I recognize these realities in my bones. It is my great hope that we can get through the coming years peacefully, with strength in ways that put us and our alliances on a stronger and more sustainable footing,' Colby noted at his own confirmation hearing. 'I'm willing and ready to engage with those who disagree with me and adapt my views based on persuasive arguments and the fact is that I value our alliances deeply, even as I think they must be adapted, and that I love our great country, and will put its interests first and foremost,' Colby added, addressing some of the controversy behind his nomination. After his confirmation, Colby now sits in the Pentagon's number three spot. Meanwhile, Colby's boss Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appears to be in the more interventionist camp. In a post made to social platform X in May, Hegseth noted that the U.S. had their sights set on Iran over the nation's backing of the Houthi rebels. 'We know exactly what you are doing,' Hegseth wrote at the time. 'You know very well what the U.S. Military is capable of — and you were warned. You will pay the CONSEQUENCE at the time and place of our choosing.' The debate between interventionism and isolationism within the GOP also extends to elected members of Congress. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who legislates with a heavy libertarian streak in his Republicanism, was one to acknowledge Trump's foreign policy record this weekend, writing 'No new wars on your watch—and you continue to push for a leaner, more accountable government. We appreciate your commitment to putting America first,' in a Saturday post on X celebrating the president's birthday. Yet, other more hawkish Republicans cheered Trump's decision to allow Israel to strike Iran earlier this week. They have been urging him to take more aggressive approach in the Middle East. 'Game on,' wrote Sen. Lindsey Graham on social media. 'Pray for Israel.' Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., questions Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth during a Senate Committee on Appropriations subcommittee hearing to examine proposed budget estimates for fiscal year 2026 for the Department of Defense, on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in Washington 'Donald Trump doesn't mess around. Bombs away,' cheered Rep. Randy Fine of Florida on social media after the attacks. Trump's first Secretary of State and former CIA director Mike Pompeo appeared on Fox News on Friday morning, greeting hosts by noting it was 'a very good morning' 'There was literally zero evidence that the negotiations were going to lead to a good outcome,' he said about Trump's peace talks. 'I think the Israeli leadership finally decided not only did they have the moment to do this, but they had the tools and resources to effectively obliterate much of the Iranian regime's military programs.' Pompeo cheered on the strikes as a demonstration of 'Western resolve' to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Speaking with ABC News Sunday morning, Trump addressed reports that Israel was encouraging Administration to join the conflict with Iran to eliminate its nuclear program. 'We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved,' the president told ABC News. Trump also addressed a rumor that Russian president Vladimir Putin way be open to serving as a mediator between Iran and Israel. 'Yeah, I would be open to it. He is ready. He called me about it. We had a long talk about it. We talked about this more than his situation. This is something I believe is going to get resolved,' the president said of his Russian counterpart to ABC News. On the campaign trail in 2024, Trump himself often promised to be a peacemaker and the conflict between Israel and Gaza, as well as Russia and Ukraine. During a rally in Washington, D.C. the day before he was sworn in for a second term this past January, Trump declared,'I will end the war in Ukraine, stop the chaos in the Middle East and prevent World War III from happening, and you have no idea how close we are.'
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Israelis are doing the world a big favour
Iran has been behind most of the instability in the Middle East for at least the past two decades. Its militias ignited Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003 and enabled Islamic State to develop across parts of the Arab world. Hezbollah, its proxy in Lebanon and Syria, kept the dreadful Assads in power for a generation and enabled the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. I saw Hezbollah up close in Syria for 10 years and I saw this year the huge joy of the Syrian people when the Iran-backed militia was vanquished there. Iran has also directed the Houthis to bring global shipping to its knees and backs the bloody-handed murderers of Hamas. But the mullahs' grand strategic plan has always been to develop a nuclear arsenal. This would have been an intolerable danger not only to Israel but to other nations regarded as enemies by the Tehran regime – including us. Sadly, President Donald Trump proved unable to persuade the mullahs to give up their nuclear programme. It must now be abundantly clear that the leadership in Iran has no intention of giving up its nuclear weapons programme, and Iranian bombs menace London and Washington as much as Tel Aviv. Like President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, the Supreme Leader in Tehran has no concern for his civilian population. Hence, whatever people think of Israel, their efforts in this case to end the nuclear ambitions of Iran must be applauded and supported by the entire free world. There is huge concern, and rightly so, about escalation but nobody is or should be keen to support Tehran. Even though Iran has given much support to Putin in his illegal fight with Ukraine, he has barely lifted a finger or even said anything to help. Of course, the truth is that Putin actually disdains everyone in the Middle East and without gold, missiles or some other inducement he would never do anything for Iran. Other traditional supporters of the mullahs have been deafening in their silence. Any escalation will only come from Iran, and only if we let it. This dangerous situation, in my view, makes it even plainer than it already was that we British must spend – as an absolute minimum – 3 per cent of GDP on defence. And that figure must not be achieved by pretending that intelligence, spies, diplomacy or pensions are defence spending, as we are doing now with our current, misleading, 2.6 per cent aspiration. We need an actual genuine increase in spending on actual genuine defence, not more smoke and mirrors from the Treasury. Hopefully even the 'wokerati', who bizarrely seem to support everyone who would do us harm – and who seem blind to the fact that those they support do not share their values in the slightest – will realise that hiding behind their fake shemaghs and liberation flags won't protect them in any way from the mullahs who would see us all burn in hell, with gay people and feminists first in the queue. Meanwhile with our limited resources we are doing the right things. I applaud the deployment of RAF jets to the region. Force is the only useful currency in dealing with Iran. The Israelis are doing our work for us, but we should stand ready to help if required. And help may, in fact, be required, though we Brits cannot provide it. The deepest parts of the uranium enrichment complex at Natanz are probably beyond the reach of any weapon the Israelis have. It might be necessary to deploy the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a huge and heavy steel spear with an explosive payload like the bunker-busting bombs of WWII. Only heavy US bombers can carry the MOP, and so the decision would be one for President Trump. An alternative might be some kind of daring special operation. Mossad and the various other Israeli secret services would seem well able to manage this sort of thing, as they have proved against Hezbollah. There are many people in this country who are concerned that this conflict will ignite a wider war across the Middle East. They worry that the UK could be drawn into the fight, and I understand that. As a British soldier I went to war twice in the region. Nevertheless, I believe that Israel's necessary strikes on Iran's nuclear weapons programmes will make the world in general, and Britain in particular, much safer than allowing the Islamic Republic to gain possession of 'the bomb'. It is better to deal with such festering problems before they have fully developed, rather than later.
