Bird flu case with "flu-like symptoms" hospitalized in Colorado
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has confirmed a third U.S. bird flu hospitalization, Wyoming's health department said Friday, after a woman was admitted to a healthcare facility in neighboring Colorado.
The patient was experiencing "flu-like symptoms" and had "health conditions that can make people more vulnerable to illness," Wyoming's health department said. She was likely exposed to the H5N1 virus through direct contact to an infected poultry flock at her home.
"Our staff has followed up with other people who had contact with the flock and the patient, and will continue working with state and national experts to monitor the situation carefully for Wyoming," Dr. Alexia Harrist, Wyoming's state health officer, said in a statement.
It is unclear how many people in Colorado may have been exposed to the bird flu case while traveling in the state. A spokesperson for Colorado's health department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The patient was a resident of Wyoming's Platte County, the state's health department said. The Wyoming Livestock Board recently confirmed three backyard flocks infected by the virus, including in Platte County.
Those flocks were infected by B3.13, state veterinarian Hallie Hasel tells CBS News. It is unclear whether the human bird flu patient in Colorado was also infected by B3.13.
A spokesperson for the CDC, which usually studies and sequences worrying bird flu cases, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Health experts had thought that B3.13 strain might be less severe for people infected. That is different from the D1.1 strain that was behind a bird flu death in Louisiana last month and a hospitalization of a child in Canada last year.
The first U.S. bird flu hospitalization was reported in Missouri last year, sickened by B3.13, but health officials at the time said that person was likely hospitalized for other reasons and had incidentally tested positive for the virus.
The hospitalization comes just days after bird flu cases were also confirmed in people in Nevada and Ohio.
The Nevada patient was not hospitalized and only had mild symptoms, local health officials have said. Ohio's health department has not commented on the status of their bird flu case, despite repeated requests.
Health and agriculture departments also announced Friday another raw pet food recall linked to spread of the virus to cats in Oregon, and a second spillover of the D1.1 virus from birds into cows in Arizona.
Before Friday's case, there had been 68 human cases of bird flu confirmed by the CDC. Most have been linked to direct exposure to sick animals, though investigators have been unable to identify a source for three cases so far.
The uptick in bird flu cases comes amid an ongoing surge of seasonal influenza that is at record highs nationwide in emergency rooms and hospitals, above peaks seen during the 2009 swine flu pandemic.
Data from testing laboratories suggests it is the usual seasonal variants of the virus driving the surge, not human-to-human spread of a bird flu strain.
The CDC said Friday that those seasonal strains of the virus had driven influenza levels to some of the highest peaks in years, marking the first "high severity" season declared by the agency since 2017.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How CDC cuts affect women with chronic diseases like sickle cell
WESTLAND, Mich. — For D'Asia Jackson, every day is a guessing game over whether excruciating pain will upend her life. The 28-year-old medical assistant was born with sickle cell disease, an inherited condition that causes red blood cells to be shaped like a crescent moon. The anomaly can cause blood clots, organ damage and excruciating pain, which can worsen during the menstrual cycle. 'Pain-wise, I always describe it as like being hit by a Mack truck,' Jackson said. 'When I know my period is coming, I know pain is probably right behind it.' Over the last 10 years, Jackson has worked with her doctors to try a variety of contraception options to get her symptoms under control, from the Depo-Provera shot, a hormone injection given every three months, to an IUD to different forms of birth control pills. According to Jackson, none of them helped. Some made her periods even worse. 'I might have a good four or five good days of not bleeding in a month,' she said. 'Over the years, it's like the period actually started getting heavier, and that's when it started affecting my sickle cell.' At times, she's ended up in the hospital needing iron infusions due to loss of blood. Doctors don't know how to manage her symptoms. Sickle cell has no cure and treatment options are variable. 'The lack of education on sickle cell is very frustrating,' she said. 'I go into hospital stays having to educate doctors and nurses.' Now, women like Jackson are worried that lack of knowledge, particularly about how contraception affects their conditions, could get worse. In April, a small team that compiled information into what some consider the country's 'contraception bible,' a set of guidelines used by physicians to assess which types of birth control are safe for their patients, was fired from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as part of mass layoffs from the agency. The eight-person team was responsible for evaluating research and recommending birth control methods for patients with various conditions, from sickle cell disease, kidney disease and lupus to those at risk for HIV. The guidelines, called the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, provided the latest research for doctors, including an app that recommended which contraceptive methods were safe. The app has been downloaded more than 440,000 times, according to the CDC. Now, the work of that team has been halted as part of the reduction of the Women's Health and Fertility Branch of the Division of Reproductive Health. 'These are the only federal guidelines that focus on the safety of contraception for women with certain medical conditions,' said Lee Warner, the former chief of the Women's Health and Fertility Branch. 'This work exists nowhere else, and these individuals specialize in this area. Without their presence, the work stops.' Warner retired from the agency in April just after learning his team was being eliminated. 'While most women are able to use most methods, we looked at 60 conditions and over 1,800 evidence-based recommendations across an array of contraceptive methods,' he said. 'For some women, it is very dangerous for them to become pregnant at a certain point. So having contraception available to them that they can choose can help protect them.' At least 90% of people in the United States with sickle cell disease are Black. The maternal mortality rate for Black sickle cell patients has been found to be 26 times higher than for non-Black people. 'The CDC's decision to cut the team responsible for contraceptive guidelines is especially troubling for the sickle cell community, where pregnancy can carry severe health risks,' said Teonna Woolford, who founded the nonprofit Sickle Cell Reproductive Health Education Directive to advocate for patients and expand knowledge about the often-misunderstood disease. 'Eliminating this resource will disproportionately impact a community already facing significant barriers to care, further deepening health disparities.' In response to a request for comment, an official for the Department of Health and Human Services did not explain why the team was cut. In May, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. defended the cuts in a hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. 'Right now we have 42 divisions that do maternal health,' Kennedy testified. 'They're not cuts. They're consolidations. It's ridiculous to have 42 divisions that are all supposed to be doing the same thing.' Warner disagreed with Kennedy's testimony. 'Especially with this branch,' he said, 'the expertise is not redundant of that elsewhere in the federal government.' 'Once this expertise is gone, it is permanently gone from the agency. It is going to be very hard to resume and re-create,' he said. 'The HHS restructuring consolidates maternal and child health programs into the new Administration for a Healthy America (AHA) to improve efficiency and better address public health needs,' an HHS official said in a statement to NBC News. 'The reorganization aims to streamline operations, maximize resources, and support key priorities like maternal mental health and data collection. We remain committed to improving health outcomes for American families.' Representatives for HHS did not specify if work on the contraception guidelines would continue. The Trump administration did not respond to questions about why the team was cut or if its work would continue. The CDC's most recent update to the contraception guidelines was published in August. The updates included new recommendations for people with sickle cell disease, finding that combined hormonal contraception presents an 'unacceptable health risk' due to patients' risk of life-threatening blood clots. In previous versions of the guidelines, the CDC found the advantages of combined hormonal birth control, which contains estrogen and progestin, outweighed potential risks such as blood clots or stroke. The newest guidelines also increased the risk category for the Depo-Provera shot, while ranking methods like progestin-only pills and IUDs as generally safe. Jackson was unaware of the updated guidance until her interview with NBC News. She said she is using an IUD as well as combined hormonal contraception in the form of a pill to try to manage her bleeding. 'I didn't know that,' she said. 'I kind of just hope that my doctor knows a lot and kind of just steers me in the right direction.' Warner said the CDC team should be publicizing the updated guidance now to make physicians aware of the changes and adjust how they treat patients. 'We actually planned to do a road show of the guidelines in the late fall and throughout the spring in which we would disseminate the guidelines and go speak to provider groups,' he said. 'It's not happening.' The severe pain associated with her periods has driven Jackson to seek a hysterectomy for relief. 'I have been asking for a hysterectomy for years. I've seen five different OBs, and no one will do it,' she said. While the current guidelines are still accessible, the August update could be the last, leaving Jackson with little hope that she'll find a method of birth control that works for her. 'I am terrified of how health care is going to go with all of these cuts being made,' she said. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
If we don't listen to young men about their mental health, this is the cost
Behind stoic expressions and casual small talk, too many young men are quietly drowning. They're your classmates, brothers, coworkers, and sons — fighting internal battles with depression, anxiety, and isolation, often with no one to tell and nowhere to turn. The time to confront the mental health crisis among young men is now. Despite growing awareness around mental health, men — especially younger men — continue to slip through the cracks. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), suicide remains one of the leading causes of death among males aged 15–24, with a rate of 21.1 per 100,000 — nearly four times higher than their female peers. In 2021, only 18% of men aged 18–44 received any form of mental health treatment, compared to nearly 29% of women. Letters: Wake up, Floridians: Our politicians don't respect or represent us These aren't just statistics; they are a collective alarm bell. Here in South Florida, our rich cultural diversity adds another layer, often reinforcing the message that vulnerability is weakness — that men must 'tough it out.' The results are devastating — silence, self-medication, and in worst cases, suicide. We must work together to end this stigma immediately. Mental health is not a character flaw or a gendered issue — it's a public health imperative. And for young men, that means rewriting outdated narratives that equate stoicism with strength. Real strength is admitting you need help. It's having the courage to talk about anxiety, loneliness, or trauma — and seeking support. This transformation has to start early and happen everywhere: in homes, schools, sports teams, places of worship, workplaces, and digital spaces. Normalize therapy. Encourage mental health days. Train educators and coaches to recognize red flags. And most importantly, let boys and young men know that their feelings are not only valid — they're human. Opinion: Florida seniors shouldn't have to deal with homelessness. They need our support. To the young men reading this: you're not broken. You're not alone. And asking for help is one of the bravest things you'll ever do. Let's stop asking men to suffer in silence. Let's start building a culture where mental health is strength, not shame. Brian McSwain is a Licensed Mental Health Counselor and serves as Program Director for Beachway Therapy Center in West Palm Beach. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Men's mental health is worth talking about | Opinion
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
New England voters strongly disapprove of Kennedy's performance and polices as health secretary, according to new Globe/Suffolk poll
On one front, Kennedy does draw wide support from across the spectrum with his move to phase out artificial food dyes. But his most recent move this week served to underscore how polarizing his agenda can be: On Monday, Kennedy Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The move stunned and alarmed many in the medical community — as well as New Englanders who participated in the Suffolk/Globe survey, which was conducted before Kennedy fired the officials. Advertisement Logan Snierson, a 26-year old aircraft mechanic and registered Democrat from Rochester, N.H., spoke to the Globe having just seen the news that Kennedy had gutted the CDC vaccine board and was disturbed by the implications. Advertisement 'I mean, it just feels like we're regressing as a country in health care,' he said. Related : His poll numbers probably shouldn't come as much of a surprise. New England is not only more liberal than the country as a whole but has a high concentration of well-educated professionals who work in the region's nation-leading universities and hospitals, and the local economy is heavily dependent on the medical, pharmaceutical, and health care industries — all of which have been hit hard by federal budget cuts and the administration's oressure campaign on elite schools. A national survey conducted by Pew Research in April and May found more favorable results for Kennedy: 43 percent of those polled disapproved of his performance, while 36 percent approved and 21 percent were not sure. The opposition to Kennedy here is deeply felt. The single largest group of respondents, by far, were those who said they strongly disapproved of the job he's doing. By contrast, only 14 percent of those surveyed strongly approved. In the Globe poll, Kennedy's popularity broke along familiar partisan lines. Ninety-one percent of Democrats disapproved of Kennedy; 80 percent of them strongly disapproved. While just 15 percent of Republicans approve of Kennedy, that was a larger share than the 4 percent of Democrats who did. Seventy-six percent of Republicans favor Kennedy overall. The splits among independent voters closely mirrored the overall results. Sixty-two percent disapprove of Kennedy while 29 percent approve. Many of those displeased with Kennedy's performance said they haven't been surprised by his actions, given his Advertisement 'I was shocked by his appointment and therefore everything has been concordant with that,' said Craig Franz, a 72-year old retiree and registered Democrat from Narragansett, R.I. 'It's a terrible time for health in the country and for science and research.' Related : Clear majorities disagreed with several of Kennedy's most significant policy decisions and views. Sixty percent disagreed with his belief that fluoride should be removed from public water supplies, for instance, compared to 31 percent who agreed. Kennedy's most unpopular move, the survey found, was the decision of his Food and Drug Administration to limit COVID-19 booster shots to those over 65 years old or at risk of serious illness. Sixty-two percent disagreed — almost all strongly so — while 32 percent agreed. The survey did underscore the broad appeal of one staple of Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' platform: his push to Kennedy has not pursued any ban just yet, but in April, he announced a suite of actions designed to curb use of the dyes, which have been increasingly linked to health risks like cancer. The secretary's focus on food dyes and addressing food safety in general united poll respondents who otherwise expressed a wide range of views on Kennedy. Anna Morrison, a 44-year old barber and independent voter from Falmouth, said Kennedy was 'doing a very good job' overall and pointed first to his steps on tackling chemicals in food; she agrees with Kennedy that those chemicals are contributing to a chronic disease epidemic in the country. Advertisement On the other end of the spectrum, Margot Critchfield, a 69-year old retired Episcopal priest and Democrat from Cape Cod, believes Kennedy is unqualified for the job and that his views are 'dangerous,' especially when it comes to vaccination. But she agreed with his stance on food dyes, though she noted it was not an endorsement of his leadership in any way. 'I agreed with that but I felt like it was almost like a trick question, because it was hard to believe I'd agree with him on anything,' she said. David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center, said the results show there's only one issue Kennedy should be talking about — 'mandating the removal of synthetic dyes from the food supply.' 'If he leads with that and he goes aggressively on that issue, even among the people who hate him, even in the most liberal areas of the nation, people overwhelmingly agree,' Paleologos said. 'That's a gift-wrapped issue for him. And for Trump, too.' Though Kennedy is polarizing in New England, some voters are still conflicted about his overall impact. Ellen, a 71-year old retiree and independent voter from Sturbridge, who declined to give her last name, approves of Kennedy's moves on food additives and fluoride but disagrees with him on vaccines. She said that he wouldn't have been her first choice as health secretary but said 'he means well' even if 'he's misguided in a lot of ways.' 'I think personally, he's a bit out there,' she said. 'But isn't everybody in this administration?' Sam Brodey can be reached at
