$70m mansion is ‘Australia's most expensive knockdown'
At $70m, the original midcentury mansion at 38 Vaucluse Rd will likely take the title as Australia's most expensive knock down.
The 1400sq m block is prime Eastern Suburbs real estate, the type of 'land' that rarely comes to market, but when it does it can literally command top dollar. The reason for its premium price tag is its 30m harbour-facing – however not waterfront – frontage capturing both the Harbour Bridge and Opera House.
MORE: Neighbours become $200m richer overnight
The home sits just in front of James Packer's former home La Mer, which was sold for an Australian house record of $70m in 2015, underlining this new offering's potential.
Elliott Placks and Riki Tawhara of Ray White Double Bay, are marketing the perfectly positioned, but significantly run down home.
'It's just an incredible landholding, with the most amazing views on your doorstep from the moment you walk into the property,' Placks said.
'You've got all of Sydney's icons right there in front of you from this vantage point of Vaucluse.
'As well as the outlook there's dual street access and a large block to work with.'
Placks said the multimillion dollar knockdown had already commanded interest from cash buyers from around the world.
'There's a mix of inquiry. It's definitely got an international status because of the world famous views and rare position.'
The vendor is Isaac Wakil, the 98-year-old garment trade guru turned property developer and philanthropist who moved to the address 65 years ago alongside his late wife Susan.
MORE: Wild reason Aussie has 300 homes
The pair, who never had children, have made headlines over the past decade after a mass $200m sell off of their property portfolio including several long-held and abandoned commercial sites such as the landmark Griffiths Teas building in Surry Hills and the Terminus Hotel in Pyrmont.
Much of the millions in profits reportedly went to The Art Gallery of NSW, Opera Australia, St Vincent's Hospital and the Sydney Jewish Museum. In 2016, the couple donated a record $35m to The University of Sydney through the Susan and Isaac Wakil Foundation.
MORE: Kmart set to change everything in Temu war
Currently, the two-storey home features a lower floor with three bedrooms, formal and informal living and entertaining spaces, a library, office, plus a full-width balcony orientated towards the iconic views. The same level also houses two full bathrooms, a powder room and garage.
Downstairs, there is an original kitchen and vast rumpus room with a bar opening to a grand terrace, the lawn and huge swimming pool facing the harbour panorama.
The property, which also has access to Carrara Rd, has two more lock up garages below and is close to Hermitage Foreshore track, harbour beaches, and Kambala School.
MORE: Price of car spot proves Australia has lost it
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
20 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Rate cut windfall: Aus big bank's shock new forecast
A bombshell forecast by one of Australia's biggest banks could put thousands more back in struggling homeowners' pockets than expected amid an unprecedented rate cut war. In a shock move, Westpac Bank has doubled its rate cut forecast for the current cycle to now expect the Reserve Bank to implement four cuts to the cash rate target – putting in two additional 0.25pp falls in 2026. That would drive the cash rate target down to pandemic-era 2.85 per cent again, a number it was last at in November 2022. Wallabies to wealth: Huge windfall looms for 25yo star The move would save as much as $4,200 a year in interest charges for someone currently on a $600,000 loan, according to Canstar analysis. data insights director Sally Tindall said 'if Westpac's forecast comes to fruition and there are four more RBA cuts through to mid-next year, someone with a $600,000 loan could potentially see their monthly repayments drop by almost $350 a month.' 'This would be a huge relief for households under pressure, however, borrowers should remember this is a forecast, rather than a given.' In a surprise addition, Westpac also believes those 2026 cuts could come in earlier depending on whether inflation and labour market figures track weaker in late 2025. Of the big four, only National Australia Bank expects RBA to cut rates at its next meeting on July 8, with the other three picking a fall to 3.6pc in August. 'A single 0.25 percentage point cash rate cut, if fully passed on by lenders, could reduce monthly repayments on a $600,000, 25-year mortgage by $90,' Ms Tindall said. So far the Big Four forecasts show Westpac expecting four cuts now, NAB predicting three, and CBA and ANZ sitting on two. Such cuts would also drive the bulk of interest charges on mortgages under 5 per cent, with Westpac expecting the timing to be a cut in August and November this year and then two more in February and May next year. data has seven lenders already offering fixed rates from 4.99pc, Ms Tindall said, as banks attempt to get more buyers to lock in. 'While the majority of these deals are for owner-occupiers paying principal and interest, two banks – Australian Mutual and Police Bank – are also offering this sub-5pc rate to investors.' Lenders offering at least one fixed rate starting with a 4 include Australian Mutual Bank (4.99pc), Bank of Queensland (4.99pc), Community First Bank 4.99pc, GMCU 4.99pc, Queensland Country Bank 4.99pc, Pacific Mortgage Group 4.99pc, and Police Bank 4.99pc. 'The RBA won't hesitate to act in July should global volatility ramp up, but the more likely scenario is that it will sit tight until after the June quarter CPI results, due out at the end of next month,' is Canstar's prediction. 'Borrowers shouldn't be banking on multiple rate cuts just yet, but they can start preparing by shopping around for a better deal, particularly if, as an owner-occupier, their variable rate starts with a '6'.' 'Fixed rates continue to fall as lenders look to lock in more customers with rates starting with a '4'.'
ABC News
29 minutes ago
- ABC News
Second Festival Plaza tower receives planning approval despite heritage concerns
A 38-storey office building with shops, restaurants and a public plaza is set to tower over South Australia's Parliament House, after the concept was granted planning approval despite a number of concerns raised by the government's heritage agency. The State Commission Assessment Panel (SCAP) granted planning consent to developers Walker Corporation on Wednesday to build a 160-metre-tall skyscraper in the Festival Plaza precinct, directly behind Parliament House. The tower, scheduled for completion in 2027-28, is expected to accommodate up to 5,000 office workers and will stand alongside Walker Corporation's 29-storey "Festival One" office tower which opened in 2024. The new 38-storey building will feature outdoor dining areas and retail tenancies on the ground-floor, an elevated plaza space on level one, commercial office space from levels six to 16 and 19 to 35, and a restaurant on level 36. The SCAP — a panel of planning experts appointed by the State Planning Commission to assess major CBD development applications — determined the Festival Tower plan was not "seriously at variance" with the planning code, according to minutes of its meeting published on Thursday. The panel granted the project planning consent subject to nine conditions, five of which were heritage matters concerning the relationship between the tower and Parliament House. The Malinauskas government strongly backed Walker Corporation's proposal after asking the company to revise its earlier plan for a three-storey retail hub that would have stretched across the northern facade of Parliament House. Planning Minister Nick Champion said the SCAP approval was "unambiguously good news for the state", adding that the Festival Plaza will be "vibrant and teeming with people" once the tower is finished. "We want to activate this plaza and office workers will do that," Mr Champion said. "They will provide the customers for food and beverage, they'll wander down to the theatre after work, they'll have drinks in bars in the train station and in town. "This will bring vibrancy to the square and activity to the square, it will make this beautiful place even more vibrant and welcoming." The second Festival Tower has not been without controversy, particularly due to its size and location on public land between the Adelaide Festival Centre and Parliament House. A self-described coalition of 125 eminent South Australians, headlined by former Labor premier Lynn Arnold, campaigned against the tower and argued the Festival Plaza should be "open and civic in character". The SCAP's approval also comes despite a number of concerns raised by the government's heritage agency, Heritage SA, about the impact the tower would have on Parliament House, a national heritage place. In a submission to the SCAP, Heritage SA raised concerns that the "visual dominance" of the proposed tower would leave views of Parliament House's northern facade "compromised". "The currently open setting to the north of Parliament House will be enclosed by the tower, compromising the historic landmark scale of Parliament House along the North Terrace boulevard," Heritage SA's principal heritage architect Michael Queale wrote. Government planning officer Ben Scholes, who prepared a summary report for the SCAP on the development, noted Heritage SA's concerns but said the agency had "not directed refusal of the application". "Instead, through detailed conditions to be assigned to any Planning Consent granted, Heritage SA has recommended design amendments to mitigate the concerns raised," Mr Scholes wrote. "This position from Heritage SA, while highlighting significant impacts, indicates that these impacts may be considered manageable and would be capable of resolution through design adjustments, rather than representing a fundamental incompatibility with policy expectations." Mr Scholes said the Walker Corporation proposal represented a "delicate balance" between the strategic vision for the precinct and heritage impacts. He added that the proposal was "not considered to be so fundamentally inconsistent or materially detrimental to the heritage and cultural values of Parliament House" to be "seriously at variance" with the planning code's heritage policies. "The circumstances of this application are consistent with this precedent, where a balance between strategic aspirations and heritage values was implicitly accepted." Mr Champion said the heritage conditions imposed on the planning consent primarily relate to the building materials that "will be used to match the features of Parliament House". "Every indication that we've had from Walker [Corporation] is that they care about complimenting the … heritage features of Parliament House," he said. "That was one of the things that was worked on a lot by the Government Architect and the Design Review Team … a lot of thought going into that as we blend the old and the new." The ABC has contacted Walker Corporation for comment. The SCAP's approval marks one of the final stages of the redevelopment of the Festival Plaza precinct — a process that began in 2014 when Walker Corporation entered a partnership with the state government to redevelop the Festival Plaza car park. That preceded a public-private partnership to upgrade the Festival Plaza's public realm, followed by construction on the 29-storey Festival One tower, which is now home to Flinders University and Deloitte. Early works behind Parliament House are already underway to prepare for the construction of the second tower, which is planned to hold 1,354 car parking spaces and around 47,000 square metres of office space. The second Festival Plaza building will rank among Adelaide's tallest buildings when completed. At 160-metres in height, the tower would eclipse the city's current tallest building, Frome Central Tower One, which stands at 138-metres-tall in the east end of the CBD. An even taller 180-metre, 37-storey hotel was given planning consent last year for construction behind the Freemasons Lodge at 254 North Terrace.
ABC News
41 minutes ago
- ABC News
The Trump administration's AUKUS review set off a political storm, but it doesn't mean the deal is dead
News that the Trump administration is reviewing AUKUS broke like a wave over Australia this morning. Defence Minister Richard Marles has responded with determined calm, saying Australia has known about the review for "weeks" and that it was perfectly "natural and understandable" for the new administration to "look under the hood" of the submarine pact. The review won't necessarily sound a death knell for AUKUS and there are plenty of experts who say it delivers enough benefits to the United States to ensure its survival. But it has provoked a storm of controversy and speculation, with defenders of the project taking to the battlements and sceptics declaring it will offer a golden opportunity for the government to escape a pact that is shaping as a strategic catastrophe for Australia. And there are also plenty of signs the Trump administration is happy to use the review to twist Australia's arm on defence spending — putting the prime minister in an awkward position ahead of an anticipated meeting with Donald Trump. At this stage, details are scant. A Pentagon official says the US wants to make sure the plan aligns with Mr Trump's "America First" agenda, ensuring "the highest readiness of our service members" and "that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs". It will be led by senior official Elbridge Colby, who has been a high-profile AUKUS sceptic — although he has sounded more open to the initiative since taking office. Still, Mr Colby warned during his confirmation hearings that the US would only be able to sell nuclear powered submarines to Australia under AUKUS if the US managed to ramp up submarine production to meet its own critical needs. Put simply: if the US Navy is facing a nightmare scenario, like a war in the Taiwan Strait, then it might prefer to have those additional submarines under its direct control, instead of under the command of another country that might choose to steer clear of the fight. Under the AUKUS agreement, Washington will only begin to transfer second-hand Virginia-class submarines to Australia if it can first lift its local production rate of nuclear-powered boats to at least two a year by 2028. Currently, American shipyards are producing around 1.2 nuclear-powered attack submarines per year but will need to hit a target production rate of 2.33 before any can be sold to Australia. Analyst Euan Graham from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute says the administration will "need to be convinced that the short-term loss to the US Navy's submarine order of battle is worth the longer-term gains from basing and maintenance and greater interoperability". "Support from the US Navy and Congress will be critical," he said. But the administration will also face real costs — not least to US credibility — if it pulls the plug. US analyst Richard Fontaine says all three countries have "absorbed financial and diplomatic costs to get to this point" and "walking away would amount to a strategic setback and devastate ties with Australia". That might explain why some Australian officials and politicians insist they are quietly confident Mr Trump and his key lieutenants will not abandon AUKUS. Questions around the US industrial base and grand strategy might dominate the review, but the process is not happening in a vacuum. The Pentagon says it will use the review to make sure "allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence". In the past few months, both US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Mr Colby have publicly demanded that Australia dramatically lift defence spending. The message seems clear. Nobody in the US is saying outright that AUKUS could face the chop if Australia refuses to play ball. But by directly linking the two issues, the Trump administration seems to be flagging that it is happy to use AUKUS as leverage. Unsurprisingly, some Australian MPs are predicting Mr Trump will demand the Albanese government commit to pour more money into the US submarine industrial base. It is still not certain if Anthony Albanese will sit down with Mr Trump on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada next week, for their first face-to-face meeting. But if they do, it is certain AUKUS and defence spending will be at (or near) the top of the agenda. And the Trump administration's decision to apparently leak — or let slip — news about the review just days before the meeting shows they are happy to put the acid on Australia. If AUKUS does get scrapped, Australia will be left with a very hefty bill and nothing to show for it. Under the AUKUS deal, Australia last year began making a series of multi-billion-dollar payments to the United States and United Kingdom to help boost submarine industrial production in both nations. Earlier this year, the government made a $768 million down-payment to the US as part of an overall pledge of $4.7 billion, to help secure the transfer of second-hand Virginia-class submarines here in the 2030s. Australia is also scheduled to pay $4.6 billion to the UK to help support the eventual construction of a new SSN-AUKUS fleet, but the government and defence have been reluctant to admit these contributions have a no-refund clause if the submarines do not arrive. That is not the only sunk cost. As Greens senator David Shoebridge points out, Australia is also "spending $1.7 billion of taxpayers' money to build a US nuclear submarine base that will be operational by 2027 just off Perth". Ever since former prime minister Scott Morrison tore up Australia's submarine deal with France in favour of the AUKUS nuclear option, the ambitious deal has dominated the Defence Department's future planning and efforts. Despite concerns about the direction of AUKUS under the Trump administration, Mr Marles dismissed calls to develop a fallback plan in case the US reneges on the pact. If the AUKUS deal was to collapse, Australia's options to acquire submarines, conventionally powered or nuclear, are extremely limited. France would be reluctant to resume the now-scrapped Attack-class program with Australia, while Germany, which was overlooked in 2016, has indicated its submarine construction yards already have full order books. Australia could potentially return cap-in-hand to Japan, more than a decade after a handshake deal between former prime minister Shinzo Abe and then-prime minister Tony Abbott was made to buy that country's Soryu-class submarines. But the reality is that if AUKUS does fall through, Australia will be facing a yawning capability gap, with no obvious replacement for our dependable but rapidly ageing Collins Class submarines — all at a time when we're facing the most perilous strategic landscape in decades.
