
Wales reacts to UK–US trade deal as farmers raise alarm
Fears for food standards as steel and car sectors welcome tariff relief
WALES stands to gain and lose under a newly struck UK–US trade deal hailed as a 'historic breakthrough' by Prime Minister Keir Starmer — but Welsh farmers have warned it must not come at the cost of domestic food production.
The agreement, finalised during a late-night call between Starmer and President Donald Trump, slashes US tariffs on key British exports, including steel, aluminium and cars. The move is expected to protect thousands of jobs in Wales, particularly in Port Talbot's struggling steelworks and the automotive supply chain.
Speaking to workers at the Jaguar Land Rover plant in Solihull, Starmer said: 'We did the hard yards. We stayed in the room. This deal is about saving British jobs – and that includes those in Wales.'
However, the Farmers' Union of Wales (FUW) responded with caution, warning that the deal opens the door to cheaper American imports which could undercut Welsh beef producers.
While the UK has secured reciprocal access to the US market for British beef — including a tariff-free quota of 13,000 metric tonnes — the same figure of US beef will now enter the UK tariff-free.
FUW President Ian Rickman said: 'Welsh agriculture must not become collateral damage. An influx of US beef could disrupt our domestic market and force our farmers into unfair competition with cheaper, sub-standard imports.'
The UK Government has insisted that food safety standards will not be compromised — with hormone-treated beef and chlorinated chicken still banned. But the FUW says the real danger lies not in food safety, but in food production standards, such as environmental and animal welfare rules, which are often lower in the US.
Rickman added: 'Country-of-origin labelling must be made mandatory. Consumers deserve to know what they're buying — and Welsh farmers deserve a level playing field.'
The deal also promises 'preferential treatment' for UK aerospace components, and includes a reduction in car tariffs from 27.5% to 10%, safeguarding a vital export route for the British car industry. The US is Britain's largest car export market, valued at over £9bn annually.
Meanwhile, Welsh steel producers welcomed the US decision to scrap its 25% tariffs on UK steel and aluminium, originally imposed under Trump's protectionist measures. With Port Talbot's future uncertain, this lifeline could prove crucial.
Yet critics, including the International Chamber of Commerce, pointed out that many high US tariffs remain untouched. 'The reality is US tariffs on UK exports are still significantly higher than they were at the start of the year,' said secretary-general John Denton.
Tensions also flared in Westminster, where Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch accused Labour of capitulating to Trump: 'We cut our tariffs, and America tripled theirs. Starmer called it historic — I call it a sell-out.'
Welsh Liberal Democrats called for Parliament to vote on the deal, warning that ongoing negotiations over digital services and agriculture must be scrutinised. 'This isn't just a done deal — it's the start of a long road with major consequences for Wales,' said a spokesperson.
As the first country to strike a trade agreement with Trump following his controversial 'liberation day' tariff hikes, the UK has both broken new ground and raised fresh questions.
Starmer, addressing reporters after missing the second half of the Arsenal vs PSG match to finalise the deal, admitted: 'It's jobs won, not jobs done. This is a foundation, not a finish line.'
The FUW echoed that sentiment: 'As the dust settles, we will continue to keep a close eye on developments. The stakes for Welsh farming could not be higher.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Formula E's half-indoor, half-outdoor London race to get one final run-out
Formula E have released their calendar for the 2026 season and the flagship race the ExCeL Centre in east London has been included, but is expected to be the final time it is used Formula E's flagship season finale in London will get one final run-out in 2026. The event at the ExCeL Centre in the east London docklands will host the final two rounds of the 2025/26 season, as confirmed by the calendar release on Tuesday. But it is expected to be the final time that Formula E race on the unique half-indoor, half-outdoor circuit, as car capabilities are set to outgrow the venue. FE signed a deal to race at the ExCeL until the end of the Gen3Evo era, which includes this season and next. However, the Gen4 car is expected to be even faster and even more powerful than before, meaning the tight circuit is unlikely to be sufficient. The current Formula E car gets from 0-60mph in just 1.8 seconds - quicker than an F1 car. The indoor land speed world record was broken by Formula E at the London race weekend in 2023, when British driver Jake Hughes hit 135.9mph in a specially-adapted car. Speaking exclusively to the Mirror earlier this season, Formula E CEO Jeff Dodds said: "The ExCeL are amazing people to work with, and it's a great venue. You've got 50,000 people over the weekend, the inside-outside is cool, the activations are really good. "But clearly, we need a home in the UK for Gen4 onwards. I think there are only two logical routes to that. "One is you find an alternative in London, an alternative location. There are other big areas of London that are going through regeneration that could be great for a motor racing circuit. "Or we find a permanent racing circuit that delivers against our objectives in the UK. We haven't made that decision yet. All bets are on in that respect." A new race in Madrid at the Jarama circuit has been added to the calendar for next season. Formula E have long wanted to race in the Spanish capital, with it being the hometown of the series' founders. Formula E calendar 2025/26 Round 1: Sao Paulo, Brazil, December 6 Round 2: Mexico City, Mexico, January 10 Round 3: Miami, Florida, USA, January 31 Rounds 4&5: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 13-14 February Round 6: Madrid, Spain, March 21 Rounds 7&8: Berlin, Germany, 2-3 May Round 9&10: Monte Carlo, Monaco, 16-17 May Round 11: TBC, May 30 Round 12: TBC, June 20 Rounds 13&14: Shanghai, China, 4-5 July Rounds 15&16: Tokyo, Japan, 25-26 July Rounds 17&18: London, United Kingdom, 15-16 August


Powys County Times
9 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
World Bank sharply downgrades forecast for global economic growth to 2.3%
US President Donald Trump's trade wars are expected to slash economic growth this year in America and around the world, the World Bank forecast. Citing 'a substantial rise in trade barriers' but without mentioning Mr Trump by name, the 189-country lender predicted that the US economy – the world's largest – would grow half as fast (1.4%) this year as it did in 2024 (2.8%). That marks a downgrade from the 2.3% US growth it had forecast back for 2025 back in January. The bank also lopped 0.4 percentage points off its forecast for global growth this year. It now expects the world economy to expand just 2.3% in 2025, down from 2.8% in 2024. In a forward to the latest version of the twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill wrote that the global economy has missed its chance for the 'soft landing' – slowing enough to tame inflation without generating serious pain – it appeared headed for just six months ago. 'The world economy today is once more running into turbulence,' Mr Gill wrote. 'Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep.'


The Guardian
15 minutes ago
- The Guardian
A nuanced approach to ageing, sex and gender
Born in 1976, I am around the same age as Susanna Rustin and the generation of 'middle-aged, gender-critical women' who believe that their biological sex should underpin and define their rights (Why is there such a generational divide in views on sex and gender in Britain?, 5 June). I am not one of those people. Forty-nine years' experience of living in a female body in a world deformed by class, caste and economic and racial inequality – never mind environmental destruction – has only made me wonder quite why it matters so much to some people. A truly progressive society should be moving towards seeing the person first, both beyond and in profound recognition of their politicised identities. One can see biological sex as both fundamental and immaterial at the same time. As I approach 50, it's clear to me that it's possible to hold both these thoughts simultaneously. My menopausal womanhood matters as it gets in the way of things I want to do in life. But there's no way it matters to me above all else, and there's no chance it gets in the way to a greater degree than the various effects of social and economic inequality. It is a fallacy to suggest that trans inclusivity is more compatible with capitalism than with collective liberation. If the Progress Pride flag is flown from a corporate building – a rare sight in my experience compared with the rainbow Pride flag – it's not because it 'suits them', in Rustin's words, to shift attention away from class politics towards individual expression. Perhaps younger people better understand that corporate interests don't engage with class politics anyway, so how's a flag going to hurt anyone? I was born with breasts and ovaries, and still have them; I have given birth twice. These facts have had undeniable effects on my life – but so has the disadvantage of my class of birth and the continuing advantage of my whiteness. If I were to look at every aspect of my life through the prism of my reproductive organs, I would be limiting the possibilities of looking at the multiple effects of all those factors in the whole – the effects of which can only lead one to conclude that they are human, a person, first. It's called intersectionality, and that term was come up with by Kimberlé Crenshaw, who was born in 1959. Lynsey HanleyLiverpool Susanna Rustin lists several possibilities for why gen Z are more likely to advocate for the inclusion of transgender women in single-sex spaces. One thing she did not mention is that it may be due to the personal relationships that this demographic is more likely to have with transgender individuals, and how much more easily it is to sympathise with the struggles of those we know. As an older member of gen Z, I have had two openly trans peers in my cohort during my time at university, my former neighbour was transgender, and now in my workplace I have a transgender colleague. This resembles the norm – a Guardian article from June 2022 suggests that 50% of British gen Zers said they knew at least one transgender person. I would argue that gen Z more openly fights for the inclusion and protections of transgender women because we're more likely to see them as truly women, rather than 'self-identifying' individuals, due to our personal connections with them. To me, my trans female colleague would intrude on my bodily privacy the same amount as my cis female colleague would. As always, I implore others to seek out the voices and stories of transgender people if knowing them personally may be outside your generational demographic, so we can better empathise with this often scapegoated BarkerCamelford, Cornwall Thank you for such a well-written and clearly argued article by Susanna Rustin. I am pleased to see the Guardian publishing this piece. It is very important to be able to speak openly about these important issues and engage in frank but respectful debate. I completely agree with the author and would also add that with age comes experience, a certain weariness, a generally more nuanced outlook on life and a deep understanding of how embodied our experiences are but also anger – anger that hard-won women's rights, protections, dignity and safety can be so easily dismissed by so-called and address supplied Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.