logo
Syrian architect uses drone footage to help rebuild hometown

Syrian architect uses drone footage to help rebuild hometown

Yahooa day ago

Syrian architect Abdel Aziz al-Mohammed could barely recognise his war-ravaged village when he returned after years away. Now, his meticulous documentation of the damage using a drone helps to rebuild it.
"When I first came back, I was shocked by the extent of the destruction," said Mohammed, 34.
Walking through his devastated village of Tal Mardikh, in Syria's northwestern Idlib province, he said he could not recognise "anything, I couldn't even find my parents' home".
Nearly half of Tal Mardikh's 1,500 homes have been destroyed and the rest damaged, mainly due to bombardment by the former Syrian army.
Mohammed, who in 2019 fled the bombardment to near the Turkish border, first returned days after an Islamist-led offensive toppled longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad in December.
The architect, now based in Idlib city, had documented details of Tal Mardikh's houses and streets before fleeing, and afterwards used his drone to document the destruction.
When he returned, he spent two weeks carefully surveying the area, going from home to home and creating an interactive map showing the detailed conditions of each house.
"We entered homes in fear, not knowing what was inside, as the regime controlled the area for five years," he said.
Under the blazing sun, Mohammed watched as workers restored a house in Tal Mardikh, which adjoins the archaeological site of Ebla, the seat of one of ancient Syria's earliest kingdoms.
His documentation of the village helped gain support from Shafak, a Turkey-based non-governmental organisation which agreed to fund the reconstruction and rehabilitation of 434 out of 800 damaged homes in Tal Mardikh.
The work is expected to be completed in August, and includes the restoration of two wells and sanitation networks, at a cost of more than one million dollars.
- 'Full of hope' -
Syrians have begun returning home after Assad's ouster and following nearly 14 years of civil war that killed over half a million people and displaced millions of others internally and abroad.
According to the United Nations refugee agency, UNHCR, more than 600,000 Syrians had returned home from abroad, while around 1.5 million internally displaced people have gone back to their regions of origin.
The agency estimates that up to 1.5 million Syrians from abroad and two million internally displaced people could return by the end of this year.
Around 13.5 million currently remain displaced internally or abroad, according to UNHCR figures for May.
In Tal Mardikh, Alaa Gharib, 45, is among only a few dozen residents who have come back.
"I lived in tents for seven years, and when liberation came, I returned to my village," said Gharib, whose home is among those set for restoration.
He is using a blanket as a makeshift door for his house which had "no doors, no windows, nothing".
After Western sanctions were lifted, Syria's new authorities are hoping for international support for post-war reconstruction, which the UN estimates could cost more than $400 billion.
Efforts have so far been limited to individuals or charities, with the government yet to launch a reconstruction campaign.
Architect Mohammed said his dream was "for the village to be rebuilt, for people and life to return".
He expressed hope to "see the Syria we dream of... the Syria full of hope, built by its youth".
ohk-lk/nad/lg/ami/tc

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Karoline Leavitt's ‘Have To Save Face' Jab Instantly Backfires
Karoline Leavitt's ‘Have To Save Face' Jab Instantly Backfires

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Karoline Leavitt's ‘Have To Save Face' Jab Instantly Backfires

Critics mockingly declared the Trump White House an irony-free zone on Thursday following talk of totalitarian regime tactics by press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Leavitt was asked during a briefing to respond to remarks from Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who in his first comments since the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities and the announcement of a ceasefire with Israel had defiantly declared that Iran would 'never surrender' to the United States. 'Look, we saw the Ayatollah's video, and when you have a totalitarian regime, you have to save face,' Leavitt replied. 'I think any commonsense, open-minded person knows the truth about the precision strikes on Saturday night. They were wildly successful,' she added, despite ongoing debate over the actual claimed effectiveness in destroying Iran's capabilities to build nuclear weapons. The 'totalitarian regime' having to 'save face' line was too ironic for many critics online: Dem Sen. Patty Murray Trolls Trump With Hilariously Brutal Taste Of His Own Medicine Dr. Oz's 'Completely Incoherent' Credit Card Flub Has Critics Saying, What?!? 'Doesn't Take An Einstein': Jasmine Crockett Hits Trump With Sharp Melania Swipe

Analysis: Trump is losing support among independent voters. Who are they?
Analysis: Trump is losing support among independent voters. Who are they?

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Analysis: Trump is losing support among independent voters. Who are they?

We'll have to wait and see exactly what the American bombing raid on Iranian nuclear sites accomplished and how far it set back the country's nuclear ambitions. The White House and Pentagon have launched a concerted effort to convince Americans the mission was successful and needed. At a Pentagon news conference, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine went into great detail to explain the years of planning that underpinned readiness for the attack and how it was executed. Details like those Caine shared could help sway public opinion and bring Americans behind strikes. But the early assessment of how the public views the strikes is probably not what the administration was hoping for. A majority, 56%, disapproved of the strikes in a CNN poll released this week, before conflicting assessments of the mission's success. The results in CNN's poll fall along predictable ideological lines. Democrats will pretty much always disapprove of what the Trump administration does, and Republicans will pretty much always approve. Here's how CNN's polling team put it in their report: Majorities of independents (60%) and Democrats (88%) disapprove of the decision to take military action in Iran. Republicans largely approve (82%). But just 44% of Republicans strongly approve of the airstrikes, far smaller than the group of Democrats who strongly disapprove (60%), perhaps reflecting that some in Trump's coalition are broadly distrustful of military action abroad. It's an obvious rule of US politics that independent voters are generally the ones who might, as their opinions shift sway, tilt power in the country. And on a range of issues, they have been turning against Trump. CNN's Aaron Blake looked last week at numerous polls on Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill. 'Independents opposed the bill by around a 3-to-1 margin … The KFF and Fox News polls – the ones with the fewest undecideds – showed 7 in 10 independents opposed it,' Blake wrote. On what may be Trump's signature issue, deportations and immigration policy, CNN's polling editor Ariel Edwards-Levy wrote about a CNN poll in April, 'more than half of independents now say they have no real confidence in him to deal with the topic, with 56% now saying he has gone too far on deportations.' On tariffs, the economy and government cuts, Trump has failed, at least so far, to convince Americans who don't identify with either party, that his agenda is the right thing to do. I went to CNN's chief data analyst, Harry Enten, who has been tracking this trend for some time. 'It's pretty clear that independents and independent voters have turned against Trump,' he told me. Back in April, Enten's analysis said that Trump had the worst approval rating on record with independents at that point in a presidency. 'His issue is he has completely lost the center of the electorate,' Enten said, offering two very obvious and simple reasons why. Independents don't like what Trump is doing on the economy. They don't seem to like the bulk of his agenda otherwise (see the 'Big, Beautiful Bill'). This will present major problems for Trump and the GOP going forward. 'Now, it's possible that Trump and the GOP can do well going forward without independents breaking overwhelmingly for them,' Enten said, pointing out that independents broke for Trump in 2024. 'The problem is you can't be losing independents 20+ points and survive in American politics,' he added. At the same time, independents are hard to track for a variety of reasons. Unlike Republicans and Democrats, they don't act as a unified voting bloc, as Edwards-Levy and CNN's Jennifer Agiesta wrote a few years ago. 'Plenty of independents are in fact partisan and they're certainly not de facto moderates,' Edwards-Levy told me. What do independents have in common? 'They're less strongly tethered to particular partisan loyalties and less likely to be closely engaged with politics, all of which makes their views potentially more malleable than those of stronger partisans,' Edwards-Levy said. In a recent Washington Post poll about the Trump's agenda bill, for instance, only 18% of Democrats and 25% of Republicans said they hadn't heard anything about the controversial proposal to extend Trump's first-term tax cuts, create new tax cuts and slash spending, including on Medicaid. It was a much larger portion of independents, 34%, who hadn't heard anything at all about the president's top legislative priority.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store