How Mazda Plans To Outsmart America's Harsh Tariffs
Manufacturers importing vehicles and related components into the United States are all trying to find inventive ways to mitigate the effect of the Trump administration's tariffs, which are expected to increase the price of a new car by almost $2,000. Among the hardest-hit brands are European and Japanese, as they rely more heavily on imports. Mazda is part of this group, which is why the Japanese marque has hatched a new plan to reduce the impact of tariffs in the USA, but it may not be one you expect.
Mazda's plan involved increasing sales in its domestic market of Japan by a third. Currently, the brand sells around 150,000 models annually in Japan, but it wants to boost that number to 200,000 units "as early as possible," reports Automotive News.
Using its experience of growing the brand in the United States, Mazda will grow domestic sales, too. This process will go beyond its range of cars, as Mazda will also optimize its sales network and relook at its marketing strategy.
"Considering various situations including the most recent tariffs, we think there is a pressing need to rebolster and accelerate our domestic business," said Tadashi Miura, Mazda president.
After the USA, Japan is Mazda's biggest market, but it only makes up approximately 10 percent of the brand's global sales. Five other Japanese brands all outsell Mazda domestically, these being Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Suzuki, and Daihatsu. It all means that there is room for Mazda to increase sales in Japan.
The 25% tariffs impact most of Mazda's US lineup, from the CX-5 to the CX-70 and CX-90, all popular crossovers. These models are produced in Japan, as is the MX-5 Miata sports car. An exception is the CX-50, which became the first Mazda to be produced at the Mazda Toyota Manufacturing USA plant in Huntsville, Alabama. Jointly owned by Mazda and Toyota, the plant also builds the subcompact Toyota Corolla Cross.
As Toyota's relationship with Mazda deepens, the possibility exists for more Mazda models to be produced at the Huntsville plant. However, this could take a lot of time, which is why it's wise for Mazda to look at multiple opportunities, including the drive to boost sales in Japan.
Last month, Mazda sales declined by over 6% in the USA compared to May 2024, indicating that the effect of tariffs are already being felt, just as the brand predicted. It remains to be seen how quickly and effectively Mazda can halt this trend, and that may come down to its initiative in Japan.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
London Tribunal Rules that Visa and Mastercard's (MA) Fees Violate Competition Law
Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA) are once again under legal fire as a London tribunal ruled that their default multilateral interchange fees—charges applied to retailers each time a customer uses one of their cards—violate European competition law. These fees, set by Visa and Mastercard rather than negotiated individually, have long been criticized by retailers for being excessive and non-transparent. The latest ruling comes from the Competition Appeal Tribunal in the U.K., which sided unanimously with hundreds of merchants who brought the case after a decade-long legal battle over these charges. Confident Investing Starts Here: The law firm Scott+Scott, which represents the claimants, called the ruling a major victory. David Scott, the firm's global managing partner, said that the decision was 'a significant win for all merchants who have been paying excessive interchange fees to Visa and Mastercard.' According to the firm, this is the first time a court has found that both commercial card fees and inter-regional (cross-border) multilateral interchange fees violate competition law. The ruling confirms that Visa and Mastercard's fees unlawfully restricted competition by setting default rates that retailers had little choice but to accept. Despite the setback, both Visa and Mastercard pushed back strongly against the ruling. A Visa spokesperson said that the company 'continues to believe that interchange is a critical component to maintaining a secure digital payments ecosystem that benefits all parties, including consumers, merchants and banks.' Mastercard also criticized the decision by calling it 'deeply flawed' and stating that it would seek permission to appeal. A second phase of the litigation is still underway, which will determine whether merchants passed on the cost of these interchange fees to consumers through higher prices. That upcoming trial could influence the amount of any potential damages. Which Payment Stock Is the Better Buy? Turning to Wall Street, out of the two stocks mentioned above, analysts think that Mastercard stock has more room to run than Visa. In fact, Mastercard's price target of $639.86 per share implies 16.1% upside versus Visa's 11.8%.


Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Resilient as U.S.-Canada Trade Talks End, Inflation Rises
Both the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) secured new intraday all-time highs on Friday, although some of the gains were erased after President Trump said that the U.S. had terminated its trade talks with Canada. Confident Investing Starts Here: Following Canada's decision to proceed with its digital services tax on U.S. technology companies, Trump announced a halt to all U.S.-Canada trade discussions. The tax charges a 3% fee on all U.S. tech revenue above C$20 million, or about $14.6 million, collected from Canadian users. 'We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period,' said Trump on Truth Social. Trump also said that the U.S. would no longer consider removing sanctions on Iran following a speech from Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Khamenei downplayed the damage of the U.S. strikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites and said that the country had delivered a 'slap to America's face.' Meanwhile, the core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) index, the Fed's preferred gauge of inflation, showed a monthly rise of 0.2% and a yearly rise of 2.7%. Economists were expecting growth of 0.1% and 2.6%, respectively. Furthermore, April's core PCE was revised upward to 2.6% from 2.5%. Core PCE excludes food and energy prices from the regular PCE index given their volatility. Shifting gears to more optimistic news, Trump is preparing executive orders to support AI development, according to Reuters. The orders could include green-lighting the construction of AI data centers on federal land and easier grid access for new energy projects, said sources close to the matter. What's more, consumer sentiment could be in the early stages of a recovery. The June Index of Consumer Sentiment rose by 16% month-over-month to 60.7, reversing six consecutive months of declines. Economists were expecting 60.5, with a higher figure representing a more positive economic outlook. At the same time, fears over tariff-driven inflation and economic uncertainty still persist. 'Despite June's gains, however, sentiment remains about 18% below December 2024, right after the election; consumer views are still broadly consistent with an economic slowdown and an increase in inflation to come,' said Survey of Consumers Director Joanne Hsu.


Politico
36 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump pushes Thune to crack down on wind and solar in megabill
President Donald Trump is urging Senate Majority Leader John Thune to crack down on tax credits for wind and solar energy as part of the GOP megabill, siding with House conservatives who want to phase out those credits more quickly, according to three people familiar with the negotiations. The late-stage effort has involved direct conversations between Trump and Thune over the past two days. The intervention from Trump centers around a technical provision that could determine whether hundreds of planned projects are able to qualify for the wind and solar incentives, according to the people granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the conversations. The president's involvement has emerged as a complicating factor as Republicans aim to start voting on the megabill as soon as Saturday. Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), a close Trump ally, confirmed that Trump is directly involved in the push to further temper the Inflation Reduction Act credits. 'I talked to POTUS about it this morning and he certainly wants the renewables out ASAP,' Cramer said Friday. The approach pushed by Trump would match restrictive language in the House-passed reconciliation bill, H.R. 1, that would determine eligibility for wind and solar investment and production tax credits based on when those projects enter into service. It's a departure from Senate Finance Committee language backed by moderates allowing projects to receive credits based on when they begin construction. It's unclear whether Thune plans to include the so-called 'placed in service' standard in the final bill text. Doing so would put moderate senators who have pushed a slower schedule for sunsetting those incentives in a major bind, forcing them to choose between rejecting Trump's agenda or allowing the gutting of tax credits that could lead to canceled projects, job losses and higher electricity prices in their states. Thune's office and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday. Trump's new push follows his Truth Social post last weekend declaring, 'I HATE 'GREEN TAX CREDITS' IN THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL.' Renewable energy industry officials and advocates argue that a 'placed in service' requirement is difficult for energy project developers because their timelines could be derailed by permitting delays, snags in connecting projects to the grid and other factors outside their control. Such a requirement would functionally end the credits for many planned projects, they say. Reverting to more restrictive placed in service language would likely see pushback from moderate senators such as Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who said Thursday that such a move would be 'disastrous in my state.' Another moderate who has pushed back on IRA rollbacks, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), declined to say Friday night whether he had heard about a decision on placed in service language, but called the Senate Finance Committee's approach 'a more rational way of doing it.' 'There are lawsuits, regulatory hurdles and other things that would make it virtually impossible to get [projects] in service' even if they are essentially complete and would otherwise qualify, Tillis said. Some Senate conservatives have backed the change, which they said will help keep Republicans' campaign promise to end the Inflation Reduction Act subsidies. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz said earlier this week 'there is a strong commitment to end the Green New Deal subsidies by the end of President Trump's term' — an objective, he said, 'that we're working hard to accomplish.' The effort has been supported by outside conservative voices in recent days, including Alex Epstein, a vocal opponent of wind and solar subsidies who has met with Senate Republicans in recent weeks. Epstein said Friday night that Trump is 'aware that the Senate had watered down in some significant way what the House did.' But he said moving to a placed in service standard is not a done deal and he is 'not letting up myself until I see a law with this in it.' Leading Trump officials like Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, who also chairs the National Energy Dominance Council, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright, have also repeatedly criticized wind and solar energy, arguing those intermittent resources are unreliable and overly reliant on tax subsidies. In a post to X Friday night, Burgum wrote that Trump 'promised to reverse the Biden administration's disastrous energy policies, and the One Big Beautiful Bill delivers on this promise by ending the Green New Scam and investing in reliable, affordable baseload power!'