logo
Online Safety laws could flood our site with fake news, claims Wikipedia

Online Safety laws could flood our site with fake news, claims Wikipedia

Telegraph08-05-2025

Wikipedia is launching a legal challenge against the Online Safety Act over fears that new requirements could allow false information to appear on its site.
The Wikimedia Foundation will challenge legislation that could define Wikipedia as a category one service under the Act.
Services in this category will be subject to the most stringent duties to protect users from harmful content online, which would require Wikipedia to carry out user verification – a filter that would damage the way volunteers and communities edit and review content on the site.
The foundation said the duties meant it would have to allow any user to block other unverified users from editing or removing content they post, upsetting the delicate hierarchy the site currently has in place.
The platform warned this change could mean malicious users could easily post harmful, false and misinformation content, and block Wikipedia's volunteer editors from then removing it.
The Wikimedia Foundation said in a blog post: 'Wikipedia is kept free of bad content because of the important work of thousands of members of the public, who can review and improve the content on the website to ensure it is neutral, fact-based and well-sourced.'
Sophisticated volunteer communities, working in more than 300 languages, collectively govern almost every aspect of day-to-day life on Wikipedia.
Their ability to set and enforce policies, and to review, improve or remove what other volunteers post, is central to Wikipedia's success, notably in resisting vandalism, abuse and misinformation.
The blog post said: 'For example, volunteer users worked day and night to ensure that Wikipedia presented neutral and reliable information about the Southport murders at the same time as misinformation and race-baiting spread unchecked on social media.
'However, if Wikipedia is designated as category one, the Wikimedia Foundation will need to verify the identity of Wikipedia users.
'That rule does not itself force every user to undergo verification – but under a linked rule, the foundation would also need to allow other (potentially malicious) users to block all unverified users from fixing or removing any content they post.
'This could mean significant amounts of vandalism, disinformation or abuse going unchecked on Wikipedia, unless volunteers of all ages, all over the world, undergo identity verification.'
'Overregulated'
The Online Safety Act is steadily coming into force this year, with social media and other platforms hosting user-generated content becoming subject to a range of duties that require them to protect users, and in particular children, from seeing harmful or illegal content.
Firms who breach the new rules face fines of up to £18 million or 10 per cent of global revenue – whichever is greater.
The Wikimedia Foundation said it did not oppose online safety regulation, or even the use of a categories system, but said it felt it would be 'overregulated' if designated as a category one service and felt compelled to act.
It added: 'Although the UK Government felt this category one duty (which is just one of many) would usefully support police powers 'to tackle criminal anonymous abuse' on social media, Wikipedia is not like social media.
'Wikipedia relies on empowered volunteer users working together to decide what appears on the website. This new duty would be exceptionally burdensome (especially for users with no easy access to digital ID).
'Worse still, it could expose users to data breaches, stalking, vexatious lawsuits or even imprisonment by authoritarian regimes. Privacy is central to how we keep users safe and empowered.
'Designed for social media, this is just one of several category one duties that could seriously harm Wikipedia.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Handbag burglars tunnel into shop in £250k heist
Handbag burglars tunnel into shop in £250k heist

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Handbag burglars tunnel into shop in £250k heist

About £250,000 in luxury handbags has been stolen from a store by thieves who gained access through a hole they created from the property next Police said the three suspects appeared to have access the shop via the chimney at St James House in New Road, Prestbury, Cheshire, at about 23:40 BST on are thought to have entered a disused building adjacent to the shop an hour before, and created a hole in the adjoining wall which led to the next door store through the chimney. Det Con Clare Slattery appealed for helping trying to track down those behind the burglary and "the whereabouts of the items that were stolen". The force said the offenders stole a number of high-value designer handbags, with a total estimated cost of around £260, Con Clare Slattery said: "Our enquiries are ongoing, and we would urge anyone who witnessed this incident or saw anything suspicious to get in touch with us."The same goes for anyone with dashcam footage or CCTV which might aid our investigation." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Surrey Police makes four arrests over two day Epsom Derby
Surrey Police makes four arrests over two day Epsom Derby

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Surrey Police makes four arrests over two day Epsom Derby

Police made four arrests over the two day Epsom Derby weekend in what the Surrey force said was its "largest pre-planned operation" Police said it worked closely with The Jockey Club to ensure the event at Epsom Downs on 6-7 June was carried out Supt Graham Barnett said "no two years are ever the same" when policing the high profile horse had been granted increased powers ahead of the event after Epsom council adopted a Public Space Protection Order (PSPO). 'Disruptive' for residents The PSPO was designed to give police the ability to tackle anti-social behaviour without the need to immediately resort to Surrey force said it used specialist resources such as planning, intelligence, drones, and public order, to "support the safe running" of the four arrests, which were made in and around the racecourse, included:a 45-year-old man from North Cheam arrested and cautioned for being drunk and disorderlya 63-year-old man arrested for the same thing and given an informal, out-of-court disposala 20-year-old man from Worcester Park arrested on suspicion of assault and released with no further actiona 24-year-old man from Redhill arrested on suspicion of assault and sexual assault by touching, who has since been bailed Ch Supt Barnett said: "Our teams worked tirelessly to prevent and respond to reports of crime and anti-social behaviour related to the Derby."We appreciate this event can be disruptive for Epsom residents and those travelling through the area."I'd like to thank the local community for their understanding and patience."The Derby, which has been described as the richest flat race in Britain, has come under pressure in recent years as the number of paying spectators fell from 48,000 in 2004 to 27,000 last year.

Canterbury GP's genital exams 'unnecessary', court hears
Canterbury GP's genital exams 'unnecessary', court hears

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Canterbury GP's genital exams 'unnecessary', court hears

A former GP conducted "unnecessary" genital examinations on nine male patients, including young teenagers, a court has Manson, 56, is alleged to have carried out the exams for complaints including coughs, headaches and knee accusers said they did not recall him wearing gloves, offering a chaperone or giving "proper explanations" for the examinations before they took at Canterbury Crown Court on Monday, Dr Manson, of Tower Way, Canterbury, denied 18 offences of sexual assault and six of indecent assault. The court heard that Dr Manson worked as a GP between 1994 and 2017, along with working as a GP trainer and programme director of GP training, and as a GP appraiser for the General Medical first complaint of sexual assault against him was filed to Canterbury Police in 2017, followed by an NHS England exercise which saw more alleged victims come a police interview, he said he had never touched a patient for improper or sexual purposes and said every examination was conducted for justified medical reasons, the court was Jennifer Knight KC told jurors Manson also failed to document in patients' notes any potential findings or the the fact such examinations had taken place at all. The first two alleged victims were brothers and both saw Manson before and after they were 16, the court said they were told to pull down their trousers and boxer shorts during a number of Knight said that the elder brother initially "assumed" this was necessary but had gradually become "uncomfortable".Their mother told investigators she never met Dr Manson when her sons were young teenagers as she would always stay in the waiting room, the court heard. Another alleged victim saw Dr Manson twice in 1999 when he was 35 and then 12 years later in 2011, each time with abdominal all three occasions, a genital examination was undertaken and, on both occasions in 1999, his underwear was removed without consent, the court Manson told police this had been necessary to check lymph nodes and femoral pulses in the victim's groin area. However, Ian Wall, a forensic medicine professor and GP, noted there would be no reason to do this, especially without trial continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store