Ukraine's troops dying over US aid cut-off, say soldiers on front line
Ukrainian soldiers are dying because of Donald Trump's decision to end military aid to Ukraine, front-line troops have told The Telegraph.
Soldiers revealed how they are feeling the pressure of dwindling American supplies and the looming summer months, when battles usually become more ferocious, and fear they have lost any remaining initiative.
But their view on the war has become even more pessimistic following President Trump's announcement on Wednesday that the US would cease to provide intelligence to Ukraine, and morale is dangerously low.
'We are not the ones advancing over the last few months,' said combat medic Slava, 27, speaking from a village on the border between Dnipropetrovsk and Donetsk regions.
'It's sad to say, but we don't have initiative on the battlefield any more.'
US support is a crucial component of Ukraine's ability to defend itself against Russian missiles and launch long-range strikes.
Intelligence from Washington, meanwhile, has proved vital not just for Ukraine's ability to attack deep-lying Russian positions or defend its own, but also in protecting civilians.
'I am going to say honestly how it is: everything is bad and it's going to be worse, but we need to keep working and pushing,' said Artem – not his real name – a 30-year-old medic who wished to remain anonymous for safety reasons.
Artem, who ferries injured soldiers to and from the front lines, said that he had noticed a '20 per cent' increase in casualties in recent weeks.
'I think that the number will rapidly grow even more,' he added. 'On top of this it is getting warmer. Better weather conditions means a higher intensity of fighting.'
The White House said on Wednesday that it would consider restoring military aid if President Zelensky returned to the negotiating table.
It was later reported that Mr Zelensky had agreed to further peace talks with the Trump administration after Washington ceased its sharing of battlefield intelligence.
But those serving on the front lines in Donetsk said even if the aid resumes, it could be too little, too late to hold off further Russian advances.
'The front line is not stable any more. It is not a line, but a zigzag, which makes it more difficult to defend,' said Slava.
'Drones are the main issue. It is impossible to drive to evacuation points often and impossible to stop driving to give a patient the full care they need.'
'I want the world to know that more people are dying because of it,' said Artem, referring to the dwindling US support.
Slava added that now is 'not the time' to suspend the sharing of intelligence, saying that the move was a 'gamble' with the fate of her country.
'It's not the time to appease the enemy. This step shows once again that the Republicans are for Russia.'
According to Artem, the intensity on the battlefield has become increasingly ferocious since the end of US aid.
'The workload is absolutely insane. I have been in touch with other medics and everyone is saying they are overwhelmed,' he said. 'We all have an empty look in our eyes because of everything.'
Aleksander, a 34-year-old soldier who has served on the front line for three years with no rotation, said morale was running low.
'Honestly, the morale situation is tough in the third year, but we are holding on. I did not go to fight for just anyone. I went for my family.'
On Wednesday, Mr Zelensky said he wants to see 'an end to the war once and for all' and agreed to return to the negotiation table.
But Artem said that any deal with Russia that does not acknowledge the damage inflicted on Ukraine by Moscow's armies would be a mockery of those who died defending their country.
'In that case I would wonder what it was all for,' he said. 'Freedom is not free.'
Those serving on the front lines vowed to The Telegraph that they would keep fighting until a deal is agreed that they believe is fair to their country.
'There is no other way for us. It's either we keep fighting, or we cease existing,' said Slava.
Aleksander said that although Ukraine's prospects look bleak, its soldiers have managed to pull through before.
'I want to say that as long as this war continues, we have a single chance to win – because we may never get another one,' he said.
'The Russians thought they would take Kyiv in three days, but they failed, and now this has been going on for three years. We need to get through this period.'
Slava expressed fears that Ukraine is now 'the country that stops the overflow of Russian influence' and wondered what a deal that favours Russia could mean for Europe.
'Once our defence is destroyed, the rest of Europe is next. Russia will never stop.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CartCon 2025: Tariffs, turbulence and the future of resilient retail
At second-annual CartCon conference in Napa Valley, CA, the tone was electric with anticipation but also laced with urgency. Billed as a summit for the company's expansive ecosystem of brands, vendors and strategists, the event served as both a product showcase and a pressure valve. Nowhere was that tension more visible than during one of the conference's hardest-hitting panels, a deep dive into the complexities of tariff policy and its ripple effects on global sourcing, consumer pricing and retail resilience. The panel consisted of three voices with rare insight into the collision of policy and commerce: Chris Smith, president of Summit Global Strategies; Tim Manning, former White House supply chain coordinator under President Joe Biden; and Nick Stachel, logistics strategy adviser at Izba Consulting. What followed was not a high-level overview, but a granular exploration of the legal, political and operational forces shaping how, and where, products are made, moved and sold. From globalization to geo-economics Smith opened the discussion by tracing the historical arc of U.S. trade policy. For decades following World War II, American trade strategy revolved around multilateralism. The U.S. saw global trade not just as an economic imperative but as a geopolitical tool, creating allies, raising standards of living and preventing conflict. But in 2016, that long-standing consensus fractured. The bipartisan abandonment of the Trans-Pacific Partnership signaled a sharp pivot. As Smith explained, the political center collapsed under the weight of the 'China Shock,' a term describing the decimation of American manufacturing towns due to offshoring. Smith described President Donald Trump's tariff policy as a psychological reset. Before Trump, U.S. tariffs averaged around 2%. Within months, they jumped to 18% in key categories. This wasn't just an economic strategy, it was anchoring. 'It's like burger sizes,' Smith said, relating back to Wendy's psychological marketing strategies. 'Before Trump, we had singles and doubles. Now the triple is on the menu, and everything else looks small by comparison.' Tariffs, he added, have become Trump's 'cat toy' — a provocative distraction wielded without consistent strategy. Even if future administrations soften tariff policy, Smith warned, the structure of global trade has already shifted. Retailers and manufacturers alike are building permanent workarounds. Inflation, particularly in consumer goods, is the slow-burning consequence. While Smith provided the philosophical backdrop, Manning broke down the legal tools underpinning today's tariff landscape. The real disruption, Manning emphasized, has come through the use, and misuse, of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Originally designed as a tool for national security sanctions, IEEPA has been repurposed by the Trump administration to enact sweeping tariffs with little congressional oversight. Manning described the legal and logistical chaos for businesses from these tactics. In just six weeks, the Trump administration issued 17 executive orders using IEEPA authority, stripping trade policy of its usual predictability and process. For businesses, this has been catastrophic. Sourcing strategies built over years have unraveled in days. 'We're in a volatile environment,' Manning said. The cost of doing business now includes factoring in the potential for abrupt, unexplained swings in tariff exposure. Long-term investments have become high-risk bets, and in many cases, they're simply not being made. On-the-ground retail strategy Bringing the policy talk down to the warehouse floor, Stachel outlined how brands are actually coping with this new reality. In the short term, some are fast-tracking inventory from China before new tariffs hit, relying on expedited ocean freight and cross-docking at West Coast ports to minimize delays and avoid customs bottlenecks. Others are making subtler moves — like holding prices steady on high-visibility products – say, a gaming console – while raising prices on accessories and add-ons to recoup margin. Stachel noted that many brands have moved beyond the now-familiar 'China Plus One' strategy, opting instead for a 'China Plus Three' approach. They are spreading risk across Vietnam, India and Mexico, often working with global manufacturing giants like Foxconn that can seamlessly shift production across borders without retooling or retraining labor. In essence, brands are outsourcing flexibility itself. For those planning beyond the current election cycle, geographic diversification is no longer enough. Brands are factoring in port access, transportation infrastructure, exposure to natural disasters and local workforce stability. Some are eyeing countries like Morocco, Colombia and Thailand as next-generation sourcing hubs. Nearshoring to Mexico has particular appeal, not just because of its proximity to U.S. consumers, but because of the downstream economic benefits. 'We're still benefiting from a cross border perspective, from a transportation trucking perspective, from a warehousing perspective, as these border towns are growing, the economies in the small border towns are growing as well,' said Stachel. These sourcing shifts are backed by hard data prepared by Stachel. According to a comparative analysis of emerging manufacturing markets, countries like Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines are increasingly viable alternatives to China, not only in terms of labor costs but also port infrastructure and U.S.-bound vessel frequency. Vietnam, for instance, operates nearly 50 seaports, including Ho Chi Minh City and Hai Phong, both of which have multiple sailings to the U.S. each week. Indonesia boasts over 100 ports, including Tanjung Priok in Jakarta. Even Cambodia, though limited in scale, has weekly direct sailings from both Phnom Penh and Sihanoukville. These figures underscore the importance of transportation fluidity and market access in sourcing decisions. As Stachel emphasized, brands are no longer optimizing solely for cost, they're optimizing for resilience. Both Smith and Manning cautioned that the real reckoning may be ahead. While tariff impacts are already being priced in at the retail level, the broader inflationary wave has yet to crest. Smith called inflation the 'other shoe,' likely to drop later this summer as new tariffs pass through the supply chain and collide with already fragile consumer sentiment. Uncertainty, they agreed, has become the greatest tax of all. With businesses unable to predict future policy, many are frozen. Manning advised attendees to monitor key macroeconomic signals, including treasury bond activity, consumer confidence indices and safety stock drawdowns. Executive orders posted on he added, are the best early indicators of a sudden policy shift. What retailers are saying – and doing The audience at CartCon also offered candid perspectives. Through real-time polling, attendees offered a rare window into how brands are navigating the chaos. Asked what recent policy had most affected their supply chains, 68% cited China tariffs, with an additional 24% naming de minimis enforcement, or stricter checks on duty-free, low-value imports. In a sign of just how volatile the environment has become, 64% said they revisit their sourcing strategies quarterly. And nearly half, 47%, have responded by raising prices. Twenty-nine percent have changed sourcing countries, while 18% are simply eating the cost. Looking ahead, most brands aren't betting on reshoring. Asked if they expect to source more from the U.S. in five years, 70% said their sourcing would remain about the same, and 30% expected an increase. No one expected to source less. It was a striking rebuke of the idea that domestic manufacturing is due for a renaissance, at least for the retail segment. Tariffs and uncertainty are already impacting consumer demand. Thirty percent of respondents said they expect a consumer slowdown by Q4 2025, while 45% said they're already feeling one. And yet, the vast majority, 82%, said they are not cutting marketing budgets in response. In today's environment, visibility is survival. In a forward-looking poll, 81% of respondents said online shopping will be the dominant channel in the next decade, compared to just 6% for stores. Even more striking, 75% believe direct-to-consumer models can still succeed, suggesting that agility, not abandonment, is the key to survival. The post CartCon 2025: Tariffs, turbulence and the future of resilient retail appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia fines Apple for violating 'LGBT propaganda' law, TASS reports
MOSCOW (Reuters) -A Russian court on Tuesday fined U.S. tech giant Apple six million roubles ($76,510) for violating Russian rules on what Moscow calls "LGBT propaganda," the state TASS news agency reported. Russia in 2023 widened existing restrictions on the promotion of "non-traditional sexual relations" amid a broader crackdown on LGBT rights, part of President Vladimir Putin's push to uphold what he calls traditional values. Apple was fined three million roubles in two civil cases on Tuesday, TASS reported. Apple was last month fined a total of 7.5 million roubles for the same offence. Apple did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. ($1 = 78.4205 roubles)
CNBC
21 minutes ago
- CNBC
Why Elon Musk turned against Trump's $5 trillion mega tax and spending bill
President Donald Trump is pushing to pass a sweeping tax and spending bill by July 4, but the proposal is already sparking fierce internal GOP debate. The bill combines 2017 tax cut extensions with new Trump-era proposals, including deductions on American-made auto loans and changes to child tax credits. But not everyone is on board. Elon Musk has launched a high-profile feud with Trump over the bill, and key Republican senators are warning that the bill could add trillions to the national debt.
