logo
Ciklum to double workforce in India with new offices in Chennai, Pune

Ciklum to double workforce in India with new offices in Chennai, Pune

CHENNAI: Experience engineering company Ciklum said on Tuesday it will double its engineering workforce in India and open two new offices, as part of a broader push to expand its global operations.
The company plans to open a 15,000 square foot facility in Chennai and a 25,000 square foot site in Pune, aiming to scale its presence in India, which it described as a key hub for digital talent.
'We're making a significant investment in India—doubling our engineering talent and expanding across Chennai, Pune, and other tech hub, ' the company's chief executive officer Raj Radhakrishnan told reporters.
Ciklum, which employs more than 4,000 people globally, reported annual revenues of over $225 million. The Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) region contributes about 80% of its revenue, while the United States accounts for 20%. Radhakrishnan said it expects US revenue to double as part of its strategic growth plans. Ciklum partners with firms including Microsoft, Nvidia, and Amazon Web Services, offering AI-led solutions to clients in banking, retail, technology, and healthcare sectors.
The company said it is expanding its AI capabilities to deliver faster, more personalized services, and has launched an innovation lab in partnership with SRM Easwari Engineering College in Chennai. The initiative, called Lumina, will focus on research in artificial intelligence and edge computing.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rajrishi Singhal: What markets demand needn't be what society wants
Rajrishi Singhal: What markets demand needn't be what society wants

Mint

time6 hours ago

  • Mint

Rajrishi Singhal: What markets demand needn't be what society wants

Apple's highly anticipated developer conference this year has not only disappointed reviewers and equity markets, but also raised many disturbing questions. One, it has raised anxieties over the future viability of the iPhone manufacturer. More importantly, it highlights the divergence between what is good for society versus what is good for the stock market, belying the benign and popular perception of the role that equity markets play in society. Apple's developer conferences, called WWDC25 this year, are usually a marquee event in the tech world, providing independent developers and tech analysts an inkling of the company's progress with hardware and software. At WWDC25 on 9 June, Apple executives were able to share only a limited future path for the company, especially on its progress with artificial intelligence (AI). Apple's senior executives told the gathering that the promise made last year about upgrading Apple Intelligence, with voice assistant Siri as its centrepiece, would take some more time to accomplish. Also Read: China plus one: Apple and India might need to woo not just Trump but Xi too This left many analysts and developers cold. Even the stock market expressed its displeasure: Apple's common stock has tanked almost 25% from its 52-week high. The market's disapproval, interestingly, is not limited to Apple's slow progress in integrating AI, but also centres around the company's data privacy policies. The market's unhappiness seems to stem from the company's reluctance to use a customer's individual usage data or information as an input for training personalized AI models. Apple instead prefers to use insights based on aggregate consumer preferences, unlike competitors like Microsoft and Google. It would then appear that the market is rewarding companies that will profit from scraping individual data, rather than businesses which have red lines on using personal data. Also Read: Apple's Hotel California trap: It can check out but not leave China The market's simple logic is that companies using personal data for their AI engines can unlock new revenue sources by offering consumers hyper-personalized offerings. Plus, there is the subscription angle. For example, individual subscription rates for Microsoft's Copilot Pro are expected to be around $20 every month, its key selling point being its ability to unlock AI features in all Microsoft 365 products, such as Word or PowerPoint, allowing customers to generate drafts, summarize content or analyse data at a faster rate. Google AI Pro will also be available to customers at the same rate, but a turbo-charged version called Google AI Ultra will be available for $250 per month. When this columnist asked Google's Gemini how Apple's future AI plans can make money for the company, one part of the AI engine's reply stood out: 'Apple's strong stance on privacy ('intelligence without surveillance') is a powerful differentiator in an era of increasing data concerns. This can foster greater trust and loyalty among its user base, leading to continued purchases of Apple products and services over competitors. While not a direct revenue stream, it's a critical factor in sustaining its high-margin business model." Also Read: Dave Lee: Apple must make peace with developers for AI success Yet, the stock market did not seem impressed. Clearly, for market operators, short-term corporate profits have greater primacy over privacy concerns. Even if we were to disregard the normative issues of morality or ethics for a moment, the stock market's responses are visibly out of sync with society's needs or concerns. There is a reason for this: the stock market is focused on the limited constituency it serves. Its behaviour aligns almost perfectly with the objectives set out by institutional investors or companies looking to raise money. In the not-too-distant past, the market was bestowing the Apple stock with a premium too because the company had plugs and ports that differed from other manufacturers, guaranteeing the company exclusive, high-margin revenues, even if that meant consumer discomfort or the exercise of near-monopolistic power. Also Read: Big Tech in the dock: The EU could force Meta and Apple to change their coercive ways The statement that the market's singular focus on corporate bottom-lines and their impact on share prices does not necessarily align with what could be good for broader society might seem like belabouring a truism; but the need to reiterate this has arisen in the face of a growing tendency to conflate a stock market's signals with the desires or ambitions of society on the whole. One good example of the market-versus-society divergence is the premium that US equity markets placed on companies setting up manufacturing bases in China. This was happening at a time when the US political class and civil society were bemoaning the absence of democracy and human rights in the North Asian country, even while hoping that closer integration with the global economy would discipline its regime. Reality has turned out otherwise, but stock markets continued to glorify companies that moved production to China. Also Read: Apple's UK run-in: Privacy may matter less to its customers than it thinks The linking of stock market performance with broader social well-being in India found fresh oxygen during the covid pandemic when benchmark indices, after initially dipping sharply, spiked with help from technology and pharma stocks. This was used by many politicians as well as Indian fund managers aligned with the ruling party's political ideology to indicate the economy's recovery and society's triumph over the virus. Planners and policymakers must realize that a healthy society's needs, desires and ambitions extend far beyond quarterly earnings and the oscillation of benchmark indices. The author is a senior journalist and author of 'Slip, Stitch and Stumble: The Untold Story of India's Financial Sector Reforms' @rajrishisinghal

Build A Portfolio Without A Full-Time Job To Attract Opportunities
Build A Portfolio Without A Full-Time Job To Attract Opportunities

NDTV

time6 hours ago

  • NDTV

Build A Portfolio Without A Full-Time Job To Attract Opportunities

Build Portfolio: Students aiming to land their first job can create an impressive portfolio by showcasing more than just work experience. Even without a full-time job, you can build a strong and appealing portfolio by consistently working on your skills and updating your work. Here's how you can craft a portfolio without holding a full-time position and attract opportunities. 1. Start With Personal Projects Work on personal projects related to your skill field and pick projects that could completely showcase your skills and be helpful in real world situations also. Share a detailed pdf on how your approached the problem and solved it. 2. Volunteer or Collaborate Offer your knowledge and skills to NGOs, college clubs, small businesses, or even friends. These unpaid collaborations still count as real work and can really help you strengthen your portfolio. For example, you can help a local cafe or a small food cart with their social media posts or offer to redesign your college fest website. 3. Take Part in Online Challenges or Hackathons Hackathons are recognized and conducted by various top companies like META and Microsoft. Securing the top spot or being in the top 10 performers in any hackathon helps recognize your skills around the world. You can showcase the hackathon challenge link in your portfolio. 4. Learn And Share Students can share their learning on online platforms like LinkedIn and Youtube. It helps you to improve with your skills and shows that you are passionate and continuously growing in the field. For example, writers can start a blog and developers can upload their projects on Github. 5. Include Case Studies For each project, briefly explain: The problem Your approach Tools/skills used Final result/outcome Building a strong and attractive portfolio takes time and commitment. Make sure you continue learning, upskilling, and regularly updating your portfolio with fresh work to stay relevant and job-ready.

AI and future of jobs: Here's what top tech CEOs Sam Altman, Jensen Huang are saying
AI and future of jobs: Here's what top tech CEOs Sam Altman, Jensen Huang are saying

Indian Express

time8 hours ago

  • Indian Express

AI and future of jobs: Here's what top tech CEOs Sam Altman, Jensen Huang are saying

As more companies adopt artificial intelligence and automate jobs, fears about AI's impact on low-level tasks and entry-level roles have sparked a heated debate about the future of white-collar jobs—especially among those just entering the workforce. Despite widespread fears that artificial intelligence could automate jobs and reduce employee wages, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang believes that while jobs are undoubtedly evolving in the AI era, entry-level white-collar roles won't be entirely wiped out. Huang leads Nvidia, now the world's most valuable technology company. 'Some jobs will be obsolete, but many jobs are going to be created… Whenever companies are more productive, they hire more people,' Huang said at the VivaTech conference in Paris last week. His comments were in response to recent claims by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who warned that up to 50% of all entry-level white-collar jobs could be eliminated by AI, potentially pushing unemployment to 20% within the next five years. 'One, he believes that AI is so scary that only they [Anthropic] should do it. Two, that AI is so expensive, nobody else should do it… and three, AI is so incredibly powerful that everyone will lose their jobs, which explains why they should be the only company building it,' Huang said. 'I think AI is a very important technology; we should build it and advance it safely and responsibly. If you want things to be done safely and responsibly, you do it in the open… Don't do it in a dark room and tell me it's safe.' While Huang believes that AI will open more career opportunities in the future, OpenAI's Sam Altman have a different view on how artificial intelligence may impact the job market. According to Altman, whose company makes the most advanced LLM, expects there could be 'whole classes of jobs going away' as AI develops. 'The rate of technological progress will keep accelerating, and it will continue to be the case that people are capable of adapting to almost anything,' he said in a blog post last week. 'There will be very hard parts like whole classes of jobs going away, but on the other hand, the world will be getting so much richer so quickly that we'll be able to seriously entertain new policy ideas we never could before. We probably won't adopt a new social contract all at once, but when we look back in a few decades, the gradual changes will have amounted to something big.' According to Altman, while the job landscape may change in the coming years, there will also be new opportunities created by superintelligence: '…maybe we will go from solving high-energy physics one year to beginning space colonization the next; or from a major materials science breakthrough one year to true high-bandwidth brain-computer interfaces the next.' Huang and Altman aren't the only tech CEOs with strong views on AI and jobs—Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu also has clear thoughts on how AI could impact employment. According to Vembu, if artificial intelligence disrupts the job market, there are two possible outcomes: the prices of automated goods and services could drop significantly, or the remaining human-centered professions may see a substantial increase in pay. 'On the subject of AI and jobs: Hypothetically, if all software development were to be automated—I want to emphasize that we are nowhere close to that goal—and all software engineers like myself were out of work, it's not as if human beings would have nothing to do.' Vembu also pointed out the broader economic challenge: 'How do people afford all the goods that pour out of automated factories that employ no workers?' Meanwhile, LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman believes that what young people learn in college isn't the most important factor when it comes to getting a job. According to Hoffman, the ability to apply AI tools and leverage connections is far more essential to landing a job. ''It isn't specific degrees, specific courses, [or] even necessarily specific skills that are relevant to you,'' he said in a recent video on his YouTube channel. 'It's your capacity to say, 'Hey, here is the new tool set, here's the new challenge.' That is actually what the future work's going to look like. One thing is to not focus on the degree, but to focus on how you learn and to be continually learning,' Hoffman said. ''The other part of college that's super important, that you should not forget, is that life is a team sport, not just an individual sport,' he continued. 'You can help each other.' In recent months, more and more tech CEOs have weighed in on the rise of AI and its impact on the job market. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt has urged workers to embrace AI to stay competitive. 'If you're an artist, a teacher, a physician, a businessperson, a technical person—if you're not using this technology, you're not going to be relevant compared to your peer groups, your competitors, and the people who want to be successful,' Schmidt said at TED 2025 in May. 'Adopt it, and adopt it fast,' he warned. Others have downplayed the likelihood of widespread job losses due to AI. Among them is Google CEO Sundar Pichai, who described AI as an 'accelerator' for productivity and new jobs—while still acknowledging the importance of Dario Amodei's concerns and the need for an industry-wide debate. Demis Hassabis, head of Google DeepMind, has expressed less concern about labor impacts, focusing instead on the broader risks of AI. Meanwhile, Bill Gates has argued that AI will lead to a proliferation of much-needed expertise across industries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store