
Bending, breaking, yielding
Presented by The American Council of Life Insurers
With help from Eli Okun, Garrett Ross and Bethany Irvine
Good Sunday afternoon. Happy Mother's Day. It's Adam Wren. Get in touch.
DRIVING THE DAY
President Donald Trump campaigned as a leader who would 'never give in,' 'never give up,' 'never back down,' not to mention one who promised to 'NEVER QUIT,' 'NEVER BEND,' 'NEVER BREAK,' and 'NEVER YIELD.'
And yet in recent days, Trump and his administration officials have done nearly all of those things on any number of issues, foreign and domestic.
Abroad, amid a historic conflagration between India and Pakistan, Vice President JD Vance said on Fox News just days ago the conflict was 'fundamentally none of our business.' Yet less than 24 hours later, Vance and Secretary of State (and national security adviser) Marco Rubio found themselves enmeshed in the kind of American interventionism of which MAGA has expressed skepticism and even disdain. Call it a bend — one that took place, of course, amid a nuclear threat.
'What drove Mr. Vance and Mr. Rubio into action was evidence that the Pakistani and Indian Air Forces had begun to engage in serious dogfights, and that Pakistan had sent 300 to 400 drones into Indian territory to probe its air defenses,' the NYT's David Sanger, Julian Barnes and Maggie Haberman write. 'But the most significant causes for concern came late Friday, when explosions hit the Nur Khan air base in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, the garrison city adjacent to Islamabad.'
Across the globe, Trump is now frustrated with his own efforts at ending the Russia-Ukraine war, something he promised to do 'on day one,' though he now says he was joking, as WSJ's Josh Dawsey and Alex Ward write.
Yielding: Closer to home, in his Oval Office meeting on Tuesday with Canada's new Prime Minister Mark Carney, who said in response to Trump's effort to make the nation the 51st state that, 'As you know from real estate, there are some places that are never for sale.' Trump yielded, saying 'that's true.'
Backing down: The same day, Trump withdrew the nomination of Ed Martin, a longtime champion of accused Jan. 6 rioters, to be the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. He backed down.
Bending: On Friday, Trump again all but backed down on his ''TINY' tax increase for the RICH,' conceding that 'Republicans should probably not do it, but I'm OK if they do!!!' Certainly a bend, if not a break.
Now … Trump faces a question of whether to bend, break or yield on one of his signature campaign promises: No taxes on tips. The early version of the tax bill released by House Republicans on Friday — and due for a committee vote on Tuesday — did not include the proposal at all. (More on that below.)
WHAT ELSE IS ON THE HORIZON …
Expect to hear a whole lot about this: ABC's Jonathan Karl and Katherine Faulders have the buzziest article of the morning: President Trump is poised to accept a Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet from the royal family of Qatar as a kind of Air Force One in what looks to be the most valuable foreign gift to the U.S. ever. It will be available for use by President Trump 'until shortly before he leaves office, at which time ownership of the plane will be transferred to the Trump presidential library foundation,' ABC reports.
Is that legal? The 'White House counsel's office and the Department of Justice drafted an analysis for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth concluding that is legal for the Department of Defense to accept the aircraft as a gift and later turn it over to the Trump library,' per ABC. The gift is expected to be announced in the coming week, as Trump visits the Middle East. Speaking of …
Trip preview: Tomorrow, the president embarks on a four-day trip, with stops in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. But don't expect it to be heavy on geopolitics, write WaPo's Michael Birnbaum and Matt Viser: Trump's focus is on business deals.
SUNDAY BEST …
— Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, on air safety and America's air traffic control system, on NBC's 'Meet the Press': 'The lights are blinking, the sirens are turning … because what you see in Newark is gonna happen in other places across the country.'
— Ukrainian Ambassador Oksana Markarova on Trump's Truth Social post that it's a 'potentially great day' for Russia and Ukraine, on ABC's 'This Week': 'Any day potentially could be a great day. And we have heard loud and clear from President Trump that ceasefires should be full and unconditional. ... Nobody wants peace more than Ukraine. The question of the day is whether Russia wants it, because today, 108 Shahed drones again hit residential areas in Kyiv Oblast.'
… On Trump and Zelenskyy's relationship: 'We will focus on the future. And sometimes friends can disagree. But that's [a] disagreement among friends. We all have the same goals of sovereign and prosperous Ukraine, as we have heard from our leadership and your leadership.'
— Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) on a potential ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, on NBC's 'Meet the Press': 'The killing needs to stop. And I think the 30-day ceasefire is something that Putin needs to accept. Look, a longstanding peace in that part of the world between Ukraine and Russia … is going to be good for Ukraine, Russia, Europe, and the United States. And we wouldn't be in this position if we'd had a strong leader previously.'
— Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) on whether she'd run for president again, on NBC's 'Meet the Press': 'I am focused on my job right now. I'm third in leadership in the Senate, and we have a lot to do, and that means making sure people have got their Medicaid, their Social Security and taking on these Trump tariffs that are hurting the American people and our economy and not helping small businesses. I want a better America, and I just don't think that's how we're going to get there with this president.'
TOP-EDS: A roundup of the week's must-read opinion pieces.
9 THINGS FOR YOUR RADAR
1. THE TRADE WAR: The second day of talks between top Chinese and U.S. officials is underway in Geneva, where Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are meeting with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in an effort to decrease tensions between the two economic powers.
The readout from Day One: Yesterday, the group met for around eight hours. Neither side commented on 'the substance of the discussions nor signalled any specific progress towards reducing steep trade barriers,' as Reuters reports. But President Trump took to Truth Social to declare that a 'total reset' of the U.S.-China relationship had been negotiated 'in a friendly, but constructive, manner.' He did not offer specifics.
What Trump is thinking: 'Trump has opened the door for lower tariffs. He said in recent days that they couldn't get much higher than the current 145%, so that it was likely they would eventually come down,' writes WSJ's Brian Schwartz. 'And Friday, he suggested lowering tariffs to 80%. … Some administration officials viewed Trump's 80% idea as a public message to encourage Bessent to try to get closer to completing an arrangement that would lower China's tariff rate to around 80%.'
Are Trump's tariffs making money? That's the big question behind a useful new interactive project from POLITICO. As of May 8, the U.S. has generated $46.6 billion this year from tariffs, according to Treasury Department data. That's 46.3% more than the same time last year, but massively short of the amount of money that would be needed to replace the revenue generated by income taxes ($2.4 trillion in 2024), as Trump administration officials argue is possible.
2. RUSSIA-UKRAINE LATEST: Yesterday, 'Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed restarting direct talks with Ukraine in Istanbul on May 15, 'without preconditions,'' report AP's Samya Kullab and Joanna Kozlowska. This morning, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy 'responded cautiously,' NYT's Andrew Kramer reports: He called the interest in talks a 'positive sign,' but insists on an immediate ceasefire as a precondition.
Why now? 'The back and forth … came after the leaders of France, Britain, Germany and Poland visited Kyiv and announced a Monday deadline for Russia to accept a 30-day cease-fire or face additional sanctions,' per the Times. 'The European leaders, who spoke by phone from Kyiv on Saturday with President Trump, said that the United States would also impose sanctions on Russia if Mr. Putin did not agree to a truce.'
Related read: 'Russia and North Korea Turn Their War Alliance Into a Propaganda Tool,' by WSJ's Dasl Yoon and Jane Lytvynenko
3. PLAN OF A TAX: House Republicans are likely to release the final details of their tax bill tomorrow afternoon ahead of a Tuesday debate and vote by the Ways and Means Committee. But based on the partial text — the so-called 'skinny' version of the bill — released on Friday evening, we're getting a good sense of some of the potential political upsides and downsides.
The political upsides: 'The first public version of Republicans' long-awaited tax bill aims to put more money in Americans' pockets quickly in early 2026,' WSJ's Richard Rubin writes. It would up the standard deduction for individuals (currently $15,000) by $1,000, and for married couples ($30,000) by $2,000. The maximum child tax credit would increase to $2,500 from $2,000.
The timing: 'Those changes would mean that many taxpayers who don't change their withholding would see larger-than-expected refunds in spring 2026,' which is obviously convenient timing ahead of the midterm elections.
The political downside: This plan would 'cost nearly $5 trillion, according to a new estimate from Congress's nonpartisan tax scorekeeper,' as POLITICO's Benjamin Guggenheim reports. That price tag 'far exceeds what is permitted by the budget resolution Republicans adopted earlier this year,' which allows for up to $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, contingent on $2 trillion in accompanying spending offsets.
Seem like important omissions: This version of the tax bill does not include Trump's promise to eliminate taxes on tips … nor the higher 'state and local tax deduction prized by blue state Republicans in swing districts' … nor does it make any 'mention of the expensive business provisions that Republicans want to restore.'
4. 2028 WATCH: Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) headlined a town hall in Pennsylvania's Bucks County yesterday, a move that has prompted speculation that he could be interested in a future presidential bid. But the headlines that emerged from his swing through the swing state were less about his own political future than the present-day challenges of the Democratic Party …
The Fetterman angle: 'Gallego said Republicans are trying to pull John Fetterman to the right and argued Democrats should keep the Pennsylvania senator in their corner as he faces mounting questions over his health and shifting political persona,' POLITICO's Holly Otterbein reports. ''There needs to be space for Fetterman and for other senators in our caucus,' he said in an interview Saturday. 'He still is a senator that fights for working-class people. We may not be 100 percent in agreement a lot of times in a lot of areas, but we don't have to be.''
The party's problems: 'What happened [in] the last election is that we got so pure, and we kept so pure that we started kicking people out of the tent,' Gallego said, per CBS News' Anne Bryson. 'It ends up there aren't enough people in the tent to win elections. … We did this to ourselves.'
As for his own future: 'Gallego said he's focused on his first term as a senator and being a good father as his wife is pregnant with a boy due next month,' WaPo's Sabrina Rodriguez writes. 'But he acknowledged he has not ruled out running for president and has fielded calls from some influential Democrats asking him to consider it. 'Babies get older,' Gallego said.'
5. IN A BOX TO THE LEFT: Some Democrats are desperately pushing to move on from former President Joe Biden after their devastating 2024 election losses, but as the party works to rebrand, Biden's public emergence remains 'an unavoidable subject' for many, POLITICO's Brakkton Booker reports: 'The former president's allies are bracing for the potential release of audio of Biden's interview with Robert Hur … That's in addition to an upcoming book by two high-profile journalists that promises to shed light on Biden's decision to run for reelection … For many Democrats, both events are dredging up past problems — not just around Biden's age, but also inflation and the party's handling of cultural issues.'
Tell me how you really feel: 'It's time for Joe Biden to go away with all due respect and let the next generation of Democrats take the mantle,' says Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha. 'Every time he appears on a show or says something, it's just another week or a month that we have to defend him and remind everybody that we got beat by Donald Trump, again.' Adds Andrew Heaton, a Georgia-based Democratic strategist: 'The last thing we want is anything that's going to feed it to the naysayers who are going to point to see: 'once again, it was a big cover up in the party.'
6. SPEAKING UP: Rümeysa Öztürk made her first public comments yesterday after her release on Friday from federal custody. In a news conference at Boston's Logan airport, the Turkish grad student at Tufts — whose authorship of an op-ed critical of the university's response to the war in Gaza led to the Trump administration detaining her and revoking her visa — struck a hopeful tone, GBH News' Sarah Betancourt reports. 'America is the greatest democracy in the world, and I believe in those values that we share. I have faith in the American system of justice,' said Öztürk.
What's next: 'Even with her release, Öztürk's immigration removal case will continue, as will the habeas case disputing her arrest,' Betancourt writes.
First in Playbook — Elsewhere in the free speech fight: In a letter first shared with Playbook this morning, more than 300 nonprofits are joining together to push back on the attacks on Harvard University's tax-exempt status.
'No president, whether this one or a future one, should have the power to punish private nonprofit organizations because he disagrees with them, the signatories, which include the likes of American Oversight, PEN America and . 'If just one president weaponizes the government and abuses this power, no American's political views will be protected from government retribution from that moment forward. Just as Americans must be free to attend places of worship and to vote, they must also be free to express their views.' Read the full letter
7. AN OPENING FOR DEMS: 'Trump Is Reaching Into Parents' Lives. Can Democrats Capitalize?' by NYT's Katie Glueck: 'The prices of strollers and car seats are skyrocketing as companies race to adjust to President Trump's tariff policies. Federal support for a major campaign to promote safe infant sleep habits appears to have been cut. Measles outbreaks are terrifying parents of young children, even as the nation's health secretary undermines vaccines. The Trump administration's policies are reaching ever deeper into the lives of American families, transforming routine and apolitical parts of some parents' days — trips to the pediatrician, conversations at swim classes, chatter on online baby gear forums — into scenes of anxiety and anger. For a Democratic Party still searching for its strongest message amid the upheavals of the second Trump term, the politics of parenting offer a telling test case: Can Democrats persuade voters that this White House is making their lives harder?'
8. MUSK READ: 'Elon Musk's regulatory troubles have begun to melt away in Trump's second term,' by NBC News' David Ingram: 'In the past few months, Trump's Justice Department has dropped a case against Musk's rocket company, SpaceX, and his Labor Department has canceled a planned civil rights review of his automaker, Tesla. … And in more than 40 other federal agency matters, regulators have taken no public action on their investigations for several months or more — raising questions about whether those cases may have become dormant.'
9. WHAT EMBASSY ROW IS READING: 'To Dominate the Arctic, Trump Needs Ice-Breaking Ships. Finland Wants to Help,' by WSJ's Daniel Michaels: 'Icebreakers are purpose-built, which drives up costs. Only a few are produced worldwide annually, and they can last half a century. … Finland learned to make icebreakers out of necessity because much of its trade with the West is via the Baltic Sea — one of the world's busiest waterways but the only crowded one that routinely ices up.'
TALK OF THE TOWN
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser is the latest political leader to see their popularity rebound dramatically in the Trump 2.0 era, according to a new Washington Post-Schar School poll.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY: Former Sen. Laphonza Butler (D-Calif.) … Resident Commissioner Pablo Hernández Rivera (D-Puerto Rico) … Justin Vail … Karen Skelton … David Castagnetti … Sarah Schmidt … Bethany Little … Angie Alfonso-Royals … José Cunningham … Matt VanHyfte of the House Energy and Commerce GOP … GMMB's Danny Jester … Logan Gibson of Booz Allen Hamilton … Patrick Kane of MPA … Microsoft's Fred Humphries … retired Gen. John Kelly … former Reps. Harold Ford Jr. (D-Tenn.) and David Young (R-Iowa) … Alex Dease … Michael Pregent … POLITICO's Allison Davis, Haley Siddall and Parker Collins … State Department's Chris Landberg … Alden Schacher … Altana's Daniel Nasaw … Andrew Binns … Alex Wagner … George Hadijski … Cami Connor … Jo Ling Kent … Time's Olivia Waxman … DAGA's Emily Trifone … Austin Stevens of Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin's office … Bloomberg's Tonya Riley … Brian Walsh of UnitedHealth Group … Julie Trute of Liberty Mutual … Chris Gustafson … Austin Cantrell … Ian Gray … Alex Lange of Trident GMG
Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.
Send Playbookers tips to playbook@politico.com or text us on Signal here. Playbook couldn't happen without our editor Zack Stanton and Playbook Daily Briefing producer Callan Tansill-Suddath.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump supporters, this is what you're cheering as his deportation scheme unfolds
For the past several days, Los Angeles has been alive with protests over President Donald Trump's immigration agenda. These largely peaceful demonstrations are vital to democracy. They're also infuriating Trump and Republicans. They've upset the president so much, in fact, that he deployed the National Guard and 700 U.S. Marines to the city against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. On the campaign trail for reelection, Trump threatened the 'largest deportation operation in American history.' Whether he's actually achieving that doesn't really matter; the terror he's instilling in immigrant communities is unlike anything I've seen in my lifetime. In the wake of these protests, it is important to remember why people are upset in the first place. Protesters are angry that Immigration and Customs Enforcement is indiscriminately targeting people, and these people, who are being arrested and deported, have no access to due process. They are angry, and they are allowed to voice their frustrations. While nearly half the country voted for this terrifying regime, half the country wanted anything but this. It's deeper than what's happening in Los Angeles. It's what this administration is doing all over the country. For those who still support Trump's plan, here is what you are supporting. What's particularly alarming about what's happening in Los Angeles is that it flies in the face of the Republican fight for states' rights. Apparently, it's fine when abortion is left to the states, but protests must be managed by the federal government. In fact, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once called out former President Joe Biden for even thinking about federalizing the National Guard in Texas in 2024. Now, she's cheering on Trump's actions in California. The cognitive dissonance is astounding. Opinion: Trump is so busy wasting $134 million on LA invasion he forgot to lower prices I am glad people are protesting Trump's horrific immigration policies. I am glad folks are standing up for their neighbors, because whether you like it or not, undocumented people are contributing members of your community. But the truth is that if you're excited about the federal government invading California, then you stopped caring about states' rights. Since Trump was inaugurated for his second term, ICE has arrested more than 100,000 undocumented migrants. The vast majority of the people being detained in ICE facilities have no criminal convictions. People reporting for their immigration hearings – as they have been instructed to do by the U.S. government – have been arrested. So were people at a Los Angeles Home Depot looking for work. To Trump and the people within his administration, every undocumented immigrant is a criminal. It's not just undocumented immigrants who are being taken in. Take Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a legal U.S. resident who was wrongly deported to a maximum security prison in El Salvador and only recently returned to the United States to face federal criminal charges. There are also student protesters, like Mahmoud Khalil, who have been detained by immigration officials because they dared to speak out against what's happening in Gaza. Republicans are now afraid of words. Opinion: After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment – only MAGA can protest These arrests have become too much for a select few Trump supporters who still have a conscience. Florida Sen. Ileana Garcia, one of the founders of 'Latinas for Trump,' recently called out the inhumane actions of Trump and White House adviser Stephen Miller. 'This is not what we voted for,' Garcia wrote. 'I have always supported Trump, @realDonaldTrump, through thick and thin. However, this is unacceptable and inhumane. I understand the importance of deporting criminal aliens, but what we are witnessing are arbitrary measures to hunt down people who are complying with their immigration hearings ‒ in many cases, with credible fear of persecution claims ‒ all driven by a Miller-like desire to satisfy a self-fabricated deportation goal.' Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. I hate to break it to Garcia, but this is exactly what she and others voted for. This is what America's 'largest deportation operation' was always going to look like – it was never going to just be the 'worst of the worst.' But her latest reaction is a sign that supporting Trump now means something different. It now means supporting rounding up people following the legal process just to make yourself feel better with a fake sense of "securing the border." Under Trump, immigration officials have essentially done away with due process in the interest of meeting deportation goals. They've made it clear they want no part of following the law or the process for deporting people. That's too much work. They'd rather defy the courts, then play the victim when the courts rule against them. Opinion: Republicans, be so for real. This embarrassing government is what you wanted? That's what happens when you arrest people on their way to immigration hearings. That's what happens when you deport people to jurisdictions outside of the United States. It is what happens when you circumvent the rules to achieve a goal, and it should terrify everyone. Regardless of what Trump and Republicans think, the right to due process for everyone is enshrined in the Constitution. If the president can take away the rights of a vulnerable group of people, who's to stop him from infringing on the rights of U.S. citizens in the future? Again, Republicans, you still want this? You want people to be stripped of their rights? You want a federal government imposing itself on states? You want people deported indiscriminately? Congratulations, then. You're doing it. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump lied. ICE nabs law-abiding immigrants, not criminals | Opinion
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zelenskyy says he regrets that Oval Office blowup, but he's still pushing Trump
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he regrets that his Oval Office meeting with President Donald Trump in late February spun out of control, but explained that it was his impatience to reach "concrete decisions" during wartime that led to the blowup. 'We simply don't have that much time in our lives. I wanted concrete decisions,' Zelenskyy said on Wednesday in an interview in Odessa with the Axel Springer Global Reporters network, which includes POLITICO. 'We were unable to make certain decisions, extremely important decisions. I don't know whether America was ready to address these issues or not. I have to resolve this issue of war. You see, time is very precious. Not my personal time, but the time of my country.' Zelenskyy also said he liked his one-on-one meeting with Trump, held two months later on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral at The Vatican, much 'better' than his ill-fated visit to the White House. 'We were able to discuss much more than at the other meeting, which felt like it lasted a lifetime,' Zelenskyy said, describing Trump as 'friendly.' Ukraine's embattled president, whose assertiveness and persistent requests for additional aid also privately irked President Joe Biden and his top aides, has worked assiduously to improve his relationship with Trump since that fateful February encounter. And the two countries did eventually sign the economic agreement to jointly develop Ukraine's rare earth minerals once the war is over, a pact that was temporarily tabled when the White House visit went sideways. Yet he also suggested in the interview that even his war-torn country may be able to turn the war into a new phase. 'Relations between our countries are not entirely balanced, but that was in the past,' Zelenskyy said. 'And today we must do everything we can to ensure that the next meeting in the Oval Office is successful for both countries. The lives of many people depend on it. And peace depends on it. Many countries in Europe depend on whether there will be security and peace in Ukraine. The security and stability of many countries in Europe depend on it.' After months of trying to browbeat Ukraine into negotiating a peace deal that would have required them to permanently cede occupied territory to Russia, Trump is showing a new willingness to allow the war to continue. That's seemingly a response to Russian President Vladimir Putin's refusal to seriously engage in peace talks. With Trump possibly rethinking his approach, Zelenskyy pushed the White House to maintain a sense of urgency and increase its pressure on Moscow. 'It's important to impose sanctions. We shouldn't... play by Putin's rules. It is important to impose sanctions and force Putin to agree to a ceasefire so that we can talk about ending the war,' Zelenskyy said. He will have a chance to make another direct appeal to Trump next week when he is scheduled to attend the G-7 leader's summit in the Canadian Rockies. Trump, during a meeting last week with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, expressed hesitation about giving the Senate a green light to advance widely supported legislation to impose additional sanctions on Russia. Describing the proposal in its original form as 'very harsh' on Russia, the president has been privately skeptical about the effectiveness of sanctions and, for months, has believed taking a harder stance toward Putin would backfire. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. But with the Russian leader unwilling to make any substantive concessions toward a ceasefire while stepping up his bombings of Ukrainian cities, Trump appears to be shifting course away from his push for peace and tempering his hopes for a fast rapprochement with Putin. In Wednesday's interview, Zelenskyy said Trump remains the key figure who can bring the war to an end and urged the president to allow the sanctions bill to move forward. 'The strength of the sanctions, how strong the sanctions package will be, depends on him,' Zelenskyy said. 'The speed with which decisions are made depends on him; we don't see any resistance from the senators, for example. On the contrary, the majority is in favor.' Trump, during the meeting with Merz, said the timeline for when he'll have to toughen up with Putin is 'in my head' — a statement that Zelenskyy said gave him hope that the stronger pressure he's asking for from the U.S. will eventually come. 'I very much hope that President Trump will stick to it,' Zelenskyy said. 'It's not even about the fact that he promised during the election campaign that he would end the war. That's not the point. It's more that he is a certain person — and let's also consider his age — and I think it's important for him, I hope it's important for him to end the war. He has spoken about it very often, he has repeated many times that he will end the killing.' Zelenskyy also spoke about Operation Spider Web, the clandestine and ultimately successful endeavor to sneak drones into Russia that earlier this month succeeded in taking out roughly a third of Putin's long-range bomber fleet. Trump, whose aides said he did not get a heads up about the attack, expressed only mild frustration over the attack and stated that Putin, in a call last week, told him that he planned to retaliate soon. The attack, Zelenskyy said, ushered the war into 'a new phase,' suggesting that Kyiv is also capable of escalation if the fledgling peace talks run aground. 'I think that both in the U.S. and everywhere else, we must do everything we can to end this war so that we do not have further phases in this war.'

Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Catastrophic': Rural public media stations brace for GOP cuts
Public media stations around the country are anxiously awaiting the results of Thursday's House vote that could claw back $1.1 billion from public broadcasting, with leaders warning that the cuts present an existential crisis for public media's future. For smaller stations — many of which are in rural parts of the country — the funding makes up critical chunks of their yearly operating budgets. Many of them are being forced to plan how they'll survive the cuts, if they can at all, public media executives say. Local leaders say the cuts would not only deprive their audiences of news and educational programming, but could also lead to a breakdown of the emergency broadcast message infrastructure that is critical for communities with less reliable internet or cellular service. 'That would mean an almost immediate disappearance of almost half our operating budget,' David Gordon, executive director of KEET in Eureka, California, said of the rescission proposal. 'Assuming [KEET] would continue, it would be in a very, very different form than it is right now.' The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the entity that distributes federal money to public media stations via grants, said about 45 percent of public radio and TV stations it provided grants to in 2023 are in rural areas. Nearly half of those rural stations relied on CPB funding for 25 percent or more of their revenue. But that funding is being targeted for a vote as part of a push from President Donald Trump that also aims to cut $8.3 billion in foreign aid. The rescissions package would cut CPB funding already approved by Congress for the next two fiscal years. The proposal, which only needs approval from a simple majority, must pass both chambers of Congress within 45 legislative days from the day it's introduced. The House is set to vote on Thursday. If the House and Senate follow their current schedules, the deadline to vote on the cuts is July 18. If the deadline passes and Congress has not approved the cuts, the White House will be required to spend the money — but funding could still be cut in future budgets. If approved, the package would codify a series of cuts first picked out by the Department of Government Efficiency earlier this year. Both Trump and Elon Musk, former head of DOGE, have repeatedly accused NPR and PBS of bias against Republicans. In 2023, the Musk-owned social media site X labeled NPR as "state-affiliated media," falsely suggesting the organization produces propaganda. Trump regularly suggested cutting federal funding for public media during his first term. But his second term has brought increased hostility to mainstream media outlets, including the Associated Press, Voice of America, ABC News and CBS News. Approximately 19 percent of NPR member stations count on CPB funding for at least 30 percent of their revenue — a level at which stations would be unlikely to make up if Congress approves the rescissions, according to an NPR spokesperson. Ed Ulman, CEO of Alaska Public Media, predicts over a third of public media stations in Alaska alone would be forced to shut down 'within three to six months' if their federal funding disappears. PBS CEO Paula Kerger said in an interview she expects 'a couple dozen stations' to have 'significant' funding problems 'in the very near term' without federal funding. And she believes more could be in long-term jeopardy even if they survive the immediate aftermath of the cuts. 'A number of [stations] are hesitant to say it publicly,' she said. 'I know that some of our stations are very, very worried about the fact that they might be able to keep it pieced together for a short period of time. But for them, it will be existential.' Smaller stations with high dependency on federal funding may be forced into hard choices about where to make cuts. Some stations are considering cutting some of what little full-time staff they have, or canceling some of the NPR and PBS programming they pay to air. Phil Meyer, CEO of Southern Oregon PBS in Medford, Oregon, said his station will have to get creative just to stay afloat. 'If we eliminated all our staff, it still wouldn't save us enough money,' Meyer said. 'It becomes an existential scenario planning exercise where, if that funding does go away, we would have to look at a different way of doing business.' Some rural stations are worried they won't be able to cover the costs to maintain the satellite and broadcast infrastructure used to relay emergency broadcast messages without the federal grants. In remote areas without reliable broadband or internet coverage, public media stations can be the only way for residents to get natural disaster warnings or hear information about evacuation routes. After Hurricane Helene devastated Western North Carolina last year, leaving the region without electricity for days, Blue Ridge Public Radio in Asheville, North Carolina, provided vital information on road closure and access to drinking water for people using battery-powered and hand-cranked radios. 'I think it's pretty catastrophic,' Sherece Lamke, president and general manager of Pioneer PBS in Granite Falls, Minnesota, said of the potential consequences of losing the 30 percent of her station's budget supplied by CPB. Station managers around the country have made direct pleas to their home congressional delegations in the past year, urging them to protect public broadcasting from the rescission proposal and publicly opposing Trump's executive order calling on CPB to stop providing funding to stations. PBS, NPR and some local stations have sued the Trump administration to block the order. Brian Duggan, general manager of KUNR Public Radio in Reno, Nevada, said he's optimistic about the chances of the House voting down the funding cuts, particularly after talking with his local member of Congress, Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.), who co-signed a statement opposing cuts to public media on Monday. 'I maintain optimism … based on my conversations with the congressman,' Duggan said. 'I will just hold out hope to see what happens ultimately on the House floor.' Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, whose public media stations are among the most dependent on federal grants in the country, told POLITICO on Wednesday she's concerned about stations in her state and is trying to get the package changed. In the wake of Trump administration pressure, some stations have seen an uptick in grassroots donations. But while larger stations in well-populated metro areas have broader, wealthier donor bases to draw on for additional support, many rural stations can only expect so much help from their community. Some of the stations in rural areas are forced to navigate the added complication of asking for donations from Republican voters as Trump rails against the public media ecosystem. 'We live in a very purple district up here,' Sarah Bignall, CEO and general manager of KAXE in Grand Rapids, Minnesota said. 'If we started kind of doing the push and the fundraising efforts that were done in the Twin Cities, it would be very off-putting to a lot of our listeners.' Increases in donations, sponsors and state funding — only some states fund public broadcasting, and other states are pushing their own cuts to public broadcasting — would be unlikely to cover the full loss of smaller stations with heavy dependence on federal grants. 'It's not like we can just go, you know, 'Let's find a million dollars somewhere else.'' Lamke said. 'If we knew how to do that, we would have.' Longtime public media employees have experience in managing the lack of certainty that comes with the nonprofit funding model. But some said that the federal cuts, along with the White House effort to eliminate the public media model, have made forecasting the future of their stations more difficult than ever. 'I think this is the biggest risk that we've had, certainly in the time that I've been in public broadcasting,' Kruger said. 'And I've been in this business 30 years.' Calen Razor contributed to this report.