logo
This pouch could be the Zyn of caffeine

This pouch could be the Zyn of caffeine

Fast Company4 hours ago

There's a new energy brand on the market, and it's betting that the next frontier in caffeine isn't coffee, soda, or any other drink, for that matter. It's the pouch.
Wip is a caffeine pouch, available in 100-milligram and 200-milligram strengths, that's designed to be popped between your lip and gum to provide a quick dose of what it describes as 'natural caffeine.' The pouches come in candy-like flavors, including mint, sour cherry, orange citrus, and strawberry kiwi, all packaged in a brightly colored, hockey-puck-size container.
If any of that sounds familiar, that's probably because, at least in form factor, it's pretty similar to the nicotine pouch brand Zyn, which exploded in popularity after gaining traction on TikTok, primarily among young users. Meanwhile, over the past few years, the caffeine market has also been buzzing with a similar demographic.
Energy drinks have gone mainstream, appearing on menus at Starbucks, Dunkin', and Dutch Bros. Older brands like Jolt Cola and Rockstar have gotten supercharged facelifts, while the newcomer Alani Nu notched more than a billion dollars in sales in just one year.
Wip is betting on the idea that if consumers are gravitating toward a pouch for their nicotine boost, it might be a major new unlock for the caffeine industry, too.
The idea for Wip was conceived by David Cynamon, a Canadian entrepreneur who is now the brand's chairman and a major stakeholder. According to Wip CEO Richard Mumby, Cynamon 'understood the ubiquity of pouches in other form factors, mainly in nicotine,' and recognized an opportunity to expand the consumer category into caffeine.
The brand debuted last summer under the name LF*GO! (alongside a marketing partnership with Mike Tyson), a move that Mumby describes as more of a market test than an official launch. 'In four months, they got really meaningful traction and realized they needed to bring in the right team to realize the full opportunity of creating an altogether new category for energy and caffeine,' he says.
Mumby stepped in as CEO last October. Given the inspiration that Wip is pulling from the nicotine industry, Mumby's previous experience makes sense for this new role: From 2014 to 2017, he served as CMO for Pax Labs, the umbrella company for Juul and Pax vapes.
In less than a year, Mumby's team at Wip worked to create an entirely fresh identity for the brand before it hit the market in early June. The new branding takes a page out of Red Bull's iconic playbook, positioning the product as a tool for athletes—and, like Zyn, also a cool accessory.
Is the pouch the new energy drink?
From an outside perspective, it's easy to see why consumers might choose a nicotine pouch over a cigarette: You can pop one on the go, it has no odor, and, more recently, has become a kind of status-signaling habit among its young male target audience.
It's less clear why one might abandon their daily cup of coffee in favor of a caffeine pouch. Mumby's pitch for creating this new consumption category comes down to what he calls 'the three Cs': confidence, convenience, and cost.
He argues that consumers want to have confidence in the quality of their caffeine (a need that Wip purports to meet by deriving its caffeine from green coffee beans); they want the convenience of a hands-free caffeine option; and they want a cheaper caffeine fix (a 15-pouch pack costs about $8, or about 60 cents per serving).
'For an emerging brand or category, sometimes you have to go to the periphery to find these unmet needs,' Mumby says. 'But in caffeine, they're really at the heart of the product.'
Branding the caffeine pouch
To get the public on board with this novel form of caffeine intake, Mumby says he had a few main goals with the new branding. First, he needed to clearly articulate what caffeine pouches actually are, and establish a brand name that consumers could easily remember. He also needed a high-energy look to compete in an already saturated category. In collaboration with the branding agency Studio George, his team checked the first box with 'Wip,' a name designed to be short, zingy, and catchy.
'You can't will consumers to do it, but I wouldn't be disappointed if I heard somebody walk into a bodega and say, 'Do you have any mint Wips,' or refer to having to 'Wip' their way through a workout,' Mumby says.
For the wordmark, Studio George opted for a forward-leaning, slanted bold font with jagged edges, meant to convey a sense of momentum. The packaging features flavor-signaling neon colors, metallic silver, and pops of energetic yellow, clearly evoking the world of sports branding.
Mumby imagines Wip as a product that could see mass adoption, but it's specifically marketed as a companion for athletes and others whose pastimes involve using their hands. Someone headed to the gym, for example, might prefer a Wip over the 'cumbersome' proposition of packing energy drinks in their bag, Mumby explains. 'Also, a cup of coffee on a construction site is hard to put down and not have dust get into it,' he says. 'If you work with both of your hands, you need dexterity. The form factor just lends itself to some obvious solutions.'
On first glance, Wip does look strikingly like a nicotine product, especially given its rounded packaging and hardcore aesthetic. Mumby says the brand's main strategy to ensure consumers don't get confused is to incorporate clear signals at the point of sale, including by labeling the pouches as 'clean caffeine' on display units. Currently, Wip is available online, on Amazon, at convenience stores in Florida and Arizona, and at some smaller athletic stores across the country.
I Wip my way through this article
Before writing this story, I gave Wip a try for the first time—specifically, the 100-milligram mint flavor. While I've never tried a Zyn, and therefore can't compare the two, this experience was akin to sucking on an abnormally sweet Altoid, or maybe a less-powerful Listerine strip. It wasn't unpleasant (and it did prevent the onset of a morning caffeine headache), but it also wasn't my personal favorite way to consume caffeine. Still, I could see how the form factor might be convenient as a pre-workout boost or a pick-me-up on the job.
My main concern with Wip, actually, is how easy it is to consume. One of the 200-milligram pouches is equivalent to about two cups of coffee. A standard 8.4-ounce Red Bull contains just 80 milligrams of caffeine. Pop two max-strength Wips, and you've just hit the maximum amount of caffeine that the Mayo Clinic defines as safe for the average adult, likely in significantly less time than it would require to chug five Red Bulls.
When asked about Wip's safety, Mumby says the brand's website and social media sets out clear guidelines on safe caffeine consumption, including the 400-milligram limit. It's worth noting, however, that there's no such information on the package itself. While I didn't experience any adverse effects from my 100-milligram Wip, I'm not sure I want to know what it might feel like to mindlessly have one too many. For now, I'm sticking with coffee.
The extended deadline for Fast Company's Next Big Things in Tech Awards is this Friday, June 27, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Apple may solve its Google Search problem
How Apple may solve its Google Search problem

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Apple may solve its Google Search problem

How Apple may solve its Google Search problem originally appeared on TheStreet. I hate my Dell laptop. If I close the lid, the laptop will "suspend," but not really. Putting it in a bag in that state will make it hot, and the fans will choke. I have to watch out for this because if I don't, it will get damaged over time and die. This should be enough for the product to be recalled. There are more issues with it, but that is a topic for another day. I know that other manufacturers have the same problem. This is what you get from a modern-ish with an Apple MacBook would be puzzled to hear this. They don't have this problem, and how the heck do PC users tolerate it? It seems that PC manufacturers can get away with anything today, and Apple can't; it is held to a higher standard. With the release of the M1 chip in 2020, Apple left the PC competitors in the dust. It took them years to catch up. Even though I still wouldn't buy an Apple laptop for myself, this chip made me comfortable recommending them. But I digress. The reality is that innovation takes time. After all, Apple needed thirteen years to make something really "life-changing" following the launch of the iPhone. In fact, Apple generally takes its time, opting for others' so-called best-in-breed until it creates something better. Perhaps that's why it relies so much on Google for search, rather than a homegrown solution. Apple's deal with Google has worked out well for it (and is profitable), but, unfortunately, that relationship may end soon. The Justice Department's antitrust lawsuit against Google revealed that Apple () was paid $20 billion by Google in 2022 to keep it the default search engine in the Safari browser, reported Bloomberg. Google lost the lawsuit, and the DOJ wants the company to cease multibillion-dollar payments to Apple, among other things. Reuters reported that Google plans to appeal the decision. Apple does not reveal revenue from this deal with Google in its earnings reports; however, it is part of its services fiscal 2022, Apple's services revenue was about $78 billion. The calendar and fiscal year don't align, but making an estimate would mean Google's payment was about 25% of services revenue. Total revenue was $394 billion, so about 5% came from Google. More Tech Stocks: Amazon tries to make AI great again (or maybe for the first time) Veteran portfolio manager raises eyebrows with latest Meta Platforms move Google plans major AI shift after Meta's surprising $14 billion move When you need to keep your revenue growing constantly, having 5% of it at risk is something you can't afford. This is especially true given that Apple has been under fire lately for its apparent failure to launch some amazing artificial intelligence products. I've already written about why the company is struggling on that front. Unconfirmed media reports suggest Apple wants to buy or partner with Perplexity AI to get its hands on its AI-powered search, which provides cited responses to search queries using third-party LLMs. According to Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan, if this deal happens, it will quickly give Apple AI abilities that can be integrated into Siri. It will also provide access to the search advertising market and a high-quality team of AI not all roses, though. He pointed out four drawbacks: Technology integration might prove to be difficult. The company might face legal and regulatory risks. The deal would have an impact on existing Google relations. Some of Perplexity's offerings are dependent on rival LLMs. Mohan has an Apple stock price target of $235 and rates the stock a buy, based on a favorable price-to-earnings ratio. He says Apple is trading at approximately 29 times his estimate for calendar year 2026 earnings per share of $8.07. The 5-year historical P/E range is 16 to 34. "We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a multi-year upgrade cycle, large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services," said Mohan. Getting into the search advertising market and fixing Siri, with one acquisition, sounds like killing two birds with one stone, but I have my doubts. Knowing that Meta tried to buy Perplexity AI and instead bought Scale AI, I hope that Apple is playing 4D chess. I think Apple would be better off buying a real search engine instead, because Google is getting worse and worse every Apple may solve its Google Search problem first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 25, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 25, 2025, where it first appeared.

Families flee Toronto, Ottawa as policies and rental conversions limit desirable housing
Families flee Toronto, Ottawa as policies and rental conversions limit desirable housing

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Families flee Toronto, Ottawa as policies and rental conversions limit desirable housing

Young families are being driven from Ontario's biggest cities, with misguided policies and conversions to rental units limiting the supply of affordable homes with three bedrooms or more, according to the University of Ottawa's Missing Middle Initiative. Using census data on housing and population, the group found the number of children under five declined in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) and in Ottawa between 2016 and 2021 but grew by over five per cent in some adjacent regions — especially where there was growth of owner-occupied homes with three or more bedrooms. 'The tax, regulatory, and economic conditions in many Ontario communities are making it increasingly difficult for middle-class families to afford a three-bedroom home, resulting in a decline in the population of young children in those communities,' the analysis noted. 'This needs to be fixed.' The authors argue that housing policy in Ontario fails to distinguish between studio apartments and larger units, which they term ''unit-is-a-unit' thinking,' and say more needs to be done to encourage building homes for families. The Missing Middle Initiative says their analysis confirms the 'drive to qualify' phenomenon, in which people seeking home ownership venture further and further from city centres in search of properties they can afford. A lack of supply is among the factors that have pushed home prices beyond the financial means of many Canadians; the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation recently said the pace of homebuilding would roughly need to double over the next 10 years to bring prices to affordable levels. The analysis finds that population growth in an area generally aligns with increases in available housing of any type, but 'the metric most highly correlated with the population growth of children under the age of five was the increase in the stock of owner-occupied housing with three or more bedrooms.' The data showed there was 'almost no relationship' between changes to the population of children under five and growth in the number of studio to two-bedroom homes in a community. The group found a negative correlation between growth in rental housing with three or more bedrooms and the growth of the population of children under five years old, as "'conversion to rental' of existing homes crowded out young families." Notably, the census data used count occupied homes rather than housing starts, and also distinguish between owned and rented units, which permitted the Missing Middle Initiative to track changes in how homes are occupied. The analysis points to growth of around 20 per cent of 3+ bedroom rentals in Ottawa and Hamilton between 2016 and 2021, 'almost (but not completely) entirely due to formerly owner-occupied homes being converted into rental properties.' The population of children under five years old decreased by 0.2 per cent in Ottawa over that time and grew by 2.8 per cent in Hamilton, both well under overall population growth rates in those cities. The Missing Middle Initiative analysis acknowledges that correlation is not causation — which is to say that similar patterns in sets of data do not necessarily mean one trend is causing the other. But they argue that there are some obvious 'potential causal' relationships. One is that 'communities with a high number of young families, who are reaching the age where they are starting to have children, tend to build a large number of family-friendly homes, as developers respond to this market demand.' They also suggest that the inverse is true, that is, 'communities that build a lot of family-friendly housing attract families with young children.' Data on movements of people from one part of the province to another lend support to that theory, they say: the migration of children from 0–4 years old shows 'a strong positive correlation' with the stock of 3+ bedroom owner-occupied homes. John MacFarlane is a senior reporter at Yahoo Finance Canada. Follow him on X @jmacf. Download the Yahoo Finance app, available for Apple and Android. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Maple Leafs GM Makes Clear Statement About John Tavares Negotiations
Maple Leafs GM Makes Clear Statement About John Tavares Negotiations

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Maple Leafs GM Makes Clear Statement About John Tavares Negotiations

Maple Leafs GM Makes Clear Statement About John Tavares Negotiations originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Toronto Maple Leafs general manager Brad Treliving spoke to reporters one last time before the NHL Draft and less than a week before the start of free agency on July 1. Advertisement Judging by his words and tone, Treliving sounded increasingly confident that veteran forward John Tavares will remain in blue and white beyond this summer. The former Leafs captain is set to become an unrestricted free agent next week, but according to Treliving, negotiations have been trending in the right direction. 'We've both expressed a shared outcome, which is (that) John wants to stay and we want to keep John,' Treliving said. 'We're moving, hopefully in a direction to bring it to closure. "My hope is, until proven otherwise, that we'll have a good outcome there.' Tavares just completed a seven-year, $77 million contract. Given that he will turn 35 in September, it's fair to assume his next deal will have a significantly lower cap hit. Advertisement Maple Leafs management could be considering a few comparables for Tavares' upcoming deal, including the $4.5 million-per-season contract given to defenseman Chris Tanev last summer. Meanwhile, market projections and recent signings such as Brock Nelson's three-year, $7.5 million deal have been used as benchmarks, with Daily Faceoff projecting Tavares to sign for nearly $8 million per season. Toronto Maple Leafs forward John Tavares is expected to stay in Klement-Imagn Images According to NHL insider Pierre LeBrun, the 'sweet spot' may be around $20 million over four years with a cap hit of $5 million per season. 'I believe that if the Leafs put $20 million over four years in front of John Tavares, that he would sign it,' LeBrun said. 'Neither side is there quite yet, but I think that ends up being the sweet spot if this gets done here in the next seven days.' Advertisement Since the Leafs signed Tavares in 2018, the center has 493 points and 222 goals in 515 regular-season games in Toronto, as well as 31 points in 51 postseason outings. Related: Maple Leafs Urged to Start DNA Change By Trading $60 Million Veteran Related: Maple Leafs Linked to Pending Free Agent Forwards from Two Canadian Teams This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 27, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store