Groups petition EPA to act as ozone levels in Memphis exceed national health standards
Anti-pollution groups are petitioning the EPA to formally declare Memphis out of compliance with national health standards for ozone emissions. (Photo: Karen Pulfer Focht for Tennessee Lookout)
Memphis and surrounding communities have ozone emissions levels that are too high to comply with national health standards, according to data published by the Environmental Protection Agency.
A coalition of environmental groups is saying it's long past time for the federal agency and local regulators to tighten restrictions and require better emission controls for sources of air pollution.
The Southern Environmental Law Center filed a petition with the Environmental Protection Agency on June 5, asking the EPA to formally recognize that the Memphis metro area is failing to meet federal requirements — a move that would trigger stricter requirements for future air permits.
Ozone — also known as smog — is created when pollutants from cars, industrial plants, power plants and other sources react when exposed to sunlight, according to the EPA. Ozone exposure can damage airways and lead to difficulty breathing. People with asthma, emphysema, or those who spend a lot of time outdoors are particularly at risk, the EPA website states. The American Lung Association gave Shelby County an 'F' grade for ozone pollution this year.
Ozone emissions averages have exceeded federal limits for the last two years, marking an increase in emissions since 2020.
The Shelby County Health Department, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality and the Arkansas Department of Energy and Environment are responsible for enforcing federal Clean Air Act requirements for the greater Memphis area. The SELC, along with partners Memphis Community Against Pollution, Young Gifted and Green and the Sierra Club criticizes the local regulators' efforts to reduce ozone emissions as inadequate.
'We've been trying to work with the local governments to persuade them to do more, and quicker, but they just aren't taking it seriously enough, so this was really a last resort to us,' SELC Senior Attorney Caroline Cress said. 'You know, the data doesn't lie. We know that it is unhealthy to breathe that air now, and we can't just sit by and let that continue to get worse.'
The Shelby County Health Department could not be immediately reached for comment.
The EPA set the air quality standard for ozone at 70 parts per billion in 2015. The agency is required to review its standards every five years, but decided not to change the ozone standard in 2020.
The Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee — which acts as an independent advisor to the EPA — issued a report in 2023 recommending that the standard be reduced to 55 to 60 parts per billion 'to be protective of public health.' The EPA has not yet changed the standard.
The agency calculates a three-year benchmark figure using data from air monitors to measure compliance with the standard. The Memphis metro area has five air monitors that continuously collect data: three in Shelby County, one in Arkansas and one in Mississippi.
Between 2021 and 2023, two of the Memphis-area monitors exceeded the standard. From 2022 to 2024, four of the five monitors exceeded the standard, with the fifth not far behind.
There is no monitor located in South Memphis, where industrial development has ballooned in recent years. It's also home to majority Black communities who say they're being surrounded by industrial pollution.
South Memphis communities have battled pollution for years, organizing in 2021 to stop the development of the Byhalia Pipeline, which would have transported crude oil through historically Black Southwest Memphis neighborhoods. The EPA investigated potential cancer clustering in neighborhoods surrounding the Sterilization Services of Tennessee facility in 2022, but found no evidence of higher concentrations of cancer diagnoses that could be connected to the facility.
The sterilization company uses ethylene oxide, a colorless gas that has been linked to several types of cancer. The company has operated in compliance with EPA regulations, but the federal agency updated its regulations after studies showed the gas is 'more harmful to human health than we previously knew,' according to a report published by the Tennessee Department of Health in 2023.
The Shelby County Health Department determines where to place monitors within Shelby County. The department's 2025 air monitoring network plan indicates that it received funding from the EPA to add a monitoring site in South Memphis, which has been without one for more than a decade. The plan does not include a proposed site, and states a monitor may be placed by late 2025 or 2026.
The department could not be immediately reached for comment on the proposed South Memphis site.
The EPA has authority to review data and declare an area as out of compliance at any time.
'We believe that it really does have an obligation at this point,' Cress said of the EPA. 'We are presenting it with its own data that is on its website that shows unequivocally that this area is violating federal standards.'
Should the EPA change the Memphis area's designation, more stringent air quality permit requirements would impact Elon Musk's xAI (also known as the Colossus data center in South Memphis), 'among many other facilities that are emitting ozone-forming pollution,' Cress said.
The petition alleges that xAI could be the 'largest stationary source' of ozone emissions in Shelby County, but because the methane gas-fired turbines being used to power the facility are unpermitted, the facility's emissions are unknown to the public.
A representative from xAI could not be immediately reached for comment.
Tennessee Rep. John Gillespie, a Memphis Republican, issued a statement Monday in support of xAI's Memphis facility, lauding the 'hundreds of high-paying jobs' created by the endeavor.
'Despite what some people would have you believe, xAI is not in the middle of a residential neighborhood,' Gillespie wrote. 'Instead, it's suitably located in the 3,500-acre Frank Pidgeon Industrial Park, a nearly 60-year-old industrial development that many native Memphians refer to as President's Island.'
'The industrial park has over one thousand acres specifically set apart from any residential areas, making it the perfect location for this technology to operate,' Gillespie wrote.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
9 hours ago
- Associated Press
EPA says power plant carbon emissions aren't dangerous. We asked 30 scientists: Here's what they say
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration's Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed a new ruling that heat-trapping carbon gas 'emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants do not contribute significantly to dangerous air pollution.'' The Associated Press asked 30 different scientists, experts in climate, health and economics, about the scientific reality behind this proposal. Nineteen of them responded, all saying that the proposal was scientifically wrong and many of them called it disinformation. Here's what eight of them said. 'This is the scientific equivalent to saying that smoking doesn't cause lung cancer,' said climate scientist Zeke Hausfather of the tech firm Stripe and the temperature monitoring group Berkeley Earth. 'The relationship between CO2 emissions and global temperatures has been well established since the late 1800s, and coal burning is the single biggest driver of global CO2 emissions, followed by oil and gas. It is utterly nonsensical to say that carbon emissions from power plants do not contribute significantly to climate change.' 'It's about as valid as saying that arsenic is not a dangerous substance to consume,' said University of Pennsylvania climate scientist Michael Mann. 'The world is round, the sun rises in the east, coal-and gas-fired power plants contribute significantly to climate change, and climate change increases the risk of heat waves, catastrophic storms, infectious diseases, and many other health threats. These are indisputable facts,' said Dr. Howard Frumkin, former director of the National Center for Environmental Health and a retired public health professor at the University of Washington. Climate economist R. Daniel Bressler of Columbia University, said: 'We can use tools from climate economics, including the mortality cost of carbon and the social cost of carbon, to estimate the climate impacts of these emissions. For instance, in my past work, I found that adding just one year's worth of emissions from an average-sized coal-fired plant in the U.S. causes 904 expected temperature-related deaths and over $1 billion in total climate damages.' University of Arizona climate scientist Kathy Jacobs said: 'Their statement is in direct conflict with evidence that has been presented by thousands of scientists from almost 200 countries for decades. 'It's basic chemistry that burning coal and natural gas releases carbon dioxide and it's basic physics that CO2 warms the planet. We've known these simple facts since the mid-19th century,' said Oregon State's Phil Mote. Andrew Weaver, a professor at the University of Victoria and former member of parliament in British Columbia, said: 'President Trump is setting himself up for international court charges against him for crimes against humanity. To proclaim you don't want to deal with climate change is one thing, but denying the basic science can only be taken as a wanton betrayal of future generations for which there should be consequences.' Stanford climate scientist Chris Field, who coordinated an international report linking climate change to increasingly deadly extreme weather, summed it up this way: 'It is hard to imagine a decision dumber than putting the short-term interests of oil and gas companies ahead of the long-term inters of our children and grandchildren.' ___ Matthew Daly and Michael Phillis contributed from Washington. The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at


New York Times
9 hours ago
- New York Times
E.P.A. Axes Biden's Climate and Pollution Limits on Power Plants
The Trump administration moved Wednesday to erase limits on greenhouse gases from power plants and to weaken restrictions on their other hazardous emissions, including mercury, arsenic and lead. Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, hailed a 'historic day' and said the proposed changes would unshackle the coal, oil and gas industries from 'expensive, unreasonable and burdensome regulations' imposed by the Biden administration. Together, the moves mark a major blow to efforts to tackle climate change and to reduce threats to public health. The power sector is the country's second largest source of pollution that is heating the planet, behind transportation. The Trump administration is pursuing an aggressive agenda to bolster the production and use of fossil fuels, while also scrapping policies that reduce planet-warming emissions. 'E.P.A. is helping pave the way for American energy dominance, because energy development underpins economic development, which in turn strengthens national security. And, most importantly, the American public voted for it last November,' Mr. Zeldin said at a news conference at the agency's headquarters in Washington. He labeled efforts to fight climate change a 'cult' and said the pollution limits written by the Biden administration were designed 'to destroy industries that didn't align with their narrow-minded climate change zealotry.' Mercury emissions are a particular hazard from power plants that burn coal and oil. Those plants account for 44 percent of all mercury emissions in the United States, according to the E.P.A. Once in the atmosphere, mercury converts into methylmercury, which can accumulate in fish and other food. Exposure can cause serious neurological damage in developing fetuses and children, and has been associated with respiratory ailments and heart disease in adults. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
First Knozone Action Day of 2025: Outside air will be bad June 12. What you should know
The first Knozone Action Day has been issued for June 12, 2025. Hot temperatures, sunny skies, and light winds will lead to conditions suitable for ozone development when combined with wildfire smoke and other emission sources. Due to a high ground-level ozone forecast, the air quality outside will be deemed unhealthy for sensitive groups. The Indianapolis Office of Sustainability said people in Central Indiana with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary (COPD) disease, and other similar diagnoses should avoid time spent outdoors on June 12. Unhealthy air quality impacts public health and environmental justice as vulnerable groups, including children, older adults, pregnant people, outdoor laborers, and anyone suffering from asthma, COPD, emphysema, heart disease, or other conditions, are at greater risk, according to the office. Nearly 1 in 5 Marion County residents is at greater risk for severe symptoms due to unhealthy air quality. People can sign up at to be notified of unhealthy air days early. and the Environmental Protection Agency's AirNow website and mobile app are other resources for monitoring local air. This time last year: Stay inside, Knozone Action Day extended due to high temperatures Knozone Action Days happen when levels of certain pollutants rise above acceptable thresholds. During Knozone Action Days, the air quality may become unhealthy for sensitive individuals due to increased ground-level ozone and/or fine particles, which are two of the most common pollutants in the United the ozone layer high in the atmosphere helps protect us from the sun's rays, ozone down where we breathe is dangerous for public health, according to the Office of Sustainability. Ground-level ozone is created when a chemical reaction occurs between sunlight and hydrocarbons from emission sources common in urban areas, like gas-powered vehicles and lawn mowers. Fine particulate matter (or PM2.5) refers to microscopic particles in the air, including dust and smoke, that we can inhale into our lungs and cause damage. This can even be caused by wildfires or dust clouds blowing from thousands of miles away. Residents are encouraged to reduce their contribution toground-level ozone by: Avoid vehicle idling, including when in drive-thru lanes or picking up carry-out Drive less by using active forms of transportation like walking or biking (utilizing Pacers Bikeshare's IndyRides Free pass) Utilize public transportation or carpool with services such as IndyGo or Commuter Connect Wait to refuel and use gas-powered lawn equipment until temperatures are cooler Combine errands to reduce the number of trips Conserve energy by turning off lights or setting the air conditioner to 75 degrees or above Delay the use of garden, household, and workshop chemicals until the air has returned to healthy levels Jade Jackson is a Public Safety Reporter for the Indianapolis Star. You can email her at and follow her on X, formerly Twitter @IAMJADEJACKSON. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Poor air quality in Indianapolis expected for June 12, 2025. What to expect