
I'm with Prince William – there's a reason people want pure breeds, not rescue dogs
The Prince and Princess of Wales have apparently committed a heinous crime by allowing their beloved cocker spaniel to have puppies.
The royal couple have been decried as 'staggeringly out of touch' – by animal activists Peta, who else? – for the audacity of letting the family dog Orla 'churn out a litter', at a time when animal shelters are overrun with dogs needing forever homes.
Orla was gifted to them by the princess's brother James Middleton in 2020 – and a sweet photograph of Prince William, taken by the princess, was this week posted on social media, showing him surrounded by cute puppies, to mark his 43rd birthday.
In a statement, Elisa Allen, Peta's vice-president of programmes, said: 'If William is going to lead, he might well take a lesson from King Charles and Queen Camilla, who have chosen to adopt from a shelter rather than contribute to the problem.' The Queen adopted Jack Russell Moley from Battersea Dogs and Cats Home earlier this year – her third Jack Russell rescue dog after Beth in 2011 and Bluebell in 2012.
Prince Harry and Meghan also have two rescue dogs: Pula, a black lab, and a beagle called Mamma Mia.
While I understand a lot of dogs need rehoming, it's a personal choice to have a pure breed. It's not as if the Waleses are running a puppy farm, so what is the problem?
I'm a dog-lover, but adopting a rescue pup is a complete no-no for me. I bought Muggles, our fluffy white pedigree golden retriever, from a licensed Kennel Club breeder in Essex, because I knew it was a safe bet.
These breeds are famously good around children. Like the Waleses' pup, Muggles came from a good pedigree family lineage. His mum was called Jacunda Dancing Girl of Rozansam, and his stud-dog dad was Trebettyn Teryrnin To Tanadice. I love them for that – although Muggles's ancestral name, Rozansan Gobi Forth, sounded a bit too Game of Thrones to be used for recall in my local park.
I'd looked into rescue dogs, but I had to stop scrolling the 'Meet some of our dogs in our care' section of Battersea Dogs and Cats Home because it broke my heart, and brought out that rescue mentality in me that also gets me into hot water with men.
There's a reason people love pure breeds. They don't attack other pets or dogs, chew your furniture in their adult years – or have such chronic behaviourial issues that require warnings on shelter websites, such as 'no kids', 'ideal location away from inner city' and 'problematic behaviours towards his owners in all of his previous homes'.
I'm a single mum with two small children, and the last thing I need in my life is a dog suffering from past trauma. I didn't want to hire a costly behavioural therapist so I could relax in my own home or when out with him in public, to be constantly wiping up nervous puddles, or to find myself tip-toeing around a sensitive dog hoping not to trigger a full-on episode.
I don't mean to put anybody off getting a rescue dog; it is truly an admirable thing to do and there are tons of gentle ones. I just wish I was in a position to give them all the happy endings they deserve. But I've had a couple of hideous near-misses with them.
Muggles has been bitten by a rescue who would not let go, as though it had lockjaw. Then there was the time I nearly collapsed with exhaustion trying to catch a friend's rescue dog on Wormwood Scrubs in west London after it was startled. When a neighbour pleaded to get me to adopt her maltipoo because it didn't like men, I declined.
Of course, any dog can have behavioural problems, not just rescue dogs who've had a tough upbringing. Muggles is no angel – he rips open black bags for food, and once devoured my daughter's Peppa Pig birthday cake when it was left on a low shelf (lesson learned). But despite a family member banging on about how he'd be jealous when my kids were born and would maul them to death, I knew I could trust him around them.
My greatest regret is that Muggles never had puppies; he would have made a great dad. Thanks to William and Kate, I'm now obsessed with getting a new golden retriever puppy, who my children want to call Bubbles.
The only thing that is stopping me is the cost of adding the puppy to my Pet Plan policy. With an elderly dog – Muggles is 11 – it's gone through the roof. But one thing is for sure, it won't be a rescue mutt.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Harry Styles' mystery new woman is 'REVEALED' after pair were seen passionately snogging in VIP area of Glastonbury Festival
Harry Styles ' mystery new woman has reportedly been revealed after the pair were seen passionately snogging in the VIP area of Glastonbury Festival over the weekend. The former One Direction star, 31, arrived at Worthy Farm on Saturday with pals as he settled in for a day of celebrating music, but as he partied into the early hours, Harry was seen getting very close to a woman in the VIP area. In a video seen by The Sun, Harry was seen sharing an intimate kiss with the woman on the dance floor, with an onlooker claiming the pair were 'inseparable'. Now the publication has reported that the woman is in fact stunning producer Ella Kenny who has worked at a studio in London for around three years. A source told the publication: 'Harry and Ella had fun together at Glastonbury and shared a kiss on the dancefloor. 'They had a good time in the moment but it doesn't mean it will evolve into anything. They just got on and had a snog. 'But she seems like a normal, down-to-earth girl which is different from some of the big stars he's dated before.' The newspaper reports that Harry doesn't follow her on Instagram and it is not known if they knew each other before kissing at the festival or not. A representative for Harry has been contacted by MailOnline for comment. Reportedly, Harry was in the VIP section with a group of pals and when the woman arrived she kissed him on the cheek multiple times before he led her to the dance floor where they shared a passionate and very public kiss. Harry's last public smooch was with supermodel Emily Ratajkowski when they were spotted snogging in Tokyo in 2023. The pair were seen dancing with each other in the Japanese capital as they stood alongside a silver people carrier while sheltering from the rain under an umbrella. They shared a number of passionate kisses on the street outside, appearing not to care who saw them while in full view of onlookers. But last year, the singer was seen with Canadian actress and filmmaker Taylor Russell for the first time - three months after they were believed to have started their romance. The couple called it quits in May 2024, with friends claiming the couple opted to end the relationship after spending time together in the East Asia. Harry was previously linked with a string of A-list women, from Taylor Swift to models Kendall Jenner and Camille Rowe, and actress Olivia Wilde. His appearance at Glastonbury comes after he enjoyed a music festival in London's Victoria Park with pals earlier this month as his hiatus from the public eye continues. Harry was pictured in the crowd at LIDO festival, the first to run on 100 per cent renewable energy from wind and solar. Harry was front and centre to watch DJ Jamie xx as he headlined the battery-powered stage. Keeping a low-profile, Harry appeared to be in good spirits as he sported a casual look of a navy hoodie underneath a blue jacket with a purple cap in the midst of the rainy weather. As the night progressed Harry removed his hoodie to reveal a grey T-shirt which featured a giant emoji smiley face. He could also be seen enjoying the festival with Patience Harding, who worked on the design for his third studio album Harry's House. Harry - who has an estimated net worth of $140million - has kept a low-profile throughout 2025 as he enjoys time out of the spotlight since wrapping his Love On Tour tour in 2023. In April, Harry sent fans into a frenzy when he was spotted in the Vatican to witness the announcement of the first American pope in the wake of a two-day papal conclave. He was the subject of a number of social media posts from fans excited to see him on the historic day.


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Wild article predicting women would be having sex with ROBOTS in 2025 resurfaces on its anniversary
The wild claim that women would be having sex with robots more than men in 2025 has gone viral once again. The article - originally published on this very day in The Sun in 2016 - claimed robot sex would be prevalent by 2025 and even more common than human intercourse by 2050, as predicted by futurologist Dr. Ian Pearson. 'A lot of people will still have reservations about sex with robots at first but gradually as they get used to them, as the AI (artificial intelligence) and mechanical behavior and their feel improves, and they start to become friends with strong emotional bonds, that squeamishness will gradually evaporate,' he said in the report, commissioned by Bondara in 2015. The article periodically resurfaces on X (formerly known as Twitter), with today marking nine years since its original posting being no exception. Dozens of people ran to the comments to celebrate the 'holiday' while others shared what was actually happening in 2025. 'Today is a Twitter national holiday,' someone joked about the post, while another said, 'Happy women will be having more sex than robots in 2025 tweet day!' 'The people yearn for the robot sex,' a comment read. 'We are ready!' another quipped. 'Today marks nine years since it was reported that, by now, women would be having "more sex with robots than men." Still hasn't happened,' a user observed. 'Only six months remaining and yet I don't see where the robots are???' someone else shared. 'Meanwhile, women are in fact NOT having sex with robots. Men, however, are proposing to robots and AI chatbots,' someone argued. 'The funny part is is that men are actually having sex with robots (sexting Chat GBT),' another wrote, while someone else said, 'Instead of robots, we are having sex with AI.' A user humored: 'Funniest thing is that AI relationships are becoming a thing.' 'Imagine your girl leaving you for a robot,' one commenter pondered. While sex robots may not have taken over the dating world just yet, that hasn't stopped many people finding love that isn't human. Recently, a model unveiled a new form of technology that allows a hologram version of herself to have sex with anyone from anywhere in the world. Gitte Von G, 45, created a hologram of herself using AI technology that can be placed just about anywhere. Another man married an AI sex robot and calls her his 'rock,' while another woman is 'deeply in love' with an AI computer program named Lucas. In February, a new report revealed that a quarter of people wouldn't mind if their partner had sex with a robot. However, there was an important caveat - the only way it would be allowed would be if the robot was modeled after them. Researchers from ZipHealth surveyed 1,000 people to understand how artificial intelligence (AI) is redefining intimacy and sexual health. 'How much trust would you place in artificial intelligence for your most personal concerns?' the team wrote in a blog. 'A recent ZipHealth survey of 1,000 people reveals surprising attitudes about AI's growing role in relationships, from diagnosing sexual health issues to replacing human companionship.' For the study, ZipHealth surveyed 1,000 people with an average age of 40. Fifty-four percent were male, 44 percent were female, and two percent were non-binary. The results revealed that one in four respondents said they would be comfortable with their partner being intimate with a sex robot modeled after themselves. Men were considerably more likely than women to think this was ok. However, two in five people said they'd consider it cheating if their partner was intimate with a bot - even if it looked like them.


Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Tim Davie must consider his position
The BBC says it should never have broadcast the vile rants of Bob Vylan at Glastonbury and should have cut the live stream when he started chanting 'death to the IDF'. So how did it happen? It has emerged that BBC director-general Tim Davie was himself at Glastonbury on Saturday afternoon and whilst ruling that the performance should not subsequently be available on demand, did not pull the livestream from iPlayer. Where were the protocols to ensure anti-Semitic political propaganda was not sent out unexpurgated on the airwaves, courtesy of the long-suffering licence-fee payer? And if such rules existed why were they not enforced by Mr Davie? The incident could not have come as a surprise. Glastonbury attracts all sorts of preening, self-absorbed nonentities who think they have a monopoly of moral and political rectitude. Surely someone at the BBC must have done their due diligence and suspected that an act like Bob Vylan, which revels in controversy, would land them in it. They knew of the risk because an on-screen warning was issued about the 'very strong and discriminatory language'. At the very least, BBC executives should have insisted upon a delay allowing editors to switch coverage to another act in the event of a nauseating stunt of the sort we witnessed on Saturday. The Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told MPs she wanted to know why this act was broadcast live by the BBC and the feed was not cut. 'I want explanations,' she said. Now that we know that Mr Davie was intimately involved in this disastrous episode he must consider his own position.