
"Everybody Should Pay Same": Inside Trump's Order To Slash Drug Prices In US
Washington:
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing pharmaceutical companies to slash drug prices so they match those abroad. The order gives a 30-day deadline to drugmakers to achieve price targets, with Trump saying he will take further action to lower prices if those companies do not make "significant progress" toward those goals.
Trump said he's seeking to cut drug prices by at least 59 per cent -- and in some cases as high as 80 or 90 per cent through the wide-ranging order. "Everybody should equalise. Everybody should pay the same price," the President said.
He also accused the European Union of "brutal" tactics to make pharmaceutical firms sell drugs for lower prices on their territory -- meaning companies then raise prices in the United States to keep their profits up. "Whoever is paying the lowest price, that's the price that we're going to get," Trump said.
As part of his plan, the US aims to institute a "Most Favoured Nation" policy that pins the cost of drugs sold in the United States to the lowest price paid by other countries for the same drug. "Even though the United States is home to only 4 per cent of the world's population, pharmaceutical companies make more than two-thirds of their profits in America," Trump said.
"The European Union has been brutal, brutal. And the drug companies actually told me stories, it was just brutal, how they forced them," the Republican added.
He further claimed that American consumers had been treated like "suckers" and cited in particular the costs of the obesity-reducing drug Ozempic, which he said were vastly lower in Europe. He said during a conversation with an unnamed friend, he came to know the weight-loss injection cost $88 in London and that the same medicine in the US costs $1,300.
Issue Of Drug Prices In the US
Among developed nations, the United States pays the highest prices for prescription drugs, which are often nearly three times more than in other countries. In her first term as well, Trump had tried to bring the US in line with other countries but was blocked by the courts.
However, the plan mainly relies on the goodwill of pharmaceutical companies to negotiate their prices and can again face legal challenges, similar to his first term. The proposal comes as the president seeks to fulfil a campaign promise of tackling inflation and lowering prices for a host of everyday items for Americans, from eggs to gas for their cars.
What Trump's Order Said
If drugmakers do not meet the government's expectations, the Trump administration will use rulemaking to bring drug prices to international levels and consider a range of other measures, including importing medicines from other developed nations and implementing export restrictions, a copy of the order showed.
The order also directed the government to consider facilitating direct-to-consumer purchasing programs that would sell drugs at the prices other countries pay. It also directed the US Federal Trade Commission to consider aggressive enforcement against what the government calls anti-competitive practices by drugmakers.
Will It Work?
The executive order is likely to face legal challenges, particularly for exceeding limits set by US law, including on imports of drugs from abroad, health policy lawyer Paul Kim to news agency Reuters.
"The order's suggestion of broader or direct-to-consumer importation stretches well beyond what the statute allows," Kim said.
However, Lawrence Gostin, a professor of health law at Georgetown Law, believes such challenges are likely months away and will come after the Trump administration takes more concrete action to force companies to lower prices instead of the 'scattershot threats' included in the executive order.
'At the point when there are actual consequences and we know what they are, and when companies feel that they have to lower the price of their drugs, at that point we're going to have a flood of litigation,' Gostin told Reuters.
The Federal Trade Commission has a long history of antitrust enforcement actions against drugmakers and other healthcare companies. Trump last month ordered the FTC to coordinate with other federal agencies to hold listening sessions on anticompetitive practices in the drug industry.
"President Donald Trump campaigned on lowering drug costs and today he's doing just that. Americans are tired of getting ripped off. The Federal Trade Commission will be a proud partner in this new effort," said FTC spokesperson Joe Simonson.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump has many ways to hurt Elon Musk
THERE WAS a time, not long ago, when an important skill for journalists was translating the code in which powerful people spoke about each other. Carefully prepared speeches and other public remarks would be dissected for hints about the arguments happening in private. Among Donald Trump's many achievements is upending this system. In his administration people seem to say exactly what they think at any given moment. Wild threats are made—to end habeas corpus; to take Greenland by force—without any follow-through. Journalists must now try to guess what is real and what is for show. So it is with the break-up between Mr Trump and Elon Musk, the world's richest man and until last week a 'special government employee". A few months ago Mr Musk posted on X, his social-media platform, that he loved the president 'as much as a straight man can love another man". On May 30th, at a joint press conference in the Oval Office to announce Mr Musk's departure from government, Mr Trump called him 'an incredible patriot" and praised his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (known as DOGE). Yet by June 5th it had all broken down. On his Truth Social media platform the president posted that the billionaire was 'wearing thin" and 'went CRAZY". Mr Trump then threatened to 'terminate" his government contracts. Mr Musk responded on X, claiming that Mr Trump's name appears in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier who was convicted of trafficking and having sex with underage girls. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public," wrote Mr Musk. Later he agreed with a post saying that Mr Trump should be impeached. He also said he would begin decommissioning his Dragon spacecraft, which transports astronauts to the International Space Station. If carried out, the threats could be disastrous for both men. Mr Trump could lose a valuable donor and the supportive sway of X; Mr Musk's business interests could suffer enormously. But in response to a comment advising him to 'cool off", Mr Musk wrote 'good advice" and backtracked on his call to decommission the Dragon. Where things go from here is anyone's guess. The initial cause of the falling out between Mr Trump and his 'first buddy" was the president's so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill". Mr Musk was incensed that the measure would add enormously to the deficit, and so undermine the work of DOGE. On June 3rd he escalated his criticism, calling the bill a 'disgusting abomination". On June 5th he added another complaint, saying that Mr Trump's tariffs are going to bring about a recession. Mr Trump has his own explanation for Mr Musk's sudden disloyalty. He says the Tesla CEO is unhappy because his bill would cancel a government subsidy for electric cars created by Joe Biden. If Mr Trump does decide to retaliate, the risks to Mr Musk and his businesses are extensive. The threats the president has already made, however, are the least credible. Cancelling the contracts of SpaceX, Mr Musk's space company, would be profoundly disruptive to the government. Without SpaceX rockets, it would struggle to put anything into space, including spy satellites. The Pentagon relies heavily on the firm's Starlink satellites. SpaceX itself could probably weather such moves. Though it has benefited greatly from government contracts, the firm's commercial revenues soared nearly three-fold last year, according to estimates by Quilty Space, a business-intelligence firm. Mr Musk has also wanted to cancel the Dragon spacecraft for some time. Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Mr Trump who is no fan of Mr Musk, has proposed even bigger penalties. He wants the South African-born billionaire to be stripped of his American citizenship—he says Mr Musk is an 'illegal alien"—and his companies nationalised under the Defence Production Act. Such actions also seem unrealistic. Stripping Mr Musk's citizenship would require a judge to rule he committed fraud. The Defence Production Act almost certainly does not permit sudden nationalisation, even if the country is at war. That does not mean Mr Musk can breathe easy, though. His interests are vulnerable to more routine measures. At the time he entered government in January, he and his companies were subject to 65 potential or actual regulatory actions by 11 federal agencies, according to the minority staff of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, an arm of the Senate. These include accusations that Tesla, Mr Musk's car company, lied about its self-driving technology; that Neuralink, his brain-implant company, violated the Animal Welfare Act with its experiments on monkeys; and that SpaceX repeatedly failed to follow the law when launching rockets. (As head of DOGE, Mr Musk was able to dismantle some of the agencies within the government investigating him, such as the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.) One of the reasons why Silicon Valley magnates like Mr Musk rallied around Mr Trump last year was that he promised a more favourable regulatory environment. But 'there was always the risk that what they were buying instead were the conditions of oligarchy", says Donald Moynihan of the Gerald Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan. That is, business leaders who are loyal to the president get to operate as they like, while those who are critical get the full force of the law. Mr Musk may be about to discover what life is like outside the tent. Perhaps on feeling the cold he will find a way back inside. © 2025, The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved. From The Economist, published under licence. The original content can be found on


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Indian export businesses are using AI to stay ahead on global tax rules
Live Events Indian organisations have long embraced Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning technologies in various aspects to achieve their business goals. Now, they are actively exploring ways to implement these advancements responsibly and profitably. This goal closely aligns with the Digital India initiative , launched in 2015 to build a next-generation empowered many measures, the country is steadily progressing toward this vision, with its digital economy projected to contribute nearly one-fifth of the nation's GDP by 2030. This shift holds significant potential for businesses operating domestically, as well as for those planning to expand into global markets.. However, they must address regulatory compliance, cross-border taxation, and evolving trade policies to navigate international trade these concerns, many organisations are turning to technology-driven tax solutions. A recent survey stated that 92% of companies have adopted or planned to implement digital tax platforms within the next five years. Moreover, over half are actively integrating AI-driven technologies to streamline tax functions, paving the way for a smarter, more automated compliance constant stress of creating a tax-transparent and globally connected trade environment has driven Indian exporters to seek the best-in-class solutions. This stress arises from the multilayered regulations they need to tackle from the outset. In the US, for instance, tax compliance becomes challenging due to the multijurisdictional nature of sales tax. Each state imposes their own rates and economic nexus laws requiring businesses to collect and remit sales tax once they exceed certain revenue thresholds, even if the company has no physical presence there are over 13,000 sales and use tax jurisdictions in the US with their policies and deadlines. Similarly, the VAT system in the European Union (EU) has its own set of requirements. An Indian exporter selling across member states may need to charge different VAT rates based on the product type and the buyer's location, leading to a convoluted network of compliance responsibilities. This can be overwhelming, especially as compliance errors can lead to penalties and disruptions in overcome this, AI-powered tax systems offer an integrated solution that consolidates tax laws from multiple jurisdictions, automating calculations, filings, and regulatory updates. By reducing manual efforts and decreasing the risk of errors, AI helps exporters redirect their focus from regulatory burdens to strategic AI-enabled platforms can help track real-time transactions, proactively flagging potential issues before filing returns. For example, if an Indian exporter selling apparel online approaches California's economic nexus threshold of $500,000 in sales, AI systems can alert the business to register for sales tax in that utilizing ML algorithms, AI can also predict future tax liabilities based on historical data and projections, helping businesses avoid unforeseen tax burdens. Simultaneously, AI and ML make accessing and interpreting vast amounts of tax data stored in the cloud easier. AI-driven platforms can source and structure this data, helping businesses understand what has changed, track new tax rates, and automatically find the correct rates for each product and line with this, companies are increasingly adopting advanced technologies, such as GenAI, blockchain, and data analytics, to revolutionise their tax to recent studies, 87% of tax and finance professionals believe GenAI will significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their operations. GenAI helps businesses automate complex tax-related processes, such as generating accurate tax reports, predicting potential liabilities, and identifying discrepancies across jurisdictions. This allows organisations to swiftly adapt to regulatory shifts, ensuring greater compliance and reducing the risk of costly mistakes in cross-border the basicsThe push for Digital India is propelling significant progress in various sectors, focusing on leveraging technology to streamline operations and compliance. A recent example of this impel is the launch of Bharat Trade Net (BTN), a unified digital platform designed to simplify cross-border trade. BTN focuses on enhancing logistics, customs clearance, and trade documentation processes, which are often burdensome for it significantly improves transparency and provides easier access to financing, making it simpler for Indian businesses to expand. Given this, as AI drives tax compliance and automation, it has the potential to enhance the capabilities of platforms like BTN, ensuring that Indian businesses remain innovative and efficient the collaboration between the government and businesses will be crucial in shaping a future-ready tax ecosystem. With this, the increasing adoption of third-party, automated tax solution providers signals towards more secure, scalable, and cost-efficient solutions for managing tax compliance. Looking ahead, all these advancements will smoothen the tax processes and empower businesses to respond faster to regulatory changes, ensuring greater accuracy and transparency. As the industry evolves, Indian exporters need to be better equipped to meet the obstacles of a rapidly changing tax world, enabling sustainable growth and unfolding new opportunities for businesses and the economy author is VP, Product Management, The views expressed are solely of the author and ETCIO does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETCIO shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person/organisation directly or indirectly.


News18
37 minutes ago
- News18
Vivek Ramaswamy's Photo Met With Racial Remarks Again. This Time Netizens Shut Trolls
Last Updated: Despite the hate, several users called out the unnecessary attacks directed towards Vivek Ramaswamy and questioned the racial double standards. The ongoing public fallout between Tesla co-founder Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump has taken an unexpected turn. It has now dragged Indian-origin Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy into the spotlight. While the two heavyweights were engaged in a full-blown feud, Ramaswamy quietly posted a family photo which was met with a fresh wave of vicious trolling. The post in question showed Ramaswamy carrying his two children, Karthik and Arjun, with a caption that read, 'It's why we do it." But instead of being seen as a heartwarming moment, the picture sparked backlash online with users interpreting it as a sign of him distancing himself from the Musk-Trump standoff which is something that didn't sit well with many Americans. One user commented, 'Go fix India, anchor baby." 'Is there a scientific reason as to why I find this photo repulsive?" someone wrote. Some stood by Ramaswamy, expressing support and condemning the racist slurs being posted by users even using Grok for abuse. @grok change the background of this photo to a American White House— ThatuVadaiSettu (@ThatuVadaiSettu) June 6, 2025 @grok change the background of this photo to a garbage-filled street in India— Trevor Sutcliffe (@TrevorSutcliffe) June 6, 2025 An individual simply advised, 'Take care of your family. Protect your family. The rest is noise." Take care of your family. Protect your family. The rest is noise.— MAZE (@mazemoore) June 6, 2025 In the comments, some users even mocked his children for wearing shoes without socks. A person said, 'In America we wear socks," while another added, 'We wear socks under our shoes in America." In America we wear socks.— MongolianBeast (@MongolianBeast1) June 6, 2025 These comments were not random. They were linked to an earlier incident in March when Ramaswamy was trolled for being barefoot in his own home during an old interview. The photos had resurfaced online and many people mocked him for following the common Indian custom of removing shoes indoors. Some even wrote, 'We aren't in India." Another such racial attack on Ramaswamy surfaced just a few days ago. The Indian-origin entrepreneur had shared a post celebrating his 10th wedding anniversary with wife Apoorva. It included before-and-after pictures from 2014 and 2025 taken at the same spot in the Rockies. What should have been a personal and joyful moment also attracted hateful comments. Some users posted discriminatory remarks like – 'The beauty of the whiteness destroyed by brown" and 'Why do you both look 3-4 shades lighter? You didn't bleach your skin, did you?" In the fall of 2011, I met a brilliant medical student named Apoorva & asked her out on a first date – to head west for a weekend & hike Flattop Mountain in the Rockies. She accepted. We got within striking distance of the summit when a blizzard hit. I was foolishly stubborn… — Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) May 26, 2025 The backlash ties into Ramaswamy's past remarks on the H-1B visa programme. Last year, he spoke about the need for more foreign workers but also called for major changes in the system. He said the process should be more merit-based and transparent. But he was slammed for allegedly favouring the replacement of American workers with Indian immigrants. He eventually stepped down from his role as co-chair of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a position he was set to share with Musk. As of now, Vivek Ramaswamy is running for governor in the state of Ohio. About the Author Buzz Staff A team of writers at bring you stories on what's creating the buzz on the Internet while exploring science, cricket, tech, gender, Bollywood, and culture. First Published: June 07, 2025, 10:07 IST