Neuralink device helps Monkey see something that's not there
Elon Musk's Neuralink Corp. used a brain implant to enable a monkey to see something that wasn't physically there, according to an engineer, as it moves toward its goal of helping blind people see.
The device, called Blindsight, stimulated areas of a monkey's brain associated with vision, Neuralink engineer Joseph O'Doherty said Friday at a conference. At least two-thirds of the time, the monkey moved its eyes toward something researchers were trying to trick the brain into visualizing.
The results were the first Neuralink has publicized about tests of Blindsight, a brain chip that mimics the function of an eye. This is a closely watched frontier for brain device development, a scientific field that's testing the boundaries of how technology can be used to potentially treat intractable conditions.
As with all animal studies, it's an open question how the results would apply to humans. The device isn't approved for human use in the US.
The short-term goal of Blindsight is to help people see, and the long-term goal is to facilitate superhuman vision — like in infrared — Musk has said. The company has been testing Blindsight in monkeys for the past few years and is hoping to test it in a human this year, the billionaire said in March.
On the sidelines of the conference, O'Doherty declined to comment further about Neuralink's work.
Neuralink is also implanting devices in people who are paralyzed that allow them to communicate directly with computers, one of several companies in the growing technological field.
Five people have received Neuralink implants so far, Musk has said. Three were implanted in 2024 and two in 2025, according to O'Doherty's presentation at the Neural Interfaces conference. In some cases, patients are using their Neuralink device for about 60 hours a week.
In the future, brain devices using similar technology could allow paralyzed people to move or walk, Musk has said. O'Doherty co-authored a poster with academic researchers, which was presented at the conference, describing an experiment that used the Neuralink implant to stimulate the spinal cord of a monkey, causing its muscles to move. Other researchers have been working on spinal cord stimulation to restore muscle movement for several years.
Musk's medical aspirations are a stepping stone toward the goal of increasing the speed of human communication for everyone, allowing people to 'mitigate the risk of digital super-intelligence,' Musk said in 2024. He's also building artificial intelligence through his company xAI Corp.
Eventually, the company wants the Blindsight system to include a pair of glasses to help make the chip work, O'Doherty said in his talk.
Testing in monkeys has advantages. The visual cortex in a monkey is closer to the surface of the brain than in a human, making it easier to access, O'Doherty said in the presentation. Neuralink could use its surgical robot to insert its implant into the deeper regions in a person's brain, he added.
Swetlitz writes for Bloomberg
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Tesla claims rival startup is built on stolen trade secrets
Most people are waiting early for news on Tesla's (TSLA) planned robotaxi rollout, an event that CEO Elon Musk has been hyping up for months. With the buzz surrounding this well-publicized event, one that could usher in a new era for the automotive transportation industry, it can be easy to overlook Tesla's updates in other areas. But the company recently revealed that it may face a new challenge from a competitor in a different part of the sector. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter On Wednesday, June 11, Tesla filed a complaint in a San Francisco Federal Court, accusing a former employee of leaving the company with illegal material that may have been used to launch another company, which several prominent venture capitalists have backed. Now this startup is threatening Tesla's progress in a fast-growing market, and Musk's company is taking legal action in an attempt to avoid loss of market share. Image source: Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images Over the past few years, Tesla's Optimus program, its division that focuses on developing humanoid robot technology, has come into focus as Musk has touted its progress. He's discussed a future in which robots outnumber humans and perform many of the tasks typically done by humans. Related: Elon Musk finally gets some good news from Jeff Bezos That may sound like something out of a work of science fiction, but Tesla's more recent news reads more like something out of a novel by John Grisham or Scott Turow. The company is suing a former employee who left the company and promptly started a competitor, allegedly with stolen trade secrets. Zhongjie "Jay" Li spent two years at Tesla, serving as a Technical Lead between August 2022 and September 2024. During this time, he "advanced robotic hand sensors - and was entrusted with some of the most sensitive technical data in the program," according to the company's attorneys. When he left Tesla, though, Li allegedly walked away with highly classified information that the company believes he used to launch listed as being launched the same month that he departed. The startup's LinkedIn profile states that it creates "humanoids dexterous enough to thread a needle." More Tesla News: Tesla rival gets good news as robotaxi launch loomsThe 'anti-Tesla' gives American buyers more good newsTesla makes a desperate move as it continues to lose customers did not immediately respond to an inquiry from TheStreet regarding the lawsuit, and so far, has not issued a public statement on Tesla's accusations. However, Li has posted to X recently, implying - but not explicitly stating - that he doesn't trust Musk. Musk has staked much of Tesla's growth prospects on its robotaxi launch and its plans to advance into the humanoid robotics market. However, the lawsuit against Li isn't the only potential hurdle for the company to overcome as it rushes to usher in a turnaround. Related: Tesla faces new challenge as leader announces exit Early in June, Tesla lost one of its engineering leaders, as Vice President of Engineering Milan Kovic announced he would step down from his role at Optimus, effective immediately. He said his decision had nothing to do with Musk and purely reflected his own desire to spend more time with family. Even so, Musk's robotaxi ambitions are facing a growing list of challenges at a highly pivotal time. The company's declining sales across the U.S., Europe, and China indicate that it will need to make progress in other areas to remain competitive and keep shares elevated, despite Musk's decision to return to the company. Tesla has teased progress from its robotics division, including sharing a video of a dancing robot. But Proception claims to have overcome one of robotics' biggest challenges, that of creating a hand that can truly match human dexterity. It remains unknown how the lawsuit will progress. But in the short term, Tesla must deal with the fact that a new rival appears to be making progress in an important area. Related: Elon Musk company reveals major leap forward The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla EV registrations in the US fall 16% in April
Tesla (TSLA) electric vehicle registrations in the United States fell by 16% in April, acording to the latest data out from S&P Global Mobility. Yahoo Finance senior autos reporter Pras Subramanian dives into the report and weighs in on CEO Elon Musk's criticisms of President Trump's "big, beautiful" tax and spending bill and the delay of Tesla's robotaxi launch in Austin, Texas. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Tesla US registrations sliding 16% in April. That's according to data from S&P Global mobility. Joining us now from the Nasdaq Yahoo! Finance senior autos reporter Pras Subramanian. So Pras, um, what is what is this data telling us about sort of, I guess things that Tesla don't seem to be getting much better. Yeah, it's the first indication now we're seeing now US data, right? So registration data from S&P Global mobility showed that 16% drop in April year over year. Uh, this is happening while other competitors like Chevy and BMW see sales gains. So with regards to Tesla, uh, every model except the Model 3 saw sales drop in the US in April. And this is sort of coming on the backdrop of what we saw in Europe, right? We saw a lot of bad data there for sales data in Europe, mostly recently for for April and May there. So we're seeing an echo here in the US, but I want to quickly touch on the fact that, you know, we mentioned Chevy at number two, the very popular Equinox and Blazer EV doing well. BMW also there having some good models. They're seeing some sales gains. And then and Tesla overnight last night, maybe looking to address that the top in the market, updated the Model S and Model X vehicles there. So new updates there potentially to stem the losses and on the top end, but but nonetheless is still a pattern that we're seeing that has been recurring throughout the Western world and also now in the US now with April data. And Pros of course, if people investors in Tesla have been watching other things, namely, what seems to be sort of, you know, warming, if not warming relations, at least not further cooling relations between the president and Elon Musk, and also they're looking ahead to the robo taxi launch, which has been pushed back, yes to June 22nd. So we'll see if it if it gets pushed back more, but there does seem to be some optimism building around some of this stuff. Yeah, you saw Musk backtrack a little bit on those comments he made last week about the the the big beautiful bill talking about how it didn't really cut a lot of the spending, but mostly with the subtext of him being upset about potential loss to EV tax credit. That being said, the robo taxi launch are testing in Austin is happening. Uh we've seen some cars going back and forth to chase vehicles, but the actual official start Musk says won't happen till the 22nd. That was a push back from the 12th that was previously reported. And Musk also said the 22nd date could be pushed back just just because of of safety and precaution looking to be sort of cover all their bases with such a big high profile test happening in that city. But you know, we talked about this before, this is a big news for Tesla, big move. They need to do that to unlock the value, but you know, Waymo's been operating in Austin and also other cities for for some time now. So they have a lot of catching up to do when it comes to that robo taxi business. Yes. We'll see how it plays out. Pras, thank you. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Vox
5 hours ago
- Vox
What happens to DOGE without Elon Musk?
Elon Musk holds a news conference with President Donald Trump to mark the end of his tenure as a special government employee overseeing DOGE on May 30 in the Oval Office of the White House. Tom Brenner for Washington Post via Getty Images Elon Musk may be gone from the Trump administration — and his friendship status with President Donald Trump may be at best uncertain — but his whirlwind stint in government certainly left its imprint. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), his pet government-slashing project, remains entrenched in Washington. During his 130-day tenure, Musk led DOGE in eliminating about 260,000 federal employee jobs and gutting agencies supporting scientific research and humanitarian aid. But to date, DOGE claims to have saved the government $180 billion — well short of its ambitious (and frankly never realistic) target of cutting at least $2 trillion from the federal budget. And with Musk's departure still fresh, there are reports that the federal government is trying to rehire federal workers who quit or were let go. For Elaine Kamarck, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, DOGE's tactics will likely end up being disastrous in the long run. 'DOGE came in with these huge cuts, which were not attached to a plan,' she told Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram. Kamarck knows all about making government more efficient. In the 1990s, she ran the Clinton administration's Reinventing Government program. 'I was Elon Musk,' she told Today, Explained. With the benefit of that experience, she assesses Musk's record at DOGE, and what, if anything, the billionaire's loud efforts at cutting government spending added up to. Below is an excerpt of the conversation, edited for length and clarity. There's much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. What do you think Elon Musk's legacy is? Well, he will not have totally, radically reshaped the federal government. Absolutely not. In fact, there's a high probability that on January 20, 2029, when the next president takes over, the federal government is about the same size as it is now, and is probably doing the same stuff that it's doing now. What he did manage to do was insert chaos, fear, and loathing into the federal workforce. There was reporting in the Washington Post late last week that these cuts were so ineffective that the White House is actually reaching out to various federal employees who were laid off and asking them to come back, from the FDA to the IRS to even USAID. Which cuts are sticking at this point and which ones aren't? First of all, in a lot of cases, people went to court and the courts have reversed those earlier decisions. So the first thing that happened is, courts said, 'No, no, no, you can't do it this way. You have to bring them back.' The second thing that happened is that Cabinet officers started to get confirmed by the Senate. And remember that a lot of the most spectacular DOGE stuff was happening in February. In February, these Cabinet secretaries were preparing for their Senate hearings. They weren't on the job. Now that their Cabinet secretary's home, what's happening is they're looking at these cuts and they're saying, 'No, no, no! We can't live with these cuts because we have a mission to do.' As the government tries to hire back the people they fired, they're going to have a tough time, and they're going to have a tough time for two reasons. First of all, they treated them like dirt, and they've said a lot of insulting things. Second, most of the people who work for the federal government are highly skilled. They're not paper pushers. We have computers to push our paper, right? They're scientists. They're engineers. They're people with high skills, and guess what? They can get jobs outside the government. So there's going to be real lasting damage to the government from the way they did this. And it's analogous to the lasting damage that they're causing at universities, where we now have top scientists who used to invent great cures for cancer and things like that, deciding to go find jobs in Europe because this culture has gotten so bad. What happens to this agency now? Who's in charge of it? Well, what they've done is DOGE employees have been embedded in each of the organizations in the government, okay? And they basically — and the president himself has said this — they basically report to the Cabinet secretaries. So if you are in the Transportation Department, you have to make sure that Sean Duffy, who's the secretary of transportation, agrees with you on what you want to do. And Sean Duffy has already had a fight during a Cabinet meeting with Elon Musk. You know that he has not been thrilled with the advice he's gotten from DOGE. So from now on, DOGE is going to have to work hand in hand with Donald Trump's appointed leaders. And just to bring this around to what we're here talking about now, they're in this huge fight over wasteful spending with the so-called big, beautiful bill. Does this just look like the government as usual, ultimately? It's actually worse than normal. Because the deficit impacts are bigger than normal. It's adding more to the deficit than previous bills have done. And the second reason it's worse than normal is that everybody is still living in a fantasy world. And the fantasy world says that somehow we can deal with our deficits by cutting waste, fraud, and abuse. That is pure nonsense. Let me say it: pure nonsense. Where does most of the government money go? Does it go to some bureaucrats sitting on Pennsylvania Avenue? It goes to us. It goes to your grandmother and her Social Security and her Medicare. It goes to veterans in veterans benefits. It goes to Americans. That's why it's so hard to cut it. It's so hard to cut it because it's us.
