SEC votes to stop defending climate disclosure rule
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to stop defending a rule that required some companies to disclose their planet-warming emissions and how climate change would impact their business.
The Republican-majority commission's Thursday decision is not a surprise, as it had previously said it would pause its defense of the rule.
However, the formal vote marks yet another step toward the likely death of a rule that sent shockwaves through Wall Street.
The SEC's acting chair, Mark Uyeda, said in a statement that the rule was 'costly and unnecessarily intrusive.'
However, climate activists said that the decision provides less transparency for the public.
'Letting companies hide climate risks doesn't make those risks any less real — it just makes it harder for investors to manage them and protect their long-term savings,' said Ben Cushing, director of the Sierra Club's Sustainable Finance campaign, in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Spectrum: Lt. Gov. Tressel; Ohio budget; defense contractor setting up in central Ohio
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – This week on The Spectrum: Former Ohio State football coach Jim Tressel is settling in as Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine's right-hand man, but will he try to run to replace him? Colleen Marshall sits with the lieutenant governor for an exclusive interview as he weighs a potential run for the governor's mansion. Both property tax relief and a flat state income tax could become a reality if the latest draft of the state budget passes. 'I think it's a very exciting and very bold budget,' State Sen. Jerry Cirino (R-Kirtland) said. Hear how the budget could affect funding for the state's school districts. Anduril, a cutting-edge defense contractor, is setting up shop in America's heartland. 'Central Ohio is going to be vital to the future of what we do,' Anduril Senior Vice President of Strategy Zachary Mears said. Hear how the business is already making an impact on the war in Ukraine as it prepares to employ thousands of central Ohioans. Democratic strategist Spencer Dirrig and Republican strategist Terry Casey join the roundtable to discuss Tressel's political future in red-state Ohio and the disagreements between the Ohio House and Senate over the budget. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
How the House Settlement will reshape Texas A&M athletics
How the House Settlement will reshape Texas A&M athletics It's time for the universities and colleges to back up the Brinks trucks as they get ready to deal with all the financial obligations as a result of the House settlement approval on Friday evening. After years of lawsuits and the rise of NIL in college athletics, regulation is finally being introduced. However, the legal battles are far from over, and precedent-setting cases will likely continue for years. For now, we can examine how this approval, alongside the Texas bill, will shape Texas A&M athletics, particularly with universities now permitted to directly pay athletes. Financial Impact The most significant factor is money. The landmark case, approved by Judge Claudia Wilken, allocates $2.5–$3 billion to former players from 2016–2024 who were unable to benefit from NIL. Additionally, a revenue-sharing model essentially establishes a salary cap, beginning at approximately $20 million for the upcoming season and increasing annually over the next decade. Scholarship & Roster Changes Another major shift is the removal of scholarship limits, replaced by roster restrictions. Texas A&M head football coach Mike Elko has repeatedly highlighted the challenges this presents when shaping a team while awaiting regulatory clarity. These uncertainties complicate roster management as teams prepare for rapid policy implementation. Title IX Implications An unresolved concern is how funding will be allocated across various sports, particularly women's athletics. Even though money is earmarked for women's sports, the exact distribution under the settlement remains unclear. Following their strong season, fans are calling for increased funding for Texas A&M's softball team, led by Coach Trisha Ford. With the sport's popularity on the rise, financial investments may shift in the coming years. Texas A&M's Position Athletic Director Trev Alberts has faced criticism for his early fiscal conservatism, yet he has positioned Texas A&M ahead of the curve. At the annual SEC meetings, Alberts reinforced the university's commitment to expanding scholarships. Current & Future Scholarship Allocations: Overall: 255 → 400+ 255 → 400+ Football: 85 → 105 85 → 105 Men's Basketball: 13 → 15 13 → 15 Women's Basketball: 15 → 15 15 → 15 Baseball: 11.7 → 34 11.7 → 34 Softball: 12 → 25 12 → 25 Men's Track & Field: 12.6 → 45 12.6 → 45 Women's Track & Field: 18 → 45 While changes will impact each university differently, Texas A&M is well-positioned to provide a strong student-athlete experience without cutting sports. However, the future remains uncertain as college athletics enters a new era of free agency, where players may seek better opportunities elsewhere if an opportunity to secure their future financially presents itself. Contact/Follow us @AggiesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Texas A&M news, notes and opinions. Follow Jarrett Johnson on X: @whosnextsports1.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - What's the matter with Ohio? Trump tariffs are a loser even in Red states.
Donald Trump largely got a second chance at the presidency due to a deep dissatisfaction with the economy. It turns out his tariff policy has not eased fears and in fact may be fueling deeper anxieties among voters. It is one of the few issues where a significant number of Republican voters are willing to break with the president. Notably, independent voters are also spooked by tariff uncertainty. While public opinion polling in the aggregate has illustrated these trends, few polls have probed how Red State voters are reacting to Trump's tariff policies. Once a prized bellwether state, Ohio has now voted solidly Republican in the last three elections, including a double-digit margin of victory for Trump in 2024. Yet, our poll of Buckeye voters finds Trump is currently underwater and the tariffs are a major reason why. A majority of Ohio voters (51 percent) believe the Trump tariff policies will personally hurt them and just 1 in 4 think his tariff policies will benefit them. About half think the tariffs will hurt the United States (49 percent), while 38 percent think the country will benefit from them. This is somewhat vexing as Trump had long indicated he would engage in an aggressive tariff policy in his second term. Perhaps the uneven rollout and increased media attention to the potential effects of tariffs on the American consumer could be driving the discontent. Although Trump enjoys almost universal support among Republicans in our poll on most issues, there is some melt when it comes to the tariffs. Just 47 percent of Republicans think the tariffs will personally help them, and less than 1 in 5 think the tariffs will personally hurt them. Independents also provide some caution, as a majority (53 percent) think they will personally be hurt by Trump's tariff policies. The poll finds some rare bipartisan agreement in who respondents think will benefit most from the tariff policies. Respondents overwhelmingly think the tariffs will benefit the wealthy (66 percent) and large corporations (60 percent). Majorities of both Democrats (75 percent) and Republicans (56 percent) believe the wealthy will benefit from the tariff policies. Seventy-two percent of independents also believe the wealthy will benefit. When it comes to large corporations, however, it is Republicans who are most likely to agree that these entities would likely benefit from the Trump tariff policies, with 67 percent in agreement, compared to 55 percent of Democrats and 51 percent of Independents. Large majorities of all respondents believe that small businesses (59 percent), the middle class (58 percent), the working class (58 percent), labor unions (58 percent) and the United States automobile industry (54 percent) do not stand to benefit from the tariffs. Although Trump has claimed that his tariff policies would benefit these groups, thus far, most people appear to be skeptical. This is a message Democrats will likely amplify leading up to next year's midterm elections. As might be expected, the largest amount of agreement among all respondents is that foreign governments would not benefit from the tariffs (75 percent). Overall, we find Trump's approval in Ohio is underwater with 47 percent approving and 48 percent disapproving of his job in office. Keep in mind that this poll is of voters who indicated they supported Trump by a 10-point margin, largely reflecting the actual outcome of the 2024 election in the state. Moreover, this is a 7-point slide in favorability from when we polled Ohio voters in February of this year. Nationally, Trump's approval is at minus 4, with 46 percent approval and 50 percent disapproval. The frenzied pace of the first few months of the second Trump presidency has created some unease among many voters as well. Not surprisingly, nearly 9 in 10 Democrats feel more anxious (86 percent). More broadly, majorities of non-whites (59 percent), those 18-44 (53 percent) and women (50 percent), personally feel more anxious with Trump as president. While 24 percent of independents are less anxious with Trump as president, 43 percent are more anxious with him as president. Notably, Trump has changed course on the implementation of his tariffs on several occasions already, likely fueling more uncertainty among voters. Citizens across the country and in red states in particular have conveyed a strong distrust in government and an impulse for change. The advantages Republicans have in the House and Senate may be in jeopardy, given that the president's party has an average midterm loss of 28 seats in the House and 4 seats in the Senate from 1934-2018. In 2022, Republicans gained just 8 seats in the House and lost one seat in the Senate. If public opinion continues in this direction, especially in red states, some Republicans will be faced with difficult choices on how closely they align themselves with Trump and his tariff agenda. Robert Alexander is a professor of political science at Bowling Green State University. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
