logo
Salton Sea is emitting foul-smelling hydrogen sulfide gas, triggering health concerns

Salton Sea is emitting foul-smelling hydrogen sulfide gas, triggering health concerns

Yahoo2 days ago

On scorching days when winds blow across the California desert, the Salton Sea regularly gives off a stench of decay resembling rotten eggs.
New research has found that the shrinking lake is emitting the foul-smelling gas hydrogen sulfide more frequently and at higher levels than previously measured.
The findings document how the odors from the Salton Sea add to the air quality problems and health concerns in communities near the lake, where windblown dust drifts from exposed stretches of lakebed and where people suffer from high rates of asthma and other respiratory illnesses.
'The communities around the Salton Sea are on the front lines of a worsening environmental health crisis,' said Mara Freilich, a co-author of the study and assistant professor in Brown University's Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences.
The Salton Sea is California's largest lake, covering more than 300 square miles in Imperial and Riverside counties. Hydrogen sulfide is released as a byproduct of decaying algae and other organic material in the lake, where accumulating fertilizers and other nutrients from agricultural runoff and wastewater feed the growth of algae.
Hydrogen sulfide, or H2S, is toxic and studies have found that health effects of exposure at certain levels can include dizziness, headaches, vomiting, cough, chest tightness and depression. Although being exposed to high levels in the workplace is a widely known health hazard, less is known about the health effects of chronic exposure to the gas at lower levels.
People who live near the Salton Sea, many of them farmworkers, have complained for years that the stench, which tends to emerge most strongly in August and September, can give them headaches, nausea and nosebleeds.
Read more: California turns on water to create new wetlands on the shore of the shrinking Salton Sea
Freilich and other researchers analyzed existing air-quality data from three monitoring stations maintained by the South Coast Air Quality Management District in Indio, Mecca and the reservation of the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians.
They worked with the local nonprofit group Alianza Coachella Valley to install an additional air-quality sensor on a wooden piling protruding from shallow water near the north shore. The sensor has often detected hydrogen sulfide at high levels.
Examining data from different monitoring sites between May 1 and July 25, 2024, they found a striking contrast. Although the monitor on the Torres Martinez reservation detected hydrogen sulfide at levels exceeding the state air-quality standard for only four hours during that time, the sensor over the water found 177 hours with levels above the threshold.
The scientists said their results indicate that a significant portion of the gas that's being released by the Salton Sea isn't being measured, even as the stench drifts through the area's predominantly Latino communities.
'These findings highlight the need for improved air quality monitoring and more effective environmental management policies to protect public health in the region,' the researchers wrote in the study, which was published May 31 in the journal GeoHealth.
The Salton Sea lies about 242 feet below sea level in the Salton Trough, which over thousands of years has cycled between filling with Colorado River water and drying out. The lake was formed most recently in 1905-07, when the Colorado flooded the region, filling the low-lying basin.
In the 1950s and '60s, the Salton Sea became a popular destination where tourists flocked to go fishing, boating and waterskiing. Celebrities including Frank Sinatra and Lucille Ball visited the lake during its heyday.
But lakeside communities deteriorated after flooding in the 1970s. Fishing waned as the lake grew too salty for introduced species such as corvina, and people stopped boating as the water quality worsened.
Read more: In the dust of the Coachella Valley, residents push for a park along the shrinking Salton Sea
The lake has for more than a century been sustained by water draining off farms in the Imperial Valley, but it has been shrinking since the early 2000s, when the Imperial Irrigation District began selling a portion of its Colorado River water to growing urban areas under an agreement with agencies in San Diego County and the Coachella Valley.
The lake's level has declined about 13 feet since 2003. Its water is now about twice as salty as the ocean and continues to get saltier with evaporation. Bird populations have declined.
Hydrogen sulfide builds up in the lower, oxygen-deprived layer of water in the lake as decaying algae and other material decompose. During the hottest times of year, a warm upper layer of water forms. Then, when winds churn up the lake, some of the deeper water can rise to the surface and release the stinky gas into the air.
California's ambient air-quality standard is 30 parts per billion, averaged over one hour. The study found that under certain wind conditions, hydrogen sulfide levels were on average 17 parts per billion higher at the newly installed sensor over the water compared with an existing monitor near the shore.
Sometimes, the sensor detected levels as high as about 200 parts per billion.
People can detect the smell of the gas, however, at levels as low as 1 or 2 parts per billion.
'Residents exposed to hydrogen sulfide are impacted not only in their physical health — experiencing respiratory irritation, headaches and fatigue — but as well in their quality of life,' said Diego Centeno, the study's lead author, who conducted the research while studying at Brown University and is now a doctoral student at UCLA.
'If you want to be active outside, go on a run or do something, and it smells like rotten eggs, you'd be more inclined not to,' Centeno said. 'Especially during summertime, nobody wants to go outside.'
Centeno grew up within sight of the Salton Sea in the low-income community of North Shore. He said he was always fascinated by the immense body of water, not knowing why he never saw anyone bathing or boating in it.
'As water levels continue to decline, if nothing is done, this hydrogen sulfide gas really has the potential to grow,' Centeno said. 'So the more we understand, the more we can learn how to mitigate and restore the Salton Sea.'
Read more: As California farms use less Colorado River water, worries grow over shrinking Salton Sea
The researchers said their findings highlight the need for increased air-quality monitoring around the Salton Sea, and for regulators to focus on hydrogen sulfide as a pollutant that affects people's health.
Freilich said regional water regulators should prioritize setting of water-quality standards for the Salton Sea, a step that could lead to efforts to treat or reduce the nutrient levels of water flowing into the lake.
'The water quality in the sea is affecting the air quality,' she said. 'It requires the attention of multiple agencies, because it is something that connects water quality and air quality, which are typically handled separately.'
The South Coast Air Quality Management District, or AQMD, regulates air pollution in the Coachella Valley, including the northern portion of the Salton Sea. In May, the agency installed a fourth monitor for hydrogen sulfide on the northeastern side of the lake.
'This H2S monitoring network is very comprehensive,' said Rainbow Yeung, an AQMD spokesperson, adding that there are currently only a few other monitors reporting such data in the country.
Yeung said in an email that the sensor installed by the researchers is of a different type than the agency's monitors and 'may have higher H2S readings as the location of the sensor is over the source of likely emissions, which can be dispersed and therefore may not be representative of levels experienced by the community.'
AQMD issues alerts whenever hydrogen sulfide levels reach the state standard of 33 ppb at any of the monitoring sites. (Residents can sign up to receive these air-quality alerts at www.saltonseaodor.org.)
The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has established a chronic exposure threshold for hydrogen sulfide of 8 parts per billion, a level at which long-term exposure over many years may begin to result in health effects.
Read more: Meager snowpack adds to Colorado River's woes, straining flows to Southern California
The highest annual average concentration at any of the AQMD monitoring sites since 2016 has been 5.5 parts per billion, and annual averages have typically been less than 3 parts per billion, levels at which health effects are not expected, Yeung said.
The water that drains from Imperial Valley farmland and feeds the sea comes from the Colorado River. A quarter-century of mostly dry years compounded by climate change has prompted difficult negotiations among seven states over how to use less water from the dwindling river.
As these talks examine water-saving solutions, Freilich said, policymakers should 'account for the health impacts on communities' and prioritize steps that will help mitigate the problems.
California officials recently sent water flowing from a pipe onto hundreds of acres of dry lake bed near the south shore, filling a complex of shallow ponds in an effort to create wetland habitat for fish and birds, and help control lung-damaging dust.
It's not known how these new wetlands might affect emissions of hydrogen sulfide, and Freilich said she and her team plan additional studies focusing on wetlands and shallow-water areas.
Consuelo Márquez, a Coachella resident who has helped with the research, said she lived for several years as a child in North Shore, where she got nosebleeds and experienced the rotten egg odor, a 'really strong fishy smell.'
'I would wake up with blood on my pillow,' she said. When she asked her father about it, she recalled him saying: 'This happens because of the lake, because of the air.'
She said the study's results validate the concerns many people have been raising for years.
Aydee Palomino, a co-author of the study and environmental justice project manager for the group Alianza Coachella Valley, said the study shows people are 'breathing in pollutants that are under the radar of traditional monitoring systems.'
'This has the potential to have really far-reaching ramifications if it's not addressed,' Palomino said.
Funding for the research came from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Google's Environmental Justice Data Fund and NASA. But Freilich learned in March that the Trump administration had terminated the NASA grant under an order targeting diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
The researchers have an ongoing appeal of that decision, which Freilich said has been disruptive to ongoing work.
'The community is who's going to suffer at the end of the day,' Palomino said. 'And it is unfortunate because now it comes back to us to fill in the research gaps.'
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vitiligo in Children Linked to Higher Hearing Loss
Vitiligo in Children Linked to Higher Hearing Loss

Medscape

time14 hours ago

  • Medscape

Vitiligo in Children Linked to Higher Hearing Loss

Children with vitiligo showed higher risks for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and mixed hearing loss compared with matched peers in a study, but not with ocular conditions. METHODOLOGY: The study analyzed data on pediatric patients with vitiligo from 89 healthcare organizations in the US through the TriNetX Research Network between 2016 and 2024. There were 21,833 pediatric patients with vitiligo (mean age, 9.6 years; 50.1% boys) and an equal number of matched children without vitiligo. Nearly 45% of participants in both groups were White, about 27% were Hispanic or Latino, about 14% were Black, and 6.6% were Asian. The primary outcomes were hearing loss and ocular disorders. TAKEAWAY: Children with vitiligo showed significantly higher risks for SNHL (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.38-2.51) and mixed hearing loss (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.29-3.44) compared with children without vitiligo. No significant difference was observed for conductive hearing loss between the two groups. SNHL risk increased with time after the first year of follow-up, with an HR of 2.03 (95% CI, 1.21-3.41) for 1-3 years, and 2.56 (95% CI, 1.55-4.22) for follow-up periods longer than 3 years. The risk for mixed hearing loss was elevated only in the first year (HR, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.65-14.4). Researchers found an elevated risk for retinal and choroidal disorders (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.06-2.31), but this was not consistent in sensitivity analyses. There were no significant differences in the risks for vision impairment, dry eye, uveitis, or glaucoma between the two groups. IN PRACTICE: 'Our observation of increased SNHL risk, particularly after the first year of follow-up, aligns with the theory that hearing loss develops progressively through cumulative cochlear damage, correlating with disease duration and extent,' the study authors wrote. 'Further prospective studies are needed to illuminate the mechanisms underlying these associations and guide clinical practice,' they added. SOURCE: This study was led by Serena Yun-Chen Tsai, MD, MMSc, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, and was published online on June 11 in JAMA Dermatology . LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design; reliance on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes; and the absence of data regarding vitiligo severity, phenotypes, location, audiometry findings, and visual function measurements. Dermatologist diagnoses or referrals were not verified, and the rarity of some outcomes could have introduced bias. DISCLOSURES: This study's funding source was not disclosed. One author reported receiving grants, personal fees, and consulting fees from multiple pharmaceutical companies, including Incyte, Barinthus Biotherapeutics, Alys Pharmaceuticals, and AbbVie; being a founder and owning stocks in Alys Pharmaceuticals and Incyte; and serving as chief innovation officer for Alys Pharmaceuticals. Another author reported serving on the advisory board for Sanofi and receiving a salary from a Weston Career Development Award from the Society for Pediatric Dermatology and the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance.

Can You Still Get a COVID Vaccine This Fall? Here's What to Know
Can You Still Get a COVID Vaccine This Fall? Here's What to Know

Scientific American

time2 days ago

  • Scientific American

Can You Still Get a COVID Vaccine This Fall? Here's What to Know

For the first time since the COVID vaccines became available in pharmacies in 2021, the average person in the U.S. can't count on getting a free annual shot against a disease that has been the main or a contributing cause of death for more than 1.2 million people around the country, including nearly 12,000 to date this year. 'COVID's not done with us,' says Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at Brown University. 'We have to keep using the tools that we have. It's not like we get to forget about COVID.' In recent weeks, the Department of Health and Human Services, led by prominent antivaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has announced a barrage of measures that are likely to reduce COVID vaccine access, leading to a swirl of confusion about what will be available for the 2025–2026 season. HHS officials did not respond to a request for comment for this article. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Government officials appear to be limiting COVID shots to people who are aged 65 and older and to those who have certain preexisting health conditions—groups that have long been known to face a higher risk of developing severe COVID. Pregnant people and some children, meanwhile, appear to be explicitly excluded from access, despite plentiful evidence that vaccines are very safe and effective for them and that COVID infections can cause them significant harm. Scientific American spoke with clinicians and public health experts about the latest COVID vaccine recommendations, what access may look like this fall and how these policies might influence people's vaccination choices and health. What COVID vaccines will be manufactured this year? Public health experts are monitoring a strain of the COVID-causing virus SARS-CoV-2 called NB.1.8.1, which was first detected early this year and last month became responsible for one in 10 COVID cases globally. So far, the new variant has mostly been reported in Asia and Europe. But it has also been picked up in airport surveillance in multiple U.S. states, says Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious disease physician and a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. The emergence of a new variant isn't surprising, particularly at this time of year, Chin-Hong says. 'It's kind of acting like clockwork—maybe this might be the variant of the summer,' he adds. Still, NB.1.8.1 has led to concerns about a potential surge in cases—although Chin-Hong and other scientists don't have any evidence so far that it causes more serious disease than other currently circulating strains. 'All of these new variants, they might be more transmissible, they might be more immune evasive, but I've seen no data whatsoever that suggests that they're more pathogenic,' says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan. Within the U.S., a strain called LP.8.1 has been the most common one detected since March. Both NB.1.8.1 and LP.8.1 are among the alphabet soup of strains that descended from a key ancestor lineage called Omicron JN.1, which dominated U.S. cases by early 2024. Current vaccines target this category of strains. And in May a Food and Drug Administration panel determined that, this year, vaccine producers should again tailor their shots to a single strain within the JN.1 lineage—preferably LP.8.1. What's going on with COVID vaccine policy? Strain selection aside, the recent messaging and decision-making on vaccine policy for COVID and beyond have been chaotic, with various governmental groups and officials announcing different access guidelines and restrictions. 'The situation we're in right now is nuts,' says Nuzzo, referring to the fact that agency leaders have sidestepped the formal science committees that traditionally make vaccine-related decisions. 'We don't change vaccine policy on a willy-nilly basis. There's an incredible amount of nuance, and all of the data need to be considered.' But on June 9 Kennedy took a major step against this evidence-driven decision-making process by firing the entire CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Kennedy announced the committee rehaul in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, in which he alleged there were 'persistent conflicts of interest' among committee members. According to a recent HHS statement, new committee members are under consideration, and the group will still meet as scheduled from June 25 to 27. ACIP has traditionally been particularly important because any vaccine it recommends must be fully paid for by health insurance companies—a condition that greatly determines real-world access. It's unclear what the committee's overhaul will mean for COVID vaccine access in particular. Another concern is that Kennedy announced in late April that HHS would implement a policy requiring all 'new' vaccines—including updated versions of existing ones, such as COVID shots—to be tested against a placebo. The original COVID vaccines were tested in just this manner. But conducting similar tests when an effective and very safe vaccine already exists would be not only unethical for researchers but also expensive and time-consuming for manufacturers. It remains unclear when the new policy will take effect. What does this mean for COVID vaccine access this fall? If you are 65 years old or older, you should be able to get a COVID shot as you have in recent years. If you have an underlying condition such as cancer, diabetes, or heart or lung problems, you may also be able to get a COVID shot as usual. These issues and several others are on the CDC's list of conditions that leave people more vulnerable to severe disease, and this list is included in the description of the new regulatory framework. One 2021 study looked at many (but not all) of the conditions on the list and estimated that three in four U.S. adults has at least one. People are allowed to self-disclose a preexisting condition at pharmacies without a prescription or doctor's note. That list could also be expanded later if new research finds other risk factors that increase people's risk of severe COVID, says Jacinda Abdul-Mutakabbir, a clinical pharmacist and an assistant professor at the University of California, San Diego. But there's also a chance that qualifying conditions may be reduced instead. For example, current or recent pregnancy is included in the CDC's existing list, but HHS officials announced in late May that the COVID vaccine would no longer be recommended for pregnant people. Data have shown that COVID may cause various complications during pregnancy —increasing the risk that the pregnant person may require emergency care, be put on a ventilator or die. The newborn child of an infected person is also more likely to be born preterm or to have low birth weight. And babies younger than six months old—who are ineligible for vaccination because of their immature immune system—have the highest rates COVID hospitalization after adults aged 75 and older. In contrast, evidence from people vaccinated during pregnancy show that newborns receive protective immunity through antibodies that cross the placenta and are found in breast milk, Chin-Hong explains. Healthy children also face new restrictions to COVID vaccine access: The shot is now only recommended to them based on 'shared clinical decision-making,' according to the vaccine schedules released by the CDC last month. This means parents must consult with a health practitioner about whether to vaccinate such children. Experts worry about the consequences of restricting access for kids. Children under age 18 make up a smaller percentage of COVID hospitalizations and deaths. But that doesn't mean zero risk, Chin-Hong says. 'We know that COVID still kills kids,' he says. 'No death of a child is a good death—and these are all preventable.' 'Because children and pregnant people are considered vulnerable populations, they were not included in the original studies that were done for the COVID vaccines,' Abdul-Mutakabbir says. But five years' worth of real-world vaccine data from these groups show the health benefits. 'We do see effectiveness and safety in these vaccines,' she says. It's still possible that the late June ACIP meeting will shift the landscape again. But if you want a COVID vaccine this fall and don't meet current guidelines, you may still be able to request a shot. Your insurance may not pay for it, however, leaving you to risk a price tag of around $200. 'Insurance companies or providers are only required to pay for vaccines that are listed as recommended by the CDC,' Abdul-Mutakabbir says. Full, partial or no-cost coverage for nonrecommended vaccines is at the insurance provider's discretion. Any changes to coverage—and the times at which those changes are announced—will vary among programs, including private and governmental ones, such as the federal-state program Medicaid and the federal program Medicare. Until then, Chin-Hong and Abdul-Mutakabbir say, the COVID vaccines released in the fall of 2024 are still recommended and available to people who haven't already had one. And as of April 26, only 23 percent of adults and 13 percent of children in the U.S. had received the shot. 'If you are nervous about the surge or planning summer travel, I would recommend' getting the vaccine, Abdul-Mutakabbir says. The larger fight over vaccines For Rasmussen, the confusion over COVID shots signals the beginning of a longer tug-of-war—with Kennedy's HHS on one end. 'I think I know what their plan is, and it's to reduce access to vaccines in general,' she says. 'In my view, this is an incremental step in a larger attack on vaccination in general.' She encourages people worried about vaccine restrictions—and about the role of science in making these decisions—to call their congressional legislators. 'A lot of people speaking out is what is needed right now to make a big difference here,' she says. Abdul-Mutakabbir also hopes people continue to seek vaccines for COVID and other diseases—especially while they are still easily available. 'It's important that we consider the things that we can protect ourselves against,' Abdul-Mutakabbir says. 'Should you have a barrier with getting a COVID vaccine, guess what? There's no change to the flu vaccine; there's no changes to the pneumococcal recommendations; there's no change to measles, mumps, rubella vaccine. Get the vaccines that we can get.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store