Rise of the robot colleague: Why workers are choosing AI over each other
Freepik/rawpixel.com (for illustration purposes only)
INTERNATIONAL: Today's workplaces have significantly changed — more and more workers are turning to artificial intelligence (AI) for ideas and emotional support instead of their human officemates, and this trend has rewritten the rules of workplace culture. According to Microsoft's latest Work Trend Index report , published by HRD Asia , an increasing number of professionals see AI as a collaborative partner and not a mechanical tool, a 'different kind of team member.' AI becomes the ultimate brainstorm buddy
Approximately half (46%) of employees now see AI as a dependable and consistent 'thought partner' — a source of productive ideas, a brainstorm buddy, that can spur creativity, challenge their cognitive abilities, and test their perceptions. Instead of only banking on human colleagues, countless workers have opted for AI for its exceptional gains. Employees said they turn to AI because it's at all times accessible (42%), provides rapid responses and superior results (30%), and delivers a continuous stream of novel concepts (28%). More than these advantages, AI doesn't get tired as it has unlimited capacity (23%). In short, AI is prepared and equipped to work at any time of the day. Dodging drama: Why some avoid human help
For many workers, the move towards AI is not merely about acquiring competence or achieving productivity — it is also about dodging the uneasiness of working with colleagues, especially those who have attitude problems. Respondents to the survey mentioned anxiety over judgment (17%), personal tensions (16%), and highly demanding colleagues (15%) as motives why they chose AI. A minor group (8%) even said they try to sidestep alliances or teamwork tasks because co-workers tend to claim too much credit for things they didn't even exert effort on.
'It's a mindset shift,' said Conor Grennan, chief AI architect at NYU Stern School of Business. 'We've been trained to see technology as a tool, but AI is something different — it's like a new teammate.' From HR to IR: The next evolution in the workplace
As AI becomes a vital player in everyday work, businesses are starting to reconsider how teams should work. The report proposes that all workers will have to build capabilities around communicating well with AI, such as creating improved prompts, filtering AI-produced replies, and detecting flawed reasoning.
Specialists even forecast the development and rise of a completely new division to accomplish this trend. 'Just as HR and IT became foundational functions, we'll likely see the rise of Intelligence Resources departments,' said Harvard's Karim Lakhani. These divisions will aid in overseeing how humans and AI intermingle and collaborate, eventually becoming a key driver of competitive advantage in AI-first establishments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
16 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: Don't be fooled by GenAI financial advisers
NEW YORK: The wealth management industry is prepared to court its newest potential clients: Gen Z. Instead of trotting out older professionals with decades of experience, companies are utilising generative AI to develop digital assistants. These new 'experts' even come with the ability to use slang to appear relatable and relevant to their target demographic. Embracing the newest technology is yet another cultural shift in the financial services landscape that disrupts some of the norms in the industry. We've seen it with the development of robo-advisers and the rise of ' finfluencers '. Cue the traditionalists turning their noses up at how far the financial advice field has strayed from its origins. After all, future iterations of GenAI really could accelerate the long-prophesied doomsday for flesh-and-blood financial planners. IMPROVING SOFT SKILLS But now isn't the time for humans to declare defeat. Until advanced versions of the technology arrive, people should be doubling down on the one significant advantage they have against their digital counterparts: soft skills. Providing investing advice is only one facet of the job. The role is part therapist, accountability coach and teacher. Real people can push back against panicked requests to sell in a turbulent market instead of simply executing an order. A person understands how and when to ask more questions to determine the reason behind a request for conservative investments such as bonds, even at a young age when it's detrimental to be overly cautious. The problem for many young adults is that accessing this more holistic approach, which goes beyond stats and data, is costly. Financial advisers usually get paid in one of two ways: assets under management (AUM) – a percentage of a customer's investments each year – or a flat-rate fee. The latter varies based on the level of service. A comprehensive financial plan can cost thousands of dollars. AUM ranges from 0.25 per cent to 1.5 per cent, with some advisers reducing the cost as the size of a portfolio grows. LOWER BARRIERS TO ENTRY The greater barrier to entry is the possible minimum investable assets requirement, which often hovers between US$500,000 and US$1 million. Fifteen years ago, these factors prohibited access for millennials. This reality paved the way for cost-effective alternatives in the form of robo-advisers, such as Betterment and Wealthfront, with significantly lower AUM and no asset minimums. The companies sent shockwaves through the industry as many wondered if machines would finally usurp man. As years passed, it became obvious the two could have a symbiotic relationship. In fact, it turned out millennials ultimately did crave some soft skills, which led to platforms launching versions that gave customers access to humans. Instead of cratering the industry, the robo-advisers forced their living counterparts to compete in different ways. Some diversified their services, including offering virtual counsel, and others targeted less-affluent clientele. While it's easy for the regular consumer to conflate a robo-adviser with GenAI, the two are not the same. The latter is built on language-learning models instead of the mathematical-centric AI models and machine-learning algorithms that provide the underpinnings for companies like Betterment and Wealthfront. Gen Z investors may be more attracted to GenAI because it can simulate how people speak and even look. Plus, the cohort is more primed to be early adopters of the tool. They've grown used to receiving free, one-size-fits-all money guidance online. FALLIBLE TECHNOLOGY A stunning 77 per cent of teens and 20-somethings use online platforms and social media to answer their money questions, according to a 2025 Credit Karma survey. But they should remember that the technology's modern iteration is new and, like humans, fallible, which results in inaccurate or misleading information known as 'hallucinations.' Even with all these issues to resolve, companies are bullish on GenAI's ability to spit out 24/7 guidance and woo new clients. Arta Finance, a wealth management startup, is at the forefront of providing an AI financial adviser with Arta AI. The 'AI agents', as the company refers to its investment planner, product specialist, and research analyst offerings, can respond to queries by voice or text (and do so in the aforementioned generationally-appropriate slang). Arta is only available to accredited investors and offers access to human professionals, but the company plans to make Arta AI available to other financial services companies. A move that could give all kinds of retail investors access to its product. It's likely that plenty of platforms won't wait to license the service and instead will develop their own. A HUGE PITFALL Robinhood Markets plans to launch Robinhood Cortex, an AI-powered digital research assistant, this fall. The app offers a variety of investing options, including Robinhood Strategies, the company's robo-adviser. Unlike Arta Finance's offering of real-life advisers alongside its AI agents, Robinhood customers can currently only access a support team, which is mostly available to handle administrative questions. And that's a huge pitfall. Companies that don't prioritise establishing relationships with real professionals can cause retail investors to panic in turbulent times, especially novice ones who are able to access advanced opportunities, such as trading options. Granting inexperienced customers access to higher-level investing products without proper support can be financially, mentally and emotionally ruinous. Robinhood should know. In 2020, it paid the largest Financial Industry Regulatory Authority fine in history – US$70 million – for its technical outages, lack of due diligence before approving customers to trade options and sending of misleading information.
CNA
2 days ago
- CNA
Exclusive-Anthropic hits $3 billion in annualized revenue on business demand for AI
SAN FRANCISCO :Artificial intelligence developer Anthropic is making about $3 billion in annualized revenue, according to two sources familiar with the matter, in an early validation of generative AI use in the business world. The milestone, which projects the company's current sales over the course of a year, is a significant jump from December 2024 when the metric was nearly $1 billion, the sources said. The figure crossed $2 billion around the end of March, and at May's end it hit $3 billion, one of the sources said. While consumers have embraced rival OpenAI's ChatGPT, a number of enterprises have limited their rollouts to experimentation, despite board-level interest in AI. Anthropic's revenue surge, largely from selling AI models as a service to other companies, is a data point showing how business demand is growing, one of the sources said. A key driver is code generation. The San Francisco-based startup, backed by Google parent Alphabet and is famous for AI that excels at computer programming. Products in the so-called codegen space have experienced major growth and adoption in recent months, often drawing on Anthropic's models. This demand is setting Anthropic apart among software-as-a-service vendors. Its single-quarter revenue increases would count Anthropic as the fastest-growing SaaS company that at least one venture capitalist has ever seen. "We've looked at the IPOs of over 200 public software companies, and this growth rate has never happened," said Meritech General Partner Alex Clayton, who is not an Anthropic investor and has no inside knowledge of its sales. He cautioned that these comparisons are not fully precise, since Anthropic also has consumer revenue via subscriptions to its Claude chatbot. Still, by contrast, publicly traded SaaS company Snowflake took six quarters to go from $1 billion to $2 billion in such run-rate revenue, Clayton said. Anthropic competitor OpenAI has projected it will end 2025 with more than $12 billion in total revenue, up from $3.7 billion last year, three people familiar with the matter said. This total revenue is different from an estimated annualized figure like Anthropic's. Reuters could not determine this metric for OpenAI. The two rivals appear to be establishing their own swim lanes. While both offer enterprise and consumer products, OpenAI is shaping up to be a consumer-oriented company, and the majority of its revenue comes from subscriptions to its ChatGPT chatbot, OpenAI Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar told Bloomberg late last year. OpenAI has not reported enterprise-specific revenue but said in May that paying seats for its ChatGPT enterprise product have grown to 3 million, from 2 million in February, and that T-Mobile and Morgan Stanley are among its enterprise customers. In the consumer race, Anthropic's Claude has seen less adoption than OpenAI. Claude's traffic, a proxy for consumer interest, was about 2 per cent of ChatGPT's in April, according to Web analytics firm Similarweb. Anthropic, founded in 2021 by a team that departed OpenAI over differences in vision, closed a $3.5 billion fundraise earlier this year. That valued the company at $61.4 billion. OpenAI is currently valued at $300 billion.
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Google makes case for keeping Chrome browser
A judge is determining the future of Google's Chrome search engine after the tech titan was deemed in 2024 to be maintaining an illegal monopoly in online search. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - Google on May 30 urged a US judge to reject the notion of making it spin off its Chrome browser to weaken its dominance in online search. Rival attorneys made their final arguments before US District Court Judge Amit Mehta, who is considering 'remedies' to impose after making a landmark decision in 2024 that Google maintained an illegal monopoly in search. US government attorneys have called on Judge Mehta to order Google divest itself of the Chrome browser, contending that artificial intelligence is poised to ramp up the tech giant's dominance as the go-to window into the internet. They also want Google barred from agreements with partners such as Apple and Samsung to distribute its search tools, which was the focus of the suit against the Silicon Valley internet giant. Three weeks of testimony ended early in May, with May 30 devoted to rival sides arguing points of law and making their arguments before Judge Mehta at a courtroom in Washington. Mr John Schmidtlein, an attorney for Google, told Judge Mehta that there was no evidence presented showing people would have opted for a different search engine if no exclusivity deals had been in place. Mr Schmidtlein noted that Verizon installed Chrome on smartphones even though the US telecom titan owned the Yahoo! search engine and was not bound by a contract with Google. Of the 100 or so witnesses heard at trial, not one said 'if I had more flexibility, I would have installed Bing', an internet search browser from Microsoft, the Google attorney told the judge. Department of Justice attorney David Dahlquist countered that Apple, which was paid billions of dollars to make Chrome the default browser on iPhones, 'repeatedly asked for more flexibility' but was denied by Google. Google contends that the US has gone way beyond the scope of the suit by recommending a spinoff of Chrome, and holding open the option to force a sale of its Android mobile operating system. The potential of Chrome being hobbled or spun off comes as rivals such as Microsoft, ChatGPT and Perplexity put generative artificial intelligence to work fetching information from the internet in response to user queries. The online search antitrust suit was filed against Google some five years ago, before ChatGPT made its debut, triggering AI fervour. Google is among the tech companies investing heavily to be among the leader in AI, and is weaving the technology into search and other online offerings. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
