logo
'Apple would be more concerned about...': Official on Trump's remarks to Tim Cook

'Apple would be more concerned about...': Official on Trump's remarks to Tim Cook

India Today15-05-2025

India has downplayed US President Donald Trump's recent remarks urging Apple to shift iPhone production from India to the United States, with a senior government official stating that India has become a 'significant mobile manufacturing hub' and continues to attract global players based on its growing competitiveness. The official added that Apple would be more concerned about where they would find manufacturing competitiveness.advertisement"No comments," the official said when asked specifically about Trump's statement.The official, however, pointed out, "We have become a very consistent player in the mobile market via Make in India. India is a significant mobile manufacturing hub today. If companies recognise the value of manufacturing in India, they will continue to grow on that path."
The official added that companies like Apple base their decisions on global competitiveness and not on political rhetoric. "Companies go by their own competitiveness vis-a-vis other companies. Apple would be more concerned about where they would find manufacturing competitiveness," the official said.TRUMP'S REMARK SPARKS BACKCHANNEL TALKSTrump, while speaking in Doha earlier this week, said he told Apple CEO Tim Cook that he was unhappy with Apple building iPhones in India."Tim, you're my friend But now I hear you're building all over India. I don't want you building in India if you want to take care of India," Trump said, referring to his interaction with Cook.advertisementHe also claimed Apple would increase production in the US as a result of their conversation, though he offered no further details.Apple has yet to comment publicly, but Indian officials have reportedly spoken to Apple executives following Trump's remarks. According to a report by news agency PTI, the company assured the government that its manufacturing and investment plans in India remain unchanged and that India continues to be a key part of its global supply chain.INDIA'S SMARTPHONE PRODUCTION FOOTPRINTIndia has seen a sharp rise in mobile manufacturing, especially through global giants like Apple. Around 40 million iPhones—roughly 15% of Apple's annual production—are now assembled in India, primarily by Taiwanese firms Foxconn and Pegatron. Tata Electronics, which acquired Pegatron's India operations, is also expanding capacity.Between April 2024 and March 2025, Apple assembled iPhones worth an estimated $22 billion in India, marking a 60% rise over the previous year, according to PTI. The majority of these devices are exported, mainly to the United States. In March alone, India exported over 3 million iPhones to the US, accounting for nearly 98% of Apple's monthly shipments abroad, per a report by S&P Global Market Intelligence.Foxconn has also begun manufacturing AirPods in Telangana for exports, further strengthening India's role in Apple's global supply chain.APPLE ECOSYSTEM IN INDIAadvertisementThe Apple ecosystem has created around two lakh jobs in India across various suppliers and vendors, PTI reported. The country's growing pool of skilled labour, along with a well-developed supply chain for precision electronics, has helped establish India as a major base for mobile phone assembly."We have shown to the world that we are highly competitive in labour-intensive, sophisticated assembly work. We have built an ecosystem suited for high-tech manufacturing," an official told PTI.India's smartphone exports are on a steady rise, with Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw announcing last month that iPhones worth Rs 1.5 lakh crore were exported from the country in FY25.INDIA-US TRADE TIESIndia and the US enjoy strong trade ties, with bilateral trade in 2024 amounting to $129 billion. However, India maintains a trade surplus of over $45 billion with the US, which has been a bone of contention with the present Trump administration.Amid ongoing trade negotiations, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal is set to lead a delegation to the US starting May 16 to further talks on bilateral trade and investment.(With inputs from PTI, Reuters)
advertisement

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why China 'turning off tap' may be another Pakistan bluff
Why China 'turning off tap' may be another Pakistan bluff

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Why China 'turning off tap' may be another Pakistan bluff

GUWAHATI/NEW DELHI: Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma Monday demolished latest Pakistani scaremongering after India decisively stepped away from Indus Waters Treaty - what if China cuts off Brahmaputra's water supply to India? He called it a myth & cited hard data to prove the river slicing through Assam is a rain-fed watercourse that grows in India, not shrinks. "Let's dismantle this myth - not with fear, but with facts and national clarity," Sarma posted on X, adding: "Brahmaputra is not a river India depends on upstream - it is a rain-fed Indian river system, strengthened after entering Indian territory." According to Sarma, China's contribution to the river's flow is minimal, only 30-35%, mostly from glacial melt and limited Tibetan rainfall. The rest 65-70% is generated inside India by torrential monsoon rainfall across Arunachal, Assam, Nagaland, and Meghalaya. Sarma further listed major Indian tributaries feeding Brahmaputra - Subansiri, Lohit, Kameng, Manas, Dhansiri, Jia-Bharali, and Kopili, along with inflows from Khasi, Garo, and Jaintia Hills via rivers like Krishnai, Digaru, and Kulsi. If China ever does "turn off the tap", Sarma said it might actually reduce flood devastation in Assam, which displaces lakhs annually. At Tuting on India-China border in Arunachal's Upper Siang district, Brahmaputra's flow is 2,000-3,000 cubic metre per second - but swells to 15,000-20,000 cubic metre per second in Assam during monsoon. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Backed by water governance experts, Sarma's post drew strong support from Nilanjan Ghosh, vice-president of Development Studies and senior director at Observer Research Foundation in Kolkata. Ghosh said China's upstream interventions will have "negligible or almost no effect" on Brahmaputra's overall flow. Brahmaputra originates at Angsi Glacier in Tibet, flows 1,625km as Yarlung Tsangpo before entering India where it runs 918km - as Siang, Dihang, then Brahmaputra - and finishes its 2,880km journey with a 337km stretch in Bangladesh, before meeting Ganga. Though China has announced plans to build a massive hydropower dam on Yarlung Tsangpo, Indian experts said Brahmaputra's scale and Indian monsoon strength make fears of water cuts largely unfounded. IDSA senior fellow Uttam Sinha, citing peer-reviewed data, said even during lean periods Yarlung Tsangpo's annual outflow from China is far lower than Brahmaputra's total discharge in India.

US judge says prisons must provide gender-affirming care for trans inmates
US judge says prisons must provide gender-affirming care for trans inmates

Hindustan Times

time41 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

US judge says prisons must provide gender-affirming care for trans inmates

A US judge on Tuesday ruled the US Bureau of Prisons must keep providing transgender inmates gender-affirming care, despite an executive order President Donald Trump signed on his first day back in office to halt funding for such care. US District Judge Royce Lamberth in Washington, D.C., allowed a group of more than 2,000 transgender inmates in federal prisons to pursue a lawsuit challenging the order as a class action. He ordered the Bureau of Prisons to provide them with hormone therapy and accommodations such as clothing and hair-removal devices while the lawsuit plays out. The ruling does not require the bureau to provide surgical care related to gender transitions. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said the Trump administration expects to ultimately prevail in the legal dispute. "The District Court's decision allowing transgender women, aka MEN, in women's prisons fundamentally makes women less safe and ignores the biological truth that there are only two genders," Fields said in an email. The American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the inmates, said the ruling was "a critical reminder to the Trump administration that trans people, like all people, have constitutional rights that don't simply disappear because the president has decided to wage an ideological battle." About 2,230 transgender inmates are housed in federal custodial facilities and halfway houses, according to the US Department of Justice. About two-thirds of them, 1,506, are transgender women, most of whom are housed in men's prisons. The named plaintiffs, two transgender men and one transgender woman, sued the Trump administration in March to challenge Trump's January 20 executive order aimed at combating what the administration called "gender ideology extremism." The executive order directed the federal government to only recognize two, biologically distinct sexes, male and female; and house transgender women in men's prisons. It also ordered the bureau to stop spending any money on "any medical procedure, treatment, or drug for the purpose of conforming an inmate's appearance to that of the opposite sex." Lamberth, appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan, said in Tuesday's ruling that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in their lawsuit because the bureau did not perform any analysis before cutting off treatment that its own medical staff had previously deemed to be medically appropriate for the inmates. Even if it had extensively studied the issue before deciding to stop gender-affirming care, the decision might still violate the US Constitution's Eighth Amendment's protections against "cruel and unusual" punishment, Lamberth wrote. The Department of Justice had argued that the judge should defer to the policy decision of a democratically elected president, but Lamberth said a functioning democracy requires respect for "all duly enacted laws," including those that blocked the executive branch from acting in an "arbitrary and capricious" manner. Democratic self-governance "does not mean blind submission to the whims of the most recent election-victor," Lamberth wrote. The executive order said it was meant to promote the "dignity, safety, and wellbeing of women, and to stop the spread of "gender ideology" which denies "the immutable biological reality of sex." But the inmates receiving hormone treatments had little interest in promoting any ideology, and were instead taking "measures to lessen the personal anguish caused by their gender dysphoria," Lamberth wrote. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Richard Chang)

Operation Sindoor: Pakistan dossier 'reveals' 7 more targets India hit
Operation Sindoor: Pakistan dossier 'reveals' 7 more targets India hit

Time of India

time43 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Operation Sindoor: Pakistan dossier 'reveals' 7 more targets India hit

NEW DELHI: Pakistan said India conducted strikes at seven more locations than the targets officially acknowledged by Indian armed forces between May 7 and 10 during Operation Sindoor . A Pakistan govt document on its Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos (Iron Wall) and India's "unprovoked aggression", shared with its media, lists out Indian drone strikes at Attock, Bahawalnagar, Gujrat and Jhang (Punjab province), Peshawar (Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province), and Chhor and Hyderabad (Sindh province), which it claimed killed many civilians. None of these places were mentioned in the detailed briefings conducted by Indian foreign and military establishments. "We had disclosed the targets we hit in the briefings. This Pakistani document could be a propaganda attempt to show that India also targeted civilian sites," an Indian defence official said. After Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians, India on May 7 hit 4 terror hubs in Pakistan and five in POK, in calibrated strikes against terror infrastructure across the border, without targeting any Pakistani military base or civilian centre. The targets ranged from Sawai Nala camp in Muzaffarabad in north to Markaz Taiba in Muridke (Lashkar-e-Taiba HQ) and Markaz Subhan at Bahawalpur (Jaish-e-Muhammed HQ) in south. After Pakistan escalated the situation by targeting Indian military bases and civilian centres with missiles and waves of drone swarms, IAF struck at least nine Pakistani airbases and at least four military radar sites.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store