logo
Public comment periods at North Dakota local government meetings become mandatory Aug. 1

Public comment periods at North Dakota local government meetings become mandatory Aug. 1

Yahoo09-05-2025

Members of the Burleigh County Planning Commission hear public comments during a meeting on Aug. 29, 2024. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)
Every meeting of a public board in North Dakota will be required to hold a public comment period during each of its meetings beginning Aug. 1.
Senate Bill 2180, signed by Gov. Kelly Armstrong on April 30, requires local subdivisions, school districts, park districts and water resource boards to give meeting attendees the opportunity to make public comments to the board during their meetings.
The bill states public boards may only limit the comment period based on total time of the comments, the time of each individual speaker to deliver their comments, or both. It would also limit the public comment topics to the current meeting's agenda items or the preceding meeting's agenda.
Sen. Jose Castaneda, R-Minot, chair of the bill's conference committee, said the law sets the minimum standard and boards can choose to be less restrictive on public comments.
North Dakota lawmakers approve needs, some wants with $20.3 billion budget
Castaneda told lawmakers that if someone misses a meeting, they should be able to go to the next meeting and have their concerns be heard by that board.
The bill stems from concerns that public entities were not providing adequate public comment periods during meetings and were limiting comments to only items on the board's current meeting agenda.
Karen Krenz of Williston, who submitted testimony for the bill, said her local school board was limiting comments that could be made at meetings.
'As taxpayers, we should have the opportunity to contribute our input during public meetings,' Krenz wrote. 'When public input is limited, decisions may not fully reflect the needs and priorities of the community, leading to policies that are out of touch with public sentiment.'
The law requires boards to craft public comment policies. The policies may require that comments need to be pertinent to the entity receiving the public comments and may 'not interfere with the orderly conduct' of the meeting. Comments may not be 'defamatory, abusive, harassing or unlawful,' and may not include confidential information.
Photos: North Dakota Legislature works marathon final day
Castaneda said the goal of the legislation was to find a good balance between giving time for people to address these public entities and not letting the comments hijack the meeting.
Sen. Chuck Walen, R-New Town, a previous school board member, said limiting the comments to the current and preceding meeting was a good balance, otherwise, 'you can get into the weeds really, really fast.'
'I see this as a good compromise to have in here,' Walen said.
Previous versions of the bill would have limited comments to only the current agenda items of the public board meeting and would have required a public comment period be offered at only some of the meetings, or once every three months.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Some L.A. Protesters Are Marching for Neighbors and Family Members
Some L.A. Protesters Are Marching for Neighbors and Family Members

New York Times

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Some L.A. Protesters Are Marching for Neighbors and Family Members

Some of the people demonstrating in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday said they were first- or second-generation immigrants showing solidarity with their neighbors or family members, and a few expressed anger that their neighbors had received deportation orders. 'This is a real threat, this is not just talk,' said Zander Calderon, 36, a protester from northeast Los Angeles. He said he knew several people who had received such orders, as well as one neighbor who had self deported. 'He didn't want to live in fear,' Mr. Calderon, who wore a poncho with an image of the Virgin Mary and the colors of the Mexican flag, said of the neighbor. Others said that although they were not regular protesters, the federal government's recent immigration raids had motivated them to take action. 'This morning I couldn't stay home anymore,' said Elizabeth Torres, 36, who was carrying a Mexican flag outside the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday morning, as a crowd of protesters began to swell. 'If the people that are detained can see me through the windows, just know that you're not alone.' Martín Hoecker-Martinez, a physics professor who was waving an American and a Colombian flag, said that he had traveled about an hour and a half to join the protests because he could not stay home in good conscience. 'I'm an American citizen, and I think that one of the greatest points of pride of the United States is that we are a country of immigrants,' said Professor Hoecker-Martinez, whose mother came from Colombia. 'I bristle when people deride the U.S. government as the embodiment of our collective will.' Nicole Garcia, 35, attended the protest with her teenage son. She said that while she worried about the safety risks of bringing him along, she wanted him to understand 'what it looks like when community comes together.' Ms. Garcia, who described herself as Mexican American, was veiled and wore a floral wreath and face paint symbolizing the Mexican Day of the Dead. Brianna Vargas, 24, who was standing on an overpass above the U.S. 101 highway with a megaphone in her hand, said she was protesting for her parents, who had emigrated from Mexico and El Salvador, and for others who were too afraid to leave their homes. Reposting messages of solidarity with victims of immigration enforcement raids on social media is one thing, she said. 'It's different when you're actually here.'

US-China Trade Talks; LA Immigration Clashes Escalate
US-China Trade Talks; LA Immigration Clashes Escalate

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

US-China Trade Talks; LA Immigration Clashes Escalate

The US and China are ready to resume trade talks in London today... with the flow of rare earth minerals set to be a key focus; clashes between law enforcement and demonstrators in Los Angeles over anti-deportation protests escalate. President Trump's deployment of the National Guard inflames residents... California's Governor says he will file a law suit to block the federal government's intervention; and Bloomberg learns Meta is in talks to invest in startup Scale AI. The financing may exceed $10 billion, making it one of the largest-ever private company funding deals. (Source: Bloomberg)

US-China Trade Talks Resume In London Today
US-China Trade Talks Resume In London Today

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

US-China Trade Talks Resume In London Today

Good morning. The US and China start another round of trade talks in London today. Los Angeles reels in its third day of anti-deportation protests. And visiting the pyramids is becoming easier. Listen to the day's top stories. US and Chinese negotiators open their second round of tariff talks today in London. Beijing said it's already approved some rare-earth exports, but a key goal for China will be to ease US chip controls. Chinese exports to the US plunged 34.4% in May, the most since 2020.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store