logo
Scientists Found The Driving Force Behind Your Darkest Impulses

Scientists Found The Driving Force Behind Your Darkest Impulses

Yahoo08-02-2025

Psychologists call it the dark triad: an intersection of three of the most malevolent tendencies of human nature – psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism.
But the truth goes deeper, and darker. There's also egoism, sadism, spitefulness, and more. And behind this rogues gallery of all our worst inclinations on the surface, a central, common core of human darkness lies, researchers say.
In a 2018 study, psychologists from Germany and Denmark mapped this driving force behind all our darkest impulses and gave it a name. Meet D, the newly identified Dark Factor of Personality.
The theoretical framework of the D factor has its underpinnings in what's known as the g factor: a construct proposed by English psychologist Charles Spearman over a century ago when he observed that individuals who performed well on one kind of cognitive test were more likely to score well on other kinds of intelligence tests, too.
In other words, a 'general intelligence factor' could be measured. But it turns out that's not all scientists are able to detect.
"In the same way, the dark aspects of human personality also have a common denominator, which means that – similar to intelligence – one can say that they are all an expression of the same dispositional tendency," explained psychologist Ingo Zettler from the University of Copenhagen in Denmark back in September 2018.
In a series of four separate studies involving over 2,500 participants, Zettler and fellow researchers surveyed participants with questions designed to measure their levels of nine distinct dark personality traits: egoism, Machiavellianism, moral disengagement, narcissism, psychological entitlement, psychopathy, sadism, self-interest, and spitefulness.
To do so, participants were asked to disagree with a range of variable 'dark' statements, such as: "I know that I am special because everyone keeps telling me so", "I'll say anything to get what I want", "It is hard to get ahead without cutting corners here and there", and "Hurting people would be exciting".
With all the responses in hand, researchers ran a statistical analysis, with the results suggesting that while these dark traits are all distinct, they all overlap to some extent, owing to the central core darkness factor, D, which reveals itself in different ways in different people.
"In a given person, the D factor can mostly manifest itself as narcissism, psychopathy or one of the other dark traits, or a combination of these," Zettler said.
"But with our mapping of the common denominator of the various dark personality traits, one can simply ascertain that the person has a high D factor. This is because the D factor indicates how likely a person is to engage in behavior associated with one or more of these dark traits."
It's pretty provocative stuff, but you don't just have to take the researchers' word for it: You can take the D test yourself.
The team set up an online portal where you can measure your own D score via a questionnaire.
Why would people want to know? Well, apart from personal curiosity about how dark you really are, the researchers said their findings could one day lead to new discoveries in psychology and therapy, advancing our understanding of how we interpret people's malevolent actions.
"We see it, for example, in cases of extreme violence, or rule-breaking, lying, and deception in the corporate or public sectors," Zettler said.
"Here, knowledge about a person's D-factor may be a useful tool, for example, to assess the likelihood that the person will re-offend or engage in more harmful behavior."
The findings were reported in Psychological Review.
An earlier version of this article was published in September 2018.
Men's Heights Grew Twice as Much as Women's Last Century, Says Study
Airports Have a Strange Effect on Human Behavior. Here's Why.
Our Ears Still Try to Swivel Around to Hear Better, Study Discovers

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Psychopaths and Other Dark Personalities Thrive in These Places
Psychopaths and Other Dark Personalities Thrive in These Places

Newsweek

time15 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Psychopaths and Other Dark Personalities Thrive in These Places

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. People living in societies with more corruption, inequality, poverty and violence are more likely to exhibit "dark" personality traits—like narcissism, psychopathy and spitefulness. This is the conclusion of a new study led by psychologist professor Ingo Zettler of the University of Copenhagen, which analyzed data on nearly 2 million people across 183 countries and all 50 U.S. states. "It is relatively well known that both genetic and socio-ecological factors shape individuals' personality. However, respective research has hardly considered ethically or socially aversive personality characteristics," Zettler told Newsweek. Given that we now have data from about 2 million people across the world who filled out our measure on the core underlying all aversive traits via our website, we thought it would be interesting to see whether adverse societal conditions contribute to the proliferation of selfish, egoistic, and other traits," Professor Ingo Zettler told Newsweek. A file photo of a young man looking directly at the camera. A study has found that people with "dark traits" are more likely to live in societies with more corruption, inequality, poverty and violence. A file photo of a young man looking directly at the camera. A study has found that people with "dark traits" are more likely to live in societies with more corruption, inequality, poverty and violence. istockphotoluis/Getty Images Previous studies have shown that the so-called "dark triad" of personalities can show on people's faces and can even make people appear more attractive. The new analysis, however, ties these personality types to specific social settings. In their study, to quantify societal adversity, the team used World Bank data on corruption (control of corruption), inequality (Gini index), poverty (headcount ratio at $6.85/day), and violence (homicides per 100,000 people). For U.S. states, the researchers used Census Bureau data on inequality and poverty, FBI homicide rates, and Justice Department corruption convictions. These metrics allowed consistent comparisons across global and state-level contexts to assess long-term societal conditions. Combining this data with the personality questionnaire results of more than 2 million participants, a clear relation appeared. "The more adverse conditions in a society, the higher the level of the dark factor of personality among its citizens. This applies both globally and within the United States," Zettler said. Analysis of the data found that countries like Indonesia and Mexico or U.S. states such as Louisiana and Nevada—which had higher levels of corruption, inequality, poverty, and violence—also have higher "Dark Factor" levels. "The more adverse conditions in a society, the higher the level of the dark factor of personality among its citizens." Ingo Zettler Meanwhile, people in countries with lower levels of societal corruption and inequality, like Denmark and New Zealand, or states such as Utah and Vermont, tended to have have fewer "Dark Factor" personality traits. Although the observed link between environment and personality was moderate, the authors emphasize its real-world consequences. "Aversive personality traits are associated with behaviors such as aggression, cheating, and exploitation—and thus with high social costs. Therefore, even small variations can lead to large differences in how societies function," Zettler explained. Zettler believes that the findings of this study could help shape views on societal reforms and the importance of building better societies. "Our findings substantiate that personality is not just something we are born with, but also shaped by the society we grew up and live in," he said. This means that reforms that reduce corruption and inequality not only create better living conditions just now, they may also contribute to mitigating aversive personality levels among the citizens in the future." Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about psychology? Let us know via science@ Reference Zettler, I., Lilleholt, L., Bader, M., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2025). Aversive societal conditions explain differences in "dark" personality across countries and US states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(20), e2500830122. ‌

The Importance of Mathematics & Social Science in CBSE Exams
The Importance of Mathematics & Social Science in CBSE Exams

Time Business News

time15 hours ago

  • Time Business News

The Importance of Mathematics & Social Science in CBSE Exams

A pivotal point in a student's career is the exams at the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE). Often, the significant roles played by mathematics and social sciences are overlooked, while science and English often receive the most attention. These subjects are not obstacles to be crossed; instead, they are building blocks, creating not only scholastic success but also reasoning powers and a complete understanding of the world. This blog post explores the profound significance of social science and mathematics in the CBSE exams, detailing why students must devote their full attention to both subjects. While math may be perceived as a challenging subject at times, it is in fact the basis of logical reasoning and analytical thinking. A firm grasp of mathematical principles is necessary for the CBSE exams due to several reasons. To begin with, it is the foundation required for higher-level courses of study in areas such as economics, computer science, engineering, and even specific social science subfields that rely on statistical analysis. Knowing the basic concepts that form the basis of complex problem-solving is as crucial as memorization of formulas for establishing a strong foundation in algebra, geometry, trigonometry, and calculus (for higher grades). Secondly, one of the key topics that scores well in CBSE examinations is mathematics. Even though it can seem challenging, since it is objective, correct answers fetch full marks. A mathematically correct solution is right, unlike topics which can have subjective meanings. Provided that students consistently practice and have distinct conceptual knowledge, this makes it a good instrument for enhancing overall percentages. For mathematics, students who take the time to understand the 'why' of the 'how' often find it to be hugely rewarding. Additionally, the problem-solving skills developed through mathematics can be applied in any field of life. The ability to analyse data, identify trends, and draw logical conclusions is essential to everything from managing finances to making informed decisions. The challenge of solving mathematical equations gives students skills that extend far beyond the testing environment, including perseverance, observation, and the pleasure of overcoming mental challenges. Social science provides the lens through which we understand the complexity of human society, history, geography, civics, and economics, while mathematics offers the tool for deductive reasoning. It is more crucial for social science exams under the CBSE to understand the intricate network of ideas and events that have contributed to our current state and will further influence our future than it is to memorize dates and facts. One of the primary benefits of success in social science is that it enables us to gain a balanced view. We can learn from past mistakes and successes by examining history. From geography, we know about the distribution of resources and the diverse surface we inhabit. Civics encourages an informed and participatory population by educating us regarding our duties and rights as citizens. Economics explains how societies produce wealth and allocate their resources. In combination, all these social science disciplines provide a complete picture of the world. Also, social science on CBSE exams often requires interpretive and analytical skills. Apart from recalling facts, students need to be able to analyze causes and effects, compare different perspectives, and draw reasonable conclusions. Thisdevelops critical thinking and effective argumentation, two skills that are essential in academic writing, debating, and professional communication. Social science often encourages a multiple-perspective understanding and exploration of different viewpoints, unlike math, which usually has right or wrong answers. For those students who enjoy reading, analyzing, and writing, social science is an excellent subject from a marks perspective. Good marks can be achieved through the skill of writing well-structured answers with relevant examples, although this requires an in-depth understanding of the topic. Moreover, it creates a useful break from mathematics' focus on numbers, engaging a different part of the brain and presenting a comprehensive learning experience. The notion that social science and mathematics exist as distinct domains is erroneous. They complement each other in many instances. For example, statistical analysis, a mathematical skill, can significantly enhance the comprehension of economic principles in the social sciences. Trends and patterns can be identified by mathematically examining past data. However, the historical context that social science provides can sometimes provide insights into the development of specific scientific findings or mathematical concepts. A student must perform well in all subjects to achieve a high overall score. Apart from this, the skills acquired by social science (critical thinking, analytical interpretation, informed citizenship) and mathematics (logical reasoning, problem-solving) are of prime importance in progressing to postsecondary schooling. Ultimately, it is impossible to overestimate the significance of social science and mathematics in CBSE exams. They are subjects that provide students with vital information and irreplaceable abilities, not merely topics to be cleared. Students who regularly strive to understand and excel in both math and social science are not only able to achieve high scores on their CBSE examinations, but they are also establishing a solid foundation for a future filled with sound reasoning, informed choices, and a comprehensive understanding of the world around them. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Truly Intelligent AI Could Play by the Rules, No Matter How Strange
Truly Intelligent AI Could Play by the Rules, No Matter How Strange

Scientific American

time19 hours ago

  • Scientific American

Truly Intelligent AI Could Play by the Rules, No Matter How Strange

Tic-tac-toe is about as simple as games get—but as Scientific American 's legendary contributor Martin Gardner pointed out almost 70 years ago, it has complex variations and strategic aspects. They range from 'reverse' games—where the first player to make three in a row loses—to three-dimensional versions played on cubes and beyond. Gardner's games, even if they boggle a typical human mind, might point us to a way to make artificial intelligence more humanlike. That's because games in their endless variety—with rules that must be imagined, understood and followed—are part of what makes us human. Navigating rules is also a key challenge for AI models as they start to approximate human thought. And as things stand, it's a challenge where most of these models fall short. That's a big deal because if there's a path to artificial general intelligence, the ultimate goal of machine-learning and AI research, it can only come through building AIs that are capable of interpreting, adapting to and rigidly following the rules we set for them. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. To drive the development of such AI, we must develop a new test—let's call it the Gardner test—in which an AI is surprised with the rules of a game and is then expected to play by those rules without human intervention. One simple way to achieve the surprise is to disclose the rules only when the game begins. The Gardner test, with apologies to the Turing test, is inspired by and builds on the pioneering work in AI on general game playing (GGP), a field largely shaped by Stanford University professor Michael Genesereth. In GGP competitions, AIs running on standard laptops face off against other AIs in games whose rules—written in a formal mathematical language —are revealed only at the start. The test proposed here advances a new frontier: accepting game rules expressed in a natural language such as English. Once a distant goal, this is now within reach of modern AIs because of the recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) such as those that power ChatGPT and that fall within the families of Claude and Llama. The proposed challenge should include a battery of tests that could be initially focused on games that have been staples of GGP competitions such as Connect Four, Hex and Pentago. It should also leverage an impressive array of games that Gardner wrote about. Test design could benefit from the involvement of the vibrant international GGP research community, developers of frontier AI models and, of course, diehard Martin Gardner fans. But to pass the new test, it isn't enough to create an AI system that's good at playing one specific predetermined game or even many. Instead, an AI must be designed to master any strategy game on the fly. Strategy games require humanlike ability to think across and beyond multiple steps, deal with unpredictable responses, adapt to changing objectives and still conform to a strict rule set. That's a big leap from today's top game-playing AI models, which rely on knowing the rules in advance to train their algorithms. Consider, for instance, AlphaZero, the revolutionary AI model that's capable of playing three games—chess, Go and shogi (Japanese chess)—at a superhuman level. AlphaZero learns through a technique known as 'self-play'—it repeatedly plays against a copy of itself, and from that experience, it gets better over time. Self-play, however, requires the rules of each game to be set before training. AlphaZero's ability to master complex games is undoubtedly impressive, but it's a brittle system: if you present AlphaZero with a game different than the ones it's learned, it will be completely flummoxed. In contrast, an AI model performing well on the proposed new test would be capable of adapting to new rules, even in the absence of data; it would play any game and follow any novel rule set with power and precision. That last point—precision—is an important one. You can prompt many generative AI systems to execute variants on simple games, and they'll play along: ChatGPT can play a 4×4 or 5×5 variant of tic-tac-toe, for instance. But an LLM prompt is best thought of as a suggestion rather than a concrete set of rules—that's why we often have to coax, wheedle and prompt tune LLMs into doing exactly what we want. A general intelligence that would pass the Gardner test, by contrast, would by definition be able to follow the rules perfectly: not following a rule exactly would mean failing the test. Specialized tools that operate without truly understanding the rules tend to color outside the lines, reproducing past errors from training data rather than adhering to the rules we set. It's easy to imagine real-world scenarios in which such errors could be catastrophic: in a national security context, for instance, AI capabilities are needed that can accurately apply rules of engagement dynamically or negotiate subtle but crucial differences in legal and command authorities. In finance, programmable money is emerging as a new form of currency that can obey rules of ownership and transferability—and misapplying these rules could lead to financial disaster. Ironically, building AI systems that can follow rules rigorously would ultimately make it possible to create machine intelligences that are far more humanlike in their flexibility and ability to adapt to uncertain and novel situations. When we think of human game players, we tend to think of specialists: Magnus Carlsen is a great chess player but might not be so hot at Texas Hold'Em. The point, though, is that humans are capable of generalizing; if Carlsen ever gave up chess, he could be a decent contender for the Pentamind World Championship, which celebrates the best all-round games player. Game playing with a novel set of rules is crucial to the next evolution of AI because it will potentially let us create AIs that will be capable of anything—but that will also meticulously and reliably follow the rules we set for them. If we want powerful but safe AI, testing its ability in playing games on the fly might be the best path forward.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store