
What message has the Nice ocean summit sent to COP30 this year?
The ocean is essential to limiting global temperature rise. It captures about 30 per cent of all carbon dioxide emissions, and 90 per cent of the excess heat generated by these, but has been overlooked in the conversation about how to curb climate change.
This is increasingly concerning as oceans suffer from the results of excess carbon dioxide, including acidification and rising sea temperatures. These have significant impacts on ecosystems, the communities that rely on them, and the ocean's role as a climate regulator.
'The globe is burning. Our oceans are boiling. Scientists speak of effects that we're having, heatwaves even in our oceans, and as we have the rising sea levels, submersion threatens us,' said French President Emmanuel Macron at the opening plenary of the United Nations Ocean Conference (UNOC) in Nice this week.
The conference saw what Macron called 'unprecedented mobilisation' for oceans, with over 120 countries, 50 world leaders and 10,000 people in attendance. It also included a strong push to start including oceans in climate and biodiversity talks, including the COP30 climate conference to be held in Brazil in November.
That would mark a big change from previous discussions. Even the Paris Agreement - the landmark treaty that aimed to keep global warming below 1.5C - has just one mention of the ocean, noting the importance of ensuring the integrity of all ecosystems.
'We're very, very late. We're at UNOC3 - the climate COPs are at COP30. Unfortunately, the climate COPs, much like other conferences of the like, have not really properly integrated the ocean. So on the science, we're picking up, but on the political side of things, it's still very, very much catching up,' says Louis Lambrechts from the Oceano Azul Foundation.
Speaking at the beginning of the summit, Marcon pointed to the ocean's carbon capture potential and its role as a climate regulator, highlighting the need to act to protect this, particularly ahead of COP30. Lambrechts tells Euronews Green that it is crucial to create coherence between climate, biodiversity, and ocean silos.
'What should come out of this conference [...] should be very clear messages towards the next climate COP happening in Brazil later this year, about why it's so critical that the ocean should be properly addressed and considered in the debates,' he says.
'Any objective or action we're trying to have on climate would be completely unrealistic if the ocean wasn't there to play the game with us,' he adds.
Isabella Lövin, former Swedish climate and environment minister and now Green member of the European Parliament described how, during her time in government, she fought to get oceans into the climate conversation, but said this shift has taken a long time.
'People have so much to think about - what's happening on land and with the forests and the atmosphere and the cryosphere and so on, but the oceans are really one of the two major climate regulators, so we need to have much more conversations on how we can preserve the ocean in order to stay below 1.5C,' she explains.
Similarly, Ana Vasconcelos, a member of the European Parliament with centrist group Renew Europe, warned that, politically, ignoring the ocean in climate and economic negotiations is a failure.
'Europe must go to COP30 with a clear message: the ocean is not a backdrop - it's a frontline climate actor. I want the UNOC to produce real and concrete commitments that reflect the scale of the crisis and the ocean's role in solving it,' she says.
That includes establishing clear and actionable guidelines for global ocean governance, recognising that the ocean is a common resource that needs to be safeguarded through global cooperation, she adds.
Ahead of COP30, France and Brazil also launched the Blue NDC Challenge, calling on countries to place the ocean at the centre of their plans to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement. Countries need to submit updated versions of these plans by September ahead of COP30.
The ocean's role as a climate regulator is increasingly being chipped away.
At the start of the conference, on 8 June, scientists released the first Starfish Barometer - an assessment of ocean health aimed at providing reliable evidence to inform policymakers and track the restoration of ocean health. It warned of rising sea levels, record temperatures, and rapid acidification.
This is worrying given the climate disaster the ocean has, so far, held back.
'If the ocean wasn't there, it could be 50C warmer on land, but you don't get anything for free in this world, and the ocean is changing as a result of all of that excess heat going into it, and its capacity to continue absorbing heat is not something we can count on into the future,' says Robert Blasiak, Associate Professor at the Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Lambrechts likens the ocean warming to a kettle boiling: taking a long time to warm up - much longer than the air - but staying hot for a long time.
The world is heading towards that boiling point, he says, creating dead zones where marine life cannot survive, hindering ecosystems' ability to store carbon, as well as affecting fish populations and impacting those communities who rely on them.
While some damage to the ocean may take centuries to recover from, there are measures we could take today to help prevent further harm.
Banning bottom trawling and deep sea mining would be decisions with immediate results, says Lévy. These damage ocean ecosystems and, in the case of deep sea mining, a lot of the potential impacts are still unknown.
The EU's 2023 Marine Action Plan called on member states to phase out bottom trawling in all marine protected areas by 2030, due to the importance of the seabed for healthy marine ecosystems and climate change mitigation.
While 37 countries, including 15 EU nations and the UK, have signed a pause on deep sea mining as part of a political effort to prevent the practice until the implications of it are understood.
According to Lövin, the most important thing to consider when protecting the ocean is the precautionary principle - the idea of avoiding activities that might cause harm that is not yet known.
'We need to really take the precautionary approach seriously because we are the decision makers. We are the ones that are going to be held accountable. We have the responsibility for future generations,' she tells Euronews Green.
Vasconcelos also called on the EU to take a 'central and credible role' in International Seabed Authority (ISA) negotiations in July to ensure that ocean governance aligns with its climate and geopolitical priorities.
Ahead of UNOC, the European Union released its Ocean Pact, pledging €1 billion to support ocean conservation, science and sustainable fishing. It also announced that it will propose an Ocean Act in 2027 aimed at strengthening and modernising maritime spatial planning to help achieve the pact's priorities, like restoring ocean health, building a blue economy, and advancing research and knowledge.
While it was not as ambitious as some would have liked, with Vasconcelos saying it is unclear where the €1 billion will come from and leading ocean NGOs saying it lacks concrete protection measures, it has been widely welcomed as a way of bringing oceans back into the conversation and linking different ocean policies.
However, not everyone is on board. One of the notable absences from the conference was the US government, which under President Trump has pulled out of the Paris Agreement and is unilaterally trying to push ahead with deep sea mining.
Lövin called the lack of US presence a scandal, contrasting it with the efforts of the EU and other world leaders to work against planetary collapse and pointing to the need to work together to protect the world for future generations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Attack on Iran derails France's plans to recognize a Palestinian state
Emmanuel Macron wanted to make history. He aimed to be at the forefront of a "political solution" to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by launching an international "momentum" centered on France's recognition of a Palestinian state, as he put it. The date for this "path to peace" was set for Wednesday, June 18. In New York, from the United Nations headquarters, the French president, together with Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, was to revive the two-state solution, which has fallen out of favor for many years. But all of Macron's ambitions were dashed on Friday morning. Israeli strikes in Iran destroyed nuclear and military sites belonging to the regime and, in Israeli terms, "decapitated" the Iranian general staff, disrupting the geopolitical calendar. The United Nations conference was postponed indefinitely. Officially, for "logistical" and "security" reasons, Macron said at a press conference held at the Elysée on evening. "The crown prince, like the president of the Palestinian Authority, told me that they were not in a logistical, physical, security, or political position to travel to New York," he said. Macron insisted this was "pure realism."


France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
France says supports Harvard, welcomes foreign students
"We stand with universities facing the threat of government control, restriction to their funding, constraints on their curricula or research projects," Jean-Noel Barrot said during a commencement address at the high-profile HEC business school in Paris. "We stand with Harvard faculty, with Harvard students, facing unjustified stress and anxiety right now," he added in English. "Should US courts uphold decisions to ban international students, France will offer (them) a safe place to complete their degrees," he said. Universities and research facilities in the United States have come under increasing political and financial pressure under Trump, including with threats of massive federal funding cuts. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top American universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and "viewpoint diversity". A US court last week put a temporary stay on Trump's latest effort to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard. A White House proclamation a day earlier had sought to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country, and said existing foreign enrollees risked having their visas terminated. The US government has already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the institution from any future federal funding. France and the European Union are seeking to encourage disgruntled researchers to relocate from the United States to Europe. European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen said last month that the EU would launch a new incentives package worth 500 million euros ($580 million) to make the 27-nation bloc "a magnet for researchers". French President Emmanuel Macron in April unveiled plans for a funding programme to help national universities and other research bodies cover the cost of bringing foreign scientists to the country. © 2025 AFP

LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
Philip Gordon, former Kamala Harris adviser: 'Netanyahu called Trump's bluff' by striking Iran
Philip Gordon, former national security adviser to Vice President Kamala Harris, is a committed Europhile and fluent French speaker who was considered for a key position in her future administration, had the Democrats won. In April, Gordon joined the Brookings Institution think tank. He spoke with Le Monde about the early months of Donald Trump's second term. The Trump administration seemed to be pursuing negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program, but then Trump expressed support for Israeli military strikes. Did he just run out of patience with Iran? I am skeptical of the notion that Trump masterfully lulled Iran into complacency with diplomacy and then decided to enforce his "redline" with military force. Trump desperately wanted a nuclear deal with Iran and publicly and privately told Israel not to strike. But a confident Netanyahu called Trump's bluff, told him Israel needed to act, and Trump felt no choice but to go along. He now has to act as if this was his call, but in so doing finds himself having to defend Israel in a war he did not want but could not prevent.