No fixes on horizon for crowding crisis in WA's youth prisons
A sign and fence at the Green Hill School for juvenile offenders, in Chehalis, Washington. (Photo by Jake Goldstein-Street/Washington State Standard)
Problems with overcrowding have enveloped the Green Hill School juvenile detention center in Chehalis for nearly two years, leading to unsafe conditions for the minors incarcerated there and the staff tasked with overseeing them.
But Washington state lawmakers left Olympia last month without making substantial changes to address the crisis. The lack of progress was frustrating for lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.
While a new facility opening this year in Aberdeen could offer some relief, the failure to pass significant legislation on the issue means Green Hill is on track to continue housing dozens more people than it is designed to safely hold.
State Senate Human Services Committee Chair Claire Wilson, D-Federal Way said she 'really felt disappointed for the young people that we let down.'
The crowding at Green Hill comes as juvenile crime has ballooned and state law has transitioned to send young adults convicted of crimes to youth detention instead of adult prison until they turn 25.
The facility, along with Echo Glen Children's Center in Snoqualmie, is one of the state Department of Children, Youth and Families' two prisons for juvenile offenders.
Last year, the crowding crisis grew to the point that the state agency transferred 43 young men from Green Hill to an adult prison run by the state Department of Corrections and temporarily stopped taking in new people at the facility, a decision that drew staunch criticism and litigation.
For months, the population at Green Hill, which houses boys and men ages 17 to 25, has fluctuated between 220 and 240, despite a safe operational capacity of 180. Projections show that number rising another 100 by the end of 2026, according to Department of Children, Youth and Families Secretary Tana Senn.
Meanwhile, the agency's assistant secretary for juvenile rehabilitation, Felice Upton, is no longer with the department, as of April 21. The circumstances of her departure were unclear. The agency declined to comment.
Upton also previously served as superintendent at Echo Glen.
Legislators this year earmarked money for increased security at Green Hill School and for operations at the smaller, new facility set to open next month in Grays Harbor County.
Lawmakers considered major policy changes this year to tackle the overcrowding. Two bills focused on different aspects of the issue passed the Senate before stalling in the House.
Senate Bill 5278 would have set new guidelines for transferring young people to adult prison or placing them there in the first place if youth facilities are above capacity.
Senate Bill 5296, sponsored by Wilson, would have tried to direct more youth away from detention in the first place. The measure would've required judges to specifically find, based on a 'preponderance of the evidence,' that custody in juvenile rehabilitation was necessary because community-based placement would have been inadequate.
The bill also would have required court hearings to determine if people in youth prison should remain in custody, and expand eligibility for alternatives to incarceration.
'We seem to be very willing, if you will, to put money into a system to move our young people from JR into DOC, but not at all as willing to think about what it would take to keep young people from coming into the system in the first place,' Wilson said.
Wilson pushed to pass the two bills in tandem, as a package.
But while Senate Bill 5278, sponsored by Sen. John Braun, D-Centralia, had bipartisan support, the debate over Wilson's proposal was fiercely partisan. Even a handful of House Democrats worried about the more lenient approach her bill offered.
In the end, Wilson's legislation collapsed over these concerns, and Braun's bill fell with it.
'There was a well-worked, bipartisan bill with a controversial bill, and to hold that bill hostage because you couldn't get the votes in your own caucus for a controversial bill, it just seems wrong-headed or even mean-spirited, frankly,' said Braun, whose district includes Green Hill.
More than two dozen House Democrats were so frustrated Wilson's bill didn't get a vote, they put out a joint statement entitled 'Lessons In Failure.'
'For the young people trapped in a system that prioritizes incarceration over rehabilitation, this is more than a missed opportunity — it's a moral failure,' they wrote.
State Rep. Lauren Davis, D-Shoreline, was one of the few in her caucus pushing back on Wilson's bill. She thinks the state needs stronger consequences to deter minors from committing crimes, which often leave their peers as victims.
'I do not believe it is just or compassionate to allow these young people to self-destruct,' she said, noting the bill doesn't expand the community supports needed to help young people diverted away from incarceration.
The case of a 17-year-old released from custody by a King County judge despite a criminal history before allegedly killing two teens in March further stoked opposition.
Davis said she's 'not sure what part of this is acceptable to anybody, but it should be unacceptable to anybody, and this bill would have fomented more of that.'
Davis said her views on public safety have evolved since joining the Legislature in 2019. She's seen policies she supported result in homicides and suicides and doesn't want to repeat those mistakes.
Her resistance toward Senate Bill 5296 did not make her popular among her colleagues, she said.
Eric Trupin, a University of Washington researcher who for decades has worked with incarcerated youth, lamented the bill's failure.
'I think we had an opportunity to really move our juvenile justice system in a way that would really have improved outcomes for youths,' he said.
Still, he said concerns about a lack of services for diverted youth were valid.
Meanwhile, Senn said Wilson's bill wouldn't address the existing population concerns at Green Hill.
The debate isn't over. The bills will likely be back next year for the 60-day legislative session.
'We've been working on this one for a long time,' Wilson said. 'So it will come back, and hoping that Senator Braun will be responsive to bringing 5278 with it.'
The Legislature did make small moves to address juvenile detention needs.
Gov. Bob Ferguson signed a bill last month seeking to protect those held in the state's juvenile detention centers from having to spend extra time in custody over 'prison riot' charges. House Bill 1815 also looks to retroactively vacate those convictions.
An analysis found most of the prison riot charges statewide were prosecuted in Lewis County, where Green Hill is located. The new law could affect sentences or convictions for half a dozen or so detainees at Green Hill, Senn said.
Trupin said the bill is important for those individuals. 'But it's not systems changing like these other two bills were,' he said.
The new state budget sets aside $25 million to run the new 48-bed detention center on the grounds of Stafford Creek Corrections Center in Aberdeen, known as Harbor Heights. The facility is set to open in phases beginning in early June, starting with at least eight young men transferring there from Green Hill and filling to capacity by fall.
Harbor Heights will serve as a six-month rotation for young men in juvenile detention who qualify for medium security status.
While at Harbor Heights, they would build skills and participate in cognitive behavioral therapy to tackle mental health concerns. They'd then return to Green Hill or be released from custody.
'The hope is that young people will see it as an opportunity to expand their own learning and their own growth and their own development' before returning to be mentors at Green Hill, said Wilson.
The plan has drawn pushback from critics worried the former Department of Corrections facility will be dehumanizing, but officials have emphasized the Department of Children, Youth and Families will be running it with more services than adult prisons can provide.
Green Hill and Echo Glen are getting about $3.5 million each for increased security.
'I don't think it'll hurt,' Braun said. 'We've put a ton of money into Green Hill in the last five years, six years. I think it's helping. I don't think it's solving the problem. Fundamentally, it's just overcrowded. They are not delivering on the promise to give these individuals the types of services they need to get back on track.'
Lawmakers also earmarked $3 million for grants to county courts to serve youth in the juvenile justice system. Another $3 million was set aside to scout new medium-security juvenile detention facilities. A top prospect has been the minimum-security Mission Creek Corrections Center for Women in Mason County, which is slated for closure.
Any new facility would be at least four years out, Senn said.
The budget is still subject to Ferguson's approval this month.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump's birthright citizenship order lands in Seattle appeals court
Washington Attorney General Nick Brown, center, speaks to reporters alongside Solicitor General Noah Purcell, left, and Northwest Immigrant Rights Project Legal Director Matt Adams, right, outside a Seattle courthouse where federal appeals court judges heard arguments over President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. (Photo by Jake Goldstein-Street/Washington State Standard) SEATTLE — Federal appeals court judges in Seattle on Wednesday questioned a Trump administration lawyer and Washington's solicitor general over the president's executive order restricting birthright citizenship. The three-judge panel in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals appeared more open to the Trump administration's arguments than a federal judge in Seattle who in January called the order 'blatantly unconstitutional.' Perhaps the most pointed question came after a lengthy back-and-forth over what the writers of the 14th Amendment meant when they enshrined birthright citizenship into the U.S. Constitution. Hawkins asked Department of Justice attorney Eric McArthur, who clerked for conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, what the late Justice Antonin Scalia would think of his arguments. Scalia, an ardent originalist, anchored the Supreme Court's conservative wing alongside Thomas. 'He was widely critical of looking at congressional history and statements of senators opposing or supporting a particular thing, and famously said 'just the words,'' said Hawkins, a Clinton appointee. McArthur said he thought Scalia would have been 'very open to looking at all of the historic evidence.' After McCarthur's arguments, Hawkins told the Justice Department attorney he did a 'terrific job.' Trump's executive action, signed on the first day of his second term, aims to end birthright citizenship for babies born to a mother and father who are not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents. Since the aftermath of the Civil War, the country has automatically given citizenship to babies born on U.S. soil, no matter their immigration status. Wednesday was the first time the merits of Trump's order have come before a federal appeals court. The arguments from Washington's solicitor general, the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and McArthur come a few weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court took up Washington's case on birthright citizenship and others. The justices focused on whether preliminary injunctions, like the one from Judge John Coughenor in Seattle at the center of Wednesday's hearing, should affect only the parties involved in a particular case or can be applied nationwide. The Trump administration contends such orders are judicial overreach. The Supreme Court's ruling-to-come could have implications far beyond the birthright citizenship case, potentially staunching the flow of temporary nationwide blocks that state attorneys general are relying on to stop what they see as the president's unlawful actions. In their May 15 hearing, the justices appeared wary of allowing different rules by state. On Wednesday, state Solicitor General Noah Purcell called Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship 'unconstitutional and unAmerican.' 'President Trump seeks to turn citizenship into a political football, denying that precious right to hundreds of thousands of babies born in this country simply because their parents are here to work, to study or to escape persecution or violence,' said Purcell, who argued successfully against the president's travel ban in court in 2017. As is customary, the 9th Circuit judges didn't rule from the bench Wednesday. They'll issue a written ruling in the coming weeks or months. Both sides told the judges it may be prudent to first wait for the Supreme Court to weigh in on the nationwide injunction question. Former President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, appointed two of the three judges who oversaw Wednesday's hearing. The other is a Trump appointee from the president's first term. Several other cases are currently awaiting similar appellate hearings after lower courts awarded preliminary injunctions. The Supreme Court will likely have the final say on the merits of Trump's order. Speaking to reporters after the Wednesday morning hearing, Washington Attorney General Nick Brown said 'the judges had a lot of pointed and difficult questions for both sides to grapple with.' Still, he said he is 'really confident moving forward that this court, and ultimately the Supreme Court, will rule in the states' favors.' The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution codified birthright citizenship in 1868. The amendment begins: 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.' Trump's order, initially set to take effect Feb. 19, focused on the 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' phrase. 'The Fourteenth Amendment has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the United States,' Trump's executive order reads. 'The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof.'' Legal precedent, including an 1898 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, has long upheld birthright citizenship. That case dealt with a man born in San Francisco to Chinese parents named Wong King Ark. The justices ruled he was a U.S. citizen. The two sides interpret this case differently. Much of Wednesday's arguments centered the Wong Kim Ark decision. McArthur noted the Supreme Court ruled 'every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States.' He focuses on the word 'domiciled,' arguing those here temporarily or without legal status don't fall under that umbrella. Matt Adams, legal director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, countered by reading further from the Supreme Court decision. 'His allegiance to the United States is direct and immediate, and, although but local and temporary, continuing only so long as he remains within our territory,' the justices continued in their Wong Kim Ark ruling, arguing that he is 'as much a citizen as the natural-born child of a citizen.' Washington's case against Trump's birthright citizenship order, filed alongside Oregon, Arizona and Illinois, led to the second Trump administration's first judicial rebuke. The Reagan-appointed judge, Coughenour, later agreed to indefinitely block Trump's order while the case played out in court. Trump's Department of Justice appealed, leading to Wednesday's hearing. Two pregnant noncitizen women joined the states' litigation, fearful their children could be born stateless. One has since given birth to a baby born a U.S. citizen because of court action, said Matt Adams, legal director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project. In 2022, about 153,000 babies across the country were born to two parents without legal immigration status, including 4,000 in Washington, according to the plaintiffs. The states have said they stand to lose federal funding through programs like Medicaid that otherwise could help these children if they were citizens. Purcell told the judges that implementing the Trump administration's vision would be difficult, leaving hospitals to ask about immigration status and how long parents plan to remain in the United States. 'Doesn't that just show the injunction is premature?' asked Judge Patrick Bumatay, a Trump appointee. 'We don't know how unworkable it is because they were not given a chance to implement it.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
Coronation Street actor James Cartwright slams ‘archaic' conversion therapy and praises soap's handling of topic
James Cartwright, who plays Theo Silverton on , has slammed as 'archaic' in a recent interview. Cartwright's Theo is currently involved in a storyline which has seen him leave his wife and two teenage children to pursue a romance with gay character Todd Grimshaw. Later viewers learn that earlier in his life, his family's strong Christian beliefs led to him being subjected to conversion therapy. 'The idea that Corrie even have a crack at that, I think is a really cool thing,' Cartwright recently told Radio Times. 'I'm very proud and privileged and honoured to be on the Street, full stop. 'I didn't know conversion therapy [was] even a thing,' he went on to say. 'I mean, my version of that was a sort of American. So, it's a real thing, and it's very bad. 'And you don't choose your sexuality in any way more than you choose your hair colour, your eye colour and your height, it's ridiculous.' The actor, who joined the soap this year, also spoke to , revealing that he was unaware of how widespread conversion therapy remains to be in the UK. 'I was very surprised by how prevalent it was,' said Cartwright. 'In my mind, it seems [like] such an outdated thing. It feels bizarre – the idea that you can change fundamentally who you love and who you fancy. 'I think it always reminds me of that scene in A Clockwork Orange, you know, when he's got his eyes pinned back and he's being made to watch this movie about violence. It's sort of, conversion therapy feels a bit like that. It just feels archaic.' Last year, the in the UK, stating that it was a 'key immediate priority'. However, since the party got into government it has failed to make good on this promise to date. The post Coronation Street actor James Cartwright slams 'archaic' conversion therapy and praises soap's handling of topic appeared first on Attitude.
Yahoo
03-06-2025
- Yahoo
Washington's attorney general sees no signs of legal battles with Trump letting up
Attorney General Nick Brown, center, speaks to reporters alongside California Attorney General Rob Bonta, right, and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, left, before an event at Town Hall Seattle on Monday, June 2, 2025. (Photo by Jake Goldstein-Street/Washington State Standard) SEATTLE — Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown warned in mid-April that the Trump administration's actions put the country near the 'precipice of a constitutional crisis.' His comments alongside fellow state attorneys general in Colorado came shortly after the White House defied court orders to return a Maryland man the federal government had wrongfully sent to El Salvador under the president's immigration crackdown. Six weeks later, Brown shies away from using that term, but says President Donald Trump's disregard for some court rulings, especially in immigration cases, has made the circumstances around how he is wielding executive power 'much more dangerous.' 'Whether or not we're in a constitutional crisis, you know, that's somewhat of an academic debate,' the Democratic attorney general told reporters before a town hall Monday alongside his counterparts from Oregon and California. 'In my mind, we are in a crisis. Call it what you want.' It's been a whirlwind few months for Brown, who took office in January. Later that month, the day after Trump took office, Brown sued over the president's executive order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship. Since then, he's filed 19 more lawsuits, over threats to gender-affirming care, election systems and cuts to a host of federal agencies and funding opportunities. Some of that litigation is playing out in federal courtrooms in Seattle. Those cases have led to court orders blocking Trump's actions, but are not fully settled. Oregon and California are plaintiffs in even more lawsuits than Washington. Brown guaranteed more litigation to come. At Monday's event in Seattle, Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield recalled a meeting he had with his governor, Tina Kotek, in January. She didn't want him to be the next Bob Ferguson, who during Trump's first term served as Washington attorney general and brought dozens of lawsuits against the Trump administration. This raised Ferguson's profile before he was elected governor last year. 'During the first Trump presidency, I kept looking on the news all the time, and I kept seeing Bob Ferguson every single day,' Kotek told Rayfield. 'You're not going to do that to me, are you?' Rayfield told the crowd, 'I stand here in Washington to tell you I am the Oregon version of Bob Ferguson.' At the town hall, the trio of western states' top legal officials heard concerns from locals about cut public health funding, increasingly brazen immigration enforcement, disinvestment in climate policy, and congressional attacks on reproductive health care. California Attorney General Rob Bonta acknowledged that it's a heavy time for people opposed to Trump. 'We shouldn't feel hopeless, because we're not helpless,' he added. 'We have power.' Last month, Brown was in Washington, D.C., when the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments over challenges to Trump's order seeking to restrict birthright citizenship. The arguments focused on the legal issue of lower court orders blocking actions nationwide, versus only in the places from which plaintiffs are suing. The justices haven't yet ruled on the matter. Meanwhile, Brown's office will be in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Seattle on Wednesday, arguing to maintain such a preliminary injunction indefinitely stopping the federal government from implementing the birthright citizenship order. The attorney general has also been at the forefront of defending so-called 'sanctuary' policies that states and cities have enacted to stop local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. Brown said his lawsuit against an eastern Washington county that aided immigration agents was 'the most difficult case that I have had to bring.' Last week, the Trump administration included Washington, about three dozen of the state's counties and a handful of cities on a nationwide list of sanctuary jurisdictions that it feels hinder the work of immigration enforcement. Listed on the inventory was the nonexistent 'Swinomish County.' The president has threatened to withhold federal funding from these state and local governments. Over the weekend, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security took down the list's webpage amid pushback from police officials. In a call Monday, Brown and other attorneys general laughed over the administration's sloppiness. 'We will survive Donald Trump,' Brown said. Still, he felt the need to knock on wood after saying Trump wouldn't be on the ballot in 2028. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX