Islamic State group claims first attack on Syrian government forces since Assad's fall
BEIRUT (AP) — The Islamic State group has claimed responsibility for two attacks in southern Syria, including one on government forces that an opposition war monitor described as the first on the Syrian army to be adopted by the extremists since the fall of Bashar Assad.
In two separate statements issued late Thursday, IS said that in the first attack, a bomb was detonated targeting a 'vehicle of the apostate regime,' leaving seven soldiers dead or wounded. It said the attack occurred 'last Thursday,' or May 22, in the al-Safa area in the desert of the southern province of Sweida.
IS said that the second attack occurred this week in a nearby area during which a bomb targeted members of the U.S.-backed Free Syrian Army, claiming that it killed one fighter and wounded three.
There was no comment from the government on the claim of the attack and a spokesperson for the Free Syrian Army didn't immediately respond to a request for comment by The Associated Press.
The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that the attack on government forces killed one civilian and wounded three soldiers, describing it as the first such attack to be claimed by IS against Syrian forces since the fall of the 54-year Assad family's rule in December.
IS, which once controlled large parts of Syria and Iraq, is opposed to the new authority in Damascus led by President Ahmad al-Sharaa, who was once the head of al-Qaida's branch in Syria and fought battles against IS.
Over the past several months, IS has claimed responsibility for attacks against the U.S.-backed and Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces in the northeast.
IS was defeated in Syria in March 2019 when SDF fighters captured the last sliver of land that the extremists controlled. Since then, its sleeper cells have carried out deadly attacks, mainly in eastern and northeast Syria.
In January, state media reported that intelligence officials in Syria's post-Assad government thwarted a plan by IS to set off a bomb at a Shiite Muslim shrine south of Damascus.
Al-Sharaa met with U.S. President Donald Trump in Saudi Arabia earlier this month during which the American leader said that Washington would work on lifting crippling economic sanctions imposed on Damascus since the days of Assad.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement after the meeting that Trump urged al-Sharaa to diplomatically recognize Israel, 'tell all foreign terrorists to leave Syria' and help the U.S. stop any resurgence of the Islamic State group.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
San Diego official faces backlash after labeling ICE agents 'terrorists'
A California city councilmember was blasted on social media over the weekend after sharing a photo of ICE agents on Instagram with the word "Terrorists" written in red on top of the agents. In the photo, which San Diego City Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera posted to Instagram with the Rage Against The Machine song "Bulls On Parade," immigration agents appear to be in a parking lot wearing helmets and vests and carrying guns. "Look at this photo. This isn't a war zone—it's a neighborhood in our city," Elo-Rivera wrote in the post. "In San Diego, they've targeted parents dropping off their kids at school, people following the law inside courthouses, and workers just doing their jobs at local restaurants. "These are federal agents carrying out raids on under the false pretense of 'safety,'" he added. "This isn't safety. It's state-sponsored terrorism. And anyone who cares about freedom—and true safety—should be fighting back." Dhs Says Massachusetts City Council Member 'Incited Chaos' As Ice Arrested 'Violent Criminal Alien' Prior to the post Friday night, Elo-Rivera, who represents the 9th City Council District, shared a series of Instagram stories criticizing ICE action in the city. Read On The Fox News App "They've targeted parents outside schools in my district," he wrote in one story. "They've targeted people following the law at courthouses. Tonight, they targeted hard working folks in South Park and tomorrow it could be anyone in any neighborhood in San Diego. The only way we put a stop to it is by not looking away and demanding that it end." In subsequent Instagram stories, he called ICE agents "jackbooted thugs," "cowards" and "criminals" and said the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) action was "state-sponsored terrorism." California Home Of Suspect Accused Of Doxxing Ice Agents Raided And Searched After the public rant was shared by LA-based Fox News correspondent Bill Melugin on Saturday afternoon, Elo-Rivera jumped back on social media again to double down on his phrasing. "A Fox 'News' correspondent has called attention to my choice of words… I said what I meant and meant what I said," Elo-Rivera wrote. He then posted a screenshot from Cornell Law School's website, which notes there is no universal definition for terrorism, and checked off a bullet-pointed list of "common elements that characterize it" before calling Instagram users "fascists." Sanctuary City Lawyers Plot To Help Illegal Migrants Evade Ice In Exposed Group Email Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff for policy and a homeland security advisor, took to X to respond to Elo-Rivera's posts, writing, "We are living in the age of leftwing domestic terrorism. They are openly encouraging violence against law enforcement to aid and abet the invasion of America." Elo-Rivera responded by calling Miller "one of the most dishonest and worst people in America," noting "nothing makes me more confident in my position than knowing he hates it." The Instagram posts came just hours after Patricia Hyde, the head of ICE Boston, told Fox News sanctuary jurisdictions are beginning to escalate against ICE. Reported incidents include a group of activists trying to free a suspected illegal immigrant who was handcuffed by ICE and a crowd blowing ICE's cover outside an alleged illegal immigrant murderer's home. "I think the lack of cooperation is getting worse and worse, and it's putting law enforcement lives in danger," Hyde said. "Elected officials comparing ICE law enforcement agents to terrorists is SICKENING," an ICE spokesperson told Fox News Digital. "Attacks and demonization of ICE and our partners is wrong. "ICE officers are now facing a 413% increase in assaults. ICE is working day and night to remove murders, pedophiles, and gang members from American communities." Cornell University, Cornell Law School and San Diego City Council President Joe LaCava did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's requests for comment. Fox News Digital's Michael Dorgan contributed to this article source: San Diego official faces backlash after labeling ICE agents 'terrorists'
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
More local students are being accepted to Cal Poly. See where they came from
This story is part of SLO Tribune's Parents Central, our expanding coverage for local parents. We're tackling issues that matter to you the most, explaining the "what it means," from school budgets to children's health. We also want to have fun: Send us your best tips for local parents and things to do. Email tips@ Cal Poly accepted more local students for the upcoming school year than in years past — even as more students than ever before applied for a seat at the in-demand campus. Cal Poly received over 80,000 applications this year for the first time in history, and it accepted 22,956, according to the latest data. Overall, the university was as competitive as ever, with some majors having room for less than 3% of applicants. Of those who were accepted, nearly 7%, or about 1,525 students, were from the local area, according to data provided by the university. That's a 1.7% increase compared to last year, according to the data. Additionally, about 58.5% of local applicants were selected, compared to 26.8% of non-local applicants overall, according to the university's selection review report — meaning the acceptance rate for local students was more than double that of general students. Around 55.8% of local first-year students and 65.1% of local transfer students received acceptance letters, compared to 28.5% of non-local first-years and 15.5% of non-local transfer students, the report shows. A subsequent report showed that 924 local freshmen and transfers have since confirmed their acceptances and plan to attend Cal Poly in the fall. The local confirmed students represented 13% of the over 7,000 students who confirmed overall, and over 60% of the 1,525 local students who were initially accepted. Cuesta College and Allan Hancock College remained among the university's top feeder community colleges, and San Luis Obispo High School topped the list of highest-yielding high schools, according to the confirmed student report. Updated numbers provided in the report showed the university received 507 applications from transfer hopefuls at Cuesta College and accepted 286 of them. That equates to a 56.4% admission rate for Cuesta students compared to a 20% admission rate for transfer students overall, according to the report. From Santa Maria-based Allan Hancock College, Cal Poly received 361 applications and accepted 250 of those, resulting in a 69.3% admission rate. Despite accepting more local students, San Luis Obispo County, was not among the highest-yielding counties for Cal Poly acceptances. Those included Los Angeles, San Diego and Santa Clara counties. The data provided to The Tribune did not include specific number breakdowns of school and county acceptances.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump wins temporary reprieve as he fights against court block on tariffs
The Trump administration is racing to halt a major blow to the president's sweeping tariffs after a US court ruled they 'exceed any authority granted to the president'. A US trade court ruled Donald Trump's tariffs regime was illegal on Wednesday in a dramatic twist that could block the president's controversial global trade policy. On Thursday, an appeals court agreed to a temporary pause in the decision pending an appeal hearing. The Trump administration is expected to take the case to the supreme court if it loses. The ruling by a three-judge panel at the New York-based court of international trade came after several lawsuits argued Trump had exceeded his authority, leaving US trade policy dependent on his whims and unleashing economic chaos around the world. Related: Elon Musk announces exit from US government role after breaking with Trump on tax bill On Thursday, the Trump administration filed for 'emergency relief' from the ruling 'to avoid the irreparable national-security and economic harms at stake'. The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said the judges had 'brazenly abused their judicial power to usurp the authority of President Trump' in what she characterised as a pattern of judicial overreach. 'Ultimately the supreme court must put an end to this,' she said. Leavitt's comments came as a second judge, Washington DC district court judge Rudolph Contreras, called the tariffs 'unlawful' and ordered a preliminary injunction on the collection of tariffs from a pair of Illinois toy importers, which brought the case. Tariffs typically need to be approved by Congress but Trump has so far bypassed that requirement by claiming that the country's trade deficits amount to a national emergency. This had left him able to apply sweeping tariffs to most countries last month, in a shock move that sent markets reeling. The court's ruling stated that Trump's tariff orders 'exceed any authority granted to the president … to regulate importation by means of tariffs'. The judges were keen to state that they were not passing judgment on the 'wisdom or likely effectiveness of the president's use of tariffs as leverage'. Instead, their ruling centred on whether the trade levies had been legally applied in the first place. Their use was 'impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because [federal law] does not allow it', the decision explained. Financial markets cheered the court's ruling, with the US dollar rallying in its wake, soaring against the euro, yen and Swiss franc. In Europe, the German Dax rallied 0.9%, while France's Cac 40 rose 1%. The UK's FTSE 100 blue-chip index ticked up 0.1% at the start of trading. Stocks in Asia also climbed on Thursday, while in the US stock markets all rose marginally. The ruling immediately invalidated all of the tariff orders that were issued through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a law meant to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during a national emergency. The judges said Trump must issue new orders reflecting the permanent injunction within 10 days. White House officials have hit out at the court's authority. The ruling, if it stands, blows a giant hole through Trump's strategy to use steep tariffs to wring concessions from trading partners, draw manufacturing jobs back to US shores and shrink a $1.2tn (£892bn) US goods trade deficit, which were among his key campaign promises. Related: Trump claimed 'tariffs are easy' – he's learning the hard way that's not the case Without the help of the IEEPA, the Trump administration would have to take a slower approach, launching lengthier trade investigations and abiding by other trade laws to back the tariff threats. The decision is also likely to embolden other challenges to Trump's policy. Last month, California's governor, Gavin Newsom, filed a lawsuit against the tariffs, arguing they were 'illegal, full stop'. The court was not asked to address some industry-specific tariffs Trump has issued on cars, steel and aluminium, using a different statute, so these are likely to remain in place for now. Analysts at Goldman Sachs said that there could be other legal avenues for Trump to impose across-the-board and country-specific tariffs, saying: 'This ruling represents a setback for the administration's tariff plans and increases uncertainty but might not change the final outcome for most major US trading partners.' Other options for the president include sections under various trade acts that grant him powers to intervene on trade policy, albeit in an often slower and, in some instances, more limited way. Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, hit out at the ruling in a social media post that claimed 'the judicial coup is out of control'. After a relatively long – for him – period of silence on his social media platform, Trump resumed posting on Thursday, with a 500-word screed attacking the three judges who ruled against him. Trump's post began by noting that the order to unwind the tariffs had been paused temporarily by an appeals court, but then turned to baseless speculation that the three judges on the federal trade court must have been motivated by hatred for him. 'Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for them to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America? Is it purely a hatred of 'TRUMP?' What other reason could it be?' the president asked, without noting that he had appointed one of the judges himself in 2018. Trump's curiosity as to what could possibly explain the decision did not, apparently, extend to reading any of the 49-page explanation written by the court, because his post did not deal with any of the legal issues raised in the opinion. At least seven lawsuits have challenged Trump's border taxes, the centrepiece of Trump's trade policy. The court made its ruling in response to two cases. One was filed by a group of small businesses, including a wine importer, VOS Selections, whose owner said the tariffs were having a major impact and his company may not survive. The other was filed by a dozen US states, led by Oregon. 'This ruling reaffirms that our laws matter, and that trade decisions can't be made on the president's whim,' said the Oregon attorney general, Dan Rayfield. Related: Trump allies rail against court ruling blocking wide swath of tariffs The plaintiffs in the tariff lawsuit argued that the emergency powers law did not give the president the power to apply tariffs, and even if it had done, the trade deficit did not qualify as an emergency, which is defined as an 'unusual and extraordinary threat'. The US has run a trade deficit with the rest of the world for 49 consecutive years. Trump also targeted imports from Canada, China and Mexico, claiming his decision was meant to combat the illegal flow of immigrants and the synthetic opioids across the US border. His administration pointed to the court's approval of Richard Nixon's emergency use of tariffs in 1971, and claimed that only Congress, and not the courts, could determine the 'political' question of whether the president's rationale for declaring an emergency complied with the law. Reuters and the Associated Press contributed reporting
