logo
‘Horrifying' stabbing in French mosque sparks investigation into Islamophobic attack

‘Horrifying' stabbing in French mosque sparks investigation into Islamophobic attack

First Post28-04-2025

The assailant recorded the attack on his phone, and security camera footage showed him shouting insults at 'Allah,' which means God in Arabic read more
A protestor holds a sign reading "Justice for Aboubakar, Islamophobia kills" during a gathering in tribute to Aboubakar, the worshipper killed in a mosque at La Grand-Combe, and against Islamophobia, at the Place de la Republique in Paris. AFP
A man suspected of killing a Muslim worshipper in a mosque in the south of France was still on the run Sunday, authorities said, in an attack described by Prime Minister Francois Bayrou as Islamophobic.
Both men were alone in the mosque in the former mining town of La Grand Combe on Friday when the victim was fatally stabbed. The assailant recorded the attack on his phone, and security camera footage showed him shouting insults at 'Allah,' which means God in Arabic, local media said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Local prosecutor Abdelkrim Grini said Sunday that investigators are taking into account 'the possibility that this was an Islamophobic act. It's the one we're working on first, but it's not the only one,' he said.
'Racism and hatred based on religion will never have a place in France,' French President Emmanuel Macron said. 'Religious freedom is inviolable.'
Grini said images of the stabbing he watched as part of the investigation were 'horrifying' and that police forces were working non-stop to try and arrest the suspect, with 70 investigators deployed.
'We're being particularly vigilant to make sure he doesn't claim any more victims,' Grini said. He added that the suspect is a man born in France in 2004, who lived in the area and did not have a criminal record.
The Grand Mosque of Paris condemned the attack in a statement and said the victim, a young man identified only as Aboubakar in French media, had just finished cleaning the mosque when he was killed.
It called on authorities to quickly shed light on the reasons behind the attack, asking judicial authorities to say whether it is being treated as a 'terrorist' act and to note its 'scale and seriousness … for the safety of all.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Justice Minister Gerald Darmanin called the stabbing a 'despicable murder' that 'wounds the hearts of all believers, of all Muslims in France.'
Bayrou also denounced an act of 'Islamophobic ignominy displayed on video.'
'We stand shoulder to shoulder with the victim's family and the shocked worshippers,' he said. 'The resources of the state are being mobilised to ensure that the murderer is caught and punished.'
The SOS Racisme campaign group joined the calls for more clarity in the investigation and took part in a march organized later Sunday at La Grand Combe in support of the victim. Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau traveled to the nearby town of Ales to meet with local Muslim faith officials and pledged to stop the suspect.
'Of course, the possibility of an anti-Muslim act is not at all neglected, quite the contrary,' he said. 'It is out of the question to tolerate this kind of act in this hyper-violent society.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In Paris, a rally against Islamophobia and in tribute to the victim was held at the Place de la République.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's new travel ban takes effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
Trump's new travel ban takes effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

Indian Express

time26 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump's new travel ban takes effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the US by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries took effect Monday amid rising tension over the president's escalating campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed on Wednesday, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the US and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all US diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the US even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the US are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country.'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay US visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. US officials say the man charged in the attack overstayed a tourist visa. He is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees.'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government was among those that condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.

How legal is Donald Trump's move to deploy California's National Guard in Los Angeles? Explained
How legal is Donald Trump's move to deploy California's National Guard in Los Angeles? Explained

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

How legal is Donald Trump's move to deploy California's National Guard in Los Angeles? Explained

To quell the ongoing protests in California's Los Angeles, the United States' second biggest city, President Donald Trump deployed National Guard troops to the state over the weekend. Following this, the protests only intensified as demonstrators put cars on fire and even scuffled with security forces in Los Angeles. The governor of California, Gavin Newsom, has opposed the deployment of the National Guard troops and has asked Trump to take it back. California's National Guard is a standby military usually controlled by the state's governor, reported AFP. 'I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County and return them to my command,' Newsom said in a post on X. Track live updates of LA protests here. 'We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California,' he added. People in LA are protesting against the raids by immigration officials that have led to the arrests of dozens of people. These people, according to the authorities, are illegal migrants and gang members, reported AFP. Also read: Tear gas, rubber bullets fired as protests flare up in Los Angeles after Trump's National Guard deployment | 10 points However, the question that looms large is whether Trump's move to deploy National Guard troops is legal or not. To deploy at least 2,000 National Guards troops in California under federal service, Trump used the Title 10 of the U.S. Code. Terming the protests in LA as a possible 'form of rebellion', Trump used the provision of Title 10 - Section 12406 which allows any state's National Guard in federal service whenever- (1) the United States, or any of the Commonwealths or possessions, is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation; (2) there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States; or (3) the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States; 'the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws,' says the provision. According to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which is at the center of the ongoing dispute over the deployment, the US military, including the National Guard, is forbidden from participating in regular civil law enforcement. It was enacted in response to the abuses resulting from the extensive use of the army in civil law enforcement during the Civil War and the Reconstruction, according to the US Department of Justice. However, the Act allows legislated exceptions. While Section 12406 used by Trump does not override this prohibition, it allows the troops to 'protect' ICE and other United States Government personnel. This means that the National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters in LA, according to a Reuters report. While the state of California could sue Trump over the deployment, citing that the protests did not rise to the level of a 'rebellion'. However, that would be a lengthy process and the protests might be over before the lawsuit's conclusion, Reuters reported citing experts. Also, according to 10 U.S.C. 12406, orders for the deployment of National Guard under the said three circumstances 'shall be issued through the governors of the States', which is yet another point that could be challenged. However, according to legal experts, this argument might not hold much value. That is because the language likely reflects the way the troops are generally deployed but doesn't really provide the state governor an option to not comply with the President's order, the Reuters report added. With inputs from AFP, Reuters.

U.S. President Donald Trump's new travel ban takes effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement
U.S. President Donald Trump's new travel ban takes effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

U.S. President Donald Trump's new travel ban takes effect amid escalating tension over immigration enforcement

President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the U.S. by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries took effect on Monday (June 9, 2025). The new proclamation, which Mr. Trump signed on Wednesday, also imposes new travel restrictions on people from seven additional countries who are outside the U.S. and don't have a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, which include Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The new visa restrictions apply to people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The new proclamation applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. The new ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all U.S. diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the U.S. even after the ban takes effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the U.S. are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest in their country. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is designed to beat any court challenge by focusing on the visa application process and appears more carefully crafted than a hastily written executive order during Trump's first term that denied entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries. In a video posted Wednesday on social media, Trump said nationals of countries included in the ban pose 'terrorism-related' and 'public-safety' risks, as well as risks of overstaying their visas. He also said some of these countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting or have historically refused to take back their citizens. His findings rely extensively on an annual Homeland Security report about tourists, businesspeople and students who overstay U.S. visas and arrive by air or sea, singling out countries with high percentages of nationals who remain after their visas expired. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The man charged in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. U.S. officials say he overstayed a tourist visa. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro's government condemned the travel ban, characterizing it in a statement as a 'stigmatization and criminalization campaign' against Venezuelans.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store