Rare brain infection kills 8 in Tamil Nadu after a routine dental visit: What we need to know
In Tamil Nadu, what seemed like a routine dental treatment turned into something far more tragic, and it all started with a single bottle of saline.
In 2023, a team of
researchers
uncovered an outbreak of neuromelioidosis, a rare brain infection caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei.
This bacterium is often found in contaminated soil and water in tropical regions, but this time, it had entered the human body in an unusual and alarming way, through a dental procedure.
The investigation revealed that a dental clinic in Vaniyambadi town had reused an opened bottle of saline, which was initially pierced using a surgical instrument that should never have touched it — a periosteal elevator. This instrument, typically used to lift tissues during dental surgeries, was repurposed to open the bottle, and the bottle was then loosely resealed and reused.
The result? At least ten patients were infected, and eight of them lost their lives. This wasn't a slow-acting illness either. The infection advanced quickly — patients died within 16 days from the onset of symptoms.
Scientists traced the infection to a specific gene present in the bacteria, the bimABm gene. This gene, known for its aggressive behaviour toward the brain, gave the infection a terrifying twist. It didn't just travel through the bloodstream like most infections.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Lifetime Office 2024 License for Mumbai [Order]
prime software
Undo
It moved along the nerve pathways, directly reaching the brainstem, the most vital part of the human nervous system.
Bacteria that targets the brain
The bacterium behind the outbreak, Burkholderia pseudomallei, is not new. It exists in many parts of India, particularly in southern regions, living silently in the soil and water. Normally, it infects through wounds or inhalation, but this outbreak marked a frightening shift.
By entering directly through dental instruments and into the oral tissues, the bacteria found a shortcut to the central nervous system.
This direct route is why the death rate was so alarmingly high, 80% among those who had dental exposure. Compared to just one death among 11 patients who were infected from environmental exposure, the contrast couldn't have been starker.
What made this outbreak different from previous ones was the gene bimABm, identified in the bacterial samples. This gene isn't found in all B. pseudomallei strains, but the version seen here bore similarities to another dangerous bacterium, Burkholderia mallei, which causes glanders in animals and is known for targeting the brain.
The presence of this gene may have made the strain more likely to affect the brain, leading to symptoms like slurred speech, distorted vision, facial paralysis, and in many cases, death. This wasn't a generic infection — it was a targeted assault on the body's most sensitive control system.
Despite the gravity of the outbreak, no official government announcement was made at the time. It was only through scientific investigation and publication in The Lancet that the world came to know about this terrifying episode.
This silence has raised serious questions about healthcare safety and transparency. Why was such a major health event, involving a deadly brain infection, high fatalities, and poor infection control practices, not disclosed earlier? Public health exists to protect lives, but when warnings come too late, prevention becomes impossible.
7 amazing health benefits of coconut water
What does this teach about healthcare safety
This incident is more than a scientific case study. It's a wake-up call.
It shows how even a simple, everyday medical product like saline can become lethal when basic hygiene protocols are ignored. It underscores the importance of sterility in every medical setting — not just operation theatres, but even the smallest dental clinic in a town far from the spotlight.
But most importantly, it shows how bacteria are evolving. What used to be rare is no longer impossible. And what used to be confined to soil can now find new, faster routes into the human brain.
One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Rare brain eating amoeba Naegleria fowleri kills woman: How a tiny amoeba in tap water can kill you and how to stay safe
A woman in Texas died after contracting a deadly brain infection from a microscopic amoeba in tap water used for a nasal rinse, U.S. health officials have confirmed. The 71-year-old was reportedly staying at a local campground and had used water from her RV's tap in a nasal irrigation device. Just four days later, she developed severe neurological symptoms and died within eight days of falling ill. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has identified the infection as primary amebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), caused by Naegleria fowleri — a rare but nearly always fatal amoeba. 'This case reinforces the potential for serious health risks associated with improper use of nasal irrigation devices, as well as the importance of maintaining RV water quality and ensuring that municipal water systems adhere to regulatory standards,' the CDC stated. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Experience next-level CPAP comfort with Resmed AirSense 11 ResMed Enquire Now Undo What is Naegleria fowleri? Naegleria fowleri is a single-celled organism that lives in warm freshwater bodies such as lakes, rivers, and hot springs. It can also survive in poorly maintained swimming pools and untreated tap water. It is referred to as a "brain-eating amoeba" because, once it enters through the nose, it travels along the olfactory nerve into the brain, where it destroys brain tissue. Despite its terrifying name, the amoeba is extremely rare. Between 1962 and 2023, only 164 cases were recorded in the U.S., with just four known survivors. Live Events Tammy Lundstrom, Chief Medical Officer and infectious disease expert at Trinity Health, told Fox News Digital, 'The risk of brain-eating amoeba is very low. Fewer than 10 people in the U.S. every year get infected — but unfortunately, most cases are fatal. There are only a handful of survivors of known cases.' How the woman got infected The CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report detailed that the woman had used a nasal irrigation device multiple times over four days. It was filled with unboiled tap water from the RV's internal plumbing. After symptoms such as fever, headache and altered mental status emerged, she was hospitalised and treated for a suspected PAM infection. However, her condition rapidly worsened. She suffered seizures and died eight days after the symptoms began. Testing of her cerebrospinal fluid confirmed the presence of Naegleria fowleri. Although the amoeba itself was not detected in the RV water supply, investigators found the system had not been adequately disinfected. Symptoms to watch for Early symptoms of PAM often appear within five days of exposure, though onset can range from one to 12 days. These include: Headache Fever Nausea Vomiting As the infection advances, it can cause: Confusion Stiff neck Seizures Hallucinations Coma 'Early symptoms should prompt a medical evaluation, as they are also signs of bacterial meningitis,' said Lundstrom. The disease progresses swiftly. On average, death occurs five days after symptoms begin, but it can happen in as little as one day or as long as 18. How to protect yourself The CDC advises that only sterile, distilled or previously boiled and cooled water should be used for nasal rinsing. Improperly treated water, especially from RVs or municipal systems lacking adequate disinfection, can pose a risk. When swimming, experts recommend keeping your head above water or using a nose clip. 'Infection occurs when water harbouring the amoeba goes up a person's nose, usually during swimming,' Lundstrom explained. 'It is not known why some people get infected and others, even swimming companions, do not.' Drinking contaminated water is not a risk factor, as the infection only occurs via nasal exposure. It also does not spread between people. Because the amoeba thrives in warm temperatures — typically over 30°C — and can survive in sediment, swimmers are advised not to disturb the bottom of lakes or rivers. How it spreads and survives Naegleria fowleri has three life stages: cyst, trophozoite (the active stage), and flagellate. The active form can infect humans but under less favourable conditions, it reverts to a cyst and clings to surfaces in plumbing or pools. It grows best at temperatures up to 46°C and can survive briefly even in hotter conditions. Most infections occur in southern U.S. states, though cases are being reported further north — possibly linked to climate change. To limit the spread, many southern utilities perform annual chlorine burns at the start of summer to flush out biofilms where the amoeba might hide. Can it be treated? Treatment options are limited due to the rapid progression and severity of PAM. Doctors typically use antifungal and antibiotic drugs, such as rifampin and azithromycin, alongside miltefosine, a newer antifungal that has shown some promise in lab tests. But Lundstrom cautioned, 'The effect of all of these drugs on actual infected people is unknown due to the high fatality rate.' Prompt diagnosis remains difficult because early symptoms resemble other, more common infections. The warmest months are when Naegleria fowleri is most active, especially in southern regions. Splash pads, lakes, and even backyard kiddie pools can become risky if water is left untreated or stagnant. Though infections are rare, families are urged to take simple precautions. Use sterile water for nasal care. Be cautious in warm freshwater environments. And remember, the amoeba doesn't pose a risk in saltwater or from drinking. 'Millions of people enjoy swimming every summer, but only a few become infected,' said Lundstrom. 'Awareness and prevention are your best tools.'
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Bombay high court orders full reimbursement for central govt pensioner denied heart transplant expenses incurred at private hospital
Mumbai: In what it said was a peculiar case of a dispute arising over a reimbursement claim by a central govt employee for a "heart transplant" conducted at a private hospital, the Bombay high court on Friday held that the affected man, a pensioner, was entitled to decide on a private hospital for the procedure in the absence of timely availability of such facilities in all the empanelled hospitals under the govt health scheme for employees. The high court said he was entitled to full reimbursement of his "undisputed expenditure". It said that to make the man suffer for the refund was a glaring travesty of justice and violation of his fundamental rights. Anirudh Nansi, who took voluntary retirement in March 2008 as a central govt employee, is a Mumbai resident and petitioned the high court in 2022 over his December 2020 transplant. He was an assistant commissioner in the Central Excise and Customs, Pune. The high court held that the money is to be paid in four weeks to the former employee. It held that the rejection by the Centre was "not only violative of the fundamental rights but strikes at the very root, purpose, and essence of these basic human rights as guaranteed by the constitutional guarantee of right to life under Article 21". A division bench of Justice Girish Kulkarni and Jistice Advait Sethna, tn the judgement pronouncement, held that the central govt was under an obligatory position to grant reimbursement on a case-by-case basis, with no straitjacket formula to fix reimbursement rates. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esta nueva alarma con cámara es casi regalada en Castelar (ver precio) Verisure Undo The judges said a heart transplant was "certainly serious and emergent", hence, the former employee's case deserved to be treated with humane sensitivity and not mechanically in a "narrow pedantic" view. Any employee, merely because he retired, ought not to be differently treated when it comes to genuine and realistic need, held the high court. A high-powered committee (HPC) denying the pensioner full reimbursement on the grounds that the central scheme permitted rates are required to be followed, "is not the correct and a legal stand of the (Centre)", the high court noted. It said it also disagreed with the HPC's reasoning to deny a full refund even under the Centre's relaxation of guidelines for special emergent cases, stating that "heart transplantation was a planned surgery and not an emergency". The high court said that under the Centre's relaxation rules, it failed to understand how a heart transplant is not considered "extraordinary", emergent and inevitable surgery, "as a heart transplant is required only when the heart is failing, the consequences of which are just to be imagined". Even if there were no relaxation guidelines, in deserving cases, the HPC should exercise its discretion to award full medical reimbursement, held the high court. Through senior advocate Prakash Shah and advocate Anil Balani, Nansi sought reimbursement, saying he was being denied it. He sought reimbursement of Rs 22 lakh with 9% yearly interest. His claim was denied in April 2022 by the Centre. The petitioner was suffering from cardiomyopathy since 2009. In Oct 2019, his condition deteriorated, and he was advised to have a transplant. He said a private empanelled super-specialty hospital in Mumbai at the time was not performing heart transplants, hence he got his done at another one in Mumbai on Dec 29, 2020. He cited his then "grave and critical nature… and the lack of any CGHS empanelled hospitals having necessary licence, approvals, and expertise… . " Before his surgery, he got an endorsement from the Centre noting that reimbursement at a non-empanelled hospital could only be given at CGHS rates and the difference would have to be borne by the petitioner. "This medical condition is certainly not a routine affair for the hospitals, much less for the central govt hospitals or those under the Central Government Health Scheme," observed the high court after hearing the Centre's lawyers Y R Sharma and Jain. The issue before the high court was whether, in his pressing situation, he could be denied full reimbursement of the medical expenses incurred by him for such major treatment merely because he opted for a private hospital. The question was also whether the rigours of the normal rule of medical reimbursement should make way for the case to be considered specially, the high court said, particularly as a heart transplant surgery is not a walk-in category of surgery. While in many cases reimbursements may not involve any dispute on the amount, it cannot mean that in very peculiar, serious, specialised cases of medical treatment, the reimbursement needs to be only as per the rates which are pre-determined, the high court observed, as it would then "be most unrealistic, unfair, and discriminatory as in the present situation". The high court added that even if it was a planned surgery, Nansi's claim for a full refund could not have been rejected, "or merely because the rates being notified, the petitioner ought not to be granted any reimbursement". The high court said: "It cannot be that the rules governing reimbursement are sacrosanct and nothing outside the rules in exceptional/special cases and especially deserving cases can be considered for reimbursement by the central govt. It would not require elaboration that in such matters, it is an accepted position that there is a free play in the joints and such category of cases are required to be considered on their merits. "Certainly, the heart transplant surgery is one of urgency and critical importance, and could not have been postponed. It is a special circumstance. It is imperative that such surgeries are expedited in the interest of human life without an embargo of an expenditure which is secondary to human life." Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Ludhiana records second Covid death as cases rise to 18
Ludhiana: Around 10 days after a local resident died of Covid in Chandigarh, an elderly woman became the second patient to die of Covid at a Chandigarh hospital. With this, the the number of Covid cases reported in the city this year has risen to 18 and the number of deaths has risen to two. Civil surgeon Dr Ramandeep Kaur confirmed the second Covid death and said that there are 13 active cases in the district. As per the health department, new cases reported on Friday include a 22-year-old man and a 52-year-old woman. Health officials said that the woman who died of Covid in a Chandigarh hospital was a 69-year-old resident of Koom Kalan area. The woman, who had been struggling with obesity, had intermittent fever for about five months. She had been undergoing treatment in PGI for the past month. A health department official said that after her condition deteriorated, she was referred to PGI, Chandigarh and then to Sector 16 government hospital in Chandigarh before being shifted back to PGI, where she passed away on June 4. The official added that four of the woman's contacts were tested for Covid but only her grandson tested positive. He is asymptomatic. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo According to health officials, of the 18 persons who tested positive for Covid, quarantine period of three has ended. Around 13 patients are in home quarantine. Those whose home quarantine has ended include the 19-year-old girl and her 11-year-old brother from Basti Jodhewal area, whose father died of Covid on May 28. Sources in the health department said that of the 18 patients who tested positive for Covid, 13 are from Ludhiana city, three from Koom Kalan area and one each from Sudhar and Khanna. Addressing the gathering at a function in Ludhiana on Friday, health minister Dr Balbir Singh said that there was no cause for concern. He maintained that the situation was completely normal and Punjab was fully equipped to tackle any situation. However, he advised immunocompromised individuals such as pregnant women, the elderly, and those with conditions like kidney disease, high blood pressure, cancer, or respiratory issues to wear masks outdoors. He also underscored the importance of vigilance while affirming the state's preparedness to handle any health challenges. Talking to TOI, the minister said that they have adequate beds for Covid patients in Ludhiana. He suggested that the cases are of the Omicron variant. The health department advisory suggests that people continue using masks in crowded areas. "If you feel any flu-like symptoms, wear a mask and consult the nearest health centre, it says. Covid factfile Total cases in 2025: 18 Active cases: 13 Deaths: 2 Recent Death: A 69-year-old woman from Koom Kalan with obesity and prolonged fever. Treated at PGI and Sector 16 Hospital in Chandigarh. Passed away on June 4. New Cases (June 6): A 22-year-old man A 52-year-old woman MSID:: 121677361 413 | Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
