Dr Oz Mocked for Insisting It's Americans' 'Patriotic Duty' to Stay Healthy: 'Cutting Medicare is Unpatriotic'
Dr. Mehmet Oz believes it is the "patriotic duty" of Americans to stay healthy, but hearing the assertion from the head of Medicare and Medicaid, which are currently facing potential cuts, did not inspire patriotism in all Americans.
"Seventy percent of the money we spend is on chronic illness, and we're not getting our money's worth," Oz said Fox News Thursday. "So for folks listening right now, it's your patriotic duty to be as healthy as you can."
Critics bristled to the comment, accusing Oz of blaming patients for illness while ignoring health determinants like affordability, access and socioeconomic barriers.
"Then make health care affordable and reinstate not having medical debt affect credit scores," one user replied.
Others pointed to recent GOP-led policies—such as proposed cuts to Medicare and Medicaid and tariffs on prescription drugs—as counterproductive and hypocritical. "Cutting Medicare, Medicaid, and putting tariffs on prescription drugs hardly makes us healthier," wrote one. "In fact, I would say that is unpatriotic."
So, if you have some sort of illness, which you do not control, such as Cancer, such as Heart ailments, congenital diseases, you are not a patriot? This is not common sense, this is a denial of the rights of all citizens. — PaulCA - Be humorous, we're only here once. (@BabbleBabble11) May 9, 2025
Some pushed back against the idea that individuals should carry patriotic responsibility for chronic or congenital illness. "Cancer doesn't care if you're healthy or not," one post read, while another sarcastically added, "I guess I just chose Type 1 diabetes when I was young—what an unAmerican a**hole I am."
Healthcare advocates and progressives also took issue with the lack of systemic solutions. "Then why don't we have universal healthcare, you know, so we can all fulfill our patriotic duty?" a user asked.
Many resented the statement's framing, even if they agreed with his message. "Being healthy is important, but calling it a 'patriotic duty' is just a convenient way to shame people while ignoring the systemic healthcare issues that make wellness inaccessible for many," read another comment.
When you hear "it's your patriotic duty to be as healthy as you can," just run away as fast as you can. 🏃 — Scott 𝕏 (@bullriders1) May 9, 2025
Oz made similar comments when he was sworn in last month, going on to suggest that Americans should save money on drugs by staying healthy.
Originally published on Latin Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
10 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
RFK Jr. Fact-Checked for Spouting 'Dangerous Falsehoods' About Vaccines on Fox News: 'I Have Receipts'
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made a series of inaccurate claims about vaccines during a Fox News appearance Thursday. Kennedy claimed that "97% of the people on the [CDC vaccine advisory] committee had conflicts of interest," that children receive "between 69 and 92" mandatory vaccines, and that "none of them have been safety tested" — aside from the COVID-19 vaccine. He also asserted that vaccines are designed to "deregulate" the immune system, linking them to an "epidemic of chronic disease." Dr. Jake Scott, a doctor specializing in infectious disease and associate professor at Stanford Medical School, issued a detailed rebuttal on social media, accusing Kennedy of spreading "egregious, dangerous falsehoods" and backing up his criticism with data from peer-reviewed studies and CDC records. "Fox News might not fact-check him, but I will," Scott wrote. "I've reviewed the trials. I've catalogued them. I have receipts." Scott went claim by claim. Kennedy said 97% of CDC vaccine committee members had conflicts of interest, but didn't cite where he obtained that figure. Scott refuted the claim, sharing findings from a Reuter's investigation which found that while 41% of members received a form of industry payment, it was mostly in small sums for travel or meals. Furthermore, the CDC has stringent guidelines in place requiring recusals for any conflicts. Even the Fox anchor commented that Kennedy's claim that children now receive between 69 and 92 mandatory vaccines sounded quite high. It was disputed by Scott as well, who noted that vaccine mandates are set by states, and most states mandate slightly over 30 immunizations. Regarding Kennedy's claim that no vaccines other than the Covid vaccine have gone through placebo-controlled trials, Scott said, "One of the most misleading claims I've ever seen a government official make on national television." He went on to link to a database that contains 164 placebo-controlled vaccine trials, and specified at least one example for every routine childhood vaccine. Kennedy said, "Nobody has any idea what the risk profiles are on these products," which Scott countered, noting that 90% of vaccine studies include safety outcome reports, and listing four methods of post-licensure safety monitoring. He cited three instances where safety issues with vaccines were discovered and acted upon. Finally, Scott dismissed Kennedy's claim that "vaccines deregulate the immune system." "This isn't science; it's a scary-sounding buzzword," Scott wrote. "Vaccines don't 'deregulate' anything. They educate the immune system through targeted antigen exposure so it can defend against real pathogens later." Scott emphasized that while no medical intervention is risk-free, the evidence overwhelmingly supports the safety and public health benefits of routine childhood immunizations. "As a father of two, I'm extremely grateful," he added, citing dramatic drops in child deaths and disease since the introduction of vaccines like Hib, hepatitis B, and rotavirus. Kennedy's comments have drawn condemnation from health experts and lawmakers alike, with many warning that misinformation of this nature could further erode trust in lifesaving vaccines. Originally published on Latin Times
Int'l Business Times
3 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Lumps in Trump's Pants Revive Health Concerns as Speculation of 'Leg Braces' Grows Days After Tumbling Up Stairs
The latest theory circulating online about President Donald Trump's health suggests he may be wearing leg braces, based on a photo taken just days after he stumbled while ascending the steps of Air Force One. An X post shared Monday by the popular account PatriotTakes asked, "What's going on here?" and included a series of photos showing what appeared to be hard creases and lines on both of the president's pant legs. Several social media users suggested the president may be wearing leg braces. "Exoskeleton leg braces?" one X user questioned. "Those are leg braces to stabilize him. It's why he never wears shorts anymore," another added. Meanwhile, some users also speculated the lines might indicate the presence of a catheter. "Leg braces. And it appeared as though he had a catheter in as well," an X user suggested. "Double cathed up!" another guessed. Others sought to quell the conspiracy theorists, saying that the creases in Trump's pants offered no insight into his health. "Those are called pants. You're welcome," an X user wrote. The conjecture emerged days after Trump was filmed stumbling up the stairs of the Air Force One, a misstep for which former President Joe Biden was frequently criticized by MAGA supporters. In Trump's case, however, many of his own supporters were quick to defend him, emphasizing that the White House doctor gave him a clean bill of health in April. For now, the mystery of the president's pant creases remains unresolved. Originally published on Latin Times
Int'l Business Times
4 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
RFK Jr Accused of 'Lying Under Oath' After Firing Entire Vaccine Advisory Committee: 'Charge RFK Jr. With Perjury'
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is being accused of lying under oath before Congress after announcing that he will be "retiring" all members of a vaccine advisory committee. Kennedy took to the Wall Street Journal, publishing an op-ed in which he revealed that he made the decision to remove all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. The Committee, which consisted of independent vaccine experts, was often tasked with advising the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028," Kennedy wrote, defending his decision. Social media users reacted with outrage at Kennedy's actions, stating that he previously lied to Congress when he insisted that he was not anti-vaccine at his confirmation hearing. "Scary stuff. He said he wouldn't do this during his confirmation hearing," said one user. "Oh great @BillCassidy! Talking to RFK Jr seems like a perfectly good plan. How bout impeach the liar?" said another, responding to a post from Senator Bill Cassidy acknowledging fears of officials who oppose vaccinations being tapped to serve on the renewed ACIP. "It is time to fire @SecKennedy and prosecute him. He is intentionally harming Americans," said a third. "@RobertKennedyJrYou're a f--king liar and a dumbass. Why should anybody take advice from an uninformed, self righteous, opportunistic skank like you? F--k you, RFK Jr," said a fourth. "Let's play RFK's confirmation testimony where he swore this was not his plan. Lying under oath is perjury," another outraged user wrote. "This is ignorant and not true! Vaccines were one of the greatest health advancements in the 20th century! Vaccines saved countless lives. You are harming Americans with your lack of scientific knowledge and blatant ignorance. Shame in you!" added another. Others called for officials to "charge RFK Jr. with perjury." "The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine. It has never recommended against a vaccine—even those later withdrawn for safety reasons," RFK Jr. continued in the op-ed. "It has failed to scrutinize vaccine products given to babies and pregnant women. To make matters worse, the groups that inform ACIP meet behind closed doors, violating the legal and ethical principle of transparency crucial to maintaining public trust." Kennedy has made numerous other moves suggesting that he is not an advocate of vaccines, including forcing the resignation of the Food and Drug Administration's top vaccine scientist, hiring a vaccine skeptic who was disciplined for practicing medicine unlicensed to review CDC vaccine safety data and undermined the importance of a measles vaccine during one of the worst outbreaks in American history. "Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines that trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives," Bruce A. Scott, the president of the American Medical Association, said in a statement. "With an ongoing measles outbreak and routine child vaccination rates declining, this move will further fuel the spread of vaccine-preventable illnesses." Originally published on Latin Times
