Agritourism booms in WA as farmers look to future-proof businesses
Agritourism is helping farmers in southern Western Australia future-proof their businesses and legacies as experts predict the sector will continue to boom.
The CSIRO estimates the industry, which involves farmers using a combination of tours, accommodation and hospitality to attract guests, will be worth $18.6 billion by 2030.
Raquel and Murray Johnson have been leasing part of their regenerative farm, Galloway Springs at Bridgetown, to the third-party owner of a tiny house for more than two years.
"Agritourism has been a really positive shift for our farm," Ms Johnson said.
"I was reluctant in the beginning to have people come on our farm, but it's proved to be so positive.
"We started off with just some bookings and two years later we're back-to-back pretty much all of the year."
Ms Johnson said since they started leasing the land the couple's agritourism operations had expanded.
A separate farmstay offering was added and they were considering the addition of a second tiny house.
"We've had visitors straight from South Korea and from Singapore," Ms Johnson said.
The farm was also diversifying its income streams via other regenerative practices.
"I do my own farm tours, so that's exactly why they're booking — to get onto farm and to see farm animals," Ms Johnson said.
"I get the opportunity to explain farming to them and … why healthy food matters and why supporting farmers locally or directly is really important."
Olio Bello general manager Brett Roberts said his olive farm's expansion into agritourism had been a "holistic" process.
He said the shift, which began seven years ago, had helped to create connections with prospective customers.
"We're a certified organic property, so with that comes costs," Mr Roberts said.
"Tourism plays a major part in getting people to the property and — if they like our products and like our story and understand what we're about — it helps in the way we sell them."
Mr Roberts believed the marriage of farming and tourism was essential for his business.
"Without the tourism experiences, people wouldn't come to Olio Bello," he said.
"So they do piggyback each other, but if we didn't have the farm, then we wouldn't have the tourism facilities here.
"While they rely on each other, we didn't start out to be a tourist destination — it was a way for us to get our story out."
A study led by University of Western Australia Associate Professor Kirsten Martinus identified location, authenticity, interaction and learning as key areas of importance for agritourism operations.
She also highlighted the need to reframe competition as collaboration.
"If you're in agriculture, agriculture itself is quite difficult financially," Dr Martinus said.
"It's also highly competitive, but the question is, should you be competing or should providers be collaborating?"
She said WA winemakers had shown the way in working collaboratively.
"Places like wine-growing regions have been really good at this, because it's not just about going to buy the wine," Dr Martinus said.
"They've got chocolate, they've got cheese — you've got all sorts of other experiences you can have.
"You start to broaden out the cohort that might be interested.
"If you can collaborate with others … suddenly, you grow your market."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
What the US warning on China means for our defence
Sam Hawley: Donald Trump is demanding America's allies massively boost defence spending. His Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, says a Chinese invasion of Taiwan could be imminent. And one of our closest allies, the UK, is rushing to invest billions of dollars in its defence force to make sure it's war-ready. Today Peter Dean from the United States Studies Centre at Sydney Uni, on what that all means for us, and whether our defence force is fit for purpose. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal Land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. Sam Hawley: Peter, we better start with these comments from the US Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, at the Shangri-La meeting in Singapore. He has warned that China poses an imminent threat to Taiwan. Pete Hegseth, US Defense Secretary: To be clear, any attempt by communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world. There's no reason to sugarcoat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent. We hope not, but it certainly could be. Peter Dean: Yes, so Secretary Hegseth I believe is referring to here is comments made by the Chinese leader Xi Jinping and by other members of the Chinese leadership, where Xi Jinping in particular has said that the Chinese military are prepared to use force and to achieve specific capability goals by the dates of 2027 and the dates of 2029. Pete Hegseth, US Defense Secretary: We know, it's public, that Xi has ordered his military to be capable of invading Taiwan by 2027. The PLA is building the military needed to do it, training for it every day and rehearsing for the real deal. Peter Dean: This is about requirements that Xi Jinping has set for the development of the People's Liberation Army and its subsequent Navy and Air Forces as well. So this is about its development of specific capabilities, but also its command and control systems, its ability to conduct exercises and its ability to conduct the types of high-end warfare to undertake, for instance, a strike across the Taiwan Strait. Sam Hawley: So what has China then, Peter, had to say about all of this, that it will imminently attack Taiwan? Peter Dean: Well, I mean, what Xi Jinping has said is that he reserves the right to use force to solve what the Chinese argue is a domestic political issue. They, of course, refer to Taiwan as a rogue state. They don't recognise the democratic system that the Taiwanese people have. And of course, they don't recognise the will of the Taiwanese people, who overwhelmingly identify now as Taiwanese and do not wish to be reunited with the mainland. Sam Hawley: Well, China's foreign ministry does say that the US is overstepping its bounds and stoking flames in the South China Sea in response to those comments from Pete Hegseth. Sam Hawley: Let's consider, Peter, now then China's military build-up and defence spending by Western nations. Now, our Defence Minister, Richard Marles, he also addressed that conference in Singapore, noting that Australia can't rely on the US alone to counter China's military strength in the Indo-Pacific. Richard Marles, Defence Minister: There is no effective balance of power in this region absent the United States, but we cannot leave it to the United States alone. Other countries must contribute to this balance as well, and that includes Australia. Sam Hawley: And he also pointed to that huge military build-up by China. Richard Marles, Defence Minister: What we have seen from China is the single biggest increase in military capability and build-up in a conventional sense by any country since the end of the Second World War. Peter Dean: So I think what Richard Marles is putting out there is basically reaffirming Australia's strategic approach and that this is not just something that we can rely upon the US to do on its own. It doesn't have the requisite levels of capability to respond to China in this way. It must be by a community of nations within the Indo-Pacific. And as a status quo power, Australia and the United States and others are attempting to maintain the free and open Indo-Pacific that we currently have and stop any state from being able to dominate that region and impose a sort of hegemonic control over the Indo-Pacific. Sam Hawley: All right. Well, Donald Trump, of course, and Pete Hegseth have urged US allies in the region to increase their defence spending. They want Australia to raise our contribution to 3.5% of GDP, but let's face it, we are nowhere near that at the moment, and that would cost a lot of money, wouldn't it? Peter Dean: Oh, yes. You're looking in the realm of somewhere around $41 billion additional to go into defence spending to raise that level of money. I think what's really key here is GDP as a measure of defence spending has become a bit shorthand in recent decades for sort of commitment towards defending your own country or contributing to collective defence. There is no magical number that the Australian government can get to that would make our country safe. And if you remember way back when Tony Abbott was vying to become Prime Minister, when Julia Gillard and Kevin Rudd were running the country, then there was a whole debate about achieving 2% of GDP, which we currently have. Now the debate has moved on to is it 3 or 3.5% of GDP. But of course, as I said, most importantly, this number is being used internationally as a proxy by both the Trump administration, but by other states around the world, relative to an individual state's commitment to both its own sovereignty and security, but also the collective defence of the region it lives in. Sam Hawley: Yeah, well, Anthony Albanese says we will determine our own defence policy. And he notes that Australia is on track to lift defence spending to 2.4% of GDP by 2033-34. Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister: We're provided an additional $10 billion of investment into defence over the forward estimates. We're continuing to lift up. That adds up to 2.3% of GDP. Sam Hawley: A long way, as we said, to 3.5% that the Americans actually want. But nations like the UK are now moving more quickly, aren't they, Peter? The British leader, Keir Starmer, he has promised to increase annual spending to 3% up from 2.3%. They seem pretty worried in the United Kingdom. Peter Dean: Yeah, look, the UK government has made a firm commitment to move to 2.5% of GDP in the next couple of years and 3% of GDP in the near future. This is off the back of their strategic defence review. News report: Under the AUKUS security pact with Australia and America, 12 new nuclear-powered submarines will be built to protect Britain's waters. Six new munitions factories will be constructed across the UK and thousands of long-range weapons will be manufactured on British soil. Keir Starmer, UK Prime Minister: We are moving to warfighting readiness as the central purpose of our armed forces. When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready. Peter Dean: Particularly in response not only to the war in Ukraine and the threat from Russia, but of course, most recently from the changing posture of the United States under President Donald Trump. And what we can see there is Keir Starmer, along with Emmanuel Macron from France and other key leaders in Europe, are working assiduously hard to provide for greater defence of Europe based on European needs. Sam Hawley: Well, the British leader Keir Starmer says the UK must be ready to fight a war. Keir Starmer, UK Prime Minister: A battle-ready, armour-clad nation with the strongest alliances and the most advanced capabilities equipped for the decades to come. Sam Hawley: What weaponry does he want? Peter Dean: Well, what Keir Starmer has announced is that he wishes the UK military to field a force of at least 7,000 long-range missiles. Now, if you look at what's happening in the war in Ukraine in particular, but also the war in Gaza and the Houthi attacks on shipping in the Red Sea, what you've seen is the explosion of the use of long-range precision fires in each of those conflicts. Sam Hawley: Well, the UK plans to pay for all of this by, in part, cutting international aid, just to note that. What's it really worried about then? Is it just Russia or does China come into this as well for the UK? Peter Dean: Look, I think it's both. I mean, what we're seeing is a fundamental changing of the strategic order of the world that we live in. The world is becoming much more dangerous. As our own government has said, we live in the most perilous times. We're seeing the rise of revisionist powers, in particular China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. And of course, the Russian illegal and immoral invasion of Ukraine has been really at the centre of this. This is the first time since the end of the Second World War that Europe has seen a large major power conduct a full-on invasion of another state in Europe. That is an ongoing war, as we see today. And it looks like President Trump's efforts at brokering a peace deal are faltering at the moment. So that war is going to continue on. Sam Hawley: And the concern is, of course, that if Putin succeeds in Ukraine, he has other plans after that, right? Peter Dean: Well, exactly. And Putin, again, I think we need to actually believe what the rhetoric is coming out of some of these leaders from some of these states. I mean, Putin made it very clear in the lead up to the war in Ukraine that he believes that Ukraine shouldn't exist as a sovereign state, that it belongs as a part of a revitalised Russian empire that he sees. And he committed similar acts in states such as Georgia and other parts. And of course, in Ukraine itself, where he conducted limited incursions. And of course, what we see in the South China Sea and the East China Sea is ambient claims from China that are not recognised by international courts or international law. And the Chinese consistently using coercion military force against the Philippines, against Vietnam, against Indonesia, against Taiwan and against Japan in various parts of those seas to push their own sovereign claims, even though they are not recognised in the international community and not recognised by those other states. And of course, we add in the layer here of the cyber domain and cyber dimension, that while we're largely in strategic competition with these states across the globe in areas such as cyber, we're in day to day limited conflict as we receive an onslaught of assaults in the cyber domain from states such as North Korea, Iran, China and Russia. Sam Hawley: All right, well, Peter, as you say, we're living in a less stable world. But what do you think is our approach when it comes to defence, the right one? Are we war ready like the UK wants to be? And if we're not, do we actually need to be? Peter Dean: I think we're definitely not war ready at the moment. If you look at the Defence Strategic Review in 2023, it made it really clear that the ADF was not fit for purpose. The government is in the process of lifting defence spending to try and achieve some of the outcomes that were set. We don't have 10 years anymore to wait to prepare our forces. Now, what's been happening in Australia has been a long discussion in recent years over the requisite levels of defence spending. This was happening well before Donald Trump was elected for his second term of office. And if you look back to last year, you'll see some very eminent commentators and experienced people in this debate, people such as Sir Angus Houston, the former chief of Defence Force and one of the two independent leads of the Defence Strategic Review, former Secretary Dennis Richardson, former Labor leader Kim Beazley, former Home Affairs Secretary Mike Pezzullo, have all called for increasing of defence spending to around about three percentage of GDP on defence. So this is a national debate that's been happening for quite a while. And now it's become much more direct, given that our US alliance partner has directly made the request to Australia to increase defence spending. Sam Hawley: All right, and what about this imminent threat that Pete Hegseth talks about that China will invade Taiwan soon? If that was the case, and we're not saying that it is, of course, but what would that mean for us? Peter Dean: This would mean you have the two largest economies in the world going toe to toe militarily with each other across the Taiwan Strait and in East Asia. It would always inevitably suck in states like Japan and Korea and Australia and others. And in all the estimates we have, not only would it be the extreme loss of life that would occur by the states involved in the conflict, you would spiral the global economy into a major recession, if not depression. You're talking about the most dynamic economic region in the world being consumed by conflict. And we will be putting ourselves in the risk not just of a global economic recession and a major war, but of course, we're talking about a war here between major nuclear armed states. The government's not wrong when it says we live in this really dangerous strategic age. And of course, Donald Trump is not helping that, right? He's not helping stability and security. He's, you know, in many senses, creating a source of additional instability in the global strategic order. Sam Hawley: Peter Dean is the director of foreign policy and defence at the United States Study Centre at the University of Sydney. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead. Audio production by Adair Sheppard. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. ABC News Daily will be back again on Monday. Thanks for listening.

News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
100 days to go before massive NBN internet speed upgrade for Australians
Massive upgrades in internet speeds are now just 100 days away for Australian households. From September, government-owned telecommunications company NBN, which supplies internet providers like Telstra and Optus with the physical infrastructure that connects households to the internet, will deliver massive upgrades to its network speeds. The accelerated, high-speed wholesale products will be available to providers to sell to eligible residential and business customers connected to the NBN network via fibre to the premises or hybrid fibre coaxial options. The Home Fast package will increase speeds from 100/20Mbps to 500/50Mbps, delivering a five times improvement in downloads and 2.5 times faster uploads. The Superfast package will increase speeds from 250/25Mbps to 750/50 Mbps, while Ultrafast will double upload speeds from 50Mbps to 100Mbps. The Hyperfast offering will deliver 'blazing-fast speeds for top-tier connections', with 2000/200Mbps (on fibre to the premises) and 2000/100Mbps (on hybrid fibre coaxial). It is expected Hyperfast will be sold to retailers for a wholesale price of $115 per month. Customers who purchased one of these higher speed tiers, or choose to upgrade, would automatically accelerate to the new, faster speeds when the plans were made available by the retailers, the company said. NBN general manager Jane McNamara said the speed changes would 'future proof' Australia as the world moved online. 'Back in 2015, the typical Australian home had two or three internet-connected devices,' she said on Friday. 'Today, the average number is about 25 and includes devices like smart phones, laptops, TVs and smart speakers, all of which need the internet to work. 'With people in Australia averaging more than 6½ hours a day online, streaming and gaming more than ever before, the number of connected devices (is) expected to rise to more than 44 by the end of this decade.' But the company has warned that the technological boost will only be available to certain households. 'Higher speed plans are only available on NBN's fibre to the premises and hybrid fibre Coaxial technologies,' it said. 'Check your address to see if higher speed plans are available at your place, and for those customers on fibre to the node or fibre to the kerb, whether you are eligible for a fibre upgrade.' Some households might need to upgrade their home equipment to make the most of the new speeds, the company added, and simple adjustments to a home's set-up, such as how modems and routers are placed, could also impact speed. 'Many objects and materials in the home can reflect or absorb your wi-fi signal, either slowing the speed as they pass through or blocking it altogether,' the company said. 'Metal doors, appliances, mirrors, solid walls, floors, and ceilings can significantly reduce signal efficiency and effective distance. 'Interior walls, furniture and even windows can do the same but to a lesser degree. 'Liquids, like those in fish tanks, fridges, hot water systems and even bottles can absorb wi-fi signal, preventing it from reaching your devices. 'Other technology, including radios, baby monitors, microwave ovens, Bluetooth devices, use signals that can interfere with your wi-fi.' The NBN advises to keep wi-fi routers out in the open.

Daily Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Daily Telegraph
Aziz Behich scores 90th minute screamer to all but send Socceroos to the World Cup
A 90th minute Aziz Behich strike has all but secured direct qualification for the FIFA World Cup after the Socceroos' 1-0 win against rivals Japan at a packed Optus Stadium in Perth. Australia's coach Tony Popovic would not care less that Japan opted to play a young and experienced team in their FIFA World Cup 2026 third round Asian qualifier. Having qualified in March for next year's World Cup in the US, Canada and Mexico, Japan coach Hajime Moriyasu played an unrecognisable team at Optus Stadium. The resultant 1-0 win for Australia wasn't pretty, and Popovic would be more concerned about that. But he now has 12 months to do something about it. The Aziz Behich goal in the 90th minute – his first international goal in 13 years – means the Socceroos can now book their flights to next year's World Cup finals. They just have to hold off paying for them until after the final third round qualifying games have been played. The Socceroos would seriously have to mess things up to miss out on playing in their sixth consecutive World Cup. Only a big win over Bahrain by Saudi Arabia, played in the early hours of Friday morning, will keep Australia vulnerable. Aziz Behich scored the winner for the Socceroos. Picture: Getty Images RADAR OFF TARGET The Behich goal was the only time Australia looked like scoring. Despite the difference in international experience, the ball was stuck in Australia's half for most of the game. Japan enjoyed an impressive 71 per cent possession in the first half and not much less in the second. Japan completed 626 passes during the game, to Australia's 285. While the visitors had their chances, they rarely troubled Socceroos keeper Mat Ryan. Ohashi Suzuki sprayed Japan's first real opportunity to score from the top of the box. But that didn't come until the 28th minute. It was one of seven shots Japan had in the opening half. Alessandro Circati contests for the ball. Picture: Getty Images Australia had two, with Connor Metcalfe's headers from a Ryan Teague corner kick the only highlight the home team provided in the opening 45 minutes. Japan looked the better side for 90 minutes, generating 13 shots on goal and had eight corners. It was much quieter at the other end, the Socceroos having just six shots and one set piece from corner kicks. BABY BLUES Samurai Blues coach Hajime Moriyasu used the clash to test out a very young squad. Only one of his starting 11 also started in the 1-1 draw with the Socceroos in October. Daichi Kamada, who plays with Crystal Palace in the Premier League, might also have been the only player who started that is guaranteed a spot in Japan's World Cup squad. Japan's starting 11 included three international debutants and another six players with four or less international caps to their names. Daichi Kamada controls the ball for Japan. Picture: Getty Images WHAT CAN STILL GO WRONG The win does leave the Socceroos with a firm grip of second spot on the Group C table. The top two teams after Tuesday's games qualify directly for the World Cup. Japan had top spot confirmed before arriving in Perth this week. Australia will be least three points ahead of third-placed Saudi Arabia and four in front of Indonesia, regardless of results of other games that were played overnight. A massive win to Saudi Arabia over Bahrain could leave the Socceroos vulnerable, if they suffer a huge loss in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday. Aziz Behich and the Socceroos celebrate. Picture: Getty Images But Tony Popovic's team would have to seriously mess things up to miss out on playing in the World Cup next year. Australia is guaranteed a spot in the next stage of World Cup qualifying, no matter what happens on Tuesday. There's a fourth stage of AFC qualifying, where six teams will compete, where at least two will qualify directly for the World Cup. Relive the action here. Originally published as Aziz Behich scores 90th minute screamer to all but send Socceroos to the World Cup