logo
Late Pope Francis left a lasting impact on pressing issues in Asia, say observers

Late Pope Francis left a lasting impact on pressing issues in Asia, say observers

CNA21-04-2025

In particular, the half-island nation of Timor-Leste found extra meaning in the pope's Asia Pacific tour last year.
The country is likely the most Catholic in the world, with the Vatican saying about 96 per cent of Timorese are adherents to the faith.
Its road to independence was closely tied to the Catholic Church, which offered protection to its people when it was occupied by Indonesia.
Timor-Leste gained independence in 2002 after 24 years of brutal occupation. It had been a Portuguese colony before that.
Alex Tilman, Timor-Leste ambassador to Singapore, told CNA the church's role in Timor-Leste has been 'very historic' in the country's struggle to be independent.
'His visit … put Timor-Leste on the world map. It shows that although we are a small country, we have a lot of challenges, but we still managed to host His Holiness in our country for those few days when he was there,' Tilman added.
Hosting the pope was a chance for Timor-Leste to prove its capability to hold large-scale events – one of the criteria it must fulfill to become an official member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN.
Domestically, it is trying to lift its people from poverty – a point Pope Francis made during his visit.
Since independence, the country has struggled with rebuilding its infrastructure and economy.
In 2014, the World Bank estimated that about 42 per cent of Timorese lived in poverty and that about 47 per cent of children were stunted because of malnutrition.
"With the pope's visit, I think it … instilled that sense of urgency that we must do more to pull our people out of poverty,' said Tilman.
'In fact, our national development plan spells (out) very clearly that by 2030, we would like to have eradicated poverty.' INTER-RELIGIOUS HARMONY
A key theme of Pope Francis' visit was inter-religious harmony.
In the Jakarta leg of his tour, terror threats were made against him, highlighting a perennial issue in the region. But the visit proceeded with the pope and Indonesia's Grand Imam Nasaruddin Umar promoting interfaith harmony – a move experts said was a step in the right direction.
Pope Francis also went to Istiqlal Mosque in Jakarta – the largest mosque in Southeast Asia – where he held an interfaith dialogue with leaders of various religions.
Indonesia has the largest Muslim population in the world – they make up 87 per cent of its total population of about 280 million.
It also has the third-largest Christian population in Asia after the Philippines and China. Only 2.9 per cent of the total population are Catholics.
"I would say that interfaith dialogues, interfaith interactions between leaders of various communities, religious communities … are very, very important, particularly for the wider communities who are trying to make sense of all the problems in the world,' said Kumar Ramakrishna, dean of the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Nanyang Technological University.
The professor noted that people may also be attempting to understand what their role should be in conflicts between various religious groups.
'So, when they see the positive promotion of interfaith accommodation between the pope and imam of Indonesia, for example, this has a very powerful message, and it will be effective,' he added.
Observers said they hope the next pope continues to expand the Roman Catholic Church's presence in the Asia, and that the Vatican does not lose sight of the region as the continent is an increasingly significant player in global affairs.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US envoy says he does not think Palestinian state is US policy goal, Bloomberg reports
US envoy says he does not think Palestinian state is US policy goal, Bloomberg reports

Straits Times

time8 hours ago

  • Straits Times

US envoy says he does not think Palestinian state is US policy goal, Bloomberg reports

FILE PHOTO: U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee looks on during the day he visits the Western Wall, Judaism's holiest prayer site, in Jerusalem's Old City, April 18, 2025. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun/File photo US envoy says he does not think Palestinian state is US policy goal, Bloomberg reports U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said he did not think that an independent Palestinian state remains a goal of U.S. foreign policy, according to an interview with Bloomberg News released on Tuesday. "I don't think so," Huckabee said when asked if a Palestinian state remains a goal of U.S. policy, Bloomberg reported, Bloomberg reported. Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas, is staunch pro-Israel conservative picked by President Donald Trump to be his envoy to Israel. "Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it," Huckabee was quoted as saying. Those probably won't happen 'in our lifetime,' he told the news agency. Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of U.S. Middle East policy, and he has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term. Huckabee suggested a piece of land could be carved out of a Muslim country rather than asking Israel to make room. "Does it have to be in Judea and Samaria?' Huckabee said, using the biblical name the Israeli government favors for the West Bank, where some 3 million Palestinians live under occupation. The White House and U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Huckabee's remarks. An evangelical Christian, Huckabee has been a vocal supporter of Israel throughout his political career and a longtime defender of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank. Trump has pursued strongly pro-Israel policies as president and his choice of Huckabee as ambassador signaled that they would continue. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

India intensifies expulsion of suspected foreigners to Bangladesh
India intensifies expulsion of suspected foreigners to Bangladesh

Straits Times

time12 hours ago

  • Straits Times

India intensifies expulsion of suspected foreigners to Bangladesh

FILE PHOTO: Police officers escort men they believe to be undocumented Bangladeshi nationals after they were detained during raids in Ahmedabad, India, April 26, Dave/File Photo FILE PHOTO: Police officers stand next to men they believe to be undocumented Bangladeshi nationals after they were detained during raids in Ahmedabad, India, April 26, Dave/File Photo GUWAHATI, India - India has started to push people it considers illegal immigrants into neighbouring Bangladesh, but human rights activists say authorities are arbitrarily throwing people out of the country. Since May, the northeastern Indian state of Assam has "pushed back" 303 people into Bangladesh out of 30,000 declared as foreigners by various tribunals over the years, a top official said this week. Such people in Assam are typically long-term residents with families and land in the state, which is home to tens of thousands of families tracing their roots to Muslim-majority Bangladesh. Activists say many of them and their families are often wrongly classified as foreigners in mainly Hindu India and are too poor to challenge tribunal judgements in higher courts. Some activists, who did not want to be named for fear of reprisal, said only Muslims had been targeted in the expulsion drive. An Assam government spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Assam, which has a 260 km (160 mile) border with Bangladesh, started sending back people last month who had been declared as foreigners by its Foreigners Tribunals. Such a move is politically popular in Assam, where Bengali language speakers with possible roots in Bangladesh compete for jobs and resources with local Assamese speakers. "There is pressure from the Supreme Court to act on the expulsion of foreigners," Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma told the state assembly on Monday. "We have pushed back 303 people. These pushbacks will be intensified. We have to be more active and proactive to save the state." He was referring to the Supreme Court asking Assam in February why it had not moved on deporting declared foreigners. Bangladesh's foreign affairs adviser, Touhid Hossain, did not immediately reply to an email seeking comment. Last week, he told reporters that people were being sent to his country from India and that the government was in touch with New Delhi over it. Aman Wadud, an Assam-based lawyer who routinely fights citizenship cases and is now a member of the main opposition Congress party, said the government was "arbitrarily throwing people out of the country". "There is a lot of panic on the ground - more than ever before," he said. SOME BROUGHT BACK Sarma said no genuine Indian citizens will be expelled. But he added that up to four of the people deported were brought back to India because appeals challenging their non-Indian status were being heard in court. One of them was Khairul Islam, a 51-year-old former government school teacher who was declared a foreigner by a tribunal in 2016. He spent two years in an Assam detention centre and was released on bail in August 2020. He said police picked him up on May 23 from his home and took him to a detention centre, from where he and 31 others were rounded up by Indian border guards and loaded into a van, blindfolded and hands tied. "Then, 14 of us were put onto another truck. We were taken to a spot along the border and pushed into Bangladesh," he said. "It was terrifying. I've never experienced anything like it. It was late at night. There was a straight road, and we all started walking along it." Islam said residents of a Bangladeshi village then called the Border Guard Bangladesh, who then pushed the group of 14 into the "no man's land between the two countries". "All day we stood there in the open field under the harsh sun," he said. Later, the group was taken to a Bangladesh guards camp while Islam's wife told police in Assam that as his case was still pending in court, he should be brought back. "After a few days, I was suddenly handed back to Indian police," he said. "That's how I made my way back home. I have no idea what happened to the others who were with me, or where they are." It is not only Assam that is acting against people deemed to be living illegally in the country. Police in the western city of Ahmedabad said they have identified more than 250 people "confirmed to be Bangladeshi immigrants living illegally here". "The process to deport them is in progress," said senior police officer Ajit Rajian. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Trump pushing legal limits with deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles, say analysts
Trump pushing legal limits with deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles, say analysts

CNA

time13 hours ago

  • CNA

Trump pushing legal limits with deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles, say analysts

United States President Donald Trump has deployed more than 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles after days of protests by hundreds of demonstrators against immigration raids. California Governor Gavin Newsom has blasted the order as "purposely inflammatory", and the state on Monday (Jun 9) sued the Trump administration to block what it calls the 'unlawful' deployment of soldiers. Questions have emerged over whether Trump's activation of the troops is in line with the law, with analysts telling CNA it is a legal grey area. 'Legally, he's pushing the limits. But then again, we haven't tested this out before,' said Rick Mullaney, executive director of Jacksonville University's Public Policy Institute. HOW IS TRUMP JUSTIFYING THE DEPLOYMENT? Trump invoked a statute – Section 12406 of Title 10 of the US Code – in his order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service last Friday. The provision allows the president to federalise National Guard units in the event the US is invaded, if there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion', or when the president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States'. While the federal law generally forbids the US military, including the National Guard, from being involved in civilian law enforcement, they can protect federal personnel and property. 'Trump's view is that (the troops) are protecting federal property and federal agents, (who are carrying out) the enforcement of federal law, and that this was necessary given the circumstances in Los Angeles,' Mullaney told CNA938. 'The law in this area is not well developed. This will test the law.' WILL THIS HOLD UP IN COURT? Rachel VanLandingham, a co-associate dean of research at the Southwestern Law School, said the statute that Trump cited to deploy troops is not well defined. 'It's so broadly written that it gives vast discretion to the president to decide when the conditions are ripe to federalise – that is, to take control of the National Guard and use them,' she noted. She added that as there was some violence in the protests – cars were set aflame and scuffles broke out with law enforcement – the Trump administration could use the incidents to justify their case, even if they were a minority. 'I think the courts, at the end of the day, will yield to the president,' said VanLandingham, who is also a retired lieutenant colonel who served primarily as a military attorney for over 20 years in the US Air Force. Analysts noted that the decision to deploy the National Guard usually comes from the ground up – local state officials determine if it is necessary, and the governor requests troops. VanLandingham pointed out it is primarily Newsom's responsibility and duty to keep the streets of Los Angeles safe, not the president's. 'Trump completely bypassed him in an unprecedented manner,' she told CNA's Asia First. 'This goes against hundreds of years of norms, of procedural safeguards, in an aversion against using federal troops - particularly active-duty troops - in a domestic law enforcement policing capacity, because it smacks of authoritarian overreach.' TRUMP'S CRACKDOWN ON IMMIGRATION Trump's authorisation of the troops came after protests rocked Los Angeles as immigration and customs enforcement officers executed search warrants and arrested immigrants in the county last Friday. The president has made clamping down on immigration a cornerstone of his second term since his return to the White House in January, and has not held back on 'pushing the limits of executive power', said Mullaney. 'Whether it's tariffs, higher education or immigration, the president has pushed those limits,' he said. He added that the deployments were a 'calculated strong move' as part of the Trump administration's efforts to deport illegal immigrants. 'The Trump administration … is sending a message to other sanctuary cities around the country, particularly in blue (Democrat) states, that are sympathetic and supportive of what's going on in Los Angeles,' he said. Protests have also sprang up in at least nine other US cities, including New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco, according to US news outlets. Observers said that while Trump has faced criticisms, particularly from the Democrats, some polls conducted by American media outlets before the Los Angeles protests showed a slight majority approving of the crackdown on undocumented immigrants. 'The Democrats will argue that Trump was quick on the trigger. Trump will argue that Newsom wasn't doing his job,' said Mullaney. 'Trump may or may not have the legal high ground, but he believes he has the political high ground, and he likely does.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store