Chicago alders seek to learn more about delta-8 THC amid calls for greater regulation
CHICAGO — Alders on Thursday heard from hemp sellers and dispensary owners to better understand delta-8 THC as they look to place greater restrictions on products sold throughout the city that contain the cannabis compound.
The meeting comes after the state senate passed legislation that smoke shop owners and hemp retailers argued would put them out of business, and it gave members the opportunity to ask questions about hemp and learn how it could be regulated in a fair manner.
'For us, as a city, it's not an opportunity for blood money. This is not an opportunity to rush regulation, rush taxation to get revenue. That was never the intent,'Ald. William Hall (6th Ward) said at the joint meeting of the City Council's subcommittee on revenue and Committee on Health and Human Relations.
Pritzker disappointed by delay in passing Delta-8 legislation
Hemp and marijuana are both cannabis plants, but cannabis with less than 0.3% THC is considered hemp, otherwise, it is considered marijuana, which is still federally illegal.
Delta-8 is a psychoactive substance that is found in the cannabis sativa plant and is slightly different from the psychoactive and more potent delta-9 compound that is also found in the plant. While the two are different, delta-8 THC still has psychoactive and intoxicating effects, according to the FDA.
Since delta-8 is not produced in significant amounts by cannabis plants, oftentimes, concentrated amounts of delta-8 THC are typically manufactured from hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD).
Hemp-derived THC products come in a variety of forms, including, edibles, oils and vaporizer cartridges.
The FDA has not evaluated or approved delta-8 THC products for safe use in any context and warns that the products may be marketed as having 'therapeutic or medical uses.'
Delta-8 products gained popularity following the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, which legalized hemp-derived cannabinoids with a THC content of 0.3% or less.
Because of that, products that contain hemp-derived THC can be sold legally and without restriction at businesses that do not require special licenses like those that sell more potent marijuana-derived THC products.
Alders argues that while the products are legal, they are unregulated and can fall into the wrong hands too easily.
'For now, hemp, we're just getting started in terms of what are the regulations that will be viable for hemp after the plant leaves the farm,' said Chicago Department of Health Commissioner Dr. Olusimbo Ige.
Ahead of the meeting, Ald. Gilbert Villegas (36th Ward) held a press conference calling to ban products that carry delta-8.
The Illinois Senate passed legislation that smoke shop owners and hemp retailers argued were too restrictive and bad for business. It was not brought up for a vote in the House. The legislation was supported by Gov. JB Pritzker but not by Mayor Brandon Johnson.
Hall said Thursday's discussion could help in drafting a proposal which could potentially receive a vote in the spring.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Lake Forest City Council decides to keep broadcasting meetings on cable tv channel
Lake Forest residents who prefer to watch city meetings on cable television will continue to have that option as the City Council did not approve a staff recommendation to suspend the channel. Council members received an overview of the state of the local cable TV channel at their June 2 meeting with staff suggesting it should at least be temporarily discontinued. However, a split emerged among the aldermen, and no vote was taken. The cable channel airs over channel 17 for local Comcast subscribers, and the city receives it at no cost through its franchise agreement with the cable provider, Assistant to the City Manager Keri Kaup said. The city airs City Council, Finance Committee, and Plan Commission meetings on the channel that has been available to residents since the late 1980s, according to a city spokeswoman. The rest of the time, informational slides are supposed to be aired. City staff cited a lack of use in the channel, plus technical reasons for why the city should move away from the channel. Regarding viewership, Kaup said Comcast did not keep statistics on how many residents watched the meetings, but she pointed to a 2023 community-wide survey where only one percent of respondents, translating to 14 people, used the channel to get information. She contrasted that with 54 % of residents using the city's website and 59% reading the electronic newsletter, which has approximately 12,000 subscribers. She added the city did not receive any complaints from residents after the city did not broadcast the May 19 City Council meeting. Kaup added the city is responsible for the costs of maintaining and upgrading the equipment associated with the channel and mentioned a December 2024 upgrade of the audiovisual system at the City Hall's Council Chambers. Still, technical issues remain in place. 'What it didn't do was improve the quality that goes out on the cable broadcast,' Kaup said. That is because we don't have control of the quality that goes out on the broadcast. That is a Comcast issue.' She added that some connection issues have now emerged, and the city would have to replace some equipment to keep the channel going. That was a reason why the city has not aired the informational slides recently. The equipment replacement costs would be about $3,360, according to city documents. Kaup added the city staff would assist residents in demonstrating how to access the livestream of meetings through a computer, either from the city's website or its YouTube channel. 'We believe that making this change would enable us to direct our resources to communication mediums that are most utilized by our residents and maintain transparency while we are eliminating that redundancy,' she said. However, JoAnn Desmond, a member of the Lake Forest-Lake Bluff Senior Citizens Foundation Board, advocated for the city to keep the channel in place. 'I am aware of many seniors whose only access to watch city meetings is through cable TV,' she said. Desmond added that some older residents are not comfortable using computers. 'I know there are many seniors unable to enjoy active lives and do not have adequate technology skills,' she said. 'Many of these seniors enjoy the company of cable TV and would feel further disenfranchised from our city government if they did not have access to these meetings in a way they are most comfortable. This is a small price to pay for our seniors.' City Council members differed among those wanted to keep the channel in place and those who agreed with the staff recommendation. Alderwoman Nancy Novit, 1st, labeled the channel as an important tool, and she watches it personally. 'I think it is easier for people who know how to turn on Channel 17, to turn on Channel 17 than to go to the website and look for the stream and take extra steps that are not intuitive steps,' Novit said. 'Especially for the seniors who know the way they know and don't want to have to go through the machinations of learning a new way to do it.' Alderman John Powers, 2nd, also preferred to keep the channel in place. 'If there are a handful of people that still use this and want to stay connected, I think it is worth the investment,' he said. Seeing it differently, Alderman Edward 'Ted' Notz, 1st, supported a discontinuation, stating he liked the staff proposal to train people to use the livestream. 'I think that is a great solution to bridge that gap,' Notz said. That sentiment was echoed by Alderman Richard Walther, 4th. 'This will allow us to train our community to use the livestream solution,' he said. With the differing viewpoints, City Manager Jason Wicha indicated the cable TV broadcasts would continue. 'This is not a strong staff recommendation so if there doesn't seem to be a strong consensus on the council to remove it, it is a fairly immaterial expense,' he said. 'This will effectively keep the lights on.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Affirms Prior Delaware District Court Rulings in Favor of Acadia in NUPLAZID® (pimavanserin) Composition of Matter Patent
- Composition of matter patent affirmed, provides protection into 2030 - Builds on recent ruling in favor of Acadia for formulation patent expiring in 2038 SAN DIEGO, June 09, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Nasdaq: ACAD) today announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in December 2023 confirming validity of the NUPLAZID® (pimavanserin) '740 composition of matter patent. The affirmance came in Acadia's litigation against MSN Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In its affirmance, the Appeals Court applied the precedent established in Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd., MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, holding that "a first filed, first-issued, later-expiring claim cannot be invalidated by a later-filed, later-issued, earlier-expiring reference claim having a common priority date." "We are gratified that the U.S. Federal Appeals Court has affirmed the lower court's ruling in favor of our composition of matter patent for NUPLAZID, securing protection into 2030 for this patent, and beyond based on the recent favorable ruling for our formulation patent providing patent protection for NUPLAZID 34 mg capsule formulation into 2038," said Catherine Owen Adams, Chief Executive Officer. "These decisions reinforce our commitment to safeguarding the intellectual property that underpins our innovations in addressing serious, unmet medical needs." This follows the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware ruling in favor of Acadia regarding its '721 formulation patent for NUPLAZID which ruled in favor of Acadia on both infringement and validity arguments in its formulation patent litigation against Aurobindo Pharma Limited and other ANDA (Abbreviated New Drug Application) filers. About Acadia Pharmaceuticals Acadia is advancing breakthroughs in neuroscience to elevate life. Since our founding we have been working at the forefront of healthcare to bring vital solutions to people who need them most. We developed and commercialized the first and only FDA-approved drug to treat hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis and the first and only approved drug in the United States and Canada for the treatment of Rett syndrome. Our clinical-stage development efforts are focused on Prader-Willi syndrome, Alzheimer's disease psychosis and multiple other programs targeting neuroscience and neuro-rare diseases. For more information, visit us at and follow us on LinkedIn and X. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include all statements other than statements of historical fact and can be identified by terms such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "would," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "predicts," "potential," "continue" and similar expressions (including the negative thereof) intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release, include, but are not limited to, statements about: (i) the impact of the court ruling on our business and our ability to defend ourselves in the future; (ii) the continued patent protection for NUPLAZID; and (iii) the anticipated timing for termination of such protections. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied by our forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to: our ability to maintain, protect and enhance our intellectual property; the outcome of other existing and potential future lawsuits challenging our intellectual property; and our ability to continue to stay in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Given the risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. For a discussion of these and other risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ, please refer to our annual report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 as well as our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. The forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the date hereof, and we undertake no obligation to update them after this date, except as required by law. View source version on Contacts Investor Contacts: Acadia Pharmaceuticals Kildani(858) 261-2872ir@ Acadia Pharmaceuticals Tieszen(858) 261-2950ir@ Media Contact: Acadia Pharmaceuticals Kazenelson(818) 395-3043media@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Tampa cemetery is on sale again, reigniting debate over lost graves
Three years after the Tampa City Council unanimously rejected a land-use change for Showmen's Rest, a Tampa Heights cemetery, that would have allowed developers to build out the land, the parcel is up for sale again. This time, the cemetery isn't looking to change its zoning. But the City Council and nearby residents are still torn over a central question: Are there unknown bodies buried beneath the land? Owners of Showmen's Rest have said the portion of land up for sale has not been used for burials. But the Tampa City Council passed a motion Thursday to have city staff contact the property owner and ask if they could use ground-penetrating radar to address concerns about lost graves. 'Should there be graves there, individuals there, then we can look at steps forward,' said council member Guido Maniscalco, who made the motion. Maniscalco also requested a written report from city staff to update the council, which is due June 26. Although he did not mention the name of the property during the motion, Maniscalco confirmed with the Tampa Bay Times after the meeting that the report is about Showmen's Rest. Listed on Zillow for $750,000, the parcel of land at 3541 N. Blvd. is adjacent to the city-owned Woodlawn Cemetery. Showmen's Rest Cemetery hired a firm during the initial controversy more than three years ago that conducted two seismic studies that didn't find any lost graves. The Zillow listing states the seller will do another survey. 'The people that are going up against us keep insisting that there are bodies buried on this vacant parcel of land that we've never developed,' Showmen's Rest President John Perzia said. The cemetery has presented its seismic studies to the City Council, 'but nobody wanted to pay attention to it.' Perzia said the cemetery wants to sell this parcel, which was purchased from the city in 1971, to put it in a trust to keep up maintenance. They don't care who buys it, Perzia said, but they want to ensure their cemetery is preserved. 'I'm almost 70,' he said. 'When I pass away, who's going to take care of this place?' He said the city is welcome to buy the property, but city spokesperson Adam Smith said the administration is not looking to purchase. Perzia said neither he or his real estate broker had heard from the city on Monday afternoon. Maniscalco's motion on Thursday came after a previous council discussion of the cemetery on May 22. At that meeting, council member Bill Carlson also introduced the idea of setting aside city funds for ground-penetrating radar and addressing lost graves. 'What role can the city play? Because not everyone can pay for ground-penetrating radar and not everyone can afford just to give up their land,' Carlson said last month. The Tampa Bay Times reported in 2021 that there were 1,200 missing graves in the city, mostly those of influential Black residents, and the city is attempting to acknowledge and correct its role in erasing Black history. This year, the city erected a historical marker at Zion Cemetery, which was a Black burial ground before it was developed over. The city can't go onto privately owned land without the owner's permission to look for graves. If it does, the surveys are expensive. 'I was happy to hear the City Council is considering creating a fund for ground-penetrating radar,' said Rachael Kangas, director of the west central and central regions of the Florida Public Archaeology Network. 'That's usually the biggest issue we run into.' Kangas reviewed documents sent to her by Aileen Henderson, founder of The Cemetery Society, regarding the cemetery and its history, as well as research files her organization has on Woodlawn Cemetery and Showmen's Rest. 'According to the records I see, that entire block, including this parcel, were part of the original footprint of Woodlawn Cemetery and there is documentation from the newspaper that burials when the cemetery was first established were haphazard,' Kangas wrote in an email to Henderson that was shared with the Times. Additionally, Kangas wrote, the northwest corner of Woodlawn Cemetery was originally set aside for African American graves. She said documentation she read doesn't have details on the size of that area or where exactly the burials were. 'There is no reason to think this parcel of land is not part of a cemetery or that it doesn't contain unmarked burials,' Kangas wrote. Henderson said she also thinks Showmen's Rest could have lost graves and said she was excited to see the City Council take steps toward addressing the citywide issue. 'I don't blame the owner for doing what he has the right to do,' Henderson said. 'The reality is we have the supporting documentation that that is a cemetery.'
