
Spies, Lies and Allies: A tale of two forgotten revolutionaries from Bengal
Sujaan Mukherjee Kavitha Rao revives the forgotten legacy of two extraordinary freedom fighters, M.N. Roy and Virendranath Chattopadhyay, in her new book 'Spies, Lies and Allies: The Extraordinary Lives of Chatto and Roy' Delegates to the IIIrd International in 1920 in Pavlovsk included M.N.Roy.
Gift this article
The centenary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in 2020 occasioned a flurry of newspaper articles and social media posts recalling the organisation's early days. An editorial on M.N. Roy (1887-1954), published in Anandabazar Patrika, spoke about a visit to his ancestral village of Kheput in the (West) Medinipur district of West Bengal. Roy, who had founded the Communist Party of India in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, had returned to Kheput briefly in 1939 with activist and anti-colonial feminist, Evelyn Trent, his wife. The editorial lamented that although a local youth club had erected a humble monument in his memory a few years ago, its subsequent neglect accurately reflected the general indifference towards Roy's legacy.
The centenary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in 2020 occasioned a flurry of newspaper articles and social media posts recalling the organisation's early days. An editorial on M.N. Roy (1887-1954), published in Anandabazar Patrika, spoke about a visit to his ancestral village of Kheput in the (West) Medinipur district of West Bengal. Roy, who had founded the Communist Party of India in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, had returned to Kheput briefly in 1939 with activist and anti-colonial feminist, Evelyn Trent, his wife. The editorial lamented that although a local youth club had erected a humble monument in his memory a few years ago, its subsequent neglect accurately reflected the general indifference towards Roy's legacy.
My dip into the newspaper archive was prompted by Kavitha Rao's recent book, Spies, Lies and Allies: The Extraordinary Lives of Chatto and Roy, where she paints vivid portraits of Virendranath Chattopadhyay (1880-1937) and M.N. Roy, two extraordinary lives that ran parallel through times of hope and turbulence. I wanted to think through two premises that animate Rao's project: first, that 'Chatto" and Roy were, in scholar Sudipta Kaviraj's words, 'magnificent failures"; second, that they are forgotten figures.
With a self-conscious hat-tip to Frederick Forsyth's political thriller, The Day of the Jackal, Rao begins Spies, Lies and Allies with a man facing a firing squad. Her setting is Moscow, on 2 September 1937. Chatto, one of over 700,000 political opponents to be killed during Stalin's infamous purge, had been described by journalist and 'triple agent" Agnes Smedley as 'a revolutionary in a dozen different ways." Rao speculates evocatively about what must have been passing through Chatto's mind: his happy childhood, his homeland to which he had not returned in decades, his travels and travails in different parts of Europe at a singularly volatile time in history. Or did he think enviously, Rao wonders, 'of his fellow revolutionary, the dashing and charismatic M.N. Roy", who had, by securing Lenin's friendship, beaten Chatto in achieving his dream?
The two parallel lives are traced in alternating chapters. Chatto's begins at their family home in Hyderabad, where secularism and learning were held in high regard. Drawing primarily on the memoirs of his siblings, the freedom fighter Sarojini Naidu and poet and actor Harindranath Chattopadhyay, the chapter focuses on the patriarch, Aghorenath, rather than Chatto. The notable exception is the initial episode, where notorious British police officer Charles Tegart ransacks their house in search of a compromising letter from Chatto.
Roy's early days are told primarily through the region's political climate, reflected in the revolutionary zeal of figures like 'Bagha" Jatin, or Jatindranath Mukherjee. (The first chapters refer to Roy by his birth name, Narendranath Bhattacharya, which he changed after landing in the US while on the run.) Compared to her portrayal of the Chatto household, Rao's sketch of the Bengal landscape feels less immersive, despite being politically charged, perhaps owing to the nature of the archive the author relies on.
One notices three distinct movements in the book. The first, beginning with the protagonists' youth, goes on to trace their formative years into the mid-1910s. These are marked by a distinct note of optimism, as Chatto and Roy encounter a fascinating cast of characters and collectives in their attempts to secure help for India's anti-colonial struggle. By Kavitha Rao, Westland, 256 pages, ₹ 499
Chatto's path takes us to India House in London, where he meets its founder, Shyamji Krishna Varma, and a young V.D. Savarkar, among others, while Roy travels east to Japan, only to be disappointed by fellow revolutionary activist Rashbehari Bose's uncritical faith in Japan. A thrilling cat-and-mouse game ensues when Roy, on his way to China to secure arms from the German embassy, is tailed by the British police. Unable to convict him, they advise: 'There are many revolutions in these parts. Stay away from them."
In the second movement, both Chatto and Roy begin to find footholds in unlikely political networks during and in the aftermath of World War I. Chatto begins to operate out of Berlin, where, aided by German lawyer and diplomat Max von Oppenheim, he becomes involved with the Berlin Committee (later, the Indian Independence Committee), and has a brush with the pan-Islamist movement. Also read: 'I Am on the Hit List': A deep dive into Gauri Lankesh's murder
I found the chapter on Agnes Smedley one of the most nuanced in the book, as it opens up to scrutiny the problematic gender dynamics within revolutionary spaces from the perspective of a person with her own share of complexities. In fact, the book has a number of well-crafted cameos, like Bhikaji Cama, Jack Johnson and Oppenheim. The alternative vantage points afforded by these inclusions allows us to see the two protagonists from different perspectives and perhaps, more significantly, sheds light on a frenetic internationalist moment of many potential solidarities, which often falls by the wayside in mainstream narratives of India's freedom movement.
Meanwhile, Roy, thinly disguised as a Tamil student on his way to Paris, lands in New York, amid a 'teeming nest of Indian revolutionaries". A question from the audience at a public lecture by Lala Lajpat Rai prompts him to reassess his understanding of Indian independence: was the discourse around independence overlooking the hope of a truly revolutionary class struggle? Rao describes Roy's dive into Marxist philosophy at the New York Public library and his involvement with the Ghadar Movement, leading to his arrest in 1917.
The journey continues in revolutionary Mexico, where Roy meets Mikhail Borodin a couple of years later. This 'internationalist" phase sees him representing the Mexican Communist Party at the 1920 Comintern (or IIIrd International), and founding a Communist Party of India in Tashkent, along with Abani Mukherjei and others.
The pace becomes feverish in the third movement, as a frantic race to secure Russian support for the Indian cause ensues. Roy beats Chatto to secure Lenin's support, although he disagrees with the latter's insistence on working with the Indian National Congress (INC). Roy eventually meets Stalin and ends up on a doomed mission to China with Borodin, from which he escapes narrowly. Chatto, who had hoped that the INC would work with workers' and peasants' organisations, finds his relations with Jawaharlal Nehru failing disastrously. Nehru, believing Chatto to be unmoored from the ground reality, favoured INC solidarity above all else. Roy would return to India and spend over five years in jail, before founding his new philosophy of Radical Humanism. Chatto would face the firing squad eventually, unbeknownst even to his family and friends.
Rao's positioning of these two charismatic individuals as forgotten figures piqued my curiosity because, in my experience, Roy is a household name within left-leaning or indeed politically aware circles in India. (Roy even had his own first day cover in 1987.) So is Chatto, though to a lesser degree. How then do we understand the amnesia around them in their native village, in their family or, for that matter, within mainstream political discourses?
Despite their commitment and brilliance, Roy and Chatto have fallen between the cracks of narratives that later coalesced as 'history" in the public imagination. They were conducting their own experiments with truth as—to recall Antonio Gramsci's words—the old world lay dying and a new one was struggling to be born. Their faith in ideas, ideals and ideological solidarities may have seemed justified at the time but the nationalist movement in India took its own course, particularly in the aftermath of World War II, which got in the way of their vision bearing fruit in the political realm. Rao's book, which speaks disparagingly of Nehru and M.K. Gandhi's 'mealy-mouthed compromises with the British" intervenes by carving out a space for two forgotten individuals within public history.
Read as two biographies, it leaves one wishing for a deeper dive into the people themselves, but through the juxtaposition of the lives, Rao achieves a good deal more. The book is a reminder of those phases in history that are pregnant with the possibility of multiple worlds; what becomes the 'public" narrative is retroactively constructed from the vantage point of the new world that emerges eventually, often at the cost of other memories. It is that forgetting which Rao sets out to address here. Also read: Book review: 'Heart Lamp' asks in whom women can really put their faith
While her admirable effort did leave me wondering if a closer engagement with primary archives (alongside autobiographies, biographies and scholarly work) could have made the history feel more tangible, Spies, Lies and Allies succeeds in establishing the importance of including those who 'failed" and were 'forgotten" within the grand narrative of the nationalist movement.
Sujaan Mukherjee is a Kolkata-based researcher, translator and curator. Topics You May Be Interested In
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Weeks after shipwreck, Kerala Police registers criminal case against European shipping company
The Kerala Police Wednesday registered a criminal case against global shipping company Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) in connection with the capsize of its Liberia-flagged MSC ELSA 3 last month off Kerala coast. This comes nearly three weeks after the Liberia-flagged MSC ELSA 3, a 28-year-old vessel, capsized around 25 km southwest of Alappuzha while sailing from Vizhinjam port in Thiruvananthapuram to Kochi. The ship, which went down on May 24 with more than 600 containers, was carrying hazardous cargo apart from tonnes of marine diesel fuel. The FIR was registered at Fort Kochi coastal police station against the owner of the European company MSC ELSA 3, the ship master and the crew members following a complaint from the general public identified as C Shamji, who hails from a fishing village in Alappuzha. The case was registered under sections 282 (rash navigation of vessels), 285 (dangerous obstruction in a line of navigation), 286 (negligent conduct involving poisonous substances), 287 (negligent conduct with fire or combustible matter), 288 (negligent handling of explosives) and 3 (5) (acts of several persons for furthering a common intention) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Several containers of the Liberia-flagged MSC ELSA 3 got beached along the Kerala coast. Besides, waves had deposited nurdles (plastic pellets) along coastal areas of Kollam and Thiruvananthapuram. Besides, small patches of oil slick were reported along Alappuzha coast, raising ecological concerns. The FIR said the ship master and the crew were aware that the vessel had dangerous and inflammable cargo, but they navigated the ship in a 'very negligent manner' endangering life and property. The hazardous cargo released from the sunken ship had allegedly caused damage to the environment and adversely affected the fishing sector. Besides, the containers which fell off from the ship had allegedly caused obstructions in the shipping channel, which is used by other vessels. After the incident, the state's Opposition and fishermen organisations have been blaming the ruling Communist Party of India (Marxist) government for its reluctance to register a case against the shipping firm.


NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
CPM Seeks More Seats In Alliance For 2026, DMK Says Final Call Closer To Polls
Chennai: With Tamil Nadu heading towards a high-stakes Assembly election in 2026, allies of the ruling DMK have begun to share their expectations for more seats. The Communist Party of India (Marxist), a long-time ally of the DMK, has openly demanded a greater share of seats this time. CPM's State Secretary P Shanmugam on Tuesday said that the party expects a better deal in 2026. In 2006, the CPM contested 13 seats within the DMK alliance and won 9 of them. In contrast, in the 2021 elections, the party was allotted only 6 seats and won 2. The demand comes at a time when new political alignments are in play. Kamal Haasan's Makkal Needhi Maiam (MNM), which has joined the DMK alliance, is also expected to seek its share of constituencies. Adding to the intrigue, TVK Chief and actor Vijay has offered share in power with potential allies if his party forms the government. This is seen as a move to pursue partners from the DMK front, making seat-sharing talks even more crucial for the ruling coalition. Responding to the CPM's demand, a senior DMK leader said it was well within the ally's rights to ask for more seats. "These discussions and decisions are taken closer to elections. The leadership of both parties will sit together and decide", he added. The DMK-led alliance has won consecutive elections, winning the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, the 2021 assembly polls, and most recently, sweeping the 2024 general election in Tamil Nadu. With the DMK wanting to fight in enough number of seats to secure a majority of its own in the 234 member Tamil Nadu assembly, observers feel such demands from allies could then make negotiations a tight rope walk for the DMK.


India Gazette
9 hours ago
- India Gazette
CPI-M delegation visits Uri to support shelling-affected residents; slams govt for inadequate compensation, neglect
Uri (Jammu and Kashmir) [India], June 11 (ANI): A delegation of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), including the party's General Secretary MA Baby, visited Uri in Jammu and Kashmir's Baramulla district to meet people affected by shelling by Pakistan. CPI-M General Secretary MA Baby expressed reservations over the compensation amount of Rs 1.3 lakh given to the affected residents. 'The situation here is highly distressing, as you would have seen with the drone and shelling attacks. The government has only given Rs 1.3 lakh as compensation, which these days cannot even buy a proper door and window. This is highly deplorable, and we strongly disagree with the government's attitude. The democratic process has been destroyed here. Omar Abdullah is the Chief Minister; this is a Union Territory, and Modi and Amit Shah are controlling everything. We heard that the review meeting conducted with the Lieutenant Governor excluded the Chief Minister,' he said. He further addressed the plight of the people affected by shelling, saying, 'An eight-member family has been given a small room--this attitude of the government needs to change. We, MPs from West Bengal, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan, and other corners of the state, came here to raise the plight of people in border areas. We demanded a special session to discuss it, but the Prime Minister refused. He didn't even attend the all-party meeting, only giving lectures here and there.' One of the delegates, CPI-M leader Mohamad Yousuf Tarigami, said, 'The people living in border villages should have access to bunkers for their safety. We have come here to express solidarity and tell them we stand with them. We assure them that we will be their voice in Parliament.' The visit followed shelling by Pakistan in the civilian areas of Jammu and Kashmir post Operation Sindoor, which was conducted on May 7. The operation was conducted in retaliation for the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people, including a Nepalese national. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7 and struck nine terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied-Kashmir in response to a ghastly terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. After the attack, Pakistan retaliated with cross-border shelling across the Line of Control and Jammu and Kashmir as well as attempted drone attacks along the border regions, following which India launched a coordinated attack and damaged radar infrastructure, communication centres, and airfields across 11 airbases in Pakistan. After this, on May 10, an understanding regarding the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan was announced. (ANI)