
Spin-Out Strategy: Turning Scientists Into Entrepreneurs
A lot of hopes are being pinned on the U.K.'s so-called Golden Triangle, an expanded technology cluster encompassing London and the universities of Oxford and Cambridge. If all goes according to plan, this will be the life sciences and deeptech powerhouse of Britain's innovation economy - a natural home for the next generation of science-led startups. As such, its success - and the contribution of the universities that form the three points of the region - are crucial to future economic prosperity.
The challenge, however, is to maximise the potential of the startups - many of them university spin-outs - within the region. To do that, the founders who are taking their technologies to the marketplace will have to make the transition from academics to effective CEOs and salespeople. It's not always an easy journey.
So, what can be done to help? I've been talking to Anthony Finbow, currently Entrepreneur in Residence for Founders at the University of Cambridge and its START accelerator program. As an entrepreneur with more than 25 years of experience in starting, running and advising companies in the software and life sciences sector, his role is to support the university's emerging entrepreneurs, equipping them build viable companies.
As he acknowledges, there is often a learning curve. While it would be wrong to generalize about the Seed and pre-Seed companies in the cohort - some are already selling while others are still at the stage of identifying a market for a prototype technology - the working background of many academics means there are gaps to fill.
Finbow cites sales as a case in point. 'Often they have no experience in selling,' he says. 'It is not just about turning up. It is about researching the customers and learning from the first interaction about the client's needs and how they can be served. From there, you build a knowledge bank. A lot of people are not experienced in that.'
It's a view echoed by Daniel Fredrich, CEO of Pinepeak, one the companies participating in the accelerator programme. The company uses AI to predict wildfire risks anywhere in the world and is developing a product aimed at the insurance industry.
'We're scientists by background, with little experience of enterprise sales when we started Pinepeal in 2023, " he says.'Since then, we've been on a steep learning curve.'
The task of finding paying customers is complicated by the fact that - almost by definition - science-led startups are offering something new to the customers they target. A point made by Rebekka Mikkola, co-founder and CEO of Trismik, a spinout that is developing tools for the evaluation of large language models. As she explains, the purpose of the technology is to help users decide on which LLMs are most suitable for the tasks in hand.
'We're operating in a space where many agree LLM evaluations are broken, but there's little consensus yet on how to do it better,' she says. 'Our biggest challenge is building a presence in this emerging category. We're not just introducing a new tool - we're proposing a new standard. That means earning trust early, proving our method works across real-world use cases, and becoming the default choice for anyone who needs to evaluate LLMs reliably.'
There are cultural challenges too. Finbow says life as an academic researcher is very different from that of an entrepreneur. In his own career, Finbow has'vectored' from telecoms to life sciences. In the latter field, he found scientists who were focused on the scientific disciplines of conducting experiments to prove concepts. Culturally, that's a long way from the cutthroat world of building differentiated products in competitive markets.
So, how does Finbow see the transition from researcher to entrepreneur beginning? Finbow defines his role, at least in part, in terms of helping founders to become more expansive in their thinking. Or to put it another way, he wants them to nurture a long-term vision.
'Most early-stage companies are focused on what they can bring into the world and what will be marketable and saleable in the first instance,' he says. People tend to de-emphasise the concept of the vivid vision.'
By that, he means an assessment of the startup's prospects from the standpoint of a founder who is still running the company five years into the future.
'So imagine yourself in five years' time and use that as the basis for describing a vector towards something more compelling than the start point,' he says. 'Imagine as deeply as possible every facet of the business that one has built.'
After that, the next stage of the exercise is to imagine how to get there. 'You build a bridge via a series of milestones from today to the future.'
Is this all a bit much for first time founders to address? After all, many will be struggling developing a viable product and finding the first customer. Finbow admits there is a balance to be struck between a focus on the now and a vision for tomorrow.
'There are periods when you have to be expansive in your thinking and times when you need to focus,' he says. "I would say to founders, if it looks like the offering isn't going to be compelling enough to sell soon, it is important to have an expansive thinking phase. Expansive thinking is good training for figuring out how to pivot, expand and point the business in the right direction in the future.'
If all that seems theoretical, the founders participating in the START accelerator can see very practical benefits, not least in terms of building contacts within their chosen sectors.
'It (START) has connected us with a powerful network of mentors, investors, and operators who've helped us think deeply about how to scale trust in an area where hype often drowns out rigour. It's also given us the headroom to move quickly while staying grounded in Cambridge's strong research culture,' says Mikkola.
Fredrich sees similar benefits. 'It is helping us connect with key partners and advance our commercial ambitions,' he says.
The same point might be made out of any good accelerator. Academic founders may face specific challenges, but the task of creating a differentiated product, finding a fit with markets and building traction are pretty much universal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
17 hours ago
- Forbes
Musk Follows Harvard In Biting The Hand That Feeds
Elon Musk and Harvard Both Bite the Governmental Hand that Feeds Them From an early age, children are taught essential lessons: do not play with fire, do not pet strange dogs, and if one cannot swim, stay out of the deep end. Another timeless rule—often forgotten by those in positions of immense wealth and influence—is this: do not bite the hand that feeds you. This lesson, while simple, has profound implications in the real world. It applies just as readily to billionaires and institutions as it does to children on a playground. Yet recent actions by both Elon Musk and prominent academic institutions—most notably Harvard, but also Columbia, MIT, and others—suggest that even the most successful individuals and organizations are capable of ignoring foundational wisdom. Harvard set the tone. Amid growing political scrutiny and a shifting cultural landscape, the university has drawn intense criticism over its handling of campus protests, particularly those involving slogans such as 'from the river to the sea.' The administration's decision to defend even the most controversial speech—widely viewed by many as antisemitic—has triggered investigations and jeopardized billions in tax-exempt status and government research funding. This raises a critical question: is this truly the hill worth dying on? Is preserving the right to controversial protest slogans worth risking Harvard's institutional future? It is doubtful that most students and faculty would knowingly trade funding, grants, and prestige for this fight. Elon Musk, the world's richest man, has now followed suit—this time turning his attention toward President Donald Trump, with whom he has launched a high-profile and personal feud. What makes this move especially striking is that President Trump is not a distant figure or a fading influence. He is once again sitting in the White House, wielding executive authority over regulatory agencies, defense contracting, and infrastructure initiatives—all areas that directly affect Musk's companies. Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI have flourished in part because of government partnership. SpaceX alone holds multibillion-dollar contracts with NASA and the Department of Defense. Tesla has benefitted from years of energy subsidies and EV tax incentives. Picking a fight with the sitting president—regardless of personal conviction—puts this entire ecosystem at risk. And again the question must be asked: is this battle worth the damage? Whatever principle Musk may be defending, the consequences extend far beyond himself. Shareholders, employees, and retail investors—many of whom placed their trust and savings in his leadership—are the ones left exposed. The parallel between Harvard and Musk is striking: both have been immensely successful, aided in large part by government funding, favorable regulation, and public goodwill. And both have, for different reasons, chosen to confront the very institutions and leaders that have helped sustain their growth. There is precedent for how this ends. Jack Ma, once the most powerful entrepreneur in China, famously criticized the Chinese government. The backlash was immediate and absolute. His companies were dismantled. His IPO was cancelled. His wealth and influence evaporated almost overnight. Even in less authoritarian systems, the lesson holds: those who antagonize the systems that support them may not survive the consequences. While Musk's personal net worth has dropped from nearly $450 billion to approximately $300 billion, the impact is more symbolic than practical for him. But for millions of investors, employees, and stakeholders, these battles matter. Market volatility, regulatory backlash, and reputational risk all come with tangible financial costs—costs borne not just by Musk himself, but by those who have trusted and invested in his vision. The same applies to Harvard and peer institutions. Their leadership may believe they are standing on principle, but the price of alienating government agencies and key financial backers could reshape the long-term trajectory of these universities. The erosion of public trust, the loss of bipartisan support, and the potential withdrawal of federal funding pose existential threats. Leadership—whether in business or academia—requires more than conviction. It requires judgment, timing, and the discipline to separate personal ideology from institutional responsibility. Founder-led companies often outperform when leaders are focused, visionary, and measured. But when ego replaces strategy, the consequences can be swift and severe. No one is demanding absolute political alignment or silence in the face of controversy. No one is asking Elon Musk to wear a MAGA hat. But his recent actions have been so volatile, so self-destructive, that investors may soon be tempted to hand him something else entirely—a MEGA hat: Make Elon Great Again. In today's polarized environment, the margin for error has narrowed. And for those who owe much of their success to public support—whether in Silicon Valley or the Ivy League—biting the hand that feeds is not just unwise. It is unsustainable. ---------------------------------- Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please refer to the following link for additional disclosures: Additional Disclosure Note: The author has an affiliation with ERShares and the XOVR ETF. The intent of this article is to provide objective information; however, readers should be aware that the author may have a financial interest in the subject matter discussed. As with all equity investments, investors should carefully evaluate all options with a qualified investment professional before making any investment decision. Private equity investments, such as those held in XOVR, may carry additional risks—including limited liquidity—compared to traditional publicly traded securities. It is important to consider these factors and consult a trained professional when assessing suitability and risk tolerance.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump's Federal Funding Freeze For Harvard University Is Having A Ripple Effect On The Cambridge Housing Market
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. President Donald Trump's $3 billion funding freeze on Harvard University is starting to have an impact on the local real estate market in Cambridge, Massachusetts, according to Trump's freeze on grants and contracts on the esteemed Ivy League institution threatens to affect the ecosystem of start-ups, entrepreneurs, and researchers in the Boston metro area, particularly in Cambridge, the area surrounding the campus. Brokers are already seeing potential homebuyers backing out of deals, including one where the buyer lost a $10,000 deposit. 'It's very unusual in my experience for someone to put down a $10,000 offer deposit and then back out,' Sage Jankowitz, a solo broker in Cambridge, told Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Invest Where It Hurts — And Help Millions Heal: Trump's attempts to block Harvard from enrolling international students — currently blocked in a court action — also threaten to harm the rental economy, which relies heavily on housing for graduate students. 'These people are mostly in their 30s or 40s,' says Jankowitz, who works with a broad cross-section of buyers and sellers, including investors. 'A lot of them are married. A lot of them have one kid or multiple kids that come with them while they're here.' Boston's housing market is one of the hottest in the country and not solely reliant on Harvard to thrive, but the loss of tenants and buyers could dampen the market in the Cambridge area, which immediately surrounds Harvard. 'It's the densest concentration of academic talent in the world,' Lawrence S. Bacow, who served as president of Harvard University from 2018 to 2023 and as president of Tufts University from 2001 to 2011, told the New York Times. 'Universities and teaching hospitals are to Boston what cars are to Detroit, what energy is to Houston, or finance is to New York.' Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? University-related research is an integral part of the Boston metro area, where biotech companies have contributed to the development of flourishing neighborhoods, such as Kendall Square in Cambridge, home to the biotech company Biogen, and Boston's Seaport District, where Vertex Pharmaceuticals is based, as reported by The Times. There is a concern that if academic researchers leave, the city's economy, including housing, will suffer. 'Some will leave their science behind, and it will end — after a huge investment, it just falls off a cliff,' Dr. Wendy Chung, chief of pediatrics at Boston Children's Hospital, told the Times. 'The instability is very hard for people who are so hard-working and dedicated to their mission — they can only be pushed so far before they break.'Evan Horowitz, executive director of Tufts University's Center for State Policy Analysis, told the Wall Street Journal that if the Harvard funding freeze persists, the city could suffer a 'wealth spiral effect,' with research, real estate, and retail all affected. 'These aren't distributed jobs—they're concentrated, so we could see strong local effects,' he said. Lauren Holleran, a vice president at Gibson Sotheby's International Realty in Cambridge, has already noticed a difference with high-end clients who are holding off on buying and selling. 'They're saying, let's see how things shake out,' she told the Journal. Lower interest rates mean some investments won't yield what they did in months past, but you don't have to lose those gains. Certain private market real estate investments are giving retail investors the opportunity to capitalize on these high-yield opportunities. , which provides access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate. The best part? Unlike other private credit funds, Looking for fractional real estate investment opportunities? The features the latest offerings. Image: Shutterstock This article Donald Trump's Federal Funding Freeze For Harvard University Is Having A Ripple Effect On The Cambridge Housing Market originally appeared on
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Bus company welcomes plan to tackle city traffic
A bus company has welcomed council plans to develop proposals to tackle Oxford's "devastating" traffic. Oxford Bus Company previously urged Oxfordshire County Council to find a "Plan B", after the ongoing Botley Road closure delayed the authority's planned introduction of traffic filters. The council responded to this by confirming it would be drafting new plans to deal with the city's congestion problem. Luke Marion, the bus company's managing director, said he was "encouraged by the announcement" and "looked forward to engaging" with the council to "improve journeys" for bus users. "A robust bus network is critical in order for the Council to achieve its sustainability targets on the county's roads which we are wholly supportive of," Mr Marion said. "To further enhance the appeal of travelling by bus, we need journeys to be faster and more reliable than is currently possible. "Present levels of congestion are having a devastating impact on our city which we're keen to help resolve through positive discussion." Oxford Bus Company said journey times on the Abingdon Road had increased by an average of 17% since the Botley Road was closed, with services between Blackbird Leys and Oxford city centre slowing by 33% compared with 2013. Following Mr Marion's correspondence, the council confirmed that potential options to improve travel conditions would be discussed by the cabinet. The council had planned to introduce contentious traffic filters on several major roads in autumn 2024, but they were pushed back for another two years due to the ongoing closure of Botley Road. Labour councillor Brad Baines previously argued argued that the county council plans did "not answer questions about affordability of bus services or routes going where people need to go". "These are key barriers which are yet to be addressed or even considered." You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram. Council urged for 'Plan B' to tackle congestion LTNs and cycle lanes cost council almost £4m City traffic filters postponed by Botley Road delay Oxfordshire County Council