logo
Marsch lauds Canada's Gold Cup commitment as USMNT wrestles with same topic

Marsch lauds Canada's Gold Cup commitment as USMNT wrestles with same topic

New York Times16 hours ago

VANCOUVER, British Columbia – As the most important summer in Jesse Marsch's tenure in Canada to date gets underway in full, the men's national team head coach has made it clear: critical to success is the involvement of nearly his entire full-strength team at the Concacaf Gold Cup.
'Everybody knows how important this summer is and what it means for (the 2026 World Cup). I've explained my feelings about this tournament to the team over the last months, but I didn't really have to. They all said, 'We're coming, we want to win it.' That's a big statement, but that's how they feel. I'm glad I coach a team that feels that way,' Marsch said after Canada's first Gold Cup training session.
Advertisement
Marsch is also not shy from lighting a fuse with his comments, and ahead of Canada's two June friendlies against Ukraine and Ivory Coast, he said, 'not one guy has said to me, 'I don't want to come to the pre-Gold Cup.''
The timing of Marsch's comments gave them a clear undertone, as they came following Christian Pulisic's opting not to participate in the Gold Cup for the U.S.
While Marsch doubled down on his comments on Friday – 'It's a unique, selfless group. I haven't been around many teams that have this kind of love and commitment to each other,' he said – he also insisted his comments were not a shot at the U.S. and its star.
'First, there's some dialogue like I'm addressing the U.S. team. That's not true at all. I want to make it clear: I don't care about the U.S. team. And I never want to coach the U.S. national team. I'm making that clear right now,' Marsch said. 'I was just talking about our team.
'The team believes in what's being created, because they're being rewarded for it and they're totally engaged by the whole experience.'
Marsch was also speaking after Pulisic publicly addressed missing the Gold Cup for the first time.
'Towards the second half and the end of the season, my body just started talking to me, and my mind,' Pulisic said Thursday on CBS's Call It What You Want podcast. 'I started to think, you know, what's going to be best for me leading into next year and going into the World Cup. Is that to play eight more games, get no rest at all, go straight into preseason and then grind another year, and go straight into the World Cup? That's not what I felt was best for my body.'
Pulisic said he wanted to be part of the U.S. friendlies against Turkey and Switzerland but not the Gold Cup, only to be rebuffed, as manager Mauricio Pochettino wanted one squad for the whole summer.
Advertisement
'The only point I would make with that is that I did want to be part of at least the two friendlies,' Pulisic said. 'I did speak with the coaches, and I asked and I wanted to be part of the team in whatever capacity I could. They said no; they said they only wanted one roster, and that's a coach's decision. I fully respect that. I didn't understand it, but it is what it is. I wanted to be a part of that, but that's just the way things went. I had to make the best decision for myself, and also, in the long run, my team — although, clearly, some people haven't seen it that way.'
Even if Marsch is to be believed and was not taking a shot, the current trajectories of the Canada and U.S. national teams with less than a year to go before the World Cup present a stark contrast.
The U.S. has lost its last four matches under Pochettino, including a loss to Canada in the Concacaf Nations League third-place game. Without a full-strength team, it suffered back-to-back friendly losses against European opposition. The Americans looked listless while defending and without clear ingenuity in attack. Their recent play has raised serious questions about how prepared they will be when their World Cup begins on home soil in June 2026.
Canada, meanwhile, played one of its best games under Marsch in a 4-2 dismantling of Ukraine in a June friendly. Despite a loss to Mexico in the Nations League semifinals, Canada has still vaulted up to its highest FIFA ranking ever (30th) under Marsch's aggressive style of play.
Again, while Marsch insists there's no comparison between the two teams, it's hard not to read between the lines here: Canada is earning the results as of late in part because of the commitment Marsch sees in every camp.
Pulisic's absence is far from the only key one the U.S. must confront, though there are various reasons for the others. Midfielder Yunus Musah, right back Sergiño Dest and forward Josh Sargent are among the omissions, while two American starters, Weston McKennie and Tim Weah, will participate in this summer's Club World Cup with Juventus (Gio Reyna will as well, with Dortmund).
Advertisement
Marsch's team may be closer to full strength but will still be missing a couple of key pieces. There's a center back starter, Nice's Moïse Bombito, who is undergoing wrist surgery, while Alphonso Davies is still recovering from an ACL tear suffered in Canada's Nations League third-place game – a source of consternation and conflict between Marsch and Bayern Munich.
Ismaël Koné missed Canada's Friday's training session to attend to a family matter, but is expected to return to participate in the Gold Cup. Meanwhile, Marsch cited Canada starter Alistair Johnston as evidence of his team's commitment: after a lengthy season in Scotland and the 26-year-old's wedding this summer, the Celtic defender is planning to arrive ahead of Canada's first Gold Cup game against Honduras.
'He's going to figure out a way to come basically straight from his honeymoon,' Marsch said.
There's a little irony in that Marsch himself will be forced to miss the first two group games. His sending-off in the Nations League third-place game resulted in a two-game ban from Concacaf. He'll return for the finale vs. El Salvador and whatever may follow.
'This, unfortunately, is not the first time I've been through this,' Marsch said. 'I always actually enjoy these moments, because it's an opportunity for the team to show leadership, to take ownership, to show that they understand in all ways how to take things over. Obviously, (Canada assistant coach Mauro Biello) and the staff and everybody will be able to manage things fine. But it's a chance for the team to really now show that this is our team, we know how to handle this, and we're going to execute.'
It's still too early to determine what the mass participation and buy-in will mean for Canada's results. But what's clear right now is Marsch has attained a level of willingness that should only strengthen team unity and tactical understanding with the World Cup approaching. Marsch's tactical demands are often contradictory to what his stars, such as Jonathan David and Tajon Buchanan, experience at the club level.
'If the vision is clear and they understand how they fit in and what it means in their lives and in their profession, these guys only want to think about how they can meet standards. That's a pleasure,' Marsch said.
Advertisement
But the more time they're spending with Canada, the better the entire group should be to fight for Canada's first men's World Cup win.
'You could go to (David) and talk about how unique his situation is and how unique his mentality is,' Marsch said, referencing the fact that David is awaiting a high-profile summer transfer. 'Or you could go to guys like (defender Derek Cornelius), who has had a really long year. You could talk about (Buchanan) and technically he's owned by (Inter Milan) and he could be in the Club World Cup but he made it clear he wants to be here.'
Go back into Canada's recent men's national team history, and that desire wasn't always there. Stars have missed Gold Cups. But with the opportunity to win a first trophy since the 2000 Gold Cup, Canada's national team is looking at this summer differently.
'They all love being with this team,' Marsch said. 'They love the national team.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FIFA president Gianni Infantino feels World Cup fever: 'Soccer is conquering America'
FIFA president Gianni Infantino feels World Cup fever: 'Soccer is conquering America'

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

FIFA president Gianni Infantino feels World Cup fever: 'Soccer is conquering America'

We might still be one year out from the 2026 World Cup, but FIFA president Gianni Infantino is already feeling the energy from sheer anticipation of the world's biggest tournament coming to Canada, Mexico and the United States next summer. "Football or soccer is conquering America," Infantino told FOX Sports' Alexi Lalas during FOX's "FIFA World Cup 26: One Year To Go" celebration in Miami on Friday. "It will be a great celebration. Millions of fans will celebrate in the 16 host cities, in the stadiums but also in the fan festivals everywhere. "We will flip the country upside down, and then back up and back down." So far, 13 countries have punched their tickets to the 2026 World Cup, including the three co-hosts, all of which automatically qualified. Of the 10 countries that qualified through competing in group play, two — Uzbekistan and Jordan — will be making their first-ever appearance, thanks in large part to the new 48-team format. "The emotion is exactly the same whether you're Argentina, a world champion, or Uzbekistan or Jordan," Infantino said. "This is what we want all over the world. It's a big emotion." Before the 2026 World Cup next summer, FIFA will host the revamped Club World Cup in the United States. "One month, the best players in the world, the best clubs in the world, to determine who will be the real world championship for clubs," Infantino said. "Not only national teams, but clubs. It's about time someone created a new Club World Cup, right?" The tournament's opening match between Lionel Messi's Inter Miami and Egyptian powerhouse Al Ahly FC will take place on Saturday at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami. ​​Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily!

Penguins sign rookie forward Melvin Fernstrom, re-sign forward Boko Imama
Penguins sign rookie forward Melvin Fernstrom, re-sign forward Boko Imama

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Penguins sign rookie forward Melvin Fernstrom, re-sign forward Boko Imama

The Penguins announced two signings on Friday evening, first signing rookie forward Melvin Fernstrom to a three-year, entry-level contract. The 19-year-old Fernstrom was acquired by the Penguins on January 31 from the Vancouver Canucks in exchange for Marcus Pettersson and Drew O'Connor. Along with Fernstrom, the Penguins received a conditional first-round pick, forward Danton Henien, and defenseman Vincent Desharnais. Fernstrom spent the past season with Orebro HK in the SHL, Sweden's top professional league. He also played for the Swedish junior U-20 team. In 48 games in the SHL, he earned rookie of the year honors, scoring eight goals and nine assists for 17 points, good for first among rookies. During 12 games with the national team, he scored 11 goals and seven assists for 18 points. Fernstrom was picked by the Cancuks in the 2024 NHL Draft, 93rd overall. The team also announced that they have re-signed forward Boko Imama to a one-year contract. The one-year deal carries an average annual value of $775,000 at the NHL level. The 28-year-old forward spent last season between the NHL and AHL in the Penguins' system. In 16 games with the big club, he scored one goal. In the AHL, Imama scored three goals and two assists in 24 games. He was drafted in the 2015 NHL Draft by the Tampa Bay Lightning 180th overall.

Every incident: How Max Verstappen ended up on the brink of an F1 race ban
Every incident: How Max Verstappen ended up on the brink of an F1 race ban

New York Times

time4 hours ago

  • New York Times

Every incident: How Max Verstappen ended up on the brink of an F1 race ban

In 11 months, reigning Formula One world champion Max Verstappen accrued as many penalty points across six different infringements. Some of the incidents from last season weren't egregious per se, such as driving unnecessarily slowly in qualifying, while others were a direct result of battling with another driver, including several incidents with Lando Norris. Verstappen's most recent altercation with a rival, though, carried the most penalty points and played out during the recent 2025 Spanish Grand Prix. Advertisement The stewards found Verstappen at fault for causing a collision with George Russell — which Russell at the time said 'felt deliberate' — and handed him a 10-second time penalty and three penalty points to take Verstappen to the perilous point on 11. But questions were raised by many commentators and fans about whether Verstappen had intentionally crashed into the Mercedes driver and if he should therefore have been disqualified (and here's more on why he wasn't). Verstappen admitted a day later in a social media post that the move 'was not right and shouldn't have happened.' Penalty points last for 12 months in F1, and so Verstappen's slate won't start clearing until June 30, the day after the Austrian Grand Prix. And even that is just two points falling off, if he navigates clean weekends in Canada and Austria in the coming weeks. Here's how the Red Bull driver ended up on the brink of a Formula One race ban — and what the stewards had to say about each infringement. Infringement: Causing a collision Penalty points: 2 This was the first race weekend Norris and Verstappen truly raced for real — and hard — in F1. Norris made multiple attempts to pass Verstappen for the lead of the Austrian GP but couldn't stick the overtake. Heading into Turn 3 at the Red Bull Ring late on, Norris was on the left of Verstappen, and the Dutchman drifted towards the McLaren, leading to the two colliding. Both suffered damage and headed to the pits, but only Verstappen continued racing, finishing fifth while Norris retired. The stewards determined that the Red Bull driver was at fault and said the penalty (a 10-second time penalty and two penalty points) was ' in line with precedents.' The incident raised the question of whether such hard racing was over the limit or within accepted bounds, a topic that continued to surface throughout different parts of the 2024 season. Advertisement 'It was such a silly little touch that had great consequences for both of us, and a bit more for Lando with how (his) puncture then evolved,' Verstappen later said, a few days removed from the incident. The two had cleared the air by this point. Infringement: Forcing another driver off track Penalty points: 2 Norris and Verstappen went head-to-head again in Mexico, a week after their battle in Austin had controversially ended with Norris being penalized. Again, the McLaren driver made a move on Verstappen's outside – first at Turn 4. According to the evidence reviewed by the stewards, the papaya car was ahead of the Red Bull 'at the entry, apex and towards the exit of the turn when he started being forced off the track.' The two drivers did not have any contact, but Norris had to cut the corner, gaining an advantage as he emerged briefly ahead of eventual race winner Carlos Sainz of Ferrari. 'The Stewards believe that the maneuver was done in a safe and controlled manner and that Norris would have been able to make the maneuver on the track had he not been forced off the track by Verstappen.' Verstappen received a 10-second penalty for this infringement, along with two penalty points. But a few corners later, he tried to retaliate against Norris, going up the inside of the McLaren at Turn 8 and forcing them both off the track. Had he completed the maneuver on the track, he 'would have been entitled to racing room.' However, the Dutchman 'left the track and kept the lasting advantage,' resulting in another 10-second penalty (but no penalty points for the second move). Infringement: Going too fast under the Virtual Safety Car Penalty points: 1 Late in the São Paulo Grand Prix's sprint race, a virtual safety car period unfolded after Nico Hülkenberg's car stopped off track. In these periods, Article 56.5 of F1's sporting regulations state, in part, 'All cars must also be above this minimum time when the FIA light panels change to green' as racing resumes. Verstappen, though, tried to challenge Oscar Piastri for second place and was below the minimum time, by 0.63 seconds, 'at VSC End when the FIA light panels changed to green.' Advertisement 'This indicates a sporting advantage gained under VSC,' the stewards said in their decision. 'The driver explained that as he was awaiting VSC to end, he got the notification that he was below the minimum time, he attempted to correct the error but failed to do so by the point that the panels turned green.' Verstappen was dealt a five-second time penalty and one penalty point as a result — something the stewards called the standard 'for the advantage gained at that time'. Infringement: Driving unnecessarily slow on a cool-down lap Penalty points: 1 This was one of the rare penalties for Verstappen that came during qualifying, and it was a case that the stewards described as 'complicated.' This was because he 'did not comply with the Race Director's Event Notes and clearly was driving, in our determination, unnecessarily slowly considering the circumstances' late in the main race qualifying in Qatar. Verstappen was nursing his tires — but remained on the racing line — as Russell was approaching fast behind. But that neither driver was on a push lap impacted the type of penalty Verstappen received. Rather than the standard three-place grid drop, the stewards levied just a one-place grid drop and one penalty point for Verstappen. While it seemed like a minor incident, this penalty sparked a spat between Russell and Verstappen that stretched into the Abu Dhabi GP weekend and has simmered even since. Infringement: Causing a collision Penalty points: 2 Verstappen tangled with the McLaren driver this time. He made an aggressive move down the inside of Piastri at Turn 1 on Lap 1 of 2024's dead rubber season finale, and they collided before spinning. Ultimately, the stewards found Verstappen at fault, resulting in a 10-second time penalty and two penalty points – to make it eight points in just over five months. 'I tried to grab the inside and I quickly realized once I committed to it that the gap was closing and I wanted to try to get out of it because I didn't want to actually crash with Oscar, but unfortunately we still clipped each other,' Verstappen said after the race. 'I already apologized to Oscar. It's not what you want to happen and especially not with him. He's a great guy. Advertisement Infringement: Causing a collision Penalty points: 3 The big question that came from the 2025 Spanish Grand Prix incident is whether Verstappen intentionally collided with Russell. It all began shortly after the late safety car period was ending, as Ferrari's Charles Leclerc first overtook Verstappen at the start. They banged wheels and Verstappen was then under attack from Russell, who was on fresher soft tires while the Red Bull driver was fitted with slower hards. They clashed at Turn 1, with Verstappen going wide but staying ahead. Red Bull told Verstappen to give the position back, in an effort to avoid a potential penalty — one that the stewards later determined 'we would take no further action in relation to that incident.' Verstappen didn't hide how he felt about the team's request, and approaching Turn 5 on a subsequent lap, he slowed down and appeared to be letting Russell by. The Mercedes driver got ahead and was braking at the entry of Turn 5 when Verstappen accelerated before the two collided at the apex. Found at fault, Verstappen received a 10-second time penalty and three penalty points, making it 11 in 12 months. The thing about F1 penalties is that precedents are set and held over the years. The regulations provide a guideline to help the stewards – appointed to be independent by the FIA – determine how to judge an incident and what penalties are available. But it's up to their discretion on exactly what to choose, which is where precedent comes into play. 'When I saw it, it was like, 'Yeah, 10 seconds it's all right because it wasn't right but it wasn't too bad,'' former Haas team boss turned F1 TV pundit Guenther Steiner recently told The Athletic. Steiner has plenty of experience with drivers under his watch in F1 getting involved in controversial incidents. Advertisement 'But then afterwards I thought about it, 'What have we done? We have set a precedent.' And that is my comment now. Would it not have been better to disqualify him so it doesn't happen again? In the end, Max would not have lost a lot more, one point, exactly. If you get disqualified, you wouldn't get the three penalty points. He got his penalty not for being disqualified. And in the future now, basically it is all right to do what he did.' There are also questions of whether the stewards are punishing the consequences of incidents, which will vary depending on the scenario, and if they are taking mitigating factors into consideration. Sometimes the penalties don't match, and it's not clear why to fans. During the 2025 Saudi Arabian Grand Prix, both Verstappen and Liam Lawson left the track and gained an advantage at different points of the race. But Verstappen did so on lap one and received only a five-second penalty, while Lawson was hit with a 10-second penalty when he committed the offense later in the race. The standard penalty for that type of infringement is a 10-second penalty, but the mitigating factor for Verstappen was that it was a Lap 1, Turn 1 offense, which the stewards acknowledged in their decision documents provided a mitigating factor in this instance. 'I think a penalty needs to be black or white. Not like, 'Oh, we know because it was,'' Steiner said. 'Either it is or it isn't. And if you're not sure that it is, it's zero, it's nothing. That's my opinion about it because you cannot start to say, 'I'm not really sure.' If you're not sure, don't give any penalty.' In Verstappen's Jeddah incident – where again he was racing Piastri – the Red Bull driver did not have any penalty points added to his super license. This could be worth remembering if Verstappen gets involved in any contentious moves without contact at the upcoming races in Canada and Austria. He won't automatically be banned if he does. (Top image: Jure Makovec / AFP / Getty Images)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store