logo
Altercation between council member, fire chief ensues following council meeting

Altercation between council member, fire chief ensues following council meeting

Yahoo12-05-2025

Ongoing communication struggles between London City Council members and city employees resulted in a heated confrontation between a council member and the London Fire Chief following the council's Monday, May 5 meeting.
London Police body camera footage of the conversation has been circulating, having been posted to the "I Support Randall Weddle" Facebook page. The video has quickly gained attention, with just over 100,000 views at this time. Mayor Weddle told The Sentinel-Echo that the footage was released through an open records request.
According to Councilperson Kelly Greene, the verbal altercation took place when London Fire Chief Donnie Hale approached her. She said she then asked him to step aside with her, away from others at the London Community Center to "get out of their way."
The footage initially posted begins with Greene telling Hale that Mayor Weddle will eventually "be gone" and "won't be here forever." She later clarified that this was not a threat, but rather, she was referring to his term as mayor.
"Well, I've got his back. He's my boss," Hale responded. "If somebody else was in the same situation, I'd have their back."
"Hey, I didn't tell you not to have his back. I told you to stay out of politics. Stay out of politics. Do your job and stay out of politics."
"I do my job."
"That doesn't mean you can't have the mayor's back; he is your boss."
"That's exactly right, he's my boss and I'm going to do it."
As the altercation continues, Greene reiterates that Hale became involved in politics when he "should've done his job."
"Are you saying I'm not doing my job?"
"Well, I wonder about it."
The altercation comes to an end once the unknown officer filming and London Tourism Chair Phil Smith step in to de-escalate the situation.
Among the items on the meeting's agenda was a "fire department discussion," during which Greene posed questions regarding the London City Fire Department's pursuit of a certificate of need (CON) for critical care services. Weddle said the CON request comes following uncertainty surrounding the city's mutual aid agreement.
According to Greene, her and Chief Hale's argument stemmed from Hale's concern that the majority of council members had not responded to his emails questioning the fire department agenda item.
"I did not know who the council person was that put me on the agenda until she was called upon to ask questions," Hale told The Sentinel-Echo.
Greene commented that she has been "pretty disappointed" in Hale since he participated in "rallies that the mayor held outside the council chambers, cheering him on before [last year's] election about not voting for some of the council members." She cited such involvement in politics as why she opted out of responding to Hale.
At Monday's meeting, Greene inquired about the $50,000 already spent on medical equipment, application fees, and legal counsel — noting that the expenses accrued without the council's approval. She also stated that the fire department had joined a union — the union number being 5534.
After Greene finished sharing her concerns, including how this CON could impact Ambulance Inc. of Laurel County, she asked Chief Hale: "Do you want to answer to any of this, or I can go on?"
Mayor Weddle agreed to answer, stating that it is not the city's intention to "put anybody out of business." He also said the city is not seeking to operate an ambulance service but rather to enhance responses by providing critical care support before ambulance crews arrive.
"If you're having a heart attack or stroke, I suggest that you look at the response times [of] the ambulance service and then our city fire department," Weddle stated. "These things matter."
Councilperson Anthony Ortega inquired if Saint Joseph London had made any reports indicating that "the ambulance service is lacking."
"I think that there is a spreadsheet of things between the two entities that has been given to us showing that there is a need," Weddle responded.
Chief Hale chimed in that Councilperson Stacy Benge had seen the department's "guys in work," recalling that they had saved a man's life at a restaurant.
"I don't want this to become political because it seems like it has," Weddle said after. "This is only about our guys who love this community trying to respond."
Councilperson Greene went on to ask how many people would need to be hired. Mayor Weddle clarified that no new hires are necessary.
As the discussion progressed, Councilperson Judd Weaver asked if prescription medication was being administered. Weddle and Hale both told him "no." Hale said there had been access to a medical director until the mutual aid agreement ceased.
"What did we administer before?" Weaver asked.
Chief Hale nodded his head, stating, "If you all had answered your emails today and let me prepare for this just a little bit more, I could've had some more answers."
"I answered," said Benge.
Chief Hale would later clarify that Ortega had responded directly, whereas Benge responded through the city clerk.
Mayor Weddle was not aware of the altercation between Greene and Hale until the following day.
When asked what he thought sparked the heated conversation, Weddle commented, "Frustrations that department heads have tried to engage via email with a few council members and they refuse to ask questions or address concerns they have except on the camera."
"Trying to embarrass department heads with false information is the biggest problem," Weddle continued. "Heads try to communicate with them but they try to spin everything to get at me. Some on this council will not stop until they have me out of office."
Greene issued an apology to London residents regarding the recent controversy.
"I'm sorry to the public that sometimes these meetings seem to get out of hand," Greene stated. "My actions are just because of my love for London and my years of experience."
In light of recent events, Mayor Weddle encourages residents to not allow the negativity to define London.
"Remember this is a beautiful city that is moving forward. Great things are happening in London and we need to stay focused on the positivity," Weddle stated. "We were elected to serve the people of London my hope as a government we can get back to that."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Video of football fans misleadingly linked to Los Angeles demonstrations
Video of football fans misleadingly linked to Los Angeles demonstrations

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Video of football fans misleadingly linked to Los Angeles demonstrations

US President Donald Trump deployed hundreds of US Marines to Los Angeles following a weekend of anti-deportation demonstrations in June 2025 that saw sporadic but violent clashes between police and protesters. One video of a large crowd chanting "We are Los Angeles" circulated widely online in posts claiming it was related to the recent protests, but it was actually filmed weeks earlier as fans of the Los Angeles Football Club (LAFC) gathered ahead of a match. "This is definitely an insurrection and threats against democracy," says a June 7, 2025 post on X with thousands of interactions. Advertisement The post shares a video showing a packed crowd of people, dressed mainly in black, marching and chanting slogans including: "We are Los Angeles." Some are carrying black flags and scarves emblazoned with golden writing. Text overlaid on the video dates the clip to June 7 and asks: "Should we view this as AN INSURRECTION Firing up?" Screenshot from X taken June 10, 2025 Additional posts linking the clip to the demonstrations against Trump's immigration policies also circulated on Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and Threads. The video spread as Trump ordered the deployment of 700 Marines to Los Angeles to quell what he called "professional agitators and insurrectionists," despite the objections of state and local officials. Thousands of members of the National Guard -- a reserve military force usually controlled by the governor of a state -- have also been mobilized to the city. Advertisement The protests began June 6 after residents attempted to confront federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers who were conducting workplace raids in the city as part of the Trump administration's efforts to deport undocumented migrants. The clip shared in the post, however, is unrelated to the demonstrations. Keyword searches for the words "Empire Boys" -- a phrase seen written on some scarves and flags in the video -- led to Instagram and Facebook pages for an LAFC supporter club by the same name. Screenshot from a video posted by the LAFC supporter club "Empire Boys," with elements outlined by AFP The "Empire Boys" Instagram page posted a video of the same scene from a different angle May 18, nearly three weeks before the protests (archived here). Further research uncovered an exact match to the video circulating online that LAFC's official X account posted May 18 as fans gathered ahead of a game against crosstown rivals Los Angeles Galaxy (archived here). The teams played to a 2-2 tie. The game took place at Dignity Health Sports Park in Carson, California. AFP has fact-checked other misinformation about the demonstrations in Los Angeles here.

Hong Kong police accuse a mobile game app of promoting armed revolution

time4 hours ago

Hong Kong police accuse a mobile game app of promoting armed revolution

HONG KONG -- Hong Kong police on Tuesday accused a mobile game application of advocating armed revolution and promoting secessionist agendas, saying that those who publish it or share it with others online may risk violating national security laws. The announcement — the first to publicly denounce a gaming app — indicates that authorities are widening the crackdown that has followed anti-government protests in 2019. Authorities have crushed or silenced many dissenting voices through prosecutions under the 2020 national security law imposed by Beijing and a similar, homegrown law enacted last year. In a statement, police warned residents against downloading the 'Reversed Front: Bonfire" application, saying those with the app installed might be seen as possessing a publication with a seditious intention. They also warned people against providing financial assistance to the application developer, including making in-app purchases. ''Reversed Front: Bonfire' was released under the guise of a game with the aim of promoting secessionist agendas such as 'Taiwan independence' and 'Hong Kong independence,' advocating armed revolution and the overthrow of the fundamental system of the People's Republic of China,' police said. The game application was developed by ESC Taiwan, which did not immediately respond to The Associated Press' request for comment. On the application's Facebook page, the developer posted about surging searches for the game name and a Hong Kong broadcaster's news report about Tuesday's development. According to the application's introduction, players can assume the role of Hong Kong, Tibet, Uyghur, Taiwan or Cathaysian Rebel factions, among others, to overthrow the communist regime. They may also choose to lead the communists to defeat all enemies. The game's website says it 'is a work of nonfiction. Any similarity to actual agencies, policies or ethnic groups of the PRC in this game is intentional.' On Tuesday night, the app was still available on Apple's App Store but not on the Google Play store. The game publisher last month said Google Play had taken the app down because it did not prohibit users from adopting hateful language in naming. Apple, Google and Meta have not immediately commented. After playing the game for about three months, Kuo Hao Fu in Taiwan said he found that its content uses a humorous approach to describe serious political issues. Fu disagreed with the police accusations, saying players can also choose to be part of the force representing China. 'The Hong Kong police's actions demonstrate how Hong Kong's democratic freedoms have been controlled by the Chinese Communist Party,' he said. 'When even this level cannot be tolerated, it completely destroys creative freedom in gaming.' China considers Taiwan its own territory, to be brought under its control by force if necessary. Many Taiwanese in the self-ruled island showed concerns about Hong Kong's declining freedoms under Beijing's grip. The Beijing and Hong Kong governments insist the city's national security laws were necessary to return stability to the city following the protests.

Marjorie Taylor Greene's Popularity as She Weighs Governor's Bid—Polls
Marjorie Taylor Greene's Popularity as She Weighs Governor's Bid—Polls

Newsweek

time4 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Marjorie Taylor Greene's Popularity as She Weighs Governor's Bid—Polls

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Georgia Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene declined to rule out running for governor in a new interview published by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, as polls suggest she remains a polarizing figure in the battleground state. Newsweek reached out to Greene's office for comment via email. Why It Matters Georgia emerged as a new battleground state in the past decade and will likely be one of the most competitive states of the 2026 midterm elections as popular GOP Governor Brian Kemp retires at the end of his current term. The state narrowly backed President Donald Trump in last year's presidential election after flipping to Democrats in the 2020 election—underscoring how competitive the state has become. What to Know Greene, a conservative who rose to national prominence over her support for Trump, told the Atlanta-based newspaper in an interview published last week she is not ruling out a gubernatorial run. She remains a favorite among conservatives but has attracted strong criticism from Democrats over her past statements. "It's definitely something that I think is smart for me to consider, but it's not a decision I take lightly," she told the Journal-Constitution. "I absolutely love my district. I cannot say that enough times. I think Georgia's 14th District is wonderful. and I have a very powerful position in Congress. But I love my state. I really do." Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene speaks during a subcommittee hearing on May 7, 2025 in Washington, D.C. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene speaks during a subcommittee hearing on May 7, 2025 in Washington, poll from the Tyson Group earlier this year suggests she is viewed less favorably than other Georgia politicians. The poll, which surveyed 600 likely voters in Georgia from January 30 to January 31, 2025, found that 43 percent of Georgia voters view Greene unfavorably, compared to 27 percent who view her favorably. Attorney General Chris Carr, who is running in the GOP primary, is less known than Greene—with 54 percent of respondents saying they had never heard of him. Twelve percent said they viewed him favorably, while 8 percent said they viewed him unfavorably, the poll found. Greene may face a challenge in a Georgia general election because she is a "polarizing politician," William Hatcher, chair and professor of social sciences at Augusta University, told Newsweek on Tuesday. He noted the statewide electorate will be "more moderate" than that of Greene's deeply conservative district. "The Republicans will be more competitive with a candidate who demonstrates broad appeal to the statewide electorate, which in recent election cycles have become more competitive," he said. "The main challenge to candidates from both parties will be demonstrating that they're not too far to the left or right for a state that is increasingly competitive in elections." Meanwhile, a YouGov poll of American voters found that Greene is among the least popular politicians with a net favorability of -22. Of the 120 politicians surveyed, only Kentucky Republican Senator Mitch McConnell, former Vice President Dick Cheney, New York Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer, former Democratic New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, former Republican New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, former Vice President Mike Pence and California Representative Nancy Pelosi fared worse. Greene was first elected in 2020 and has easily won reelection since in her northern Georgia district. She won reelection by nearly 30 points in 2024. In May, she declined to run in the Senate race against Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff, describing Congress' upper chamber as "where good ideas go to die." An AJC poll suggested that race would have been an uphill battle for her, as she trailed Ossoff by a 17-point margin. Trump won Georgia by about two points in 2024, while Biden won the state by less than half of a percentage point four years earlier. What People Are Saying Hatcher told Newsweek: "Georgians are concerned with a host of issues, including the economy, healthcare, education, protecting democracy, etc. The economy, education, and healthcare are often the most influential issues listed by voters in the state. Going into the gubernatorial election, I think a main concern will be how to keep the state's economic momentum heading in the right direction, in particular supporting the state's filming industry and its emerging green technology sector. Voters will want to hear how candidates will respond to potentially negative economy trends, such as the Trump administration's tariffs that may adversely affect the state's industries and cause the cost of consumer products to increase." Greene told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution: "I don't think anybody should run on their relationship with President Trump, because I certainly could run on that probably better than anyone. I think they should run on their track record, and I think they should run on their own platform — and what they're going to do for the people and the businesses of Georgia." What Happens Next Greene hasn't made any formal announcement about whether she plans to run or not, and candidates could make their final decisions in the coming months. The Cook Political Report classifies Georgia's gubernatorial race as a pure toss-up.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store