logo
Historic figures cut from military websites while others are restored following ‘DEI' ban

Historic figures cut from military websites while others are restored following ‘DEI' ban

Yahoo22-03-2025

For the last four years, high school world history teacher Hadley DiForti has taught the story of Navy hero Doris Miller to her students.
Miller, a cook on a ship, gunned down attacking Japanese planes at Pearl Harbor in 1941, before he led other sailors to safety. The effort made him the first Black sailor to receive the Navy Cross, and his image was used on recruitment posters.
But earlier this year, when DiForti went to a Navy website that she had used for years to teach the students about Miller's story, it had been taken down, leaving her students feeling 'significantly upset.'
'I was extremely angry,' the Tennessee teacher said. 'I've taught about him now for four years in a row, and kids really do like learning about him.' She has come to rely on .gov websites because she could trust them, she said, but 'now, that's not the case.'
The Department of Defense did not respond to a request for comment for this story. Pentagon press secretary John Ullyot told NBC News earlier this week that 'DEI is dead at the Defense Department. Discriminatory Equity Ideology is a form of Woke cultural Marxism that has no place in our military. It Divides the force, Erodes unit cohesion and Interferes with the services' core warfighting mission.'
While one of the Navy's webpages about Miller had been restored, others have not. He is one of many people from marginalized backgrounds documented in thousands of webpages and images whose military history has been scrubbed from Pentagon websites, following President Donald Trump's executive order calling for government agencies to do away with anything that touches what may be perceived as diversity, equity and inclusion.
'We are pleased by the rapid compliance across the Department with the directive removing DEI content from all platforms,' Ullyot continued. 'In the rare cases that content is removed — either deliberately or by mistake — that is out of the clearly outlined scope of the directive, we instruct the components and they correct the content accordingly.'
Some pages about figures like Jackie Robinson, the Tuskegee Airmen, the Navajo Code Talkers and Desert Storm-era Gen. Colin Powell have been restored following public outrage. But many remain down and have not been restored.
'It is both perplexing and disheartening to witness initiatives that, under the guise of DEI, obscure the very narratives that shape our collective history,' said Nika White, a long-time DEI expert and author of the book 'Diversity Uncomplicated.' 'Eliminating references to these figures not only undermines foundational principles of DEI but stands as a glaring contradiction to the pursuit of truth.'
The amount of truth that stands to be lost is substantial, given the countless contributions by Black people, people of color and members of the LGBTQ community who were military heroes and historical figures.
'At its core, DEI is about recognizing and valuing the diverse experiences and contributions of all individuals, particularly those historically marginalized,' White said. 'To erase these contributions is to engage in a form of historical revisionism that diminishes the legacies of countless service members who have fought valiantly for our country.'
Multiple pages about Robinson, a second lieutenant in the Army who went on to break the color barrier in professional baseball, were taken down, including a page about Negro League players talking about serving in the military. But as of Wednesday afternoon, at least one page about Robinson, in a series about athletes who served in the military, had been reinstated.
Similarly, most of the webpages about Miller remain down. One Navy History and Heritage Command page about Miller has been restored, but a large red banner at the top of the site warns that content had been 'revised or removed to align with the President's executive orders and DoD priorities.' Other webpages about him on the Navy's website remain down.
'It's not fair and it's really shocking that our government would do this,' DiForti said. 'I want our students to be able to look at those heroes that serve this country, that looked like them, and realize that they could be like them one day, and not just the heroes that look like me.'
Henry-Louis Taylor, the director of urban studies at the University at Buffalo, said the omission of Black war heroes like Miller 'reflects a broader effort to erase Black history and return to a time when U.S. history was a fantasy centered on white glory. If Trump's goal had been a colorblind portrayal of military history, he could have simply omitted racial identifiers.'
He said it seems the objective has been to prioritize the history of white participation and heroism. 'This erasure is not just an attack on Black and other people of color — it's an attack on truth itself, turning history as a social science into history as a fairy tale.'
Donald Williamson, who served 25 years in the Army, said the changes foretell 'a sad day in America.'
'This goes against everything we were taught about diversity and inclusion in our ranks,' he said.
The Army website had deleted and then reinstated this week the page for the 442nd Regimental Combat Team. More than a third of the soldiers were born to Japanese immigrants, and despite dealing with racism in the U.S., the 442nd became the most decorated unit in American military history for its size. The group, which had to be replenished several times, totaled about 14,000 soldiers, of which 9,486 received Purple Hearts, 21 Medals of Honor and eight Presidential Unit Citations.
Missing last week on the Arlington National Cemetery website were pages about Hector Santa Anna, a World War II bomber pilot, as well as pages about dozens of notable Black, Latino and female veterans. Among the information missing was that for Powell, the former general who became the first Black chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which is the highest rank in the military after the president. His page was restored on March 16.
Medgar Evers, the civil rights icon who served in the Army during World War II, was removed from the Arlington Cemetery website as well. In 2017, Trump called Evers a 'great American hero' at the opening of the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum.
Taylor, the historian, referred to the book 'Black Reconstruction in America' by scholar W.E.B. DuBois. In it, DuBois argued that white scholars had deliberately falsified American history to create a narrative that offered a 'false but comforting sense of accomplishment,' Taylor said.
DuBois said in the book that such manipulation had led people to describe history as 'lies agreed upon' and warned that this misinformation would have destructive consequences. Taylor said DuBois foresaw what's happening now.
'Nothing good can come of this,' Taylor said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Threatened to Cut Musk's Contracts. Golden Dome Deserves Worse.
Trump Threatened to Cut Musk's Contracts. Golden Dome Deserves Worse.

The Intercept

time29 minutes ago

  • The Intercept

Trump Threatened to Cut Musk's Contracts. Golden Dome Deserves Worse.

Elon Musk and his company SpaceX were set to win big from Trump's planned 'Golden Dome' missile defense system. Then Musk went to war with Trump over the Big Beautiful Bill Act, the deficit-expanding centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda. Musk called it a 'disgusting abomination.' The president shot back with a not-so-veiled threat. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump ranted in a post on Truth Social last Thursday. Experts say that Trump is partly right: Golden Dome itself needs to be terminated, before countless tax dollars are poured into an implausible project that is destined to fail. 'Golden Dome is really more of a political marketing scheme than a carefully thought-out defense program.' 'Golden Dome can certainly go forward without Elon Musk, but it shouldn't,' William Hartung, a senior research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, told The Intercept. 'Once you get past the soaring rhetoric and glossy corporate PR, Golden Dome is really more of a political marketing scheme than a carefully thought-out defense program. The fact that President Trump claims it can be built in three years — when less complex systems like the F-35 [fighter aircraft] have been in development for 23 years and still aren't fully ready for combat — is one sign that it is not a serious initiative.' Trump signed an executive order on January 27 that directed the Pentagon to develop a plan for an 'Iron Dome for America' — a riff on the name of Israel's anti-missile defense system — which the president, who has a penchant for all things gilded, calls the Golden Dome. The plan calls for keeping America safe from 'ballistic, hypersonic, advanced cruise missiles, and other next-generation aerial attacks from peer, near-peer, and rogue adversaries' or, put more simply, shooting any threat out of the skies before it harms the United States. The Golden Dome could be the top Pentagon cash cow of the next quarter-century. Its ultimate price tag is estimated in the hundreds of billions or even trillions of dollars. Experts say that a comprehensive defense against all manner of threats — like intercontinental ballistic missiles or ICBMs surrounded by decoys, traveling at 15,000 miles per hour; hypersonic weapons; advanced cruise missiles; and advanced drones; among other threats — is impossible. The challenge of intercepting ICBMs, alone, has been compared to hitting a bullet with a bullet — but harder. Over 70 years, the United States has poured about $400 billion into ballistic missile defense. Trump's project appears to be little more than a warmed-over version of the 1980s Strategic Defense Initiative, a fanciful Reagan-era program that hoped to shoot down Soviet ICBMs and went nowhere. Golden Dome-type technology does not exist now and will not be 'fully operational' in three years as Trump forecast — or even 15 years, according to experts. 'Few of the main challenges have been solved, and many of the hard problems are likely to remain formidable over the 15-year time horizon the study considered,' reads a comprehensive analysis of strategic ballistic missile defense released by the American Physical Society's Panel on Public Affairs in March. Even a system designed to knock out North Korean missiles in mid-flight 'cannot be expected to provide a robust or reliable defense against more than the simplest attacks by a small number of relatively unsophisticated missiles.' Even if SpaceX isn't involved following Trump and Musk's public spat, other defense contractors will step into the breach to construct the unworkable system. 'Bottom line, whoever builds or tries to build the so-called Golden Dome is going to fail and waste a lot of taxpayer cash along the way. That hasn't changed,' said Gabe Murphy, a policy analyst at Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan budget watchdog advocating for an end to wasteful spending. 'The technology to knock an ICBM or hypersonic missile out of the sky does not exist, and if, hundreds of billions of dollars later, we manage to come close, our adversaries will just build a better missile.' Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits over the past two decades, according to a recent Washington Post investigation, and most of that government money has gone to SpaceX. Musk's companies have 52 ongoing deals with seven government agencies, including the Defense Department. Nearly two-thirds of that $38 billion in government business has come about in the last five years. SpaceX had emerged as a frontrunner to win crucial parts of the Golden Dome project, which aims to build a network of satellites to detect and track missiles streaking toward the United States. SpaceX currently has, according to many observers, a near-monopoly on the U.S. satellite launch market, and builds both the rockets to carry military payloads into space and satellites that can provide surveillance and targeting technology. The firm is already the top Pentagon supplier of launch services and low-Earth-orbit communications systems. NASA relies on SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket fleet to service the International Space Station. The space agency was also expected to use its Starship rocket to send astronauts to the Moon and eventually to Mars, and put up a brave front in the midst of the Trump–Musk row. 'NASA will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space,' NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens said in a post on X. In the heat of their spat, Musk tweeted that SpaceX would 'immediately' begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft, before rescinding that decision after a random X user urged him and Trump to 'cool off.' The president calmed down as well, saying he had made no decisions about canceling contracts with Musk's companies. 'I'd be allowed to do that,' Trump said on Saturday. 'But I have, I haven't given it any thought.' Still, SpaceX's role in any future Golden Dome gambit remains in doubt. 'The U.S. would only save funds from canceling contracts with Musk's firms if it doesn't turn around and pay other contractors to do the same things,' Hartung told The Intercept. 'So the 'billions and billions' Trump claims could be saved by cutting off SpaceX will more likely be transferred to other contractors.' Musk spent almost $300 million to elect Trump and other Republican candidates during the 2024 election cycle. Musk became upset when the recipients of his funds began to follow through on their promised agenda: extending and expanding Trump's tax cuts, which not only disproportionately benefit the rich but will increase the national debt by almost $2.6 trillion, according to expert analyses. The Big, Beautiful Bill Act would also pump money into Trumpian priorities like immigration enforcement while slashing funds for the most vulnerable, like cutting Medicaid benefits. On Saturday, Trump warned there would be 'very serious consequences' if Musk backs candidates to run against Republicans who vote in favor of his signature legislation. 'Contracts should be awarded and canceled by contracting officers based on their merits, not personal relationships,' said Taxpayers for Common Sense's Murphy. 'Anything else leads to waste and corruption.'

Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed
Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed

American Press

time30 minutes ago

  • American Press

Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed

(Metro Creative Services) Even at a glance, the differences are obvious. The walls of Ferriday High School are old and worn, surrounded by barbed wire. Just a few miles away, Vidalia High School is clean and bright, with a new library and a crisp blue 'V' painted on orange brick. Ferriday High is 90% Black. Vidalia High is 62% white. For Black families, the contrast between the schools suggests 'we're not supposed to have the finer things,' said Brian Davis, a father in Ferriday. 'It's almost like our kids don't deserve it,' he said. The schools are part of Concordia Parish, which was ordered to desegregate 60 years ago and remains under a court-ordered plan to this day. Yet there's growing momentum to release the district — and dozens of others — from decades-old orders that some call obsolete. In a remarkable reversal, the Justice Department said it plans to start unwinding court-ordered desegregation plans dating to the Civil Rights Movement. Officials started in April, when they lifted a 1960s order in Louisiana's Plaquemines Parish. Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the department's civil rights division, has said others will 'bite the dust.' It comes amid pressure from Republican Gov. Jeff Landry and his attorney general, who have called for all the state's remaining orders to be lifted. They describe the orders as burdens on districts and relics of a time when Black students were still forbidden from some schools. The orders were always meant to be temporary — school systems can be released if they demonstrate they fully eradicated segregation. Decades later, that goal remains elusive, with stark racial imbalances persisting in many districts. Civil rights groups say the orders are important to keep as tools to address the legacy of forced segregation — including disparities in student discipline, academic programs and teacher hiring. They point to cases like Concordia, where the decades-old order was used to stop a charter school from favoring white students in admissions. 'Concordia is one where it's old, but a lot is happening there,' said Deuel Ross, deputy director of litigation for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. 'That's true for a lot of these cases. They're not just sitting silently.' Debates over integration are far from settled Last year, before President Donald Trump took office, Concordia Parish rejected a Justice Department plan that would have ended its case if the district combined several majority white and majority Blac k elementary and middle schools. At a town hall meeting, Vidalia residents vigorously opposed the plan, saying it would disrupt students' lives and expose their children to drugs and violence. An official from the Louisiana attorney general's office spoke against the proposal and said the Trump administration likely would change course on older orders. Accepting the plan would have been a 'death sentence' for the district, said Paul Nelson, a former Concordia superintendent. White families would have fled to private schools or other districts, said Nelson, who wants the court order removed. 'It's time to move on,' said Nelson, who left the district in 2016. 'Let's start looking to build for the future, not looking back to what our grandparents may have gone through.' At Ferriday High, athletic coach Derrick Davis supported combining schools in Ferriday and Vidalia. He said the district's disparities come into focus whenever his teams visit schools with newer sports facilities. 'It seems to me, if we'd all combine, we can all get what we need,' he said. Others oppose merging schools if it's done solely for the sake of achieving racial balance. 'Redistricting and going to different places they're not used to … it would be a culture shock to some people,' said Ferriday's school resource officer, Marcus Martin, who, like Derrick Davis, is Black. The district's current superintendent and school board did not respond to requests for comment. Federal orders offer leverage for racial discrimination cases Concordia is among more than 120 districts across the South that remain under desegregation orders from the 1960s and '70s, including about a dozen in Louisiana. Calling the orders historical relics is 'unequivocally false,' said Shaheena Simons, who until April led the Justice Department section that oversees school desegregation cases. 'Segregation and inequality persist in our schools, and they persist in districts that are still under desegregation orders,' she said. With court orders in place, families facing discrimination can reach out directly to the Justice Department or seek relief from the court. Otherwise, the only recourse is a lawsuit, which many families can't afford, Simons said. In Concordia, the order played into a battle over a charter school that opened in 2013 on the former campus of an all-white private school. To protect the area's progress on racial integration, a judge ordered Delta Charter School to build a student body that reflected the district's racial demographics. But in its first year, the school was just 15% Black. After a court challenge, Delta was ordered to give priority to Black students. Today, about 40% of its students are Black. Desegregation orders have been invoked recently in other cases around the state. One led to an order to address disproportionately high rates of discipline for Black students, and in another a predominantly Black elementary school was relocated from a site close to a chemical plant. The Justice Department could easily end some desegregation orders The Trump administration was able to close the Plaquemines case with little resistance because the original plaintiffs were no longer involved — the Justice Department was litigating the case alone. Concordia and an unknown number of other districts are in the same situation, making them vulnerable to quick dismissals. Concordia's case dates to 1965, when the area was strictly segregated and home to a violent offshoot of the Ku Klux Klan. When Black families in Ferriday sued for access to all-white schools, the federal government intervened. As the district integrated its schools, white families fled Ferriday. The district's schools came to reflect the demographics of their surrounding areas. Ferriday is mostly Black and low-income, while Vidalia is mostly white and takes in tax revenue from a hydroelectric plant. A third town in the district, Monterey, has a high school that's 95% white. At the December town hall, Vidalia resident Ronnie Blackwell said the area 'feels like a Mayberry, which is great,' referring to the fictional Southern town from 'The Andy Griffith Show.' The federal government, he said, has 'probably destroyed more communities and school systems than it ever helped.' Under its court order, Concordia must allow students in majority Black schools to transfer to majority white schools. It also files reports on teacher demographics and student discipline. After failing to negotiate a resolution with the Justice Department, Concordia is scheduled to make its case that the judge should dismiss the order, according to court documents. Meanwhile, amid a wave of resignations in the federal government, all but two of the Justice Department lawyers assigned to the case have left. Without court supervision, Brian Davis sees little hope for improvement. 'A lot of parents over here in Ferriday, they're stuck here because here they don't have the resources to move their kids from A to B,' he said. 'You'll find schools like Ferriday — the term is, to me, slipping into darkness.'

'Unacceptable and inhumane': Latinas for Trump founder blasts immigration arrests
'Unacceptable and inhumane': Latinas for Trump founder blasts immigration arrests

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

'Unacceptable and inhumane': Latinas for Trump founder blasts immigration arrests

'Unacceptable and inhumane': Latinas for Trump founder blasts immigration arrests Former deputy press secretary for the Department of Homeland Security during Trump's first term and co-founder of Latinas for Trump criticizes recent immigration actions. Show Caption Hide Caption National Guard and protesters clash over ICE raids Hundreds of demonstrators fought back with the National Guard and local authorities as ICE protests escalated. WASHINGTON – Florida state Sen. Ileana Garcia, who co-founded the group Latinas for Trump, criticized President Donald Trump's recent immigration enforcement actions as 'unacceptable and inhumane' in a social media post. Her remarks come as federal agents have arrested immigrants in courthouses across the United States, including in Florida, stripping them of due process protections, as NBC News reported. Family members and pro-immigration advocates have said that in some of the arrests, immigration judges dropped active cases against migrants, potentially expediting the deportation process. The Trump administration's crackdown on immigration enforcement spurred protests in Los Angeles, in which some demonstrators hurled large chunks of broken concrete at officers, slashed tires and defaced buildings, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. On June 7, Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops deployed to the region over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. 'I understand the importance of deporting criminal aliens," Garcia, who served as the deputy press secretary for the Department of Homeland Security during Trump's first term, wrote in a tweet on June 7. "But what we are witnessing are arbitrary measures to hunt down people who are complying with their immigration hearings – in many cases, with credible fear of persecution claims – all driven by a Miller-like desire to satisfy a self-fabricated deportation goal,' she said, referring to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. "This undermines the sense of fairness and justice that the American people value." She added that she stood with Florida Republican Rep. María Elvira Salazar, who also denounced Trump's actions. 'I remain clear in my position: anyone with a pending asylum case, status-adjustment petition, or similar claim deserves to go through the legal process.' Salazar wrote in a statement on June 6. Salazar said she would meet with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem this week, along with Florida Republican Reps. Mario Díaz-Balart and Carlos Giménez, to "personally explain the dire situation unfolding in South Florida." Contributing: Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store