US formally moves to dismiss prosecution against Boeing over deadly crashes
The US Justice Department has formally moved to dismiss a criminal fraud charge against Boeing and has asked a judge to cancel an upcoming trial connected to two plane crashes that killed 346 people off the coast of Indonesia and in Ethiopia, according to court documents filed Thursday.
The deal, announced last week, will allow the American aircraft manufacturer to avoid criminal prosecution for allegedly misleading US regulators about the 737 Max jetliner before the planes crashed less than five months apart in 2018 and 2019.
The agreement in principle will require the company to pay and invest more than $1.1 billion, including an additional $445 million for the crash victims' families, in return for dismissing the criminal case, according to court documents.
Dismissing the fraud charge will allow the manufacturer to avoid a possible criminal conviction that could have jeopardised the company's status as a federal contractor, experts said.
US District Judge Reed O'Connor in Fort Worth, Texas, will decide whether to accept the motion to dismiss, accept the terms of the non-prosecution agreement and whether to cancel the trial.
O'Connor on Thursday ordered all the lawyers to present him with a briefing schedule on the government's motion by June 4.
Some relatives of the passengers who died in the crashes have been pushing for a public trial, prosecution of former company officials, and more severe financial punishment for Boeing.
The Justice Department has noted that the victims' families had mixed views on the proposed deal.
Nadia Milleron, a Massachusetts resident whose 24-year-old daughter, Samya Stumo, died in the Ethiopia crash, in an email Thursday said it hurt her to read the Justice Department's false statement that the agreement will secure meaningful accountability, deliver public benefits and bring finality to a complex case whose outcome would otherwise be uncertain.
This is not a difficult or complex case because Boeing signed a confession, Milleron said. There will be no accountability as a result of the NPA (non-prosecution deal).
Boeing said in a statement that the company is committed to complying with its obligations under the resolution, including commitments to further institutional improvements and investments, as well as additional compensation for families of those who died in the two plane crashes.
We are deeply sorry for their losses, and remain committed to honouring their loved ones' memories by pressing forward with the broad and deep changes to our company that we have made to strengthen our safety system and culture, a Boeing spokesperson said in the statement.
Attorney Mark Lindquist, who represents dozens of the victims' families, said in a statement that although he wanted to see a more vigorous prosecution, he didn't think it was going to happen.
At this point, I can only hope the criminal case and the lawsuits motivated Boeing to improve safety, Lindquist said. That's what really matters. We all want to walk onto a Boeing plane and feel safe.
Boeing was accused of misleading the Federal Aviation Administration about aspects of the Max before the agency certified the plane for flight.
Boeing did not tell airlines and pilots about a new software system that could turn the plane's nose down without input from pilots if a sensor detected that the plane might go into an aerodynamic stall.
The Max planes crashed after a faulty reading from the sensor pushed the nose down and pilots were unable to regain control.
After the second crash, Max jets were grounded until the company redesigned the software.
The Justice Department charged Boeing in 2021 with deceiving FAA regulators about the software and about how much training pilots would need to fly the plane safely.
The department agreed not to prosecute Boeing at the time, however, if the company paid a USD 2.5 billion settlement, including the USD 243.6 million fine, and took steps to comply with anti-fraud laws for three years.
But last year, federal prosecutors said Boeing violated the terms of the 2021 agreement by failing to make promised changes to detect and prevent violations of federal anti-fraud laws.
Boeing agreed last July to plead guilty to the felony fraud charge instead of enduring what could have been a lengthy public trial.
Then in December, O'Connor rejected the plea deal.
The judge said the diversity, inclusion and equity, or DEI, policies in the government and at Boeing could result in race being a factor in picking a monitor to oversee Boeing's compliance with the agreement.
Under the new agreement, Boeing must retain an independent compliance consultant who will make recommendations for further improvement and report back to the government, court documents said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
42 minutes ago
- First Post
India may impose retaliatory duty as US rejects its WTO notice on Trump tariffs: Report
India issued a formal notice to the US at the WTO proposing retaliatory action, but the US rejected the move, stating that its tariffs were not 'safeguard' measures and ruled out any talks on the matter. read more India may impose retaliatory duty as US rejects its WTO notice on Trump tariffs: Report. Reuters/File Photo The US has rejected India's 9 May notice at the World Trade Organization (WTO), which proposed retaliatory action over high US import tariffs on steel and aluminium, Hindustan Times reported. Washington stated that the tariffs were not safeguard measures, and therefore it would not engage in discussions with New Delhi on the issue, sources said on Sunday. Given the situation, India may respond by suspending certain trade benefits for US goods—such as almonds and walnuts—and by increasing customs duties on American metal imports, sources told Hindustan Times. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India's notice challenged the US decision of 10 February to impose a 25 per cent tariff on all steel and aluminium imports, effective from 12 March. The matter escalated further on 30 May, when the Trump administration doubled the tariffs to 50 per cent, effective 4 June, citing national security. More from World Mexicans elect judges in historic polls engulfed by the shadow of crime, corruption In response to the US raising import duties on steel and aluminium to protect its domestic metal industry, India formally informed the WTO on 9 May that it could withdraw trade benefits granted to the US after 30 days, beginning 8 June. In reaction to India's notice, the US informed the WTO on 22 May that India's proposed retaliation was not in line with global trade rules. Washington argued that its tariffs on metals were not 'safeguard' measures. 'Accordingly, there is no basis for India's proposal to suspend concessions or other obligations under Article 8.2 of the Agreement on Safeguards with respect to these measures,' it said in its latest communication to the WTO. Claiming the tariffs are not safeguard measures, the US declined to hold talks with India to resolve the issue, effectively putting the next move in New Delhi's hands. 'The United States will not discuss the Section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as we do not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure,' the American communication to the multilateral body added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump warns: Economic ruination of the US is coming if...
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump has warned that if American courts strike down his tariff policy , it could result in the 'economic ruination of the United States of America.' He said that in such a scenario, other countries could use anti-American tariffs to hold the United States hostage."If the Courts somehow rule against us on Tariffs, which is not expected, that would allow other Countries to hold our Nation hostage with their anti-American Tariffs that they would use against us. This would mean the Economic ruination of the United States of America!," Donald Trump posted on Truth warning came shortly after a major legal development. On Thursday, a federal appeals court in Washington reinstated his administration's tariffs on foreign imports, just one day after the U.S. Court of International Trade had ruled that Trump had overstepped his authority under emergency US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a temporary stay on the lower court's decision. This means that the tariffs first announced on April 2, which Trump called 'Liberation Day' tariffs, remain in place while the government proceeds with an early April, Trump had announced a sweeping set of tariffs, claiming that the US trade deficit amounted to a national emergency. His plan included a 10% tax on all imports. Countries like China, which run large trade surpluses with the United States, were targeted with even higher tariff many of these proposed tariffs were quickly paused. On May 12, the White House announced that it would scale back the harshest tariffs on China while trying to reach a new trade agreement. Both the United States and China agreed to reduce tariffs on each other temporarily for at least 90 the appeals court's intervention, the U.S. Court of International Trade had found that Trump had unlawfully used the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify his tariff plan. The three-judge panel said that the IEEPA was designed to address urgent national security threats and could not support wide-ranging tariffs aimed at resolving long-standing trade tariffs are currently being challenged in at least seven separate legal cases. The most recent ruling from the trade court was in response to two suits that had been combined. One was filed by five small businesses, and the other by a coalition of 12 U.S. states. In a related case, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras issued a narrower injunction that protected two educational toy companies based in the trade court's decision, Trump took to social media on Thursday night to denounce the ruling. He said it undermined presidential authority and would be celebrated by America's rivals.'The horrific decision stated that I would have to get the approval of Congress for these Tariffs,' Trump wrote. 'If allowed to stand, this would completely destroy Presidential Power — The Presidency would never be the same! This decision is being hailed all over the World by every Country, other than the United States of America.'In another post on Truth Social, Trump shared an image of himself with a caption that read: 'He's on a mission from God & nothing can stop what is Coming.'


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
IATA to oppose Trump administration's plan to impose tariffs on aircraft, components, engines, ET Infra
Advt Advt India impact By , ETInfra Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis. Get updates on your preferred social platform Follow us for the latest news, insider access to events and more. NEW DELHI: The International Air Transport Association ( IATA ) will oppose a move by the Donald Trump administration , which has called upon the US Department of Commerce to initiate an investigation to determine the effects on the national security of imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines, and associated investigation has been initiated under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which enables the US President to impose tariffs or restrict imports on the grounds of national security.'The comments (to be submitted to the US Commerce Department) are due on Tuesday. We are submitting comments on this and we are arguing that it doesn't make sense. We are hopeful that they will decide that there is no basis for pursuing this,' said Doug Lavin, Vice President for North America at IATA, to ET Infra on the sidelines of the 81st Annual General Meeting of the trade association held in Delhi from June 1 to June 3, 2025.'We hope that the Trump administration will recognise that not only will this disrupt international aviation, but it is short sighted given the fact that the US is the largest exporter of these products in the world,' added investigation will focus on whether import of aircraft, engines and associated components, are a threat to US national security and is a precursor to imposing tariffs on aircraft and parts coming into the the last two decades Indian companies such Tata Advanced Systems Ltd, Dynamatic Technologies Ltd, among others, have become major suppliers of aerospace parts and components for US companies like Boeing. If the investigation by the US Commerce Department results in imposition of tariffs or import restriction into the US, it could potentially have an impact on Indian companies.'The US is the biggest exporter of parts and engines and aircraft. However, the US manufacturers depend on about 700 suppliers around the world,' said Lavin.'I am sure there are a lot of suppliers in India. So if those suppliers are not able to import into the United States what they are selling to the US aircraft manufacturers, it will certainly have an impact on India and on the US,' added to Boeing, its sourcing from India stands at $1.25 billion a year from a network of more than 300 Trump's move on imposing tariffs on trading partners received a setback. In May, the US Court of International Trade ruled that using the International Economic Emergency Powers Act by the US President and imposing tariffs was illegal.'The president can only pursue tariffs under one of two different mechanisms. One is to say that it is a national emergency and another is to say that it is a threat to national security,' said Lavin.'He was pursuing the national emergency side and that's what the court said last week, that they put a stay on that. So, now the second side is this, the so-called 232 investigations,' he highlighted that the investigation, if initiated by the US Commerce Department, will take about a year to be completed.