Canada's Conservatives are flirting with danger
One vote. That's all that separated the Liberal and Bloc Quebecois candidates in the riding of Terrebonne after a judicial recount that moved the Liberals one seat closer to a majority government. Unfortunately, it's also apparently all that separated some Conservative Party of Canada candidates from flirting with election conspiracy theories — the very sort that now defines the MAGA brand of conservatism they spent the election disavowing.
Michelle Ferreri, the former CPC MP for Peterborough (who, it should be said, lost by almost 10,000 votes), fed this dangerous beast with a recent social media post. 'One vote,' it said, followed by three rolling eyes emojis. Ron Chhinzer, the defeated CPC candidate in Oakville-East, also hinted at his own skepticism of the result. 'One vote, eh?'
There was far less nudging and winking coming from the online influencers, social media warriors and digital outrage farmers that have long formed a key part of Pierre Poilievre's political base. They have far fewer qualms about embracing the idea that the election was being rigged, whether by Elections Canada or the Liberal government, and that Canada's election process couldn't be trusted. After trying to undermine the legitimacy of Poilievre's defeat in Carleton with a series of discredited and debunked theories, they've apparently moved on to questioning the entire democratic process.
If that sounds like an echo of the MAGA universe's attitude towards elections their party doesn't win, well, it should. Former MP and Canadian Alliance leader Stockwell Day suggested that the growing use of mail-in ballots poses a risk of — you guessed it — election fraud. That's both a clear callback to the MAGA universe's favourite conspiracy theory about the 2020 election and a warning that the virus of know-nothing Trumpism is actively spreading on our side of the border.
In fairness, there are some high-profile Conservatives who are willing to set the record straight here. Nick Kouvalis, the founder of Campaign Research and longtime Doug Ford insider, patiently explained how the process of judicial recounts work on his own social media account. 'All parties have the time and the resources — especially the CPC — to send their best lawyers to the judicial recount and have full participation throughout that process,' he wrote. 'Maybe the Conservative Party can speak to their supporters in an official capacity and explain what happened in the court-ordered review?'
Dimitris Soudas, the former executive director of the Conservative Party of Canada and director of communications to Stephen Harper, also took a swipe at the people trying to peddle conspiracy theories about the result. 'Stolen election in Terrebonne? Please — that recount was watched more closely than a toddler holding scissors. Ben Hur, his chariot crew, and half of Rome were practically leaning over every ballot.'
The problem is that the Conservatives stepping up to knock down these sorts of conspiracy theories aren't the elected ones — much less the highest-profile ones. De-facto leader Pierre Poilievre hasn't said a word about it. Neither has interim leader Andrew Scheer, who will lead the CPC caucus until Poilievre inevitably wins his by-election in the safest Conservative riding in Canada. The more credible media sources that feed the Conservative political community in Canada, whether it's Postmedia or The Hub, have been equally quiet here.
Whether it's about Pierre Poilievre's riding or the recount results in Terrebonne, Conservatives are now openly second-guessing the legitimacy of Canada's recent election. They might want to think about how that's worked out for the Republican Party.
Maybe it's because Conservative leaders are afraid of the people they've chosen to serve and represent — after all, they've seen leader after leader turfed by the fringes. Maybe it's because they don't care about the risks to democracy posed by conspiracy theories about election fraud and vote rigging. Either way, it's a form of political negligence that could have serious consequences — not just for Canada but the Conservative movement that wants to lead it one day.
They've seen what the MAGA movement has done to their more sensible Republican peers to the south, from the openly defiant (Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger) to the quietly submissive (Mitch McConnell, Bill Cassidy). Letting that brand of politics into their party will not end well for them, least of all the ones who believe in things like facts and decency. Like so many Republicans, Canada's Conservatives might try to convince themselves that embracing Trump's toxic populism is a means to their broader political end. If they're not careful here, they might also find out that it has its own ends in mind.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
3 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
GOLDSTEIN: Liberals' clean energy crusade has been a super disaster
The U.S. has cut emissions at almost double Canada's rate, without imposing a national carbon tax Get the latest from Lorrie Goldstein straight to your inbox Prime Minister Mark Carney answers a question during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. Photo by Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS Before Prime Minister Mark Carney attempts to turn Canada into a clean energy superpower he needs to explain why a decade of Liberal government policies intended to achieve this have been a massive failure on every front. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account According to the Liberal government's own estimate, as of April 2023 it had spent or committed over $200 billion of taxpayers' money to 149 government programs addressing climate change. In terms of the primary goal of this spending, reducing Canada's industrial greenhouse gas emissions to at least 40% below 2005 levels by 2030, the latest available government data from 2023 shows emissions were just 8.5% below 2005 levels. Achieving the Liberals' 2030 target will require the equivalent of eliminating all annual emissions from Canada's transportation and building sectors in seven years, which would inevitably cause a massive recession. When environmental commissioner Jerry V. DeMarco audited 20 of the government's 149 programs, he found fewer than half were on track to achieve their goals and of 32 additional measures the government claimed would assist in reaching the 2030 target, only seven were new. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. His audit uncovered examples where two different government programs were funding the same projects and reporting the same expected emission cuts, raising the possibility of double counting. Read More DeMarco said the government's lack of transparency in reporting emissions made it impossible for the average citizen to understand its claims. The computer modelling used to estimate emissions was also out of date and 'recent decreases to projected 2030 emissions were not due to climate action taken by governments, but were instead because of revisions to the data used in modelling.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. DeMarco noted that aside from falling far short of its emission targets, Canada has the worst record of reducing emissions of any member of the G7, including the U.S. The U.S. has cut emissions at almost double Canada's rate, without imposing a national carbon tax. In terms of getting value for money, auditor general Karen Hogan reported last year that in one of the government's 149 climate programs – the now-disbanded $1-billion Sustainable Development Technology Fund – there were 90 cases where conflict-of-interest rules were ignored in awarding $76 million worth of government contracts and 10 cases where $56 million was awarded to ineligible projects. DeMarco reported last week that despite spending over $6.6 billion on government programs to help Canadians adapt to more severe weather caused by climate change since 2015, the Liberals' national adaptation strategy, released in 2023, lacked essential elements to make it effective and progress since then has been slow. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Parliamentary budget officer Yves Giroux last year estimated the cost of government subsidies to Canada's auto sector to manufacture electric vehicles and batteries at up to $52.5 billion on 13 major projects – $31.4 billion, or 60%, paid by federal taxpayers and $21.1 billion, or 40%, paid by provincial taxpayers in Ontario and Quebec. That's $6.3 billion more than the announced investments of $46.1 billion the auto sector is contributing to these projects, with many now delayed due to slower than anticipated EV sales. While Canada's employment rate and economic growth are influenced by many factors, the Liberals have repeatedly promised since coming to power in 2015 that government spending on their climate policies would lead to significant increases in jobs and economic growth, which has not been the case. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Statistics Canada reported earlier this month that Canada's unemployment rate rose to 7% in May, the highest it's been since September 2016, excluding the 2020 and 2021 pandemic years, and a 12.9% increase from 6.2% a year ago in May. RECOMMENDED VIDEO When DeMarco reported in 2023 on the Liberals' so-called 'just transition' plan to assist energy sector workers to retrain for Canada's new green economy, he concluded it didn't exist, despite the government having promised it in 2019. 'We found that as Canada shifts focus to low-carbon alternatives, the government is not prepared to provide appropriate support to … workers in the fossil fuel sector,' DeMarco said. 'The transition was being handled on a business-as-usual basis, relying on existing program mechanisms such as the employment insurance program to deliver support.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. (Eventually the Liberals passed what they called the Canadian Sustainable Jobs Act in 2024, with many of these concerns still outstanding.) In terms of economic growth, Statistics Canada reported earlier this year that Canada's real GDP per capita, which measures economic output per person, adjusted for inflation, and is a widely accepted metric for measuring the standard of living, fell by 1.4% in 2024, following a decline of 1.3% in 2023. Over its near-decade in power, Canada's economic growth under the Liberals has been the lowest since the government of R.B. Bennett during the Great Depression. lgoldstein@ World Sunshine Girls Golf World Sunshine Girls


CTV News
5 hours ago
- CTV News
Nanos on the Number: What's behind decline in support for Poilievre?
Watch Support for CPC Leader Poilievre is declining. Pollster Nik Nanos has the latest on polling numbers.


Calgary Herald
6 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Bell: Good news? Danielle Smith and Mark Carney now talking big energy projects for Alberta
Well what do have here from the office of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith? Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney and Smith have now both named teams of negotiators 'for the purpose of collaborating on the advancement of major energy projects of national interest that involve Alberta.' Article content Article content The teams involve cabinet ministers and senior officials appointed to this 'federal-provincial Table.' Article content Article content In the case of Alberta, Smith has already said the team is two cabinet ministers — Jason Nixon and Rajan Sawhney — and two deputy ministers and Rob Anderson, the premier's right-hand man. Article content Article content Now a lot of what Smith said at the Global Energy Show in Calgary in answer to questions from the scribbler makes sense. Article content In Calgary, Smith said there are 'ways we can find accommodation' with Carney. Article content Along with the premier wanting a bitumen pipeline to the port of Prince Rupert in B.C., Alberta will also want changes to anti-oil policies cooked up when Justin Trudeau was the Liberal prime minister. Article content 'He has to say he's not having the emissions cap and that means not bringing it in. Not acting would be a positive,' says the premier. Article content Article content No Liberal cap on oil and gas emissions is one of the nine demands Smith has made to Carney. Article content Smith said in the past you can't really build more pipelines and increase oil production in a big way and have the cap. Article content Then there's the tanker ban off the west coast. How about only lifting the tanker ban around Prince Rupert? Article content 'On the issue of the tanker ban, maybe we come to an agreement that if all roads lead to the port of Prince Rupert just carve out Prince Rupert so you can protect the rest of the coast. I can live with that,' said Smith. Article content Article content Article content 'If he can accept that then I think we have some common ground.'