
Rights group says global brands are at risk of links to forced labor in China's minerals industry
LONDON (AP) — Several global brands are among dozens of companies at risk of using forced labor through their Chinese supply chains because they use critical minerals or buy minerals-based products sourced from China's far-western Xinjiang region, an international rights group said Wednesday.
The report by the Netherlands-based Global Rights Compliance says companies including Avon, Walmart, Nescafe, Coca-Cola and paint supplier Sherwin-Williams may be linked to titanium sourced from Xinjiang, where rights groups allege the Chinese government runs coercive labor practices targeting predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and other Turkic minorities.
The report comes as China and the United States, the world's two largest economies, continue talks aimed at easing their trade dispute.
The report found 77 Chinese suppliers in the titanium, lithium, beryllium and magnesium industries operating in Xinjiang. It said the suppliers are at risk of participating in the Chinese government's 'labor transfer programs,' in which Uyghurs are forced to work in factories as part of a longstanding campaign of assimilation and mass detention.
Commercial paints, thermos cups and components for the aerospace, auto and defense industries are among products sold internationally that can trace their supply chains to minerals from Xinjiang, the report said. It said companies must review their supply chains.
'Mineral mining and processing in (Xinjiang) rely in part on the state's forced labor programs for Uyghurs and other Turkic people in the region,' the report said.
The named companies did not immediately comment on the report.
A 2022 United Nations report found China may have committed crimes against humanity in Xinjiang, where more than 1 million Uyghurs are estimated to have been arbitrarily detained as part of measures the Chinese government said were intended to target terrorism and separatism.
The Chinese government has rejected the U.N. claims and defended its actions in Xinjiang as fighting terror and ensuring stability.
In 2021, former U.S. President Joe Biden signed a law to block imports from the Xinjiang region unless businesses can prove the items were made without forced labor. The law initially targeted solar products, tomatoes, cotton and apparel, but the U.S. government recently added new sectors for enforcement, including aluminum and seafood.
A recent report by the International Energy Agency said the world's sources of critical minerals are increasingly concentrated in a few countries, notably China, which is also a leading refining and processing base for lithium, cobalt, graphite and other minerals.
Many of China's major minerals corporations have invested in the exploration and mining of lithium, a key component for electric vehicle batteries, in Xinjiang, Global Rights Compliance said. Xinjiang is also China's top source of beryllium, a mineral used for aerospace, defense and telecommunications, its report said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tuniu: Q1 Earnings Snapshot
NANJING, China (AP) — NANJING, China (AP) — Tuniu Corp. (TOUR) on Thursday reported a loss of $648,000 in its first quarter. On a per-share basis, the Nanjing, China-based company said it had a loss of 1 cent. Earnings, adjusted for non-recurring costs, were less than 1 cent on a per-share basis. The online travel company posted revenue of $16.2 million in the period. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights ( using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on TOUR at


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Tuniu: Q1 Earnings Snapshot
NANJING, China — NANJING, China — Tuniu Corp. (TOUR) on Thursday reported a loss of $648,000 in its first quarter. On a per-share basis, the Nanjing, China-based company said it had a loss of 1 cent. Earnings, adjusted for non-recurring costs, were less than 1 cent on a per-share basis. The online travel company posted revenue of $16.2 million in the period. _____ This story was generated by Automated Insights ( using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on TOUR at


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
AI: The Overinvestment Bubble Or The Fungible Opportunity?
Tom Traugott, SVP of Emerging Technologies at EdgeCore Digital Infrastructure. In 1986, Warren Buffett famously outlined his goal "to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful." Several weeks since Nvidia's annual GTC conference, I can't help but think of this phrase when layering the excitement, growth and optimism of everything that is AI from that week on top of recent heightened economic uncertainty, market panic and fear at consumer and business levels. At GTC, Nvidia's Jensen Huang captured this tension with some key quotes in his own right. On the optimistic side: "The more you buy, the more you save. It's even better than that. Now, the more you buy, the more you make." On the disruptive side: "I'm the chief revenue destroyer"—in speaking to the major performance gains of new Blackwell chips over previous Hopper chips, and that older generation chips' value has plummeted as a result (perhaps not that different from the price of a 2024 new car when 2025 gets announced). On January 27, 2025, markets reacted negatively in response to the wider availability of the Chinese firm DeepSeek's low-cost R1 model, prompting pundits to amplify concerns about an 'AI bubble' of overinvestment, which continues in the midst of economic uncertainties with revenue generation an increasing focal point versus the R&D-like investment in training large models. Yet, the rapid evolution of every AI model, from ChatGPT and Gemini to Grok and Claude, not to mention the promise of an agentic service such as Manus AI, points to only greater innovation and capabilities to come. What's a data center developer or cloud provider to do? Lessons found from past turbulent times may be instructive, and for that, my mind goes back to 2008 and the Great Financial Crisis. In tracking the sale of Lehman Brothers' two data centers, Rich Miller, founder and former editor-at-large of Data Center Frontier, pointed out that "the $330 million valuation for the two data centers is also higher than the $250 million valuation of Lehman's North American investment banking and trading unit." This marks for me a turning point for the data center industry. Why? When the GFC hit in 2008, enterprises began to accelerate the outsourcing of IT infrastructure to third parties, choosing to focus on core business competencies and preserve capital for other uses, such as revenue generation and business expansion, not noncore facilities. Internet and tech companies began leasing data center capacity from the outset, focusing on value creation up the stack. I'm a believer in the continued value of technology assets—and while the AI boom has put pressure on the adaptive reuse and value of existing facilities available now, the pressure has also heightened the need to dramatically increase the size of investment in data center and energy infrastructure to support what's next. But what is the sweet spot for investment that isn't misguided? For that, a more recent answer emerges from an article in the MIT Technology Review describing the glut of data centers in China prompted by the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022. To prepare for the AI boom, China mobilized to spur significant investment across the country, and from 2023 to 2024, over 500 new development projects were announced across the country, with 150 built by 2024. A critical insight from the article was that the surge of development came from 144 companies targeting LLM training, but that at the end of 2024, only 10% of those companies continued to focus on LLM development. What's the lesson here? It's one that was very much present at GTC 2025 and was highlighted by Jensen Huang repeatedly. AI's revenue-generating promise manifests itself in all that is inference—and this is what is instructive about China's overbuild; it was more so in remote locations that were purpose-built for asynchronous training yet lacked the proximity and low-latency connectivity that inference demands. A panel comprised of top hyperscalers at GTC discussing lessons learned as part of building 100,000-plus GPU clusters generally reached consensus on the right answer: fungibility of infrastructure. The panel discussed this emerging best practice and explained that a large cluster of GPUs may need to serve multiple purposes, and may end up doing so dynamically, shifting from training to inference in the same cluster. GPU buildouts should therefore include the higher memory and storage that inference requires from the outset, along with the associated power and cooling requirements needed to expand their usability. Furthermore, the data center campus may continue to integrate with traditional cloud services, bringing fungibility forward as a key consideration as well. So, to be greedy in the current climate of fear, my recommendation is to follow Jensen's advice: Buy more to make more, but make data center investments in locations that provide access to scale, density and low-latency proximity to key population centers and cloud regions. This ensures a multipronged path to revenues, which ultimately is the pragmatic answer in times of economic uncertainty, affirming that investment in AI infrastructure isn't a bubble but a prudent decision to make. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?