US citizen who joined Islamic State in Syria is sentenced to 10 years in prison
WASHINGTON (AP) — A naturalized U.S. citizen who pleaded guilty to receiving military training from the Islamic State group was sentenced Monday to 10 years in federal prison.
Lirim Sylejmani, 49, engaged in at least one battle against U.S.-led forces after he entered Syria in 2015, according to prosecutors.
U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras in Washington, D.C., imposed Sylejmani's prison sentence followed by a lifetime of supervised release.
Sylejmani, who was born in Kosovo and moved to Chicago roughly 25 years ago, pleaded guilty last December to one count of receiving military training from a foreign terrorist organization.
In November 2015, Sylejmani and his family flew to Turkey and then crossed the border into Syria, where he began training with other IS recruits, according to prosecutors. They said he was injured in a battle with Syrian forces in June 2016 and was captured with his family in Baghouz, Syria, in February 2019.
'The conduct is far more than a single, impulsive act. He chose to jeopardize the safety of his family by bringing them to a war-torn country to join and take up arms for ISIS,' prosecutors wrote.
Sylejmani's attorneys say he isn't a 'committed jihadist' and doesn't espouse violence.
'He is guilt ridden for his actions and the harm he has visited on his family, who remain detained in a refugee camp in Syria living under terrible conditions,' his lawyers wrote. 'He wishes only to complete his time and find his wife and children, so he can live an average law-abiding life with them.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
Here Are The Republicans Changing Their Minds About Trump's Policy Bill
Some Republicans said they were unaware of certain provisions in the massive Trump policy bill that passed the House last month and threatened to vote against it when it returns to the lower chamber after revisions in the Senate, throwing its future into doubt. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., speaks to reporters as she arrives for a closed-door meeting ... More with House Republicans, at the Republican National Committee office on Capitol Hill on March 25, 2025, in Washington, DC. (Photo by DREW ANGERER/AFP via Getty Images) Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said Tuesday she wouldn't have voted for the bill if she knew a provision to block states from regulating artificial intelligence for the next 10 years was included, writing on X that she is 'adamantly OPPOSED' to the measure, calling it 'a violation of state rights.' Greene said she won't vote for the legislation again if the Senate doesn't remove the moratorium, though proponents of the provision, such as Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., have said it's designed to motivate Congress to adopt national artificial intelligence regulation, arguing a patchwork of state rules complicates development, according to The Intercept. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., also said during a town hall meeting in his district last week he wouldn't have voted for the bill if he knew it included a provision that would make it more burdensome for federal judges to hold people in contempt. 'I'm not going to hide the truth, this provision was unknown to me when I voted for that bill,' Flood said. The provision would require judges to set bonds for parties in federal civil suits seeking a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order to cover any costs that might be incurred if the injunction or restraining order were overturned. Advocates of the provision claim it's designed to prevent frivolous lawsuits, while opponents allege it's designed to protect Trump and his allies if they violate court orders, according to The New York Times. Elon Musk has strongly come out against the bill in recent days. He ripped the legislation in a series of more than a dozen X posts this week, calling it a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled . . . disgusting abomination.' He also appeared to threaten Republicans who voted for it, suggesting voters would remove them from office in next year's midterms. Congress has set a goal to have what's formally known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' on President Donald Trump's desk by July 4, though it's expected to undergo significant changes in the upper chamber and be sent back to the House before Trump signs it. Multiple Republican senators, including Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., have said it adds too much to the federal deficit, while others, such as Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., have expressed concerns about cuts to Medicaid. Assuming all Democrats vote against the bill, Republicans can afford to lose no more than three votes to pass the bill. The House approved the legislation in a 215-214 vote on May 22, with only two Republicans, Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, voting against the bill, while three others voted 'present.' Trump personally lobbied Republican holdouts to approve the bill, and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., spearheaded several last-minute changes, including raising the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction rate and moving up the deadline for Medicaid work requirements. The legislation would also deliver on some of Trump's campaign promises, including ending taxes on tips and overtime, extending his 2017 tax cuts and additional funding for border security. Trump's Signature Policy Agenda Passes House After Last-Minute Revisions Including SALT Cap Increase (Forbes) 'Disgusting Abomination': Musk Turns On Trump—Rips Policy Bill In New Angry Rant (Forbes) Here's Where Medicaid Cuts Stand In Trump's Mega-Bill—Affecting More Than 7 Million Americans (Forbes)
Fox News
37 minutes ago
- Fox News
Massie calls on Elon Musk to fund primary challenges against Republicans who backed Trump tax bill
Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., said Elon Musk should fund primary challenges against almost every Republican who voted for President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" last week. "I don't primary my colleagues, but I feel pretty good about him doing it," Massie told Fox News Digital on Wednesday. "There's a few others that should be spared," when asked to clarify if he meant all 215 House Republicans who supported the legislation. "But people want term limits, right? Elon can bring term limits." Musk came out against the massive Trump agenda bill that House Republicans passed last week. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," Musk first posted. It was followed by several posts on the national debt, and one that read, "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people." Massie said on Wednesday, "I just think he made one mistake when misstatement – he said take them out in November. I would take them out in primaries if I were Elon Musk." Both House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and the White House have closed ranks around the legislation. Johnson issued a rare forceful response to Musk from the podium of his weekly press conference on Wednesday, calling the billionaire "flat wrong." "Elon and I left on a great note. We were texting one another, you know, happy texts, you know, Monday and then, and then yesterday, you know, 24 hours later, he does a 180, and he comes out and opposed the bill," Johnson told reporters. "And it surprised me, frankly. And, I don't take it personal…I think he's way off on this, and I've told him as much, and, I've said it publicly and privately." The massive budget reconciliation bill is aimed at advancing Trump's priorities on taxes, immigration, energy, defense and the debt limit. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected it would add $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit over 10 years, but House GOP leaders have dismissed that modeling as inaccurate representations of economic growth. Massie was one of three House Republicans to vote against the bill. Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, also voted "no," while House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris, R-Md., voted "present." Massie is also no stranger to clashing with both Trump and Johnson. He has faced primary threats from the former and led an unsuccessful bid to remove the latter from House leadership. Massie has been consistent, however, in his opposition to legislation that would have any chance of adding to the federal debt – now currently nearly $37 trillion. Republican supporters of the bill, however, have contended that it is the best possible vehicle to radically reform government programs plagued with waste, fraud and abuse, and restore much-needed funding to the border, while extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts. However, the legislation is now in the Senate, where Republicans have already signaled they would want to see changes to the final bill. Fox News Digital reached out to the National Republican Congressional Committee for comment on Massie's remarks.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
The Smithsonian faces an existential crisis. The world is watching.
When the National Portrait Gallery was created by an act of Congress in 1962, the authorizing legislation defined portraiture as 'painted or sculptured likenesses.' And when it referred to the future directors of that museum, which is part of the Smithsonian Institution, it was with exclusively male pronouns. 'His appointment and salary,' the text read, would be fixed by the Smithsonian's Board of Regents.
