'How Is That Fair?': Victoria Derbyshire Confronts Wes Streeting Over Labour's 'Two-Tier' Welfare Plan
Victoria Derbyshire accused Labour of implementing a 'two-tier' benefits system as she confronted Wes Streeting over the plans.
Keir Starmer was forced to make major changes to his government's blueprint for slashing billions from the welfare budget following a backbench rebellion.
Under the new plan, current recipients of personal independence payments (PIP) and universal credit will continue to get the same amount of money.
However, those who claim in the future will receive less.
On the BBC this morning, presenter Derbyshire read out the views of one viewer, called Matt.
She said: 'The big concern from a lot of people, including Matt, one of our viewers, is that you are creating a two-tier system.
'He says 'I still don't understand the logic of applying cuts to future applicants. Is that just so there are fewer people who are directly affected to protest the cuts?'. How is it fair that there's a two-tier system?'
Streeting, the health secretary, replied: 'You can say that about a number of other systems.'
But Derbyshire interrupted to tell him: 'I'm asking about this.'
Streeting snapped back: 'Yeah well I'm answering the question, which is when things change and evolve, as you bring in new systems, it does change sometimes from group to group, student finance being an example.'
Derbyshire then asked: 'My question is how is that fair?'
Streeting said the government needed to make sure the welfare system is 'sustainable'.
He said: 'Even before the changes were made this week, the cost of the welfare bill is growing enormously. There's a real risk to it, both in terms of financial sustainability and democratic support and legitimacy.'
Disability Charities Urge MPs To Defeat Starmer's Plans For 'Two-Tier' Welfare System
Keir Starmer's Authority In Tatters After Humiliating U-Turn On Welfare Cuts
'Has He Got A Grip?': Naga Munchetty Skewers Minister After Starmer's Welfare U-Turn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
44 minutes ago
- New York Times
A Year After ‘Loveless Landslide,' U.K. Leader Is Even Less Popular
A year ago this week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain swept into 10 Downing Street with a landslide majority of 172 seats. As his first anniversary approached, more than 120 of those Labour Party members of Parliament threatened to vote down their leader's signature welfare legislation. It has been that kind of year for Mr. Starmer. Though he made hasty concessions last week to keep the bill on track, the mutiny makes clear what a reversal of fortune the prime minister has suffered. Stung by political missteps, sapped by a weak economy, and distracted by foreign crises that have put a heavy strain on public finances, Mr. Starmer's government has yet to get off the ground. Labour now consistently trails Reform U.K., an insurgent, anti-immigrant party, in the polls. While he is under no immediate threat to his leadership, and the next election is not expected until 2029, Mr. Starmer's personal approval rating has collapsed, even among Labour voters. There is no shortage of people with ideas about how Mr. Starmer can turn things around, from sharper messaging to savvier management of his M.P.'s. But some are coalescing around a deceptively simple argument: his cautious, workmanlike centrist government needs to pivot to the left. 'They have to do something,' said Stanley B. Greenberg, a prominent American pollster and Democratic strategist who advised Bill Clinton, as well as Tony Blair and a host of other politicians in Britain and the United States. 'I see them only stagnating or losing ground with their current vision.' Mr. Greenberg, who is not advising this government, commissioned a poll of 2,048 adults in Britain earlier this month by YouGov Blue, a market-research firm that works with Democratic candidates in the United States. He said the results showed that Labour's best chance to repair its position was to attract voters from the left-of-center Liberal Democrat and Green parties. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Canada drops tech tax to restart US trade talks
Canada has scrapped a tax on big US technology firms, just hours before it was due to come into force, to allow trade talks between the two countries to restart. On Friday, US President Donald Trump called off negotiations over a trade deal, describing the tax as a "blatant attack", and threatened higher tariffs on imports from Canada. In response, Canada has said it is removing the tax, which should have come into effect on Monday. The digital services tax (DST) would have meant US tech giants including Amazon, Meta, Google and Apple, facing a 3% charge on Canadian revenue above $20m. Canada's finance minister François-Philippe Champagne issued a statement saying the tax would be rescinded. "The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians," it said. "Canada's preference has always been a multilateral agreement related to digital services taxation," the statement added. Many countries, including the UK, are changing how they tax large multinational technology firms, which have millions of customers and advertisers around the world, but high corporation tax bills due to the way their businesses are structured. It was estimated that Canada's tax would cost the tech giants more than $2bn a year in total. Trump, who has forged a close relationship with tech company owners in his second term in office, has pushed back against such taxes. He described Canada's policy as "egregious" adding "economically we have such power over Canada". Three quarters of Canada's goods exports go to the US, worth more than $400bn a year, while Canada takes just 17% of US production. Canada's climbdown comes after a rollercoaster few months for US-Canada relations. Shortly after taking office Trump threatened to impose sweeping new tariffs and even to annex the US's northern neighbour. The antagonism helped propel Canada's Liberal Party, led by former central banker, Mark Carney, back into power. Since then there appeared to be a rapprochement, with Canada and the US saying they aimed to agree new trade terms by 21 July. UK-US tariff deal begins but still no news on steel 'We have all the cards' - Trump says he is ending Canada trade talks What tariffs has Trump announced and why?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The major PIP and universal credit changes in Labour's benefits bill, explained
The government will outline the concessions to its controversial welfare reform bill on Monday in the hope of averting an embarrassing rebellion in a crunch House of Commons vote. Between 50 and 60 Labour MPs are reportedly still planning to vote against the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in its second reading on Tuesday. This is despite a stunning U-turn by the government before the weekend, when it said it would water down or scrap a number of the bill's proposals. Originally, the government had hoped to slash about £5bn from the UK's benefits bill with significant changes to rules on personal independence payments (PIP) and universal credit (UC). About 126 Labour MPs had voiced their disapproval at the planned cuts to benefits for disabled people, and had planned a reasoned amendment to the bill that would have scuppered its progress. And while that scenario appears to have been avoided, with about half of those MPs now planning to back the altered bill, the government did not rule out further changes. On Monday, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms will publish details of a review of the PIP assessment, which the government says is "co-produced with disabled people". Health secretary Wes Streeting refused to rule out further changes following the publication of the Timms review, telling BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme "we have got to listen" on PIP. The government will amend the bill at the Commons committee stage to put the changes in place . Welfare reforms laid out in the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill – as the draft law is known – were announced in March this year. They included controversial reforms to tighten the eligibility criteria for disabled people receiving PIP. Applications for PIP are based on an assessment of a person's ability to complete everyday tasks, such as washing or preparing food. Some estimates had suggested more than one million people could lose out if changes to these eligibility tests were approved. And in the wake of growing outrage among its own MPS, the government has now promised to protect payments to existing claimants, with the new rules only applying to new claimants from November 2026. In a letter to MPs, work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said: 'We recognise the proposed changes have been a source of uncertainty and anxiety. 'We will ensure that all of those currently receiving PIP will stay within the current system. The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only." In his review of PIP assessments, "co-produced" with disabled people, disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms will say that £300m in employment support will also be brought forward over the next three years. Universal credit (UC) is the main benefit for working-age people and is currently worth about £400 per month to a single person aged over 25. Someone with disability – or long-term health condition that limits their ability to work – could potentially see this more than double, with payments for incapacity worth an extra £423.27 per month. Previously, changes would have limited eligibility for the incapacity top-up limited to claimants aged over 22. The value of the top-up was also due to fall significantly by 2030 for new claimants and be frozen for new applicants. Ministers have now promised payments to UC health benefits claimants will be "fully protected in real terms". From next year to 2030, all those who already receive the health element of universal credit – and new claimants with severe conditions and 12 months or less to live – will see an annual rise to their combined standard and limited capacity for work allowance at least in line with inflation. In her letter to MPs, Kendall said: "l adjust the pathway of universal credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element – and any new claimant meeting the severe conditions criteria – have their incomes fully protected in real terms.' In addition, 200,000 people with the most severe, lifelong conditions who are unlikely to recover will not be called for a universal credit reassessment. Changes to the existing regimes for PIP and universal credit are expected to remain, but will apply to new applicants only, with existing claimants protected. Changes to assessments for PIP are also expected to go ahead, but ministers have offered further concessions to rebels on this in the form of the Timms review. A merger of jobseeker's allowance and employment and support allowances is also still expected to go ahead, as is a "right to try" initiative to encourage people back into the workplace. For the first time, draft regulations for the 'right to try' will be laid in parliament, to enshrine in law the right for people receiving health and disability benefits to try work without fear of reassessment. The £300m in employment support announced by Timms will be brought forward over the next three years, the government says, part of its commitment to spend £1bn per year by the end of the decade helping disabled people find work, something that is due to remain in the bill. The bill had also been slated to include inflation-busting rises to universal credit payments over the next four years.
