logo
Senate Republicans propose alternative to scale back AI provision in Trump bill

Senate Republicans propose alternative to scale back AI provision in Trump bill

Yahoo9 hours ago

WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans modified language around a controversial artificial intelligence provision in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and domestic policy bill after it prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans.
AI has long been a subject of controversy due to national security and child safety risks posed by the technology, including the rise of deepfakes, misinformation and scams. The Trump administration's stance on AI has largely aligned with that of companies, arguing that regulation would stymie innovation. But the provision in the bill has been a point of contention among lawmakers as many contend that AI technology is still new and needs to be under state regulation.
The provision in the House bill passed by the lower chamber on May 22 would have prohibited states from enforcing any law or regulation 'limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating" AI models, AI systems or automated decision systems affecting trade, transportation or traffic for a ten year period.
Republicans on the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, however, released their draft text of Trump's bill on June 5 proposing to tie the ban to federal funding. States who comply with the decade-long AI regulation freeze can receive grant money from the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program.
The program is a $42.45 billion initiative to expand high-speed Internet access nationwide, according to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. The Senate proposal says that grantees can use the funds to 'construct and deploy infrastructure' regarding AI systems.
The Senate proposal is a large step away from the original provision, which lawmakers across the aisle raised concerns about.
Conservative firebrand Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she wouldn't have voted for the House bill if she'd known about it. 'We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous,' she wrote in a tweet on June 3.
California Democrat Rep. Ted Lieu, vice chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said at a presser on June 4: 'I agree with Marjorie Taylor Greene once every hundred years. This is that time.'
Texas Rep. Greg Casar, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, argued that 'writing big tech companies a blank check to exploit AI however they want - that's contrary to what the vast majority of American people want.'
Though House Freedom Caucus member Texas Rep. Chip Roy voted in favor of the bill, he echoed similar sentiments, telling reporters that governors should be able to 'protect their own constituencies, particularly on a technology that is very new and fluid.'
It still remains to be seen whether the proposal will be included in the final version of the Senate bill before it is voted on by lawmakers. Trump and GOP leaders have set a self-imposed deadline of July 4 to try to get the tax bill through both chambers of Congress and to the president's desk for signature into law.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Senate GOP propose alternative to AI provision in Trump bill

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police Officers Protest Pride After Being Barred From Marching With Guns
Police Officers Protest Pride After Being Barred From Marching With Guns

New York Times

time22 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Police Officers Protest Pride After Being Barred From Marching With Guns

Clusters of New York police officers stood sentry along the Pride March route on Fifth Avenue on Sunday, in full uniform and armed, watching the parade go by as they do every year. Nearby, dozens of their colleagues gathered behind metal barricades in protest. Some wore their uniforms; others wore polo shirts and hoisted signs emblazoned with rainbows and slogans like 'Let gay cops back into Pride March' and 'Our uniform is our protest.' Behind them, a truck bore a large digital screen with the message 'We will not be erased.' The demonstration was organized by the Gay Officers Action League, an L.B.G.T.Q. police group that has been barred from marching in New York City Pride since 2021. Starting in 1996, groups of uniformed police and corrections officers in New York marched in the parade every year. But the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement made the involvement of the police in festivities in New York and elsewhere in North America increasingly contentious. In 2021, Heritage of Pride, which organizes Pride events in New York, barred the police from marching as a group, part of wave of similar measures that followed the murder of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers in May 2020. Since then, officers in many cities have been allowed back into local Pride marches. But in New York, Heritage of Pride did not take action to lift the ban, which was slated to expire in 2025. Two weeks before the parade, Brian Downey, a detective and the president of the Gay Officers Action League, known as GOAL, said Heritage leaders told him that officers could march again on one condition: that they leave their guns at home. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Trump says he's not planning to extend a pause on global tariffs beyond July 9
Trump says he's not planning to extend a pause on global tariffs beyond July 9

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he's not planning to extend a pause on global tariffs beyond July 9

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he is not planning to extend a 90-day pause on tariffs on most nations beyond July 9, when the negotiating period he set would expire, and his administration will notify countries that the trade penalties will take effect unless there are deals with the United States. Letters will start going out 'pretty soon" before the approaching deadline, he said. 'We'll look at how a country treats us — are they good, are they not so good — some countries we don't care, we'll just send a high number out,' Trump told Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures" during a wide-ranging interview taped Friday and broadcast Sunday. Those letters, he said, would say, 'Congratulations, we're allowing you to shop in the United States of America, you're going to pay a 25% tariff, or a 35% or a 50% or 10%.' Trump had played down the deadline at a White House news conference Friday by noting how difficult it would be to work out separate deals with each nation. The administration had set a goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days. Negotiations continue, but 'there's 200 countries, you can't talk to all of them,' he said in the interview. Trump also discussed a potential TikTok deal, relations with China, the strikes on Iran and his immigration crackdown. Here are the key takeaways: Few details on possible TikTok deal A group of wealthy investors will make an offer to buy TikTok, Trump said, hinting at a deal that could safeguard the future of the popular social media platform, which is owned by China's ByteDance. 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way. I think I'll need, probably, China approval, and I think President Xi (Jinping) will probably do it,' Trump said. Trump did not offer any details about the investors, calling them 'a group of very wealthy people.' 'I'll tell you in about two weeks,' he said when asked for specifics. It's a time frame Trump often cites, most recently about a decision on whether the U.S. military would get directly involved in the war between Israel and Iran. The U.S. struck Iranian nuclear sites just days later. Earlier this month, Trump signed an executive order to keep TikTok running in the U.S. for 90 more days to give his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership. It is the third time Trump extended the deadline. The first one was through an executive order on Jan. 20, his first day in office, after the platform went dark briefly when a national ban — approved by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court — took effect. Trump insists US 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities U.S. strikes on Iran 'obliterated' its nuclear facilities, Trump insisted, and he said whoever leaked a preliminary intelligence assessment suggesting Tehran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months should be prosecuted. Trump said Iran was 'weeks away' from achieving a nuclear weapon before he ordered the strikes. 'It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before,' Trump said. 'And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions, at least for a period of time.' Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said Sunday on X that Trump "exaggerated to cover up and conceal the truth." Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, told CBS' 'Face the Nation' that his country's nuclear program is peaceful and that uranium 'enrichment is our right, and an inalienable right and we want to implement this right' under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. 'I think that enrichment will not — never stop.' Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said on CBS that 'it is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage." Grossi also said the U.N. nuclear watchdog has faced pressure to report that Iran had a nuclear weapon or was close to one, but 'we simply didn't because this was not what we were seeing.' Of the leak of the intelligence assessment, Trump said anyone found to be responsible should be prosecuted. Journalists who received it should be asked who their source was, he said: 'You have to do that and I suspect we'll be doing things like that.' His press secretary said Thursday that the administration is investigating the matter. A 'temporary pass' for immigration raids on farms and hotels? As he played up his immigration crackdown, Trump offered a more nuanced view when it comes to farm and hotel workers. 'I'm the strongest immigration guy that there's ever been, but I'm also the strongest farmer guy that there's ever been,' the Republican president said. He noted that he wants to deport criminals, but it's a problem when farmers lose their laborers and it destroys their businesses. Trump said his administration is working on 'some kind of a temporary pass' that could give farmers and hotel owners control over immigration raids at their facilities. Earlier this month, Trump had called for a pause on immigration raids disrupting the farming, hotel and restaurant industries, but a top Homeland Security official followed up with a seemingly contradictory statement. Tricia McLaughlin said there would be 'no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine' immigration enforcement efforts. Status of China trade talks Trump praised a recent trade deal with Beijing over rare earth exports from China and said establishing a fairer relationship will require significant tariffs. 'I think getting along well with China is a very good thing,' Trump said. 'China's going to be paying a lot of tariffs, but we have a big (trade) deficit, they understand that." Trump said he would be open to removing sanctions on Iranian oil shipments to China if Iran can show 'they can be peaceful and if they can show us they're not going to do any more harm.' But the president also indicated the U.S. isn't afraid to retaliate against Beijing. When Fox News Channel host Maria Bartiromo noted that China has tried to hack U.S. systems and steal intellectual property, Trump replied, 'You don't think we do that to them?'

What Happened When This Founder Bought His Winery Back From Its Corporate Parent
What Happened When This Founder Bought His Winery Back From Its Corporate Parent

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What Happened When This Founder Bought His Winery Back From Its Corporate Parent

This story is from an installment of The Oeno Files, our weekly insider newsletter to the world of fine wine. Sign up here. James Hall didn't intend to buy back Patz & Hall, the Sonoma winery he cofounded in 1988, any more than he meant to sell it in the first place. When Patz & Hall was sold to Washington State's Ste. Michelle Wine Estates in 2015, Hall stayed on as director of winemaking while his former business partner went on to establish Maritana Vineyards in Sonoma. Hall tells Robb Report that when Ste. Michelle first came knocking, the four founders (Hall, his wife, Anne Moses, and Donald and Heather Patz) had no plan to sell; they were eagerly preparing for the future. 'From production volumes and pricing to direct-to-consumer strategies and digital presence we carefully mapped out our future,' Hall says. 'We were confident in our direction and deeply committed to remaining independent.' More from Robb Report Yacht Builders Are Investing in the Art World. Here's Why. Pomellato's New High Jewelry Collection Is an Ode to Its Most Defining Decades Why Fine Dining Made a Comeback at This Year's Oscars of the Food World When Patz & Hall's chairman, Hank Salvo, approached the foursome to inform them of Ste. Michelle's entreaty, the partners were unanimously uninterested. 'We weren't looking to sell as we were committed to our new plans,' Hall says. 'Hank, ever the strategist, reminded us that even a conversation could be enlightening.' The family-run winery had never formally assessed its market value, but Salvo said engaging with Ste. Michelle could help them better understand their position and reaffirm their vision. The foursome did more than just entertain the idea; they found a price they were willing to take. But as the deal closed, Hall had one major concern: 'Could we preserve the soul of Patz & Hall?' He agreed to stay on as winemaker on three conditions. First, he wanted full creative control on items such as harvest timing, vineyard contracts, barrel selection, and blending decisions. He also requested significant upgrades to his winemaking tools, such as state-of-the-art equipment, a new lab, and expanded cellar staff. His final prerequisite was for Ste. Michelle to agree that he could continue to work with his 'cherished' vineyard partners. 'These growers are the lifeblood of our wine quality,' Hall says. 'Without them, our identity would be lost.' For the next six years, he led the team at Patz & Hall, where he continued to focus on winemaking, vineyard sourcing, and doing everything he could to improve the wines and strengthen the company. 'When Ste. Michelle Wine Estates took over, that sense of purpose didn't change,' Hall says. 'What did change was the freedom it gave me.' With a large corporation to handle things like finance, operations, and logistics, Hall was able to concentrate on what he loves most: making wine. 'It was a luxury, really. I could pour all my energy into the vineyards, the cellar, and the craft itself, knowing the broader business was in capable hands,' he says. Patz & Hall kept on making vineyard designate Chardonnay and Pinot Noir from Carneros, Russian River Valley, Mendocino, and Santa Lucia Highlands sourced from some of California's finest growers such as Larry Hyde, George Martinelli, Charlie Chenoweth, and Gary Pisoni. However, in July 2021 private equity firm Sycamore Partners purchased Ste. Michelle Wine Estates; the company then reorganized the SMWE portfolio into regional groups. With holdings in Washington, Oregon, and California, Sycamore grouped Patz & Hall into the California group alongside Stag's Leap Wine Cellars and Conn Creek, each now operating as its own business with separate financial structures. Then came what Hall calls the big shift: In May 2023, Sycamore sold Stag's Leap Wine Cellars to their minority partner, the Antinori family. That move left Patz & Hall without shared administrative support for human resources, finance, or tasting room operations, which all stayed with Stag's Leap. It became clear to him then that the winery would either be absorbed into the Washington group or sold. 'I approached management and said, 'If you're selling, I'd like to throw my hat in the ring; and regardless, I'll stay on temporarily, to help with the transition,'' Hall says. After not hearing back for several months, the call came that the winery he had founded was indeed for sale, and he put together a small group of investors to buy it back. He had already started imagining retiring and slowing down to the point that he could just tend to his home vineyard and travel. 'I was stunned. I never let myself dream it could happen,' Hall says. 'But the chance to bring Patz & Hall home? That was too good to pass up. I still have trouble believing it's happened!' Chris Hyde, second-generation grower at Hyde Vineyard in Carneros, whose family has worked with Hall for more than 25 years, is equally excited. 'What we value most is working with people who share our values and see the same future for the land and the grapes that we see,' he says. 'With James taking back control of Patz & Hall, we know exactly who we are working with and how decisions can get made.' Especially important to him is that Hall is 100 percent in the driver's seat and can make purchasing decisions in an instant without having to run it by anyone else. Hall believes that as long as he and the grower share the same vision, there is no need to own proprietary vineyards; he is comfortable with the long-term relationships he has nurtured during his time in the industry. At first, Hall insists that nothing has really changed. 'The vineyard sources remain the same,' he says. 'The winemaking team is still here. The native yeasts in the cellar, the barrels we love, the techniques we trust, they're all unchanged.' However, with a little digging, he admits that everything feels different. 'What has changed is the energy,' he says. 'There's a renewed intensity and urgency in everything we do. It feels like we're playing for keeps now. Every decision matters—whether it's in the cellar, the tasting room, or the vineyard. We're not just making wine; we're building something lasting, something personal.' It's clear that the 2022s from Patz & Hall—the first independent releases since the 2024 buyback—resonate with that renewed energy. Patz & Hall 2022 Hyde Vineyard Pinot Noir from Carneros has aromas of pomegranate, ripe summer cherry, and star anise. Vivid acidity bursts on the palate supporting flavors of Luxardo cherry, blackberry, licorice, and a hint of rosewater that wind down to a smooth finish. Patz & Hall 2022 Pisoni Vineyard Pinot Noir from Santa Lucia Highlands offers a bouquet of black cherry, brewed black tea, and a hint of spearmint. Smooth on the palate, it has fine grained tannins wrapped around bold flavors of raspberry, black plum, cocoa powder, and mint leaf. James Hall has a simple goal: 'To bring people joy, connection, and a deeper appreciation for what great vineyards and thoughtful winemaking can offer.' One sip is all you need to realize that he met that objective. Do you want access to rare and outstanding reds from Napa Valley? Join the Robb Report 672 Wine Club today. Best of Robb Report Why a Heritage Turkey Is the Best Thanksgiving Bird—and How to Get One 9 Stellar West Coast Pinot Noirs to Drink Right Now The 10 Best Wines to Pair With Steak, From Cabernet to Malbec Click here to read the full article.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store