
Wool is one of the valuable resources, but nobody is thinking about the role it can play in climate change
Renewable energy is in the zeitgeist. Solar, wind, waves. Biomass, geothermal, hydropower. There's a long list. But, with the exception of Irish activist, Lorna McCormack, scarcely anyone's talking about wool.
As founder of the successful endeavour, Wool in School, she teaches children about sustainability, natural resources and traditional crafts. Exquisitely qualified for the task, the fibre artist, climate educator and heritage specialist is also a gifted teacher - her expert communication skills honed during former careers in early years and in Deaf culture and community.
Interestingly, despite the breath of her professional experience, it was the conversations she had at home with her own four children that lit the spark for this endeavour.
'They were always interested in my art, and in the knitting I was doing at home,' she says.
'They knew wool came from sheep, but little else on that topic. It was then that I realised that nobody was teaching young people about this, and that knitting wasn't even on the school curriculum. So I decided to do something about it.'
CLIMATE & SUSTAINABILITY HUB
This she's doing - on a national basis - often with her eldest child Connor, (19), working by her side. As a result of her work, over 30,000 primary school children have learnt about wool's sustainable qualities, with close to 800 of those having been taught to knit by Lorna herself.
'All the children love it,' she says. 'There's a supportive network in every class. Among the boys, part of the reason for its popularity is that there's no competition between them, as they all begin knitting at the same time.
'Most don't get enough opportunities to do this sort of thing and they value it.'
Despite this positivity, Lorna is worried about the disconnection she sees in the classrooms, between Irish schoolchildren and nature.
'Very few know where their food and clothes come from, or that clothes can be repaired and made at home,' she says.
Lorna believes that all children should be taught practical climate skills, repairing, crafts and innovation.
Wool in School founder, Lorna McCormack: "Wool is one of the valuable resources we have, but nobody is thinking about the role it can play in climate change."
'They need to learn about wool and its benefits, how their lives are linked with farming and nature, and how heritage crafts are part of the solution to climate change.'
In her work, she sees first-hand the physical impacts of tech overuse.
'Because children play games using just their thumbs, there's a thumb-culture. Their hand-eye coordination is poor and because so many struggle with knitting needles, the first Wool in School class is often taken up with demonstrating how to hold them so they don't keep dropping to the floor.
'Before being taught how to knit, most have to be shown how to tie a knot. To begin, each child is given a knitting needle holding five stitches. Usually, those stitches are off the needle almost as soon as they take the needles in their hands.'
Despite the frequency of wobbly beginnings, the feedback is excellent. She has been told that it boosts self-esteem and that kids feel great when they help one another to knit and see their own skills improving.
Parents tell her how learning the craft helps their young ones to slow down and to be more mindful at a time when addiction to fast tech is slowing critical thinking.
With that, knitting offers a slower, more sustainable alternative to fast fashion - one that will reduce waste down the line and inspire young people to make more eco-friendly consumer choices.
Currently, less than one third of Irish people see the link between buying textiles and climate change, despite the fashion industry being estimated to be responsible for 10% of global carbon emissions.
Environment Protection Agency research paints a damning picture. Textiles account for 9% of the content in Irish general waste bins. Globally, it's estimated that one full truckload of textiles goes to landfill or incineration every second, with less than 1% of the material used to produce clothing recycled into new products. The rest is landfilled, incinerated, or exported overseas where it has a negative environmental and social impact.
Some of the pieces created by children with Lorna McCormack founder of Wool in School
'Wool is one of the valuable resources we have, but nobody is thinking about the role it can play in climate change,' says Lorna.
'Besides its environmental benefits, it's culturally significant. As a renewable, natural fibre, it stores carbon and is part of the climate solution. We need to bring back our traditional skills, and lead the next generation with climate action at heart.'
We also need to support Irish women in wool. 'They are up against people knitting with synthetic fibres, people who - because they don't ask - assume they are knitting with wool.
'Another difficulty is that in order to be processed into yarn, Irish wool must be sent to the UK. This means that when it comes to traceability, we cannot say that Irish wool is fully Irish,' says Lorna.
Of current endeavors to valorize the Irish wool industry, she says, 'A lot of money is being put into research. But through education, it can be shown that the answers are already there.
'Women in wool, women in agriculture, already have the solutions. Yet they are being ignored.
'They are fighting hard and it's difficult for them to fight against an industry that's sometimes nearly fighting against them.
'Within the wool industry there can be a lot of politics. This is something that holds back its progression. This is frustrating, particularly for these innovating women, who have long been the backbone of the wool industry in rural communities.
'Women in wool need support, finance and recognition. The last, because so often women are expected to do everything.'
Visit woolinschool.com for more information.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
We used to vilify unwed mothers. Now we criticise women who don't want to be mothers
According to the Central Statistics Office, the average age of Irish first-time mothers is now 31.7, while births to women aged over 40 have increased by 21.5 per cent in the last decade. Public discourse on the growing numbers of women electing not to have children is loud, insufferable and generally asking the wrong questions. The real story behind declining birth rates and elective non-parenthood in the West is unsurprisingly more complicated than we give it credit for. It is not just that women are too busy 'girlbossing' their way to Beyoncé gigs in fringed cowboy boots to think – quite literally – of the children. Some are choosing not to become parents. In a society that considers parenthood the default, this choice is usually made with care and clarity. After all, the social cost alone is a powerful disincentive. More would like to be parents but can't see how it might be possible under their present conditions. The situation is often reduced to personal selfishness or cultural decline – laziness, greed, convenience – resulting in women failing to do their duty. What's missing from the discourse is legitimate curiosity about why this decision appears to be becoming more common. We still treat readiness for parenthood as a sort of universal personal milestone, but that is no longer the world we actually live in. Desire isn't a primary factor in decision-making if you can't afford rent, if childcare costs more than the salary you require in order to live, and if there isn't a stable partner with whom to coparent or family or community support nearby. Many increasingly common material limitations are dismissed as a general unwillingness to inconvenience oneself in order to be a parent. But lacking the money, the housing or the support (let alone all three) to raise a child is more than sufficient disincentive. We are living in a time in which there is no guarantee that the future will look anything like the past. While it's in our collective interest for people to have more children, it isn't in the interest of many individuals or their prospective families. Chastising people for having the rationality to notice this and act accordingly is not an effective means of changing it. READ MORE [ Childcare in Ireland: 'Even as well-paid professionals, it was an exhausting struggle. The numbers never added up' Opens in new window ] In Ireland, we have a long history of disguising structural problems as moral ones. This is how we justified institutionalising more of our population than any other country in the world in the 20th century. It is arrogant of us to presume we've outgrown the sophistic habit we've long used to avoid looking too closely at ourselves. Until recently, we looked at mothers who had children outside the conditions we considered appropriate as moral failures – selfish abnegators of their collective duty. Now, we repurpose that same impulse and direct it at non-mothers. In both instances, we fall prey to the same error – a failure to look around at the conditions and society in which women live, and the incentive structures around them, and to consider how we are collectively contributing to the outcomes many claim to disapprove of. The reluctant mother is a shameful, piteous figure in our culture. She garners our disgust in a way we often spare fathers of the same inclination. It's the happy, fulfilled, enthusiastic mother our culture idolises. The 'natural' mother. We ignore the fact that only women who desire to be mothers are likely to feel fulfilled by the role, and even then, not all will feel that way – because women are people, and need more than a relational identity in order to value themselves. Young Irish women were taught to value autonomy by a generation of women who advocated and struggled to create a freedom they didn't enjoy themselves. The point was always choice. Now, women are choosing, and we're still blaming them. Not everyone is suited to parenthood, and it's better for all when those people choose to live childfree. There are valuable and meaningful ways to live a good, fulfilled life, make a contribution and invest in others beyond perpetuating one's own family line, obviously. It's a good thing that fewer people are raising children they don't want, and that fewer children experience this harm. Increasingly, there are people who don't feel hopeful about the future or cannot find stability – rejecting parenthood is both rational and compassionate under those circumstances. There are also those who would rather do other things with their time. It makes no sense for this fact to be personally offensive to people who have nothing to do with them – this is a coercive impulse that will not be remedied by a stranger having a baby. [ So, you want children. But can you afford them? Opens in new window ] However, declining birth rates are still a material problem. If the survival of humanity depends on women embracing motherhood (it does, but not to the exclusion of all other factors – we just like focusing on this one), then our discourse is incoherent. Why is there so little curiosity about why more women seem to find the prospect of motherhood unappealing, inaccessible or both? Why do we expect people – but specifically women – to choose parenthood despite all of the compelling reasons not to? This is a question we should be asking. [ Celtic Tiger baby boom has turned to bust as fertility rates decline Opens in new window ] Crucially, among all the patronising dismissals and the finger-wagging warnings of 'she'll-regret-it', a growing body of research suggests that women in both Ireland and the UK actively want more children than they have, or want to have a child, but don't consider themselves able to. This suggests the impediment is structural and very much not about diminishing desire or hoarding more money for Beyoncé tickets and Uber Eats. Evidence suggests most women would choose to be mothers – if there were more stable access to adequate housing, if childcare were more affordable, if we had more community cohesion and support. Less judgment and more curiosity would have benefited us when we were incarcerating unmarried pregnant women and girls for nonconformity, and it would benefit us now.


Irish Independent
7 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Eilis O'Hanlon: Horror replaces horror in the endless cycle of 24-hour news
The dreadful plane crash in Ahmedabad transfixed all of us watching in horror at home, but is it time to wean ourselves off a diet of disaster? Today at 21:30 It was 8:09 Irish time when Air India flight 171 crashed into a residential area shortly after take off at Ahmedabad airport.


Irish Independent
7 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Eoin O'Malley: Down with the puritans — we should all go back to the pub
Decline in drinking could be masking other problems It was the Irish who perfected the greatest social application in human history. The pub may not have been an Irish invention, but without deliberate design the pub in Ireland became a place for people to meet and socialise that was so successful we exported the concept all over the world.