
‘Fixated' constituent jailed for making threats to kill MP
An 'obsessed' constituent who made repeated threats to kill his MP and harm his wife has been jailed for 18 months.
Benjamin Clarke was branded 'dangerous' by Mr Justice Cotter after he said he wanted to 'firebomb' Bishop Auckland Labour MP Sam Rushworth, among other serious threats.
Clarke will serve an extra 18 months of supervision once released after the judge heard that the 32-year-old continues to harbour violent thoughts about the politician.
Clarke, of Durham Street, Bishop Auckland, contacted his MP in August on social media, saying: 'I cannot wait until your next public appearance, you will be lucky to leave it in one piece.'
Mr Rushworth contacted police and blocked his constituent on social media.
Clarke told a mental health practitioner the following month that, if he could find Mr Rushworth, he would 'smash his head off the pavement until he dies' and that he would firebomb his house or office, and 'lock the doors so I could hear him screaming'.
Asked if Clarke meant what he said, he told the health worker: 'I'm going to do it, it's just a matter of time.'
Clarke, who was charged with a malicious communication offence and making a threat to kill, admitted the charges in December, and was granted bail.
In February, he contacted the emergency services saying he was suicidal and told a paramedic the MP had ruined his life, that he wanted to burn down his house, and if Mr Rushworth's wife was there he would harm her too, but not the couple's children.
The paramedic was so concerned that he contacted his management and the police were called.
Sue Hurst, prosecuting, told Teesside Crown Court that Clarke clarified to officers: 'I didn't say I was going to kill him, I said I wanted to kill him.'
In a victim statement read out to the court by Ms Hurst, Mr Rushworth said he has had to step up his personal safety, including fitting a panic alarm and extra cameras at home.
The MP, first elected last year, said: 'He has repeated on multiple occasions his intent to kill me and harm my family.
'I do not know whether he is capable of carrying out his threats, but it has become increasingly apparent that he is obsessed with me and harbours a strong and irrational hatred.
'Living with that uncertainty has caused stress and worry to my family, especially my children, who feel less secure in their own home.'
Mr Rushworth said he bears no ill-will towards Clarke, describing him as mentally unwell.
Tom Bennett, defending, said Clarke has had 'significant' involvement with mental health services for years and that will continue after his release from prison.
Mr Bennett said Clarke had no intention of acting upon the threats he made.
Clarke admitted two counts of making threats to kill – once when he was on bail – and a malicious communications offence.
Mr Justice Cotter, who said Clarke was a cannabis smoker and drank up to one-and-a-half litres of vodka a day, described him as being 'fixated' on the MP.
The judge deemed Clarke dangerous after hearing that he continued to make threats about his MP while on remand awaiting sentence.
Mr Justice Cotter referred to the murders of MPs Jo Cox and Sir David Amess, adding: 'No MP should ever face personal threats, harassment or intimidation.'
The judge imposed a restraining order preventing Clarke from contacting Mr Rushworth or his wife and children, from commenting about them on social media, or from attending his home address or places where he works.
The judge told him: 'The future is in your hands, you are an intelligent man.
'You have time to reflect upon what has happened.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Investigation launched after deportee breaks free on Heathrow runway
An inquiry is under way into how an immigration detainee who was being deported from the UK managed to free himself from restraints and started to run, close to the takeoff paths of planes at Heathrow airport. The man who was captured on film sprinting across the runway at Terminal 2 on Sunday evening was about to be deported to India but managed to break free from the guards holding on to his waist restraint belt while escorting him to the plane. A spokesperson for Mitie, which holds a Home Office contract for removing migrants from the UK, told the Guardian: 'An investigation into the incident is under way. The individual was quickly apprehended, reboarded the flight, and was handed over to the relevant authorities on landing.' The incident came to light because it was captured by a plane spotter and aired on the YouTube channel Big Jet TV. The person who filmed the incident can be heard saying: 'What's going on here? Why would there be people running across the [tarmac]?' After the man was stopped, the narrator added: 'What the hell was that all about? They are stopping aircraft taxiing as well.' Metropolitan police sources confirmed that they played a role in detaining the man and that normal operations then resumed at the airport. John Van Hoogstraten, an aviation expert at Straten Consulting Services Ltd, said: 'What is known as the movement area of the airport is the entire airside. We have to consider all movement in this area, whether it's wildlife or something else. It's always a challenge for airports about how to get people on to planes if they're not using an air bridge. 'The minute an unaccounted person is airside there's no protection about what happens next in operations. In these cases aircraft have to cease operations. They will be told to stop immediately. Safety is paramount. A jet blast is sufficient to severely injure if not kill a person. The reaction of a pilot trying to land a plane and seeing a person try to cross a runway can be devastating.' A Heathrow spokesperson said: 'Working with partners, we have quickly resolved an incident at the airport involving an individual who accessed the airfield taxiway. The airport continues to operate as normal and passengers are travelling as planned.' Home Office sources confirmed that Mitie was investigating the incident.


BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Bhim Kohli: MPs demand sentence review for killers of man, 80
Two MPs have called for a review into "unduly lenient" sentences given to two teenagers convicted of killing an 80-year-old man at a Kohli died in hospital a day after being attacked while walking his dog at Franklin Park in Braunstone Town, Leicestershire, in September.A 15-year-old boy was sentenced to seven years in custody for manslaughter at Leicester Crown Court on Thursday while a 13-year-old girl was given a three-year youth rehabilitation order and made subject to a six-month Mid Leicestershire MP Peter Bedford and Alberto Costa, MP for South Leicestershire, have written to the Attorney General's Office (AGO) calling for the sentences to be looked at. The AGO told the BBC it had received several requests to review the sentences given to the pair, who cannot be named due to their the Attorney General and Solicitor General agree the sentence appears unduly lenient, they can ask the Court of Appeal to review the sentence. 'Shocked and appalled' During the hearing on Thursday, prosecutor Harpreet Sandu KC said Mr Kohli was subjected to a "seven-and-a-half minute period of continuing aggression" at the boy racially abused Mr Kohli, attacked him and slapped him in the face with a slider shoe while the girl encouraged the assault and laughed as she filmed it on her attack left Mr Kohli with three broken ribs and other fractures, but Mr Sandhu KC said the fatal injury was to his spinal cord, caused by a spine sentencing, the victim's daughter Susan Kohli said she felt angry and disappointed the punishments did not match the severity of the he had written to the AGO, Bedford said: "I am shocked and appalled at the leniency of these sentences."These two young people will soon be able to move forward with their lives, while the family of Mr Kohli serve a life sentence of pain and grief."The Ministry of Justice has been contacted for comment.


Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
These are Britain's options for tactical nuclear weapons. We must choose, and act
As the dust begins to settle on the Strategic Defence Review, Lord Robertson's interview with the Telegraph 's Roland Oliphant answered a number of important issues. However his lordship danced around the critical and pressing issue of re-introducing a tactical nuclear capability to our national deterrent. This is vital against the background of continuous nuclear threats against the UK and Europe from President Putin and the gangsters who advise him. The need to show military strength to Moscow could not be more pressing. The re-introduction of a tactical nuclear capability would impact Putin's decision-making far more than a few hundred tanks or half a dozen capital ships, but it is not quite so straight forward as strapping a nuclear bomb to a jet or on the end of a cruise missile. If the UK sticks with our closest ally, probably still the US, we will most likely purchase some F-35A runway stealth jets to go alongside our existing jumpjet F-35Bs. The Bs have the advantage of being able to operate from our carriers, but their vertical thrust equipment means that they lack range and cannot carry larger weapons in their internal bays. The F-35A is also the only 5th generation stealth jet that is certified to carry nuclear weapons – specifically the American B61-12 nuclear gravity bomb. This can be carried by German jets, will soon be certified on Italian ones, and would most likely be our tactical option also. But this may not be a credible enough option to effectively deter Putin. Though the F-35 is paraded as the stealthiest thing in the sky it is not actually invisible to radar and it might be shot down before it could get above its target to drop its B61-12s. This brings up the need to be able to knock out Russian air defences in order to make our tactical nukes (or other air power) effective. Air defence is nowadays hugely important and has been possibly the defining issue in the Ukraine war. In my day, you became an air defence officer – a 'cloud-puncher' – if no other path was open. Today the air defence officers are the first pick. Air defences, even modern and powerful Russian ones such as the S-400, can be suppressed: we have seen Israel do this against Iran's S-300s before bombing some of Iran's nuclear research establishments this and last year. Recent Ukrainian attacks, most especially the strike last week on the Russian military air base at Bryansk show that Russian AD is not as water-tight as the Kremlin would have us believe. Nonetheless it might be a big ask to get F-35s almost on top of their target in order to deliver a free-falling gravity bomb like the B61-12. The other option possibly available to the UK is to do what the French have done: rather than a free-falling nuke, France has the Air-Sol Moyenne Portée (ASMPA) supersonic cruise missile, which can be released from its carrying jet hundreds of miles from the target. The ASMPA is supersonic, making it harder to knock down than a normal subsonic cruise missile. Our missile making capability is joint with France and Europe anyway, so if we went down this route we could partner with the French, who already know what they're doing in this area. Our existing subsonic Storm Shadow cruise missile is actually French too – the warhead is the only British part. It has been put to good use against Russia in Ukrainian hands, though it appears to need help – either US defence-suppression technology or special forces operations against Russian defence radars – to be fully effective. It could be argued that it is now Monsieur Macron and France who are our closest allies, as President Trump seems to shun us 'pathetic' Europeans. This could be a viable way forward. Even I, a soldier, can recognise that reintroducing a tactical nuclear air delivered capability is not an insignificant task. It is complicated by our current lack of any AWACS radar planes and other specialist defence-suppression equipment. Nonetheless we have been in the nuclear deterrence game almost since the beginning and our Atomic Weapons Establishment can at least furnish us with the key: the actual warhead. We might alternatively make a beginning by developing a home-grown nuclear tip for our stock of US-made, submarine-launched Tomahawk cruise weapons: the Tomahawk was originally developed to deliver nukes, so we know it can do that job. One thing I am sure of is the need. As a former commander of the UK and Nato's chemical and nuclear defence forces, I know the overwhelming impact that tactical nuclear weapons can have on the battlefield, and the huge advantage they give to an aggressor against somebody who does not possess these weapons. We must be ready to deal with the Russian bear. Putin will not be deterred by 12 more submarines in the ocean in the next decade, and Dad's Army covering the White Cliffs perhaps sooner – useful and vital as these things will be. As Uncle Sam backs away from the fight, the prospect of the UK joining France in fielding a tactical capability which could cripple a Russian army in the field would likely get Putin talking peace quicker than most other threats. For 80 years there has been nuclear equilibrium in Europe, but this has become unbalanced. It is the major metric in Putin's decision making, psychologically if not physically. It isn't very important which tactical nuclear option we choose – F-35A, a French style standoff weapon, or Tomahawk. What is important is that we choose at least one and get it into service.