'I have no political power with the president'::Wayne Gretzky distances himself from politics amid Donald Trump's 51st state remarks
Wayne Gretzky firmly distanced himself from political debates (Getty Images)
Wayne Gretzky says he has 'no pull or power' with political leaders like Trump or Carney
Wayne Gretzky reaffirms his apolitical stance as a sportsman, not a politician
In a rare public statement last month, hockey legend Wayne Gretzky firmly distanced himself from political debates surrounding President Donald Trump , after renewed speculation about their relationship surfaced during Trump's second term. The 64-year-old Canadian icon addressed the topic during an interview on Toronto's AM-640 radio with Ben Mulroney.While Wayne Gretzky never mentioned Donald Trump by name, he was responding to a broader question about how people may try to use his image or legacy to push political narratives. Amid recent chatter about Trump jokingly referring to Canada as the potential 51st U.S. state—and suggesting Gretzky be its governor—the Hall of Famer made it clear that he has no interest or influence in the political arena.'But, trust me, I have no political power with the prime minister or the president,' Gretzky said. 'That's between those two guys, and that's why you hold elections… But trust me I have no pull or power with either the prime minister or the president.'The comment served as a quiet rebuttal to critics who questioned his silence on Trump's controversial comments and past policies, including trade and tariffs affecting Canada.When asked whether his record being broken by Russian superstar Alex Ovechkin had political weight, especially in today's charged climate, Gretzky dismissed the notion altogether. He insisted that during his career, politics was never part of the locker room conversation.'We watched basketball, we watched baseball… Hockey players, that's never on the docket,' he explained. 'The prime minister and the president don't tell us how to play hockey, and we don't tell them how to do politics, right?'The remarks underscore his consistent approach: stay in your lane and let leaders lead.Despite his neutrality in political matters, Gretzky's life is deeply intertwined with the U.S. He highlighted that his family — including five children, seven grandchildren, and a centenarian mother-in-law — are all American.'You be as proud of the United States of America as I am to be a Canadian,' he tells them. 'That's what your grandfather would have wanted.' Gretzky's comments offered a subtle but firm reminder that while he remains a beloved figure across North America, he has no interest in leveraging that status for political purposes.Also Read: 'Pretend you don't know me': Wayne Gretzky caught in crossfire as Donald Trump friendship sparks Canadian backlash
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
36 minutes ago
- First Post
PM Modi arrives in Cyprus, first Indian PM to visit in over 20 years
Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Cyprus on Sunday for a two day visit during which he will hold talks with President Nikos Christodoulides to strengthen bilateral ties. read more Prime Minister Narendra Modi landed in Cyprus on Sunday, beginning a two-day visit aimed at boosting bilateral relations with the Mediterranean nation. This is the first visit by an Indian prime minister to Cyprus in more than two decades. Modi's trip to Cyprus is the first stop on his three-nation tour, which will also include visits to Canada and Croatia. The prime minister is scheduled to hold talks with President Nikos Christodoulides. He will also engage with the business community at an event in Limassol as part of efforts to deepen economic ties between the two countries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD VIDEO | PM Modi (@narendramodi) arrives at Larnaca International Airport in Cyprus. During his visit, the Prime Minister will hold talks with Cyprus President Christodoulides and address business leaders in Limassol. (Source: Third Party) (Full video available on PTI Videos -… — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) June 15, 2025 'Cyprus is a close friend and an important partner in the Mediterranean region and the EU. The visit provides an opportunity to build upon the historical bonds and expand our ties in the areas of trade, investment, security, technology and promote people-to-people exchanges,' Modi said in New Delhi in a departure statement. While in Cyprus' capital Nicosia, the prime minister will hold talks with President Christodoulides and address business leaders at Limassol, it said. From Cyprus, he will head to Kananaskis in Canada to participate in the G7 Summit at the invitation of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Following the G7 Summit, Modi will visit Croatia and hold meetings with President Zoran Milanovic and Prime Minister Andrej Plenkovic. Modi said his three-nation tour is also an opportunity to thank partner countries for their steadfast support to India in its fight against cross-border terrorism and to galvanise global understanding on tackling terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Economic Times
38 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Air India plane crash: Air safety panel set up to advise on policy revamp
Following the devastating Air India Boeing 787-8 crash, the Indian government has formed a committee, led by Union home secretary Govind Mohan, to revamp aviation safety policies. Civil aviation minister Ram Mohan Naidu announced the panel, tasking it with reviewing standard operating procedures and recommending improvements to prevent future incidents. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads ( Originally published on Jun 14, 2025 ) A committee led by Union home secretary Govind Mohan will suggest steps to overhaul India's aviation safety policy as the government is looking to prevent a recurrence of incidents such as Air India's Boeing 787-8 plane crash that killed more than 270 formation of the panel two days after the country's worst air crash, civil aviation minister Ram Mohan Naidu on Saturday said it will examine the existing standard operating procedures and make recommendations on how to prevent and handle such is besides the investigation that statutory body Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) will conduct. 'We have put a time limit of three months for them to sit down, talk to various stakeholders, involve and discuss with any other important expert that is necessary,' Naidu said at his first media briefing after Thursday's committee will include the heads of civil aviation regulator Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) and security regulator Bureau of Civil Aviation Security, as well as joint secretary-level officers from the state and central governments. It will also consult experts in aviation safety, accident investigators and under the civil aviation ministry, is investigating the crash, while the US National Transportation Safety Board will also be involved in the detailed probe, given that the aircraft was manufactured by an American company, Boeing, and was made in the US.A UK AAIB team will also assist in the investigation, as will Boeing and other major component manufacturers like GE, which supplied engines for the committee will hold its first meeting next week, according to a senior government official. It will study steps taken by other countries following such accidents and its suggestions will be incorporated in the National Civil Aviation Policy, which was launched in have been three fatal crashes in the US this year, which sparked calls for overhauling of the Federal Aviation Authority.'This accident is a jolt for all of us. But it is also a wake-up call and the committee will suggest measures to make it safer, looking at the scenario where aviation is no more a luxury but an essential mode of transport and transforming India into an aviation hub,' said the official cited.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Manu Joseph: What Elon Musk can learn from the ‘richest man ever'
Elon Musk, the world's richest man among those whose wealth is known, recently found himself in a rare spot for someone of his influence: overplaying his hand. In a public spat with Donald Trump, Musk denounced the American president, suggested he should be impeached and even floated a serious allegation involving the late Jeffrey Epstein, who was charged with sex trafficking minors. Musk also claimed his money helped Trump win the presidency. Such bluster would have been the doom of a billionaire in most nations. That Musk survived this is due to the one Western value he unwittingly relied on while helping ruin it: the right to criticize power fearlessly. Also Read: X factor: The rise and fall of Elon Musk as a political figure Yet, even in America, where the old habit of being the West lingers, Musk was forced to back-pedal. Trump threatened him on social media with legal scrutiny and the withdrawal of government contracts. To understand the limits of wealth when it meets state power, Musk may want to get to know, if he doesn't already, one man who many consider the richest person who ever lived. No one clarifies the relationship between money and state better than Jacob Fugger, a 16th-century banker. In today's money, Fugger's wealth would be worth some $400 billion dollars in hard assets. Musk's net worth is similar, but more volatile, as we have seen lately. But this does not demonstrate Fugger's true financial might in his time. In his book,The Richest Man Who Ever Lived: The Life and Times of Jacob Fugger, Greg Steinmetz states that when Fugger died in 1525, his wealth amounted to 2% of Europe's GDP at a time when Europe was an economic powerhouse and there was no US. In comparison, Musk's peak net worth was lower as a proportion of the US economy. Also Read: Why regretful tweets can't fix Musk's Tesla mess The political influence of Musk is impressive, but Fugger was at another level. Fugger dealt with emperors and popes. He financed wars, revolutions and once practically bought the Holy Roman Empire for his royal client. He also got a pope to cancel a Christian sin—usury, or the practice of charging interest on loans. In 1523, he wrote a letter to Charles V, one of the most powerful men on earth at the time as the holy Roman Emperor with a string of other monarchic titles. To this man, his lender Fugger wrote, 'It is well known that without me your majesty might not have acquired the imperial crown… You will order that the money which I have paid out, together with the interest upon it, shall be reckoned up and paid without further delay." The first part of the quoted line sounds like Musk and on the whole it appears even more self-destructive than Musk's online fight with Trump. But Charles paid up. Maybe because Fugger was not being as disrespectful as we imagine, maybe medieval Europe was a place where seasoned men of the world spoke frankly. Also, Fugger was right; Charles couldn't do without him. Also Read: Musk versus Trump: A case of mutually assured destruction Fugger, like Musk, was given to boasting. But his boasts were strategic—a form of advertising to remind monarchs that only he could move great sums. Whatever Fugger did must have been respectful by the customs of his time. In any case, he did not hesitate to flatter. After all, it was an age when it was not so hard for an emperor to execute a mere wealthy man, or put him away in some dungeon. But there was a delicate way to deal with power. Emperors controlled all land and they could convert it into money, but a way of the world even then was that rulers ruled by spending money and not making it. So they needed those special men who knew how to make it, who had a lot of it and who could lend it in return for various privileges, like mining rights. It was a tricky business to lend to emperors, for those powerful men were often broke and could simply renege. The only thing stopping them was a loss of reputation, which would make their future borrowing impossible or more expensive. Even so, emperors stole all the time from businessmen. Also Read: Manu Joseph: America and the bearable loneliness of losing the West When Charles's grandfather Emperor Maximilian needed funds, he didn't just ask nicely. He forced Fugger and other bankers to buy imperial bonds with no collateral, under a 'fairness' argument—that people like Fugger were able to do business because of the safety and peace Maximilian assured. Fugger wrote to Maximilian stating something many capitalists after him would say—that big business, by its very existence, is a moral force because it creates employment. But eventually, Fugger had to buy bonds. Like Musk, Fugger took great political bets. He funded the Church and also sponsored events that led to a movement against the Church, the Reformation. He also pioneered an early news network to gain an intelligence advantage over rivals. Yet, through it all, Fugger knew how to behave in front of a crown. Fugger appeared to understand that there were two streams of power—one that came from the masses, which was accumulated in one person, the power of the state. And another sort of power which came from being useful to the state. In Fugger's time, it was very clear that it was foolish to challenge the state's power. In Musk's time, there is a feeling in the West that a man like him can challenge the state, or the new emperors of our time. This is a myth. Sure, Musk is wildly famous himself, which could lead anyone in his place to overvalue it. But being famous is not the same as being the repository of the will and grouses of people. Celebrity is often not the same as politics. The author is a journalist, novelist, and the creator of the Netflix series, 'Decoupled'.
