logo
‘Vultures' preying on evacuees, Métis leader says

‘Vultures' preying on evacuees, Métis leader says

The Manitoba Métis Federation has warned evacuees about a scam that asks for their personal information.
It's related to a fake social media post that claims to be from Manitoba Metis Federation president David Chartrand.
Chartrand said the federation has been forced to send out thousands of messages explaining that the post isn't from him. It uses a photograph of him that's been copied from the MMF website, to make it look legitimate.
MIKE DEAL / FREE PRESS FILES
A scam targeting wildfire evacuees ripped off an image of Manitoba Métis Federation President David Chartrand.
'This has really upset us,' he said on Wednesday.
'Now these vultures are coming out and they are entering this world of hardship and disaster to take advantage of people.'
More than 21,000 Manitobans have been evacuated from wildfire hot spots across the province. Scammers are taking advantage of the circumstances to try to victimize people at their most vulnerable time, whether it's through social media, emails or text messages.
Numerous evacuees, even ones who were sent as far away as Niagara Falls, Ont., because of the shortage of hotel rooms here, were posting images of the text messages they had received from scammers who claimed to be from the Canadian Red Cross. They were asked to provide banking information so they could get financial help.
Red Cross spokeswoman Heather Hogan said the organization would never ask for personal information via text. During registration, evacuees weren't asked to give their social insurance number, bank account information, a credit card number, or even pay money in return for assistance.
'Unfortunately, there are some people who may try to take advantage of those impacted by a disaster through fraudulent tactics,' Hogan said. 'The Canadian Red Cross communicates only via email, phone, or in person and would never send a link through a text message.
'The Red Cross wants everyone to be cautious of unsolicited requests for payment and confirm any details through official channels.'
Hogan encouraged anyone who has been scammed to contact local police.
Another scam, reported by the CBC, said a fake website claimed a clothing warehouse in Flin Flon had been destroyed by wildfire. It asked donors to buy the remaining stock by sending money to the owner, a single mother. No such warehouse exists. On Wednesday, both the website and its Facebook account had been deleted.
Terry Dojcak, 67, one of thousands of displaced Flin Flon residents, said he has already received several scam emails on his phone, asking for banking and personal information, which he immediately deleted without responding.
Dojcak said it was 'disgusting' that people are trying to take advantage of evacuees.
'(They should be) hung out to dry somewhere,' he said.
A spokesman for the RCMP said no one has reported being scammed.
Chartrand said despite the federation's attempts to expose the social media scam using his photo, he is still worried people could fall victim to a fraudster.
'A lot of people could be hurt financially and it could cause hurt to our government and our people,' he said.
Sundays
Kevin Rollason's Sunday newsletter honouring and remembering lives well-lived in Manitoba.
'I'm very worried some elders may get scammed. The Red Cross is so far behind — there's some 21,000 people — and they are doing direct deposit. That's what the scammers are seeking.'
Stephanie Meilleur, director of the federation's community resource department, called the scammers 'despicable.'
'It is horrendous that they have targeted some vulnerable senors and elders,' Meilleur said. 'These people are in dire need of these supports and the scammers are trying to trick people.'
— with files from Massimo De Luca-Taronno
kevin.rollason@freepress.mb.ca
Kevin RollasonReporter
Kevin Rollason is a general assignment reporter at the Free Press. He graduated from Western University with a Masters of Journalism in 1985 and worked at the Winnipeg Sun until 1988, when he joined the Free Press. He has served as the Free Press's city hall and law courts reporter and has won several awards, including a National Newspaper Award. Read more about Kevin.
Every piece of reporting Kevin produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Saskatoon police mark 1-year anniversary of Harvey Zoerb's death with call for witnesses
Saskatoon police mark 1-year anniversary of Harvey Zoerb's death with call for witnesses

Global News

time3 hours ago

  • Global News

Saskatoon police mark 1-year anniversary of Harvey Zoerb's death with call for witnesses

See more sharing options Send this page to someone via email Share this item on Twitter Share this item via WhatsApp Share this item on Facebook The Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) is renewing the call for witnesses in the brutal killing of Harvey Zoerb outside of Fairhaven School on June 12, 2024. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy SPS hopes released security videos on Facebook will help bring forward more information, asking anyone who might recognize themselves in the footage to come forward so they can cross them off the list. Global's Nicole Healey has the full story and footage in the video above.

Appeal in protracted Facebook privacy case headed to Supreme Court of Canada
Appeal in protracted Facebook privacy case headed to Supreme Court of Canada

Vancouver Sun

time9 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Appeal in protracted Facebook privacy case headed to Supreme Court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to review a ruling that concluded Facebook broke federal privacy law by failing to adequately inform users of risks to their data when using the popular social media platform. Last September, the Federal Court of Appeal found Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms, did not obtain the meaningful consent required by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act between 2013 and 2015. The decision overturned a 2023 Federal Court ruling. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The Court of Appeal said Facebook invited millions of apps onto its platform and did not adequately supervise them. It found that the Federal Court's failure to engage with the relevant evidence on this point was an error of law. Privacy commissioner Philippe Dufresne called the Court of Appeal decision an acknowledgment that international firms whose business models rely on users' data must respect Canadian privacy law. Facebook applied for a hearing at the Supreme Court, arguing the Court of Appeal took the wrong approach to consent and security safeguards under the privacy law. It said in a written application that, rather than evaluating Facebook's multi-layered efforts to obtain meaningful consent, the Court of Appeal focused myopically on the platform's privacy policy alone. The Supreme Court, following its usual practice, gave no reasons Thursday for agreeing to hear the case. A 2019 investigation report from then-federal privacy commissioner Daniel Therrien and his British Columbia counterpart cited major shortcomings in Facebook's procedures and called for stronger laws to protect Canadians. The probe followed reports that Facebook let an outside organization use a digital app to access users' personal information, which was then passed to others. The app, at one point known as 'This is Your Digital Life,' encouraged users to complete a personality quiz but collected information about the people who installed the app and data about their Facebook friends. Recipients of the information included the British consulting firm Cambridge Analytica, which was involved in U.S. political campaigns and targeted messaging. About 300,000 Facebook users worldwide added the app, leading to the potential disclosure of the personal information of approximately 87 million others, including more than 600,000 Canadians, the commissioners' report said. The commissioners concluded that Facebook violated PIPEDA by failing to obtain valid and meaningful consent from installing users and their friends, and that it had 'inadequate safeguards' to protect user information. Facebook disputed the investigation's findings. The company has said it tried to work with the privacy commissioner's office and take measures that would go above and beyond what other companies do. In early 2020, Therrien asked the Federal Court to declare Facebook had violated the law. A judge ruled the commissioner failed to establish that Facebook breached the law on meaningful consent. He also agreed with Facebook's argument that once a user authorizes it to disclose information to an app, the social media company's safeguarding duties under PIPEDA come to an end. In its decision, the Court of Appeal noted Facebook's contention that users read privacy policies presented to them when they sign up to social networking websites — something the judges called 'a dubious assumption' given such documents can run to thousands of words. 'Terms that are on their face superficially clear do not necessarily translate into meaningful consent,' Justice Donald Rennie wrote for a three-member panel. 'Apparent clarity can be lost or obscured in the length and miasma of the document and the complexity of its terms.' In this case, Rennie said, a central question was whether a reasonable person 'would have understood that in downloading a personality quiz (or any app), they were consenting to the risk that the app would scrape their data and the data of their friends, to be used in a manner contrary to Facebook's own internal rules (i.e. sold to a corporation to develop metrics to target advertising in advance of the 2016 U.S. election).' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

Appeal in protracted Facebook privacy case headed to Supreme Court of Canada
Appeal in protracted Facebook privacy case headed to Supreme Court of Canada

Edmonton Journal

time9 hours ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Appeal in protracted Facebook privacy case headed to Supreme Court of Canada

Breadcrumb Trail Links Article content The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to review a ruling that concluded Facebook broke federal privacy law by failing to adequately inform users of risks to their data when using the popular social media platform. Last September, the Federal Court of Appeal found Facebook, now known as Meta Platforms, did not obtain the meaningful consent required by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act between 2013 and 2015. Article content The decision overturned a 2023 Federal Court ruling. The Court of Appeal said Facebook invited millions of apps onto its platform and did not adequately supervise them. It found that the Federal Court's failure to engage with the relevant evidence on this point was an error of law. Privacy commissioner Philippe Dufresne called the Court of Appeal decision an acknowledgment that international firms whose business models rely on users' data must respect Canadian privacy law. Facebook applied for a hearing at the Supreme Court, arguing the Court of Appeal took the wrong approach to consent and security safeguards under the privacy law. It said in a written application that, rather than evaluating Facebook's multi-layered efforts to obtain meaningful consent, the Court of Appeal focused myopically on the platform's privacy policy alone. Article content Article content The Supreme Court, following its usual practice, gave no reasons Thursday for agreeing to hear the case. A 2019 investigation report from then-federal privacy commissioner Daniel Therrien and his British Columbia counterpart cited major shortcomings in Facebook's procedures and called for stronger laws to protect Canadians. The probe followed reports that Facebook let an outside organization use a digital app to access users' personal information, which was then passed to others. The app, at one point known as 'This is Your Digital Life,' encouraged users to complete a personality quiz but collected information about the people who installed the app and data about their Facebook friends. Recipients of the information included the British consulting firm Cambridge Analytica, which was involved in U.S. political campaigns and targeted messaging. Article content About 300,000 Facebook users worldwide added the app, leading to the potential disclosure of the personal information of approximately 87 million others, including more than 600,000 Canadians, the commissioners' report said. The commissioners concluded that Facebook violated PIPEDA by failing to obtain valid and meaningful consent from installing users and their friends, and that it had 'inadequate safeguards' to protect user information. Facebook disputed the investigation's findings. The company has said it tried to work with the privacy commissioner's office and take measures that would go above and beyond what other companies do. In early 2020, Therrien asked the Federal Court to declare Facebook had violated the law. A judge ruled the commissioner failed to establish that Facebook breached the law on meaningful consent. He also agreed with Facebook's argument that once a user authorizes it to disclose information to an app, the social media company's safeguarding duties under PIPEDA come to an end. Latest National Stories

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store