Pope Leo uses Sunday Mass to criticise surge of political nationalism
Pope Leo criticised the rise of nationalist political movements during Sunday Mass in St. Peter's Square, advocating for reconciliation and dialogue.
The Pope asked the Holy Spirit to eliminate barriers and indifference, denouncing exclusionary mindsets and 'security' zones that separate people.
Leo referenced Pope Francis's 2023 Pentecost observation that people are disconnected despite being connected, due to indifference and solitude.
He condemned the wars plaguing the world and prayed for peace, emphasising that inner peace is essential for spreading peace in families, societies, and international relations.
Since becoming Pope, Leo has consistently prioritised peace, as reflected in his initial message, and has called for peace in Ukraine and a ceasefire in Gaza.
Pope Leo criticizes political nationalism and prays for reconciliation and dialogue
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Farage: We'll reopen steel blast furnaces if we win in Wales
Nigel Farage will vow on Monday to reopen Port Talbot's blast furnaces, placing the return of traditional steelmaking at the heart of his campaign to win next year's Welsh elections. The Reform leader will use a speech in the southern Welsh town to decry the collapse of the steelmaking industry and question the strategy being adopted by Labour. It is the latest attempt to outflank Labour on the Left and further build on Reform's surge of popularity, which has sent it surging to the top of UK opinion polls in recent months. Mr Farage believes his party has a chance of winning the Welsh Parliament elections next spring, in what would be a seismic result given Labour's long-held dominance across the border. The speech is an attempt to draw a line under party feuding that led Zia Yusuf to quit as Reform's chairman on Thursday, only to reverse his decision and return on Saturday. Mr Yusuf now has four responsibilities, including leading the party's 'Doge' spending efficiencies project, named after tech billionaire Elon Musk's drive to slash bureaucracy in America. A new chairman to accompany Mr Yusuf will be unveiled on Tuesday. His role has now been split in two, with a new deputy chairman also taking on some of Mr Yusuf's old responsibilities. The Port Talbot plant was, until recently, the UK's largest steelmaker, but Tata Steel, the Indian firm that runs it, announced last year that the remaining blast furnaces would be closed, leading to the loss of up to 2,800 jobs at the site. The blast furnaces are being replaced with an electric arc furnace, which will produce less steel but in a more eco-friendly way. It will not be fully operational until 2028. Mr Farage is expected to say that he wants Port Talbot's blast furnaces to reopen in the long run, while admitting the outcome is not easy to achieve. While exploring options to viability, it is understood that Mr Farage will indicate that, if necessary, he is open to nationalisation, were Reform in power. Mr Farage's spokesman said: 'Nigel will say it's our long-term ambition to reopen the blast furnaces, not the electric arc ones, as we don't believe they will ever be online due to sky-high electricity prices. '[Mr Farage] will talk about the heritage of Wales, with Port Talbot Steelworks once being the largest steel plant in Europe, and also Wales, which once produced almost 60 million tons of coal per year, exporting half. The spokesman added: 'South Wales alone was the biggest coal exporter in the world. The Cardiff Coal Exchange set the global price for steam coal. Swansea once smelted most of the world's copper. Merthyr Tydfil was the world's largest producer of iron.' The spokesman added: 'Basically, Nigel will tap into the hearts and minds of a deeply patriotic nation that feels betrayed and forgotten about by Labour.' Working-class voters Mr Farage's trip to Wales underscores how he sees the next milestone in his party's surge in support coming first in the country's parliamentary elections in May 2026. Elections will also be held for the Scottish Parliament next year. Reform insiders were left buoyed at getting one in four votes at the Hamilton by-election last week, despite coming third. Mr Farage's embrace of Port Talbot's steelmaking past is the latest sign that he is adopting an economic agenda deliberately designed to grab political territory vacated by Labour. The Reform leader called for the nationalisation of British Steel earlier this year, weeks before government ministers announced the move. He has also called for the two-child benefit cap to be lifted and for the cut to winter fuel payments for pensioners to be reversed in full, aligning himself with many Labour MPs. Both measures have since been adopted by the Government. The focus on economic interventionism has seen him position the party to the Left on these matters with Sir Keir Starmer's party, as Reform targets disillusioned working-class voters. Andy Haldane, the former Bank of England economist, said that Mr Farage had become a 'tribune' for the views and frustrations of working-class Britons. Mr Haldane told The Guardian: 'What is certainly true is Nigel Farage is as close to what the country has to a tribune for the working classes. 'I don't think there's any politician that comes even remotely close to speaking to, and for, blue-collar, working-class Britain. 'I think that is just a statement of fact, and in some ways that underscores the importance of the other parties doing somewhat better to find a story, to find a language and to find some policies that speak to the needs of those most in need.'
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Albanian drug dealer who illegally sneaked back into Britain weeks after being deported succeeds in remaining in the UK by judge
An Albanian drug dealer who sneaked back into Britain just weeks after being deported has succeed to remain in the UK - even after committing more crimes on his return. Stiljano Ziu has been allowed to stay in the UK despite the asylum court hearing he committed a 'flagrant' breach of immigration laws, having already been deported from the country once. Ziu was jailed for producing cannabis just months after entering Britain illegally, it was heard. He then 'took advantage of the early release scheme' by agreeing to deportation in exchange for finishing his sentence early. He then entered the UK again illegally just weeks later. During his second illegal stint in the UK, which is still ongoing, Ziu committed more drugs offences and was recently jailed for four and a half years. A crown court judge previously said of Ziu that he came to the UK 'prepared to do any activity, legal or illegal', the asylum court heard. However, after a long and complicated legal process he has won his fight to remain in the UK after the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the Upper Tribunal ruled in his favour. Ziu won his appeal due to his marriage to a Greek woman in the UK after entering the country for the second time. The Home Office had refused to give him a residence card after his marriage. Ziu won his case after the asylum court heard he was not a 'present threat'. Ziu may still face deportation as a result of his recent drugs conviction, Upper Tribunal Judge Jonathan Perkins said. The Upper Tribunal heard Ziu first entered the UK unlawfully in 2017 or 2018 and by November 2018 was convicted of producing cannabis charges and was jailed for nine months. He was released from his prison sentence early, on the basis he agreed to be deported in December 2018. However he was already back in early 2019. 'He returned within weeks in clear breach of the deportation order', the tribunal was told. 'There can be no clearer case of abuse of immigration laws. 'He took advantage of the early release scheme and had no intention of remaining in Albania. 'He had the resources, means and contacts to return illegally.' His presence in the UK went unnoticed until December 2020 when he applied for a residence card as the spouse of a Greek woman exercising treaty rights in the UK. He had met her upon his return and married her in April 2021. 'He is still benefitting from his illegal entry and worked illegally too', it was heard. The Home Office refused Ziu's request, leading to his case at the asylum court. During court hearings it had to be determined whether the Home Office had showed that Ziu presented a 'present threat'. At one hearing in 2022, the Home Office accepted that there was 'not a present serious threat in relation to a propensity to re-offend'. At a 2023 hearing, Ziu won the first stage of his appeal. The judge in 2023 criticised Ziu's 'flagrant and serious breach of UK immigration laws' but said the Home Office had not shown he was a 'present threat' of re-offending. The decision led to the Home Office appealing it at the Upper Tribunal. Before the Upper Tribunal hearing, Ziu wrote a letter stating that in November 2024 he was jailed for four and a half years for conspiring to supply class B drugs. The offending happened between January 2020 and June 2022. At the Upper Tribunal hearing, it was ruled that the Home Office had not successfully challenged the 2023 decision that Ziu was not a risk of re-offending. But, Judge Perkins admitted 'it may be that this case has been an academic exercise' because Ziu may now face deportation due to his recent conviction. Judge Perkins said: 'Putting everything together we are satisfied that the judge [in 2023] made a decision that was open to her and gave lawful reasons. 'We therefore dismiss the Secretary of State's appeal. 'What happens next is of course a matter for the Secretary of State. 'However, [Ziu] must understand that his recent conviction has resulted in a sentence that may require his deportation from the United Kingdom and that is something the Secretary of State will consider. 'Nevertheless... we find that the Secretary of State has failed to show that the [2023] tribunal erred in law and we dismiss the Secretary of State's appeal.'
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
The winners and losers in Rachel Reeves's spending review
"It's a big deal for this government," says Simon Case. "It's the clearest indication yet of what they plan to do between now and the general election, a translation of their manifesto. "This is where you should expect the chancellor to say, on behalf of the government: 'This is what we're about'." As the former cabinet secretary, Mr Case was the man in charge of the civil service during the last spending review, in 2021. On Wednesday, Rachel Reeves will unveil the Labour government's priorities for the next three years. But it's unclear whether it will provide all that much of an answer about what it's really about. Unlike the Autumn budget, when the chancellor announced her plans on where to tax and borrow to fund overall levels of spending, the spending review will set out exactly how that money is divided up between the different government departments. Since the start of the process in December those departments have been bidding for their share of the cash - setting out their proposed budgets in a negotiation which looks set to continue right up to the wire. This review is being conducted in an usual level of detail, with every single line of spending assessed, according to the chancellor, on whether it represents value for money and meets the government's priorities. Budget proposals have been scrutinised by so called "challenge panels" of independent experts. It's clear that health and defence will be winners in this process given pre-existing commitments to prioritise the NHS - with a boost of up to £30bn expected - and to increase defence spending. On Sunday morning, the government press release trumpeted an impressive-sounding "£86bn boost" to research and development (R&D), with the Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle sent out on the morning media round to celebrate as record levels of investment. 14:18 We're told this increased spending on the life sciences, advanced manufacturing and defence will lead to jobs and growth across the country, with every £1 in investment set to lead to a £7 economic return. But the headline figure is misleading. It's not £86bn in new funding. That £86bn has been calculated by adding together all R&D investment across government for the next three years, which will reach an annual figure of £22.5bn by 2029-30. The figure for this year was already set to be £20.4bn; so while it's a definite uplift, much of that money was already allocated. Peter Kyle also highlighted plans for "the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system". I understand the schools budget is to be boosted by £4.5bn. Again, this is clearly an uplift - but over a three-year period, that equates to just £1.5bn a year (compared with an existing budget of £63.7bn). It also has to cover the cost of extending free school meals, and the promised uplift in teachers' pay. In any process of prioritisation there are losers as well as winners. We already know about planned cuts to the Department of Work and Pensions - but other unprotected departments like the Home Office and the Department of Communities and Local Government are braced for a real spending squeeze. We've heard dire warnings about austerity 2.0, and the impact that would have on the government's crime and policing priorities, its promises around housing and immigration, and on the budgets for cash-strapped local councils. The chancellor wants to make it clear to the markets she's sticking to her fiscal rules on balancing the books for day-to-day spending. But the decision to loosen the rules around borrowing to fund capital investment have given her greater room to manoeuvre in funding long-term infrastructure projects. That's why we've seen her travelling around the country this week to promote the £15.6bn she's spending on regional transport projects. The Treasury team clearly wants to focus on promoting the generosity of these kind of investments, and we'll hear more in the coming days. But there's a real risk the story of this spending review will be about the departments which have lost out - and the promises which could slip as a result.
