
Who is Gen Asim Munir, the army chief leading Pakistan's military amid India crisis?
In the 77 years since Pakistan was established, its affairs and politics have long been governed by the whims of powerful military generals.
Yet even now that the country is out of the clutches of martial law, it is still widely understood that the most powerful man in Pakistan is not the head of the government but instead the chief of the army.
Since Gen Asim Munir took over as Pakistan's army chief more than two years ago, he has been accused of quietly consolidating greater power without even having to topple the country's civilian rulers. As he kept himself largely out of the limelight, he consolidated an iron grip over the army's ranks and bent government policy and even the supreme court to his will.
Yet in recent weeks, as arch-enemies Pakistan and India have come closer to all-out war than they have in decades, all eyes have been on Munir. After India launched its most intensive airstrikes on Pakistan since the 1971 war in the early hours of Wednesday, hitting nine targets and killing 31 people including children, Pakistan has vowed to respond to this 'act of war'.
India's initial strikes on Wednesday were a direct retaliation for an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir late last month, in which militants killed 25 Hindu tourists and a tour guide.
Pakistan's military was swiftly granted complete authorisation by the government to decide how respond to the Indian attack. The decisions for any retaliation plan will now be largely shaped by Munir. On Saturday morning, after India was accused of firing missiles at three Pakistani military bases, Pakistan said they had begun their counterattack.
One figure familiar with discussions being held by senior Pakistani military leadership said: 'The message from the Pakistan side it is that they are going to hit back very strongly to the Indian provocation.'
It was verified by another senior security source in Pakistan. 'It will come in a big way. When we do it, everyone will know. Munir is waiting for the right time for the big blow to be delivered,' he said.
Munir is known to cut an unusual figure for an army chief. Rather than coming from an elite military family, his fled to India during partition and his father was a teacher. Munir entered the army through the officers' training school rather than the more prestigious route of Pakistan's military academy. However, he worked his way up the ranks quickly, becoming the director of military intelligence in 2016, followed by the director general of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), one of the most powerful military roles, in 2018.
It was here he fell foul of the then-prime minister, Imran Khan. After Munir reportedly briefed Khan that his new wife-to-be was allegedly implicated in corruption, Khan furiously removed Munir from his post as ISI chief in 2019, beginning a highly acrimonious battle between Khan and the powerful generals.
However, Munir was moved to another senior military post and was selected by the prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, to become the new army chief in 2022.
By this time, Khan had succeeded in turning large swathes of the country against the military, which for decades had commanded a devout loyalty among the masses. As Khan, the country's most popular political leader, was jailed and the 2024 election was marred with allegations of rigging against Khan's party, it was widely felt the crackdown was the work of Munir, who also ruthlessly purged the military of all Khan loyalists.
Yet some analysts said that the recent aggression from India may have presented Munir with an opportunity. As hyper-nationalist fervour has gripped Pakistan, with calls for all-out war with India, the military has been back in favour, with calls for Munir to stand up for the whole of Pakistan.
Aqil Shah, a professor on south Asian affairs at Georgetown University, said: 'As army chief, he has already been quite brutal – Khan in jail, the election rigged, civilians facing military trial – which has dented his reputation. But a military response that is seen as appropriate to this crisis could reduce the stain of political repression and allow him to burnish his credentials as an army chief who stood up to arch enemy India.'
Munir's own ideology on India is known to be hardline. Like many in the army, he subscribes to the 'two nation theory': that the Muslims of Pakistan fundamentally cannot live in the same country as Hindus. In comments made last month, which were seen as highly antagonistic to India, he said that 'our religions are different, our cultures are different, our traditions are different, our thoughts are different, our ambitions are different'.
He has also proved bullish and unyielding in the face of antagonism and militant activity from neighbouring Iran and Afghanistan, launching retaliatory cross-border strikes on both countries in the past year.
The retired general Muhammad Saeed, the former chief of general staff (CGS), said: 'I have served with him for many years, I know Gen Asim Munir is a fearless man. The government has given the nod to him to plan the response [to India] but it won't be only his decision. When he makes the plan, he will go in all guns blazing.'
In terms of their military might along the contested border, and despite India's army being double the size of Pakistan – about 1.2 million active Indian personnel compared with about 650,000 for Pakistan – the two sides are 'fairly evenly balanced', said Sushant Singh, an author and political science lecturer at Yale who spent two decades in the Indian army.
Singh emphasised that, since 2020, India had deployed huge amounts of military personnel and resources towards its mountainous border with China, after the India-China border crisis swiftly escalated. India has also had issues with the modernisation of its armed forces and faced a systematic recruitment problem, leading to a shortfall of soldiers.
'Despite its size, India doesn't have the kind of dominance where you would expect India to easily ride roughshod over Pakistan or declare a quick win,' said Singh.
While Pakistan's rank and file is widely seen, even among Indian generals, to be disciplined and high-performing, Singh said the issue had always lain at the top: 'The major problem is that Pakistan's senior military leadership is heavily politicised and has often acted out of ideology or religious conservatism or even delusional behaviour.'
'Gen Munir is clearly under a lot of political pressure,' he added. 'There is also pressure from the co-commanders for him to act strongly so as to be able to demonstrate and restore the credibility of the army as an institution.'
The question of who would have the edge in any confrontation is also a question of equipment. In recent years, India has been shifting away from its reliance on Russian weapons to buying western equipment, including elite French Rafale jet planes and F-16 jets from the US. Pakistan now buys 80% of its military arsenal from China.
According to reports, as tensions with India rose last month, China rushed 100 more of its powerful new PL-15 missiles to Pakistan, which it usually keeps for its own inventory and does not export.
On Friday, the Pakistan army claimed it used the PL-15 missiles to bring down several Indian jets during Wednesday's strikes. Shuja Nawaz, the author of Crossed Swords and a known expert on Pakistan's military, said this showed that 'China is not only helping Pakistan, but it but is using it as a kind of testing ground for its weaponry against India.'
For Nawaz, the use of precision strikes and unmanned drones on both sides made this conflict unlike any other in India and Pakistan's bitter history, and made the chance of escalation even higher.
'Munir really doesn't have an opportunity to play a very long game in the current situation. He has to prove fairly quickly that he and the military are prepared and that they will defend the country,' he said.
The chances of a nuclear escalation had also never been higher, he said. 'India and Pakistan don't fight long wars, they fight short wars. And they throw everything that they have in the shop window into battle. My biggest fear is that Pakistan utilises what they call tactical nuclear weapons – and then all hell breaks loose.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
China's proposed ‘super embassy poses super risk' to security, Tories claim
More than a thousand demonstrators took to the streets of central London earlier this year to protest against the proposed embassy. Ministers are expected to make a final decision on the redevelopment plans at the historic former site of the Royal Mint, after it was rejected by the local council, Tower Hamlets. The experts are now telling the Government what everyone else has known all along: the super embassy poses a super risk Cabinet Office minister Alex Burghart Speaking in the Commons, shadow Cabinet Office minister Alex Burghart accused the Government of being 'too weak' to block the plans. He said: 'The Government's own cyber experts, Innovate UK, have warned the Government that the proposed Chinese embassy at the Royal Mint threatens to compromise the telephone and internet exchange that serves the financial City of London. 'The experts are now telling the Government what everyone else has known all along: the super embassy poses a super risk. 'Yet the Deputy Prime Minister's office has said that any representations on the planning application have to be made available to the applicants. 'So perhaps the real Deputy Prime Minister can clear this up – is the Government seriously saying that if MI5 or GCHQ have concerns about security on this site, those concerns will have to be passed to the Chinese Communist Party or has the Deputy Prime Minister (Angela Rayner) got it wrong?' Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden replied: 'When it comes to both engagement with China and with an issue like this, we will of course engage properly and always bear in mind our own national security considerations.' Shadow Cabinet Office minister Alex Burghart (Ben Whitley/PA) He also accused Tory governments of opting to 'withdraw' from engaging with China for a number of years after they had previously sought a 'golden era' with Beijing. A spokesperson for Innovate UK said it 'has not raised any concerns', adding: 'Innovate UK does not have responsibility for cyber security.' Comments referred to by Mr Burghart are understood to have been made in a personal capacity. Mr Burghart went on to say: 'At the heart of this are two simple facts. First, the Government already knows that this site is a security risk; it's a security risk to the City of London and through it our economy and the economies of all nations that trade in London. 'Second, the Government has the power to block it. Ireland and Australia have both already blocked similar embassy developments. Why is this Government too weak to act?' In his reply, Mr McFadden said: 'A decision on this application will be taken in full consideration of our national security considerations. That is always part of this and it is part of our engagement with China and with other countries.' Pat McFadden, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (Stefan Rousseau/PA) Chancellor Rachel Reeves flew to China in January to meet with the country's leaders and set out a path towards further investment into Britain. Elsewhere in Cabinet Office questions, Mr McFadden said the Civil Service should be more representative of the UK and speak with 'all the accents of the country'. This came in response to Labour MP for Dudley, Sonia Kumar, who said: 'I welcome the relocation of the Civil Service across the country and with a recent study showing that Dudley has high levels of economic inactivity, what reassurances can (he) give me that young people in Dudley want every opportunity to build their career in the Civil Service, whether that's training, apprenticeships, or any mentorships?' Mr McFadden replied: '(Ms Kumar) will not be surprised to hear my strong enthusiasm for greater employment opportunities for young people in the Black Country. 'When we made the announcement last week about the relocation, we also announced a new apprentice scheme because we don't just have to change location, we have to change recruitment patterns too if we're really going (to) get that Civil Service that speaks with all the accents of the country.' Later in the session, Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) asked for reassurance that 'no Cabinet Office ministers will be attending Glastonbury this year', because 'controversial Ulster rap band' Kneecap remain part of the festival's line-up. Mr McFadden replied: 'I will not be going to Glastonbury, but I'm very much looking forward to going to see Bruce Springsteen at Anfield Stadium on Saturday night.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Battle to stop removal of wartime sculpture from Britain
A fundraising campaign has been launched to try and stop a wartime sculpture from being taken overseas by its new owner. After buying Sculpture with Colour (Oval Form) Pale Blue and Red by Dame Barbara Hepworth for more than £3.5 million in March last year, the purchaser wanted to take it out of Britain. Art Fund, a charity that raises funds to aid the acquisition of artworks for the nation, is spearheading a campaign to keep it from being taken from British shores. In November, the Government placed an export bar on the sculpture, which was created in Cornwall during the height of the Second World War. This gave institutions until Aug 27 to match the bid of the owner. Art Fund, which provides financial support for museums and the Hepworth Wakefield, has provided £750,000 of the amount needed, leaving £2.9 million still required. Eleanor Clayton, the senior curator at the Hepworth Wakefield and an expert on the sculptor, said the work needed to remain in the UK for the benefit of future generations. She said: 'The piece is one of the earliest and best examples of the wooden, string-carved sculptures that she became really well known for. 'There's only a handful of painted wooden strung works that she made during the whole of the 40s. And you can see this all in this work that she made whilst juggling childcare and domestic chores.' The sculpture was completed in 1943 after Hepworth moved to St Ives, Cornwall, with her family. She remained there until her death in 1975, aged 72. The artwork has always been in private ownership after being acquired directly from Hepworth by Helen Sutherland in 1944. It was shown as part of a Hepworth exhibition at Tate Britain in 2015. Campaigners now hope that the piece can be purchased and permanently kept on public display. Artists and creatives including Jonathan Anderson, Richard Deacon, Katy Hessel, Sir Anish Kapoor, Veronica Ryan, Joanna Scanlan and Dame Rachel Whiteread have backed the appeal. Jenny Waldman, the director of Art Fund, said: 'These campaigns are very rare. Help us to save an absolutely key work of art for the nation. 'It will be enjoyed, researched and be the source of inspiration for generations to come. Please join us in helping to save this remarkable work for everyone to enjoy.'


Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Elton John says ‘we will not back down' in awards speech addressing AI concerns
Elton John says 'we will not back down' in awards speech addressing AI concerns The Government has repeatedly rejected changes to the Data (Use and Access) Bill, proposed by the House of Lords, aimed at strengthening protections for the creative sector Sir Elton John said "we will not back down" in an awards speech where he pleaded with the UK Government to "do the right thing" by strengthening copyright protections when artificial intelligence (AI) models learn from creatives' content. The Government has repeatedly rejected changes to the Data (Use and Access) Bill, proposed by the House of Lords, aimed at strengthening protections for the creative sector. Peers have attempted to amend the Bill by adding a commitment to introduce transparency requirements, aiming to ensure copyright holders are able to see when their work has been used and by who. Veteran rock singer Sir Elton, 78, who picked up the Creators' Champion Award at Billboard's Global Power Players Event on Wednesday, is among hundreds of creatives who have raised concerns over AI companies using copyrighted work without permission. In an Instagram post he thanked the US magazine for the award and said: "Supporting the next generation of British artists is one of the major driving forces in my life. "As everyone in that room was aware, the Data Bill is currently looming over our industries and the future livelihood of all artists. It is an existential issue. Article continues below "Earlier this evening, the Government was defeated for an unprecedented fifth time by the House of Lords who have backed the crucial amendment to the Bill. "I am now calling on the Government to do the right thing and get transparency added to the Bill. "Administration of copyright must be transparent. And it must have an artist's full permission. These two principles are the bedrock of our industry. They must be included in the data Bill as a backstop. "Let's be clear – we want to work with the Government. We are not anti AI. We are not anti big tech. We are not against Labour. We want a solution that brings all parties together in a way that's transparent, fair and allows artists to maintain control of their work. "We will not let the Government forget their promise to support our creative industries. We will not back down and we will not quietly go away. This is just the beginning. "Thank you, Billboard. And thank you Baroness Kidron and The House of Lords for standing up for our world-beating artists, journalists, playwrights, designers and authors." Article continues below The prolonged impasse and the conduct of proceedings at Westminster now threatens the future of the whole Bill and its measures, including a crackdown on deepfake porn abuse.