Livingston woman vows to fight on against order by councillors to tear down fence
A Livingston woman has vowed to fight on against an order by councillors to tear down a fence she put up to protect her garden.
Dawn Gardner accused West Lothian Council's Development Management Committee of 'bullying' behaviour, and of ignoring a decision by Scottish ministers, which agreed the land belonged to her.
Mrs Gardener partially won an appeal to the Scottish Government last year and had to retrospectively apply for new permission to keep the fence.
She told the Local Democracy Reporting Service that the fence had been put up to stop persistent dog fouling and littering over the area of land beside her home.
The corner site is in her title deeds, and she has to maintain it, as did the previous owner of the house in Waverley Crescent.
Before the fence was put up the land was frequently used as a shortcut by some, and the last straw for Mrs Gardner was seeing drunks urinating against a garden wall just feet from her back door.
Mrs Gardner paid thousands of pounds to have the area fenced off to create more privacy around her home. While most of the fence is low enough to be allowed as permitted development one section is just a few inches above the height permitted.
Council planning officers told a meeting of the DMC that, while they did not fully agree with the Scottish Government's Reporter's partial upholding of the appeal, they did recommend retrospective planning permission for the fence along with planning permission to build a double garage within the garden of the house be approved.
Eliburn Community Council complained last year about the enclosure of open space, and it reiterated that when Steve Egan appeared before the committee.
He said: 'The community council's objection was to the loss of open space. Why have stated policies and not follow them. The officer's report is wholly silent on this.'
An agent for Mrs Gardner said Mr Egan had an 'unhealthy obsession' with the issue of open space around Mrs Gardner's home, adding she had fenced in land she owned to protect her home against criminal behaviour.
However, councillors did not not like the fence.
Councillor George Paul said 'the quality of finish is very poor. I don't think it's very aesthetic to the area.'
Councillor Pauline Stafford said: 'It appears that the fence is in breach of planning legislation; the height of the fence detracts from the streetscape which most other properties have quite an open aspect.'
Chairing the meeting, Councillor Tony Boyle said the fence was 'really intrusive'.
He added: 'I note there are no objections from neighbouring householders but that's beside the point.'
Having sought clarification from planning and legal officers, the DMC agreed to grant permission for the garage but refused permission for the fence.
After the meeting a furious Mrs Gardner told the LDRS: 'A new appeal goes in tomorrow.'
She added: 'The councillors took no notice of what the Scottish ministers said. They didn't even listen to the planning officer.'
Referring to the councillors she said: 'They were making really personal remarks. Some of the comments were very personal. There's nothing wrong with the fence.
'I thought it was bullying. There was not one decision based on fact; it was all personal opinion they didn't even look at what the ministers said.
Mrs Gardner said she had the support of surrounding neighbours who have told her the fence is better than the unkempt open ground there previously.
As for the objection, 'Eliburn Community council didn't even discuss it, it was never on their agenda,' she added.
By Stuart Sommerville, Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Winter fuel U-turn should have come a long time ago, Reeves told
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said on Monday that nine million pensioners will be in receipt of the payment this year after a cut was announced in the first weeks of the Labour Government last summer. The initial decision was met with heavy backlash and forced the Scottish Government to delay the implementation of its own devolved benefit. John Swinney's administration later announced a similar payment for pensioners which would be tapered and see those on the highest incomes receiving £100, compared to £305.10 for those on the least. Monday's announcement will result in cash being sent to the devolved administration at Holyrood, and Scottish Labour has urged the Government to increase its payments. But Scotland's Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said the decision was 'a betrayal' of pensioners. 'I welcome any extension of eligibility by the UK Government, but this is a U-turn the Chancellor should have made a long time ago,' she said. 'But there is still no detail about how the Chancellor intends to go about that. Unfortunately, it still sounds as if many pensioners will miss out.' Ms Somerville added that the Scottish Government had not been consulted on the decision and urged UK ministers to 'ensure the Scottish Government is fully appraised of the proposed changes as soon as possible'. 'The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government wrote to the Chief Secretary to the Treasury last week to urge the UK Government to share its plans with us as quickly as possible, so that we can understand any implications for our own programmes and, crucially, our budget,' she said. Scottish Labour MSP Paul O'Kane said: 'The winter fuel payment is a devolved payment in Scotland and Scottish Labour has long been clear that we want to see it reinstated for the majority of pensioners up here – but despite their loud spin, the SNP voted against our attempts to do so. 'The SNP must not go ahead with plans that would rob poorer pensioners in order to fund payments for millionaires. 'The SNP must re-examine their own proposals in light of this game-changing announcement, ensure payments reach those most in need, and give a cast-iron guarantee that no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans.' The Scottish Government's plans were initially to provide a universal payment to pensioners, but the proposals were scuppered by the Chancellor's announcement of the cut last summer, forcing ministers to create a different system for this winter.
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
SNP came ‘frustratingly close' to victory in Hamilton, says Swinney
Scottish Labour's Davy Russell won a surprise victory on Thursday, with the SNP coming second and Reform in third. The by-election had been sparked by the death of Scottish Government minister and SNP MSP, Christina McKelvie, who had held the seat since 2011, with the party hoping to keep it in the fold. Despite the First Minister's claim that the contest was a straight fight between the SNP and Nigel Farage's surging Reform UK, the Labour candidate won with 8,559 votes to the 7,957 of the SNP's Katy Loudon. Speaking to the PA news agency in Glasgow, the First Minister said the party had made 'modest progress' since its collapse at last year's general election – when it dropped from 48 MPs to just nine – but had further to go. 'We had a very strong campaign in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse,' he said. 'We had hundreds of members of the party that came to make their contribution to the by-election campaign – we've got to build on that. 'We've got to learn the lessons of the by-election. 'We came very close, it was frustratingly close.' Coming second in the vote, the First Minister said, is an 'indication that we are still able to perform strongly electorally'. The First Minister added that his party lost the overlapping seat at Westminster – Hamilton and Clyde Valley – by 9,000 votes last year and by just 600 on Thursday. 'So, we are quite clearly in a position where we can achieve electoral success, but we have got to build on that and make sure we're stronger for 2026,' he said. In the final weeks of the campaign, the First Minister predicted the contest would be between his party and Reform UK but, asked if such an assertion – which turned out to be wrong – cast doubt on the data used by the SNP, he appeared to suggest it was based on his own perception. 'I'm just making two points about the by-election, two observations,' he said. 'One was that Labour support was collapsing, and from last year to Thursday, Labour support collapsed by 20%, came down from 50% to 30%. 'And I observed, secondly, that Reform support was surging and it was, so my analysis of the by-election was absolutely correct. 'I simply said to people if you want to stop Reform, vote for the SNP.' Despite the by-election loss, the party continues to lead in the polls ahead of next year, with Mr Swinney saying the Government must 'deliver on the priorities of the people of Scotland'.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Nicola Sturgeon's memoir Frankly – here's what we know so far
The former first minister's hotly anticipated memoir is set to hit the shelves in the coming months. Published by Pan MacMillan and titled Frankly, the book is likely to dominate headlines once it is available. So, here's what we know about it so far. READ MORE: Ruth Maguire reveals she's cancer free and 'excited to return to work' 'Deeply personal' Announced in August 2023, Sturgeon said the book would be 'deeply personal and revealing'. Pan MacMillan won a bidding war out of nine publishers at an auction after she resigned as first minister in February that year. The book will tell the story of Sturgeon's childhood in Ayrshire as well as her career in politics, where she was Scotland's first female first minister and the longest serving in Holyrood's history. She also worked with five different prime ministers during her time in office. Sturgeon said at the time the book was announced that writing it was 'exciting, if also daunting'. (Image: Andrew Milligan) 'Restrictions' Under the Radcliffe Rules, former government ministers, civil servants and special advisers are free to publish memoirs of their time in office. However, this has to be signed off by the Permanent Secretary, Scotland's most senior civil servant, who will review the manuscript to make sure it doesn't impact national security interests, intergovernmental relations, or anything confidential. According to documents recently published on the Scottish Government's website and released via FOI, Sturgeon's memoir passed checks with no changes. Officials were sent four hard copies of the book, with the documents revealing that 'at all times strong security arrangements have been observed' and that only a small number of staff had access to it. 'On the basis of advice from my review group, it is not considered that any changes are required to the manuscript in order to comply with the Radcliffe Rules or the Scottish Ministerial Code,' John-Paul Marks, the former permanent secretary, wrote to Sturgeon in April. READ MORE: Labour Government 'must protect' UK-flagged Madleen aid ship Publication The book is due to be published on August 14, with Sturgeon being paid a £300,000 advance for her work. This is being paid in instalments to her company, and is made public through her MSP register of interest. Sturgeon is set to go on a launch tour for the book across Scotland, including an appearance at Edinburgh's Usher Hall and the Edinburgh International Book Festival. Ticket prices range from £33 to £73. Sturgeon also posted a video of herself signing a huge pile of pages that will be attached to the book for those who have pre-ordered. There have been some hints about what the book will contain. 'Full of the verve and wit that made Sturgeon one of the most high-profile politicians in the UK, this is a unique blend of personal insight and captivating vignettes,' a blurb for the book reads. 'Infused throughout with a love of Scotland and its people, it honestly discusses Sturgeon's mistakes, her battles, and her triumphs. Frankly is the compelling story of no ordinary politician.'
