Trump Urges Putin to Spare Ukrainian Troops in Kursk
US President Donald Trump urged Russia's Vladimir Putin on Friday to spare Ukrainian troops being pushed back out of Russia's Kursk region and said there was a "very good chance" the war could end.
Trump posted on social media after his envoy, Steve Witkoff, held a lengthy meeting with Putin on Thursday night in Moscow that Trump described as "very good and productive".
"There is a very good chance that this horrible, bloody war can finally come to an end," he said.
The US president said thousands of Ukrainian troops were "completely surrounded" by the Russian military and "in a very bad and vulnerable position".
"I have strongly requested to President Putin that their lives be spared. This would be a horrible massacre, one not seen since World War II. God bless them all!!!"
Military analysts have said Ukrainian forces in Kursk are nearly cut off after rapidly losing ground in what had been their only foothold in Russian territory.
Putin said on Friday that Russia will guarantee the safety of Ukrainian troops in the Kursk region if they surrender.
Kyiv's military, however, said there was no threat of encirclement, and that its troops were pulling back to better positions.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, at a G7 meeting in La Malbaie, Canada, said Witkoff is returning to the United States and there may be discussions about Ukraine over the weekend.
"But we certainly feel like we're at least some steps closer to ending this war and bringing peace. But it's still a long journey," he told reporters.
Moscow said on Friday that its forces had recaptured another village in their drive to dislodge Ukrainian forces from their last remaining footholds inside Russia's Kursk region.
The Kremlin said Putin had sent Trump a message about his ceasefire plan via Witkoff, expressing "cautious optimism" that a deal could be reached to end the three-year-old conflict. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump himself had not spoken to Putin yet.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who met Trump on Thursday, told Fox News that Trump's drive to get Russia to spare the lives of Ukrainian soldiers was "extremely helpful and extremely important."
The Trump administration launched its latest round of outreach to Moscow this week after Ukraine agreed in principle to a ceasefire at talks with US officials in Saudi Arabia.
TRUMP URGES PUTIN TO SIGN CEASEFIRE DEAL WITH UKRAINE
On Friday, Trump again pressed Russia to sign and complete "a Cease Fire and Final Agreement", saying on his private social media platform that he would extract the US from what he called a "real 'mess' with Russia".
Putin said on Thursday that he supported Trump's proposal in principle, but that fighting could not be paused until several crucial conditions were worked out, raising the prospect of longer negotiations.
Despite Putin's apparent conditions, Trump called Putin's statement "very promising".
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Friday that Putin - who has expressed concern that Ukraine would exploit any truce to regroup - had used the late-night meeting with Witkoff to convey information and "signals" to Trump.
"There are certainly reasons to be cautiously optimistic," Peskov said. "(Putin) said that he supports President Trump's position in terms of a settlement, but he voiced some questions that need to be answered together".
Peskov said the timing of a phone call between the presidents would be worked out once Witkoff had briefed Trump.
Putin has said he wants Ukraine to drop its ambitions to join NATO, Russia to control the entirety of the four Ukrainian regions it has claimed as its own, and the size of the Ukrainian army to be limited.
He has also made clear he wants Western sanctions eased and a presidential election to be held in Ukraine, which Kyiv says is premature while martial law remains in force.
Peskov played down reports suggesting Russian officials had told US counterparts they did not want Trump's Russia-Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg to be involved in top-level discussions on the war. He said Moscow had no intention of meddling.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
UK braces for possible US strike on Iran as Starmer holds emergency talks
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has placed his cabinet on alert for a potential US military strike on Iran, just a day after saying that President Donald Trump had given no indication of direct US involvement in the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. According to the Financial Times, senior British officials described the situation as 'grave and volatile.' Discussions within Starmer's team reportedly included the possibility of Trump ordering a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities using the joint US-UK air base at Diego Garcia. The potential for a US attack was discussed during a Whitehall emergency committee meeting on Wednesday, the FT reported, citing officials briefed on the talks. Also on Wednesday, Starmer held a call with Qatar's Emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, in which both leaders stressed the urgent need for de-escalation in the Middle East. 'Underscoring the deep defense and security relationship between the two countries, the prime minister reiterated the UK's support for Qatar and leaders discussed how both countries could further support regional stability,' a spokesperson for Starmer said. Starmer's tone on the situation marks a sharp shift from remarks made at the G7 summit in Canada on Tuesday, where he told reporters there was 'nothing' Trump had said that indicated he was preparing to intervene in the conflict. However, British officials have since acknowledged that Trump was unlikely to reveal his true intentions over dinner with Western leaders, and described the White House's approach to the crisis as an 'iterative process.'
Saudi Gazette
an hour ago
- Saudi Gazette
Japan's Nippon seals controversial US Steel deal after Trump pact
NEW YORK — Japanese firm Nippon Steel has completed its long-sought takeover of US Steel, after agreeing to yield unusual control to the US government. Nippon's $14.9bn (£11bn) purchase of the smaller American company, will create one of the world's biggest steelmakers and turns Nippon into a major player in the US. The plan, first announced in 2023, had been seen as a lifeline for the storied but struggling 124-year-old US Steel. But the deal ran into trouble during last year's presidential election, when US President Donald Trump and his Democratic opponents said they were concerned about the foreign acquisition of one of the last major steel producers in the US. However, Trump reversed his stance, after Nippon made concessions which the President said had satisfied his national security concerns. He gave the official green light to the deal in an executive order on agreed to pay $55 per share and take on the company's debt, a deal worth $14.9bn said it had also promised the government it would invest $11bn in US Steel by 2028, including a new facility that would be completed after that also granted the US government a "golden share" in the company, giving the government say over key decisions, including the transfer of jobs or production outside of the US, and certain calls to close or idle also committed to maintain its headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and install US citizens to key management positions including its chief executive and the majority of its board."This partnership ensures that US Steel will retain its iconic name and headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and that it will continue to be mined, melted, and made in America for generations to come," Nippon and US Steel said in a statement as shares in US Steel stopped said the deal would "protect and create more than 100,000 jobs".Trump has made protections for the steel industry a key part of his economic agenda, raising tariffs on imports of the metal to 50% to benefit American president said he changed his mind about deal after hearing from local officials, who were alarmed by warnings from US Steel that it might cut jobs without the investment from of the US Steelworkers union had opposed the takeover, which former president Joe Biden blocked in his final weeks of companies subsequently filed a lawsuit accusing him of improperly politicising a national security a statement, the president of the US Steelworkers union said that Nippon's final agreement had granted the president a "startling degree of personal control" over a corporation, while predicting attention on the company would now fade."However, our union will remain. We will continue watching, holding Nippon to its commitments," president David McCall said. — BBC
Saudi Gazette
an hour ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump focused on avoiding wider conflict as he nears decision on US strikes in Iran
WASHINGTON — As President Donald Trump weighs whether to join Israel's strikes on Iran — including using bunker-busting bombs to target nuclear facilities deep underground — a discussion is underway among his top officials over how the US can strike those targets without becoming embroiled in a full-scale war, sources familiar with the matter said. For Trump, trying to avoid prolonging the conflict that began last Thursday has become a top imperative. While he is receptive to arguments, including from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that only the US can decisively end Iran's nuclear ambitions, he is deeply wary of becoming bogged down in the type of foreign conflict he vowed to avoid, the sources said. Over the weekend, some US allies received word that the Trump administration was planning to wait and see what the Israelis accomplished during the first week of their operation against Iran's nuclear program before making a decision on getting involved with US military assets, two European diplomats said. A day ahead of that deadline, Trump said he had not made a final decision on how to proceed, and in conversations with US allies on Wednesday, administration officials did not definitively lean in one direction or the other, the diplomats said. Trump has reviewed attack plans for Iran but is holding off to see if Tehran steps back from its nuclear program, a person familiar with the matter told CNN. 'I like to make the final decision one second before it's due,' Trump said in the Oval Office. 'Especially with war, things change with war. It can go from one extreme to the other.' As the president mulls his options, he has said he does not believe a US strike necessarily means a complete US intervention in a foreign war, a source familiar with the matter said. And people close to Trump have argued that decisive strikes are different from broader action that could prolong the conflict. 'America might just drop a few MOAB's on Fordow, destroy the last nuclear asset, and then leave,' David Friedman, Trump's ambassador to Israel during his first term, wrote on social media. MOAB refers to a Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb, nicknamed the 'mother of all bombs.' 'The air space already is clear,' Friedman went on. 'How is that being dragged into anything?' As Trump keeps his options open, the administration continues to hear from allies who are urging against offensive US involvement. The range of reasons include the possibility of Iran seeking to block the Strait of Hormuz, potentially upending the global flow of oil, and Iran potentially choosing to race toward developing a nuclear weapon after any US strike, two sources familiar with the discussions said. Iran has vowed to retaliate if US forces join Israel in attacking. 'If the Americans decide to get involved militarily, we have no choice but to retaliate wherever we find the targets necessary to be acted upon,' Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht-Ravanchi said in an interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour. 'That is clear and simple. Because we are acting in self-defense.' One model for action that Trump's allies have discussed privately in recent weeks is his 2020 decision to assassinate top Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani near Baghdad International Airport using a MQ-9 Reaper drone. The strike, while still a serious escalation that drew reprisals from Iran, did not cause all-out war. Trump administration officials have discussed the Soleimani strike as a counter to theories arguing that a US strike would lead to 'uncontrollable escalation,' said sources familiar with the conversations. Trump has publicly ruled out, for now, killing Iran's supreme leader. Trump's top national security officials have made a conscious effort to try to get on the same page as they present options for the president. 'My job, our job, chairman and I, at all times is to make sure we, the president, has options and is informed of what those options might be and what the ramifications of what those options might be,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told a Senate panel Wednesday. Trump's CIA director, John Ratcliffe, has been among those who Trump has leaned on in recent days, both ahead of the Israeli strikes and as the president has considered his next steps. Ratcliffe was present at a Camp David retreat on June 8, shortly before Israel's first attack, where he briefed Trump on the latest intelligence related to Iran's nuclear program and Israel's likely next move, according to a source familiar with the discussion. The retreat at Camp David was not originally intended as a meeting focused on intelligence, as evident by fact that Ratcliffe and Trump's Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard were not initially invited, according to a senior administration official. Ratcliffe made the trip at the last minute, the official said, and briefed the president on the rapidly evolving situation. Another key voice in Trump's ear has been Gen. Michael Kurilla, commander of US Central Command. In recent weeks, some US military leaders, including Kurilla, have requested more resources to defend and support Israel as it continues to trade fire with Iran, according to two sources familiar with the matter. '[Kurilla] would want to be prepared for the most challenging contingency,' said one of the sources familiar with the matter, referring to his push for positioning US assets in the Middle East in support of Israel. Kurilla, a staunch supporter of Israel, has for months been pushing Hegseth and Trump to move a growing number of military assets into the Middle East in preparation for a conflict with the potential to metastasize – either between the US and Iran's proxies, including the Houthi rebel group in Yemen, or between Israel and Iran. Whether Trump can strike Iran while avoiding becoming drawn into a quagmire is a matter of debate. Some Iran experts warn a drawn-out confrontation could last the duration of Trump's presidency and exact a heavy toll on American lives and resources at Israel's behest. 'Any attack by the US will lead to full-scale attack by the Iranians against US bases in the region, and a full-scale war between the US and Iran,' Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute in Washington, DC, told CNN. Tehran may not be able to sustain a long fight with the US, but it won't be an easy war for Washington either, he said. Many of Trump's otherwise-staunch supporters have also questioned whether it is possible to launch strikes in Iran without getting ensnared in a generational conflict. 'First and foremost, this is not our war. This is Iran's war. The president of the United States is commander-in-chief of our forces. He listens to all of us that work in the national security lane,' said Sen. Jim Risch of Idaho, the Senate Foreign Relations chairman who met with Trump at the White House on Wednesday. 'I think he has done a masterful job of threading a very, very difficult needle,' Risch said a day before his meeting with the president. Another Senate Republican who spoke to Trump this week, Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, said he 'would not' be comfortable if the US took offensive action against Iran. 'I don't want us fighting a war. I don't want another Mideast war...I'm a little concerned about our sudden military buildup in the region,' Hawley said a day after his conversation with Trump. The risk of retaliation from Iran is strong enough that even before Trump makes a decision, the US military began making contingency preparations that account for the possibility of Iranian retaliation against US forces if Trump does move forward with a strike, according to a source familiar with the planning. After frequent conversations with Netanyahu, during which the Israeli leader has made clear Israel needs US aid to complete its ultimate goal of wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities, the president acknowledged Wednesday that US involvement would help speed up the process for Israel's success. 'We're the only ones that have the capability to do it, but that doesn't mean we're going to do it at all,' Trump said. But he also affirmed his pledge to avoid a 'long-term war.' 'I only want one thing: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,' he said. 'That's it. I'm not looking long term, short term. And I've been saying that for 20 years.' — CNN
